Slashdot Mirror


Garmin Rino-GPS Show and Tell

jspectre writes: "Garmin, makers of fine GPS products, has a sneak peek of their upcoming Rino (Radios Integrated with Navigation for the Outdoors). A new handheld combination of GPS and 2-way Radio using the common FRS spectrum. In addition to downloadable maps, trip planning, weighing 8.5oz and being waterproof you can "beam" your location to other Rino users while you talk to them. Your location will show up on their GPS display allowing you to navigate to each other. Expected availability, June 2002. Great fun for geocaching parties I'd think."

137 comments

  1. good survival tool in the savannah... by Transient0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... or does it only tell you the location of other Rinos, not rhinos?

    1. Re:good survival tool in the savannah... by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

      offtopic?!

      luckily i was able to avenge you in metamod...

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
  2. Who does this poster work for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Garmin, makers of fine GPS products

    I'll be one of the first to say that Garmin's GPS units are pretty good (I personally prefer Magellan), but isn't this poster admitting just a *wee* bit of bias?

  3. One step closer by Kizzle · · Score: 4, Funny

    One step closer to making a tricorder.

  4. eParka and GPS Maps by smoondog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    eParka.com's digital maps are a cool way to visualize GPS mapping technology for free. Supports the entire country (sans alaska) and will support the Garmin GPS...

    -Sean

    1. Re:eParka and GPS Maps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I concur with this post.

    2. Re:eParka and GPS Maps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes but goat

    3. Re:eParka and GPS Maps by Kaa · · Score: 1

      Topozone (www.topozone.com) is much better.

      --

      Kaa
      Kaa's Law: In any sufficiently large group of people most are idiots.
    4. Re:eParka and GPS Maps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I concur with this post.

    5. Re:eParka and GPS Maps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Topozone is cool, but I like how eParka maps are configurable and rendered on the fly. You can't build an elevation profile of a trail/route on topozone.

    6. Re:eParka and GPS Maps by 56ker · · Score: 1

      How does the "beam" work & what is its range?

  5. Yeah, but... by PinkStainlessTail · · Score: 1
    If it doesn't work with Galilleo, then I'm not interested!

    --
    "Slashdot is about legos and staplers." -Cmdr. Taco
    1. Re:Yeah, but... by El+Cabri · · Score: 1

      I don't want to be Tony Blair when hell have to report to Dubya that he failed to kill this project. In the best case he loses his job as governor of te UK

    2. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite the opposite... it's just a thank you note for making Tony look a fool when his grateful 'friend' went and slapped steel tariffs on him.

  6. Old News (-1: Redundant) by jimmcq · · Score: 0, Redundant

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/03/04/115122 3

  7. My Etrex!! by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny
    It's.. it's.. Aging right before my eyes!

    It's.. it's.. Becoming obsolete!

    It's.. it's.. Losing that gleam of desirablilty!

    It's.. it's.. Acquired a bit of dust and a scratch i never noticed before!

    It's.. it's... Hey, is that a vacuum tube sticking out the back?

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  8. Where are the sonars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I have long longed for a combined GPS/echo sonar. That way I can map my fishing lake in high precision. And, eventually produce ray-traced maps of the lake.

    However I have not been able to find any GPS/Sonar combos capable of output to a harddisk.

    Any suggestions?

    1. Re:Where are the sonars? by RevRigel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Garmin used to (make still) make a GPS with a fishfinder on it, with the various data integrated into one display, and exportable to computer. A few years ago, a student at the lab where I work mapped a portion of Lake Travis here in Austin, TX, for use by the projects doing sonar research out there. I'd tell you what model it was, but the lake is a 45 minute drive away. It's still on the boat in question, and still works, though.

  9. Could be annoying... by Monte · · Score: 2

    ...if it's sending GPS location data over common FRS frequencies the non-Rino FRS users will be treated to wonderful bursts of data-farts over their analog freqs.

    1. Re:Could be annoying... by Caballero · · Score: 2


      Yes, but FRS has 14 channels and 38 quiet codes(*), which means you can pick a configuration where you don't hear them. It shouldn't be a problem.

      (*) Quiet codes are little bursts that are sent prior to transmitting, so that multiple people can share the same channel. It's not perfect, but it works pretty well.

    2. Re:Could be annoying... by TomE · · Score: 1

      Um no the quiet codes are tones that are transmitted along with the radio signal that cannot be heard by humans.

