man...how do posts like these get in? This was announced months ago...just because someone get's a mail with the details? come on/. get your act together.
But the technology has improved. I set this up for several companies in the mid-90's. While it worked fine 90% of the time, there are many factors that prevented widespread use.
I found that 2.4 or 5 ghz wireless repeated are far more reliable.
Please...LDAP is a ACCESS PROTOCOL. How can it be used for contact/location/description information????????
Plllleeeeaasssssseeeee. DBs are not designed for READING information fast, DBs are meant for storing information.
LDAP is meant to ACCESS that STORED information.
You are not an ecomm consultant if you are deploying it on MS. Sorry charlie, but AD is a proprietary implementation that is not LDAP v3 compliant and is based on MS Access.
you've got to be kidding...it's far easier to tap your phone than it would be to tap into a 2g wireless transmission...especially if you are using FHSS. be for real.
It's unfortunate that marketing has produced a breed of wannabe's that have no idea how to make a real OS function. Point and click...that's all they know.
Slashdot Mirror
Exactly and it was shown live at the Consumer and Electronics Show in Vegas in Jan 02..geez /. get your act together and get some decent stories
man...how do posts like these get in? This was announced months ago...just because someone get's a mail with the details? /. get your act together.
come on
But the technology has improved. I set this up for several companies in the mid-90's. While it worked fine 90% of the time, there are many factors that prevented widespread use.
I found that 2.4 or 5 ghz wireless repeated are far more reliable.
What is really needed here is a "mesh" network. This prevents the failure of one node from taking down anything else downstream.
Please...LDAP is a ACCESS PROTOCOL. How can it be used for contact/location/description information????????
Plllleeeeaasssssseeeee. DBs are not designed for READING information fast, DBs are meant for storing information.
LDAP is meant to ACCESS that STORED information.
It's not?
By who's benchmarks? Mindcraft? and who paid for that test? Oh...that's right it was Microsoft.
Oh yea...and MS has the most secure OS, too.
You are not an ecomm consultant if you are deploying it on MS. Sorry charlie, but AD is a proprietary implementation that is not LDAP v3 compliant and is based on MS Access.
Hello? LDAP is not a directory. LDAP is a directory access protocol. GEEZ.
A directory requires a DB, but a DB cannot be a directory.
Come on...get your facts straight. There is no such thing as a LDAP directory and a RDBMS will not solve your directory problem.
This isn't a violation of my first amendment rights? So do the UT libraries censor books as well? Same difference, right?
you've got to be kidding...it's far easier to tap your phone than it would be to tap into a 2g wireless transmission...especially if you are using FHSS. be for real.
It's unfortunate that marketing has produced a breed of wannabe's that have no idea how to make a real OS function. Point and click...that's all they know.