And unfortunately, people on both sides of the issue have their own vested interests, so where on earth are we going to find a neutral person to judge who is right and wrong?
Nice when appellate judges are appointed by the scumbags the press is supposed to be watching, AND the supreme court so overworked that it only grants discretionary review.
It's not on public domain just because it gets posted to twitter.
Copyrighted content remains copyrighted no matter where you post it.
Slapping something on twitter that wasn't yours to begin with doesn't magically make it subject to twitter's terms. You have violated the implied warranty of authority by attempting to act without the permission of the copyright holder as their agent.
Which means you get busted for infringement and your rogue post to twitter gets taken down in compliance with the DMCA. It's no different from posting a copyrighted video on Youtube and having it deleted when someone drops a DMCA notice on their legal department.
Slashdot Mirror
maybe because he likes the content more than he hates the corner.
How about we compromise, and require seizures to be backed by affidavits signed under penalty of perjury?
The only thing that establishes is jurisdiction.
In the monsanto case the evidence could even have been planted.
If they didn't even have probable cause then the domains wouldn't be seizable even under CIVIL forfeiture laws.
You know the powers that be are too arrogant for our good when they don't even keep up their own pretenses.
Pointing fingers is fine.
What's wrong is using a machete to chop off other people's fingers when they point back at you.
Just because the pot's black doesn't mean its opinion on the kettle is null and void.
If we did things that way then the pot would be put to shame and everyone's so focused on the pot's hypocrisy that the kettle slinks away unscathed.
And unfortunately, people on both sides of the issue have their own vested interests, so where on earth are we going to find a neutral person to judge who is right and wrong?
Somehow you are presuming that both countries started out in the right and that they are both entitled to be treated the same.
All applying the same standards to them does is preserve whatever status quo you started with.
And being evasive will get you either booted or forced to answer in the specific.
What if the prosecutor asks you point blank?
Either you tell the truth and get stricken, or you lie and get burned on perjury charges for fibbing during voir dire.
How do you get around a prosecutor who asks you point blank during voir dire?
If you tell the truth, you get booted off the jury.
If you lie, you go to prison for perjury.
This is a question of politics at the USPTO.
Arguments based on logic will not work when the truth itself can be twisted at the convenience of the elites.
It's easy to be stupid when the media is brainwashing you.
And the TSA will confiscate all your research on the way out.
You might even say...
*shades*
The evidence was planted there.
Sadly the bar association is probably on the take as well and gets to say who can be your laywer.
Nice when appellate judges are appointed by the scumbags the press is supposed to be watching, AND the supreme court so overworked that it only grants discretionary review.
Rather nice system. For the politicians.
I hate both kodos AND kang
Would someone please make it past the corporate gatekeepers and their media smear engine so I can vote you into office already?
It's not on public domain just because it gets posted to twitter.
Copyrighted content remains copyrighted no matter where you post it.
Slapping something on twitter that wasn't yours to begin with