    3. Re:Could be annoying... by jackmakrl · · Score: 3, Informative

      "(*) Quiet codes are little bursts that are sent prior to transmitting, so that multiple people can share the same channel. It's not perfect, but it works pretty well."

      Actually the "quiet codes" are subaudible tones that open the squelch of the radio when received. Also called CTCSS (Continuous Tone Controlled Squelch System), they've been in use for years. They are not "little bursts".

    4. Re:Could be annoying... by Caballero · · Score: 2


      Thanks. I misunderstood how they worked.

      In any case, it should avoid the rhino bursts.

    5. Re:Could be annoying... by squeegee-me · · Score: 1

      Motorola has these as well and on the FRS radio web page (look at a manual such as the one for the 6320 on page 36,) they tell you both the RF frequency (page 35) and the code frequency, which is actualy a short audio tone. If your radio is set to "code 17" and some one else transmits, and they are also on "code 17" then your radio will filter out the tone that goes for a fraction of a second and then start listening. Take a scanner, scan the range of your FRS radio (462.5625 to 467.7125 Mhz if I remember) and set a code on your radio... you will hear a tone before your talking.

      --
      Who wants Pork Chops?
    6. Re:Could be annoying... by GoRK · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is no different than what happens on VHF Ham's that use a Mic-E encoder for APRS position reporting. There is a 1/4-1/2 second 1200 baud data burst at the end of the transmission. It's really not annoying, and when you consider that either 1) the communication is important enough that you really shouldn't care about being interrupted for 1/4 second when someone else talking on a channel you are using is interrupting you for far longer, or 2) you wouln't even hear it anyway if you are using a coded squelch.

      This whole product undoubtadely evolved from APRS. Anyone really interested in this unit would be blown away by APRS - It's the same idea but wider-range, internet-repeated, and has digital messaging capabilities. :)

      ~GoRK

    7. Re:Could be annoying... by Caballero · · Score: 2


      Well that sounds more like how I thought it worked, which is that the quiet codes were only sent at the start of a message. That doesn't match the description of the continuous subcarrier that other people mentioned.

      Which is it? I admit I've never looked into the details, I just read the instructions that came with my FRS, so my technical expertise in this area is severely lacking. :)

    8. Re:Could be annoying... by josecanuc · · Score: 1

      The truth: The sub-audible tone is continuous during your transmission. It is not a short burst.

      There exists some other methods that use digital codes to do the same thing, but FRS uses plain-old analog sub-audible tones superimposed on your other audio.

      -Joe

    9. Re:Could be annoying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This whole product undoubtadely evolved from APRS. Anyone really interested in this unit would be blown away by APRS - It's the same idea but wider-range, internet-repeated, and has digital messaging capabilities. :)

      Indeed, undoubtably people would be blown away by the fact that such a simple idea (a walkie talkie combined with a GPS) could seemingly be so complicated and expensive to implement using Amateur Radio, never mind so hard to get into a small convenient package. Garmin is pricing the Rino fairly aggressively (~250 street price). Try pricing a 2m HT, a TNC and a separate GPS. Never mind that you don't have the spiffy display, the convenient small package and the standard batteries.

  10. The RINOs have quads! by ClayJar · · Score: 3, Informative

    We've been discussing the RINOs (and all sorts of other GPS and GPS-related devices) for some time over on the geocaching neck of the woods. (At times, the Magellan/Garmin/Lowrance/etc. debate looks like a distro-fest.)

    The RINOs have a quadrifilar (quad-helix) antenna, which means they should have reception up there with the Magellan 300-series and Meridian receivers (and the Garmin GPS V). The poor reception of the Garmin eTrex line will not affect them. (And the Garminites all cry "Yipee!" and no longer have to cower before those of us who have been using Magellans the whole time.)

    Anyway, for group caching, the RINOs look really fun. I do most of my geocaching alone, so I'd probably pass on them, though. ;)

    RINO usefulness for the existing GPS sports:
    - Geocaching: Excellent if in groups.
    - Geodashing: Maybe, but not likely.
    - Degree Confluences: Same as geodashing.
    - Geodrawing: Multi-pen art? Cool.
    - MinuteWar: Possibly... occasionally.

    1. Re:The RINOs have quads! by mosch · · Score: 2

      Also very useful for while tripping, especially in groups!

