When I was working as a science editor, any maps like this extending disputed political claims were sent back to the author for revision, and if they refused, were revised by us. We refused to be used as a proxy for claims of "publically recognized acknowledgment" in support of these claims.
Check this out: Super flexible fiber optic. I've personally seen fiber optic cable as flexible as a shoe string - a a matter of fact, it connects my ONU to the fiber backbone...
Oh, don't attack the lack of legality (and according to the bill or rights, this is completely illegal - whatever the Supreme Court rules) for a supposedly democratically elected government to record it's citizens every move, just say that they "should" be allowed to spy back. Way to support the failed policies of a failed government. What next? They should be "allowed" to face their accuser in court? They should be "allowed" to see the charges and evidence against them?
That this guy is seen as "an authority" and a "pundit" says a lot for the degeneration of intelligent, rational discourse and thought in the US.
Slashdot Mirror
When I was working as a science editor, any maps like this extending disputed political claims were sent back to the author for revision, and if they refused, were revised by us. We refused to be used as a proxy for claims of "publically recognized acknowledgment" in support of these claims.
Right - then with the massively ginornmous database you'll have something as useful as the "no fly list"
Check this out: Super flexible fiber optic. I've personally seen fiber optic cable as flexible as a shoe string - a a matter of fact, it connects my ONU to the fiber backbone...
Yep. $50 for FTTH - although RATED for 100 Mbps, we actually usually get only 70 Mbps. Although, for $5000/month you can get 1000 Mbps gigabit service
Oh, don't attack the lack of legality (and according to the bill or rights, this is completely illegal - whatever the Supreme Court rules) for a supposedly democratically elected government to record it's citizens every move, just say that they "should" be allowed to spy back. Way to support the failed policies of a failed government. What next? They should be "allowed" to face their accuser in court? They should be "allowed" to see the charges and evidence against them? That this guy is seen as "an authority" and a "pundit" says a lot for the degeneration of intelligent, rational discourse and thought in the US.