Slashdot Mirror


User: risikofaktor

risikofaktor's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3

  1. Re:Computer systems need security audits. on CSRF Flaws Found On Major Websites, Including a Bank · · Score: 1

    CookieSafe, NoScript and the protection Opera has against CSRF - this is a big mess.
    NoScript might save you from some POST malicious requests.
    CookieSafe is similar to the Opera protection but did not work in my Iceweasel, only in Firefox it seemed to work.
    The Opera "Only send cookies to the site I visit" (which is named badly because what it does is different) on the other hand protects you from embedded images doing CSRF, but not from a CSRF by submitting a form (by hand or JS).
    So all these things to different things to protect you. We would need *all* three. Opera even says browser vendors are not responsible at all (I submitted a bug report), web developers are. But at the same time doing a "lightweight" protection.
    So as long as even browser vendors are not sure what is necessary to avoid CSRF the only thing left is make your webapps save and as a customer just be careful...

  2. Re:Er... this stops nothing on CSRF Flaws Found On Major Websites, Including a Bank · · Score: 1

    Well, I know that only a kind of token can protect you from CSRF. But checking for POST can make it harder because now Javascript has to be involved or at least clicking on a submit button by hand. As I have Javascript turned off on all unknown pages the chance for CSRF is much lower (for sites that check for POST). yes, again, that should not be the only protection... The problem is that this attack is difficult to understand, and most web developers are happy that they managed to understand how to avoid SQLI and XSS. But CSRF has to be mentioned, so spread the word.

  3. write a tool that i always wanted to write on Down Time At Work — What Do You Do? · · Score: 1

    for example i wrote a benchmark script for our website because i wanted to know how our code changes
    perform. fortunately (or unfortunately) this tool got more popular, and i had to add more features,
    but didn't really have the working time, so the new features were added quick and dirty. the script became
    unmaintainable. oh well =)
    that shows that you can do something really useful if you get the time for it from your boss.
    i have fun writing such tools because it's always like a little project where you do a technical concept
    and implement it yourself. you can write it quick and dirty but also have the chance to try out
    new tools, modules.