    2. Re:The RINOs have quads! by bhima · · Score: 1

      Yes! I am, but I can't use this damn thing because it's suddenly speaking russian to me.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  11. Security Risk by geogeek6_7 · · Score: 3, Funny

    So now those AOL IM stalkers we all know about will be able to get at our children that much faster!

    1. Re:Security Risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You appear to be disconnected from reality and are now in a zone where AOL can track you via family radio.

      Here, allow me to help you (sound of a hand smacking you off the back of the head).

    2. Re:Security Risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You simply do not comprehend the total, pervasive evil that AOL is responsible for. Here, let me help you feel it. (sound of grinding and girlish screams as I castrate you with a chainsaw)

    3. Re:Security Risk by geogeek6_7 · · Score: 1

      Actually that was an attempt at humor. I wasn't trying to be insightful. But alas. The mods thought I was :).

    4. Re:Security Risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry GeoGeek, the way things are modded, and the paranoia on slashdot when it comes to MS and AOL made your comment more ironic than you intended to be.

      Let me make it right (sound of me smacking you off the back of the head). I feel better now .

  12. weighing 8.5oz ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how many lotr would that weigh?

  13. OpenSource GPS Mapping (Topographical)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So are there any open source G.P.S. mapping software packages (topographical mapping)?

    1. Re:OpenSource GPS Mapping (Topographical)? by beta21 · · Score: 1

      OpenSource GPS mapping??!?!??!

      GPS is a poistioning tool. It uses satellites to find out where you are. (i.e. you could be in aplae and it will tell you you are 35,000 ft in the air over wherever).

      Unless someone was willing to follow a coastline or terrain feature then you could map it.

    2. Re:OpenSource GPS Mapping (Topographical)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "GPS Mapping" combines both existing mapping software that integrates with GPS devices (allowing import/export) and using GPS acquired data to create new map features (i.e. create a "road" from GPS imported route/track points, or update topography using the imported GPS altitude data). But then I suspect that this meaning crossed your mind before you posted your reply.

    3. Re:OpenSource GPS Mapping (Topographical)? by mikeboone · · Score: 3, Informative

      While there is a lot of "open source" map data out there, there aren't a whole lot of free tools that will help you use it.

      The tools and data fall under the GIS heading. Check out these sites to get started:

      • FreeGIS - A good index of available stuff.
      • MapServer - A tool mainly targeted toward serving map data on the web, but I've used it to make one-off images.
      • Data Catalog - I've downloaded free USGS topo maps here. The files are large and it takes some effort to know what you're looking for.

      I've used these tools to build maps of GPS tracks on my website. A couple examples:

      I've done most of these maps with a lot of manual labor...if anyone knows of open source/free ways to improve the process, I'd appreciate it!

    4. Re:OpenSource GPS Mapping (Topographical)? by kels · · Score: 1

      I use GMT and USGS data to make topo maps for my GPS. I get the data from my Garmin eTrex Venture with GPSMan.

      It's all free, but takes some work. See my page of details and examples.

      --
      "I believe that the cult of the particular brings only death - for it bases order on likeness." St.-Exupery
  14. Will it help me find a job? by t0qer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Will it help me find a job?

  15. in addition a satellite/listening post can.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pickup not only your voice transmission but also your beamed gps coordinates. normal frs radios they can only pickup your voice and would have to triangulate the signal.

  16. LOL! Re: How This Works by ClayJar · · Score: 1

    LOL! I haven't read anything that funny in hours!

    Of course, if anyone's wondering, GPS receivers determine position by solving a set of equations for the four variables of position (3 dimensions) and time (1 dimension).

    There is a really nice (but Shockwave, unfortunately) overview of GPS at Trimble's site.

  17. Toys for adults... by MonkeyBot · · Score: 1

    Finally! Cybiko for adults! Now I don't have to be the creepy old guy talking to pre-teenagers!

  18. Can you turn off the FRS feture? by zulux · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For week long hiking trips - it would be nesessary to turn off the FRS feture in order to save battery life. Anybody know if you can?

    Kudo's for Garmin for using AA batteries - there are readbly available back country solar chargers out there, and it would be useless if they used YAPBP (Yet Another Propriatary Battery Pack)

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    1. Re:Can you turn off the FRS feture? by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      I use NiMH cells in my eTrex. They're pretty good, but man, does that thing suck power. Agree on the YAPBP, as that'd be a strong anti-recommendation.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  19. We did this one already... by aallan · · Score: 4, Informative

    The same story was posted on the 4th of March by Hemos, see 'Garmin To Marry GPS with FRS/GMRS'.

    Al.
    --
    The Daily ACK - Eclectic posts by yet another hacker
    1. Re:We did this one already... by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 5, Funny
      And the best part is that some people actually pay to read this twice...

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  20. Sneak peak? by fruity_pebbles · · Score: 1

    Hardly a sneak peak - Garmin has had that product info page online for weeks (months?).

    1. Re:Sneak peak? by jpugh · · Score: 1

      Exactly and it was shown live at the Consumer and Electronics Show in Vegas in Jan 02..geez /. get your act together and get some decent stories

  21. How this REALLY works Re:How This Works by mikewas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The sats do not determine your position. They are accurately positioned and have synchronized clocks. Your reciever gets a signal from several satelites. From data in the signals, the reciever knows the satelites' locations & the times that the signals were sent. The reciever does all of the calculations to determine position, the satelites don't know where you are, or even that you have recieved their signal.

    --

    "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." --Napoleon Bonaparte
  22. Re:How This Works by jheinen · · Score: 3, Informative

    Uh, GPS receivers are just that, receivers. They send no data to the satellites, and they do not operate by making "requests," ala HTTP. By using a standard GPS receiver there is utterly no way the government or anyone else can determine your whereabouts. The only way your position can be transmitted is by using a transmitter like the Rino uses, or something like APRS (Automatic Position Reporting System).

    The only thing to be worried about right now would be cell phones incorporating GPS technology that transmit your location, something which the government is considering mandating.

    Of course the black helicopters can always find you, GPS or not.

    --
    -Vercingetorix
    "Necessitas non habet legem." -St. Augustine
  23. Re:How This Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "
    What nobody seems to want to talk about is the fact that my location is being determined by satellites controlled by the government. Until now it hasn't been an issue because GPS units were anonymous (roughly--if you are the only one in, say, Montana then obviously they know that all the Montana requests are coming from you).
    "
    GPS receivers do not make requests. The
    satelites continually send signals which allow
    the receiver to calculate its position. The
    satellites have no idea who will be receiving
    their signal.

    "
    However since 9/11 more and more manufacturers have been putting ID chips into their units which makes Big Brother loom large in my mind. How about yours?
    "

    No. There would have to be a satellite dish on
    the GPS receiver for it to send back ID data.

    Nice try, karma whore.

    --
    I can detect karma whores on sight.
    They have usernames.

  24. Re:frosty paost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It's my understanding that FRS is governed by _voice-only_ comms (see http://wireless.fcc.gov/prs/famrad.html). MURS and GPRS are allowed to transmit data.

    According to my interpretation, what Garmin is trying to do is illegal. That is, unless they get the regs changed for them :)

  25. it is... by mmusn · · Score: 1

    in short, a duplicate story, patented, and an old hat in the amateur radio community.

  26. What about this? by jhines0042 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What I want to know is when is a GPS company going to release a GPS for the car that does traffic analysis and automatically can route you around bad traffic spots?

    Lets say that (eventually) there is a significant installed base of GPS enabled cars. They each register their location anonymously with a central DB (anonymity could be turned off by the owner remotely for the low-jack, car recovery, option perhaps) and since the central DB would know what the speed limit on your road is (and the presence of stop lights etc...) if could monitor how traffic is flowing all across a local region.

    It could then do load balancing of traffic by telling others with the same network where to go and where to not go. If you have a specific destination programmed in it could tell you the quickest way to get there and actually be right because it would tell everyone a different way to get there to avoid congestion.

    --
    42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
    1. Re:What about this? by fmaxwell · · Score: 3, Funny

      What I want to know is when is a GPS company going to release a GPS for the car that does traffic analysis and automatically can route you around bad traffic spots?

      What I want to know is when is a GPS company going to release a GPS for other people's cars that automatically routes them out of my way!

    2. Re:What about this? by dachshund · · Score: 1
      What I want to know is when is a GPS company going to release a GPS for the car that does traffic analysis and automatically can route you around bad traffic spots?

      Hopefully soon.

      In fact, I imagine it won't be too many years before this sort of technology is built into state license-plates. There are a lot of potential benefits-- traffic balancing, intelligent traffic lights, instant accident-detection. And, of course, law enforcement. There'll be enormous privacy issues, but this sort of technology is far too useful for governments to pass up.

      First, you'd need good, cheap packet radio networks that won't mind lots and lots of transmitters occasionally chipping in a tiny packet here and there. If I'm not mistaken, most existing networks (things like CDPD) have a reasonable amount of connection overhead that makes this difficult.

      Second, you'd have an early-adopter problem where no GPS-enabled cars would be driving along a given route, and you would therefore be routed into a 2-hour traffic jam.

      I imagine trusting a computer to route you through the side-streets will also lead to a whole new series of "Bonfire of the Vanities"-type disasters.

    3. Re:What about this? by rworne · · Score: 1
      What I want to know is when is a GPS company going to release a GPS for other people's cars that automatically routes them out of my way!
      A good joke, and an interesting concept. Let's see how this would progress in the real world:

      1. Automatic rerouting of cars is sold to the public for safety purposes (disable/pull over cars for criminal stops, automatic yielding to emergency vehicles, reroute traffic around construction, accidents, etc.) Added is automatic reporting of position, via wireless signals sent from cars, for accident notification/911 purposes.
      2. Guv'ment mandates installation on all new cars. Also added is severe felony punishment for disabling or modifying such a system (modifications reported via wireless "snitch" feature)
      3. Local, state and federal autorities now use the on-board capabilities of the GPS unit combined with complex mapping software to monitor driver's activities. Erratic driving? Summon police for DUI investigation. Speeding? Send tickets via mail. To many parking tickets? Disable vehicle.
      4. Various federal agencies/politicians/celebrities/CEO's now get "preferential access" to the country's roads and highways. Traffic snarls in Los Angeles even more often than normal, but Britney Spears is never late for a concert appearance when she is driven from Bel Air/Beverly Hills cross town to an engagement during rush hour as traffic parts to automatically let her and her entourage pass.
      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
  27. Price by KDENCE · · Score: 1

    Ok, seems like a cool little gadget, but what is the price mate?

    There is a lot of kool stuff out there but without a price we cannot start thinking on whether this is something we might start begging the wifey for or not!

  28. Neat technology, but what's the patent? by dachshund · · Score: 1

    I think the ability to transmit your location to another radio is neat. But I'd be interested to see the patent claims on this technology. I can only hope that they're very specific, and refer only to this particular implementation. I can't believe they've patented the idea of transmitting a GPS position to another receiver.

    1. Re:Neat technology, but what's the patent? by jenkin+sear · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They probably haven't got a blanket patent- there's a VHF spec out there for transmitting GPS coordinates along with the VHF signal- it's intended for marine use, when calling friends or the coast guard for help. Models are already out on the market now, with support incrementally being phased in at all the coast guard monitoring stations- IIRC, they should be available across the US coastal waters by 2004.

      --
      What a strange bird is the pelican, his beak can hold more than his belly can.
    2. Re:Neat technology, but what's the patent? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

      The patent is definately narrow.

      If it's broad, Garmin will get toasted for prior art. See http://www.tapr.org/ - APRS and MIC-E have existed for a LONG time.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  29. Euro GPS by beta21 · · Score: 1

    It might be prudent to wait for the europeans to get their version of GPS up (don't know how long this will take). This way you can buy something that can use either or both!

    1. Re:Euro GPS by bleuchat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      AFAIK, Galileo (the EU version of GPS) will be compatable with the existing GPS system.

      There are a few articles on the BBC about it.
      "It will be a rival to the existing Global Positioning System (GPS) run by the United States, although the EU says the two networks will be compatible." -BBC "Green Light for Galileo project"

    2. Re:Euro GPS by javatips · · Score: 2

      It should be operational in 2008.

      It may be a long time to wait.

      However, the resolution of your (receiver) location will be 1 meter (a little more than 3 feet for the fellow Americans). This is much better than GPS.

  30. But the Garmin Maps Suck by Aelfweld · · Score: 1

    Just a warning I have the garmin eTrex vista which I like a lot but the garmin maps really suck. I got the topo quads only to discover they are missing many roads. If your missing roads its hard to have any sort of trails. I had an email exchange with garmin about this and the rep I was in contact with admited she had tried to use the maps on a AT trip only to find most of the AT was missing. And garmin would not take mapsource the product back. The unit works well with the Delorme maps which are really excellent.

    --
    Government is the abdication of your responsibility to a faceless bureaucracy. Anarchy(absence of government)is the a
  31. Perfect for hunting by mtnbkr · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to get one of these. It'll be perfect for hunting in the mountains. Now, we'll be able to know exactly where everyeone is even if someone moves (it happens). I just hope they're not too expensive...

    Chris

    1. Re:Perfect for hunting by r0ckflite · · Score: 1

      Yea, and just think how great it'll be if you can get the deer to wear them too!

      --

      Push the button Max!!!!

    2. Re:Perfect for hunting by mtnbkr · · Score: 1

      We can't get them to wear bells, what makes you think they'll wear a GPS/Radio?

      Chris

  32. What about privacy... by QuantumRiff · · Score: 3, Interesting

    will this beam your location to only the person you want, or to anyone on that freq? I've used FRS radios for caravaning on long trips, and in big cities, or big events, there is a good chance of other people on the frequency. Does this specify who gets your location, or can anyone on that freq see that quantumRiff is standing in the bathroom??

    --

    What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    1. Re:What about privacy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read
      or
      This

      It doesn't beam your position. The satellites broadcast the exact time and, using the intersection of 3 of these such times, you can determine your position.

    2. Re:What about privacy... by rcw-home · · Score: 2
      Does this specify who gets your location, or can anyone on that freq see that quantumRiff is standing in the bathroom??

      The FCC does not allow encryption on Family Radio Service bands (47CFR95.183(a)4) They usually don't allow data either - Garmin had to get the FCC to make a specific exception for the Rino.

      Anyone can listen in.

    3. Re:What about privacy... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Guess my only issue with that is that Garmin has successfully lobbied the gummint to allow them to use data on the FRS channel, but then they're going to lobby the gummint to give them a monopoly on that "technology" (by applying for a patent).

      Guess I'd be happier (and more apt to buy one) if I thought it would be interoperable with other companies' devices.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:What about privacy... by rcw-home · · Score: 2
      but then they're going to lobby the gummint to give them a monopoly on that "technology" (by applying for a patent).

      I haven't looked at the patent application, but there's all sorts of prior art in this field. Most notably, APRS. I wouldn't write off interoperability so soon. Besides, the patent wouldn't make Garmin much money if they can't license it. It's not like there's much consumer demand for features that only one vendor has any hope of providing.

  33. Re:How This Works by joss · · Score: 2

    You rock. There hasn't had a troll of your calibre on /. since the delightful MEEPT. Keep up the good work.

    --
    http://rareformnewmedia.com/
  34. One More Thing by 4of12 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To make the functionality complete would be if each device could serve as a relay in a wireless network.

    [Assuming relay usage isn't going to chew up your batteries too much] you could relay messages further than the limited range that these devices have for direct point to point contact.

    Better, a few "wormholes" with stationary TX/RX that allow you to connect to land lines would be icing on the cake.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:One More Thing by mcowger · · Score: 1
      Better, a few "wormholes" with stationary TX/RX that allow you to connect to land lines would be icing on the cake.

      That would be cool, but the FRS freq. regulations explicitly forbid such uses.

  35. Nope, but... by locoluis · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... it will help if you get lost while going to do your interview... :)

  36. Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do I HAVE to wear it on my nose?

  37. Re:How This Works by afidel · · Score: 1

    The government doesn't need GPS in your cellphone, your cellphone is constantly beaconing to the towers to keep a carrier channel open for incoming calls, pages etc. By knowing which tower you are talking to and the other towers that can receive your signal they can use triangulation and find you to within a very small distance (100 feet horizontal 20 feet vertical in the case of enhanced 911). With a mobile van equiped with directional antennas they can probably tell where on your body your cellphone is =)

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  38. Re:How This Works by jheinen · · Score: 1

    Well won't they be surprised then. There's a *reason* I got the VibraCall alert feature.

    Call me, PLEASE!

    --
    -Vercingetorix
    "Necessitas non habet legem." -St. Augustine
  39. Or all three! by raygundan · · Score: 2

    The more satellites your receiver can see, the more accurate your position is. Some receivers available now make use of the Russian Glonass system AND the GPS system at the same time. So you get better accuracy than GPS.

    I don't know if anybody makes an affordable consumer one though-- I have only heard about them through an engineer friend who sometimes does survey work for the state.

    Imagine the accuracy and the reliability you could get with all three!

    1. Re:Or all three! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      okay, you listed Glonass and GPS... what's the mysterious third?

    2. Re:Or all three! by raygundan · · Score: 2

      Oh, sorry for the omission-- the "mysterious third" is the European Galileo system that just got approved and will be up (i think) by 2007. It will be more accurate than GPS and Glonass by itself, but all three together would be spot-on and incredibly redundant.

  40. Already available. by threaded · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have it in my car.

    The display gets these little pictures like the road signs for road works, and others for traffic speed etc.

    It just routes around them, only seems to bother if the traffic is very slow for a long distance though.

    I guess it takes the data from the Traffic Master which gets info from the road side traffic sensors and gantrys etc. and pumps it into the (Siemens?) navigation system.

    Sorry, don't have many more details, it's like all built in, car's still on warranty, so have not got round to hacking around in it yet.

  41. hey, nice present by tandr · · Score: 1

    "you can "beam" your location to other Rino"

    Great gift idea! Could somebody from friends make such a nice present to Osama Bin Laden?

    Thank you.

    1. Re:hey, nice present by El+Cabri · · Score: 1

      If you want to find Osama, just check the INS file, maybe they have issued a green card for him in the last couple of weeks.

    2. Re:hey, nice present by tandr · · Score: 1

      good one.

      Wait a sec...Actually, nobody even considered this! So, make your conclusion. Well, you already did.

      PS. Hey, moderators, spend your Funny or even Insightful points on a parent one...

  42. Re:frosty paost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's this about my fetish for youth in Asia?

    ACs 0wn the world

  43. If they were more programmable... by frankwork · · Score: 1

    You could make a neat little networking system. Some friends and I have tossed the idea around for a while of a low-bandwidth P2P wireless infrastructure that would automagically relay messages to units outside the range of the transmitting unit.

    Since these things know where they are (geographically), they could configure themselves to do the routing in a semi-intelligent way.

    The routing would either be a complete nightmare or maybe just a good masters thesis. How about it, science?

    -Frank
    1. Re:If they were more programmable... by Mryll · · Score: 1


      This is already being worked on, particularly for military applications.

    2. Re:If they were more programmable... by Logopop · · Score: 1

      It's called 'Short Messaging Service' on your GSM cellphone. Every kid in Europe has got one.

  44. A "sneak peak"? by Darlington · · Score: 2, Funny
    a sneak peak

    What is that, a mountaintop that creeps up on you?

    Everyone has a spelling pet peeve. That's mine.

    1. Re:A "sneak peak"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's scary is that I've seen both CNN Headline News and E! commit the same mistake on broadcast TV. It is dangerously close to becoming accepted, despite being Completely Wrong. It's PEEK, people. PEEK. You don't "peak" at something unless you have a stiffy.

    2. Re:A "sneak peak"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Update: it's fixed now.
      I'm going to take credit, on the basis of the overpowering ridicule in my comment above.

  45. My only quesiton... by DickPhallus · · Score: 2, Funny

    This sounds sweet, but my only question is what OS does it run? RhinocerOS?

    --

    --
    Some weasel took the cork out of my lunch.
  46. Re:How This Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, the Don Knotts guy was pretty good too ;-)

  47. Done ages ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Benefon has had GSM/GPS for more than a year now. Check out the Esc!. Features include buddy tracking etc.

  48. Devices combining GPS & VHF radio by crudeboy · · Score: 1
    Does anyone know if there's any handheld devices which support both GPS & VHF radio for marine use? Would be nice to have on the sailing boat :-)

    Thanks.

  49. FRS/GMRS: using data over voice-only services by Tugrik · · Score: 1

    One of the biggest debates about this product is the use of FRS/GMRS to transmit data, when the FCC rules for these frequencies is pretty firm on their use for voice only.

    One website to refer to on these matters is the Popular Wireless Magazine BBS forums (a UBBS system). The Rino product has come under discussion a few times, including Garmin's petitioning of the FCC to violate the 'voice only communications' rule:

    Before the
    Federal Communications Commission
    Washington, D.C. 20554

    In the Matter of

    GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.

    Request for Waiver of Family Radio Service Rule Sections 95.193(a) and 95.631(d) to Authorize Manufacture, Sale and Use of GPS Transmission Enhanced FRS Units

    Request for Waiver of Sections 95.193(a), 95.193(b), and 95.631(d) of the Commission's Rules Governing Permissible Communications in the Family Radio Service
    ----

    More on that thread is located here.

    As a licensed GMRS user, I do worry what devices like this can do to the spectrum when they get popular. If it's implemented right, though, they'll be an incredibly useful tool.

  50. APRS by OverCode@work · · Score: 2

    Amateur radio has had a system called APRS for a while. This protocol, based on AX.25, periodically broadcasts the user's callsign and present coordinates. It's a really cool system; it's fun to watch a computer track the APRS coordinates of everyone in the city.

    -John
    (KG4RUO)

    1. Re:APRS by rechsmjr · · Score: 1

      Yes! APRS is cool, and it's free, and there is a very nice web interface to it that which is really amazing. The guy that runs it is a real pro, despite his open source politics ;)

      I use APRS to track my favorite underground music icons.

      They have a GPS/APRS transmitter on the tour bus, so you can track its location in real-time (well, close).

  51. Next gen features already available... by ivi · · Score: 1


    While it's nice to see Garmin's continues
    signs of innovation - I can see parents &
    day-care workers (of kids & oldies) hand-
    ing one of these to each of the people in
    the charge, so that anyone wandering off
    can be found earlier.

    But - wait... there's more!

    Noting the complaint from a poster, who
    is saddled with a now-obsolete eTrax, I
    just thought I'd remind people of some
    of the other features that (I bet) will
    sooner or later work their way into the
    Rino family (or future successors).

    Have a look at UI-View (recently reviewed
    in the Feb 2002 issue of QST magazine;
    published by ARRL)

    Kenwood has dual-band (144 & 440 MHz)
    Amateur handheld (radio) handhelds &
    higher powered mobiles that have GPS
    interfaces.

    UI-View firmware is also in the radio.

    Of course, a small computer is a nice
    (but optional) addon to the radio+gps

    Now, COMING FEATURES include telemetry
    (read: Weather Data from distant auto-
    matic gov't & private weather stations)

    Also: each radio can act as a digipeater
    (so you can get position &/or weather
    data from farther away than your radio
    reaches by itself)

    Short messaging & broadcasts (to all)
    are also in the UI-View feature-list.

    Details are available (in the file areas
    of) UI-View Announce &/or UI-View eGroups
    (Yahoo!'s)

    There is a Win32-compatible Help file
    that tells it all...

    A 16-bit trial version provides -all-
    of the above features; registering it
    allows you to run the 32-bit version,
    which also connects a -fixed- station
    node to the Internet (or, for special
    applications, in high-use areas, pos-
    sibly an Intranet...?)

    Let's all look into UI-View, start de-
    manding (of Garmin) that they "skip"
    a few steps in the development chain,
    and fewer of us will feel like the
    posting eTrax owner, in future... ;-)

  52. Oh I really NEED one of these. by grinchmaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great. Just what I need. Now my wife won't only know where I am, she can tell me to get the hell OUT of there as well.

  53. What's the big deal? by jcbarlow · · Score: 1

    Ham radio folks have been doing this trick for years, it's called APRS.

  54. A better survival tool by I+have+nutsack · · Score: 0

    I would have to say, a much better survival tool, were one planning a safari to the heart of darkness would be this item on ebay, one of which I have recently acquired for myself.

    The auction vendor describes this particular model as follows:

    Yes. This is really made from a bull's nut sack. Call it what you will; bull ball bag -- scrotum sack. It is still the same. This is really a fascinating item. I showed it to my 16 yr old niece and she took it to the movie with her last night when she went to see 'Blade II.' She and the bag both enjoyed the movie.

    This must have come from a quite large bull. It is 9 inches tall and over 6 inches in diameter. Yes. It is sanitary. Apparently treated, but still has plenty of hair. A great place to keep your family jewels, or just a few things like lipstick, cell phone, or money to carry to school, the mall, or work. One thing for sure, you will alway get questions from strangers "Nice bag. What is it made of?"


    I always get similar comments when sporting mine, though I must say, I prefer my Christian Dior model, simply because it has a much more supple, silky texture.

    --

    -------------------
    I am a highly intelligent squirrel
  55. Haven't we seen this before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/03/04/115122 3&mode=thread

  56. License required! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While they do share interstitial freqs with FRS, GMRS-capable radios require an FCC license in the US (fee ~$75 last time I checked). These are NOT FRS radios.

  57. Gonna be a LONG time by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    While there hasn't been any official statement, the unofficial consensus is that Uncle Sam turned off SA to stunt the development of the European system. SA turns off - Much less need for an alternative.

    If that was their goal, it was a success. The European program got hurt badly by the deactivation of SA.

    Now, by the time it gets off the ground, the next generation of civilian GPS will be available. (I believe that there will be support for civilian dual-frequency - The current batch of satellites doesn't support it though, so it'll be quite a while.)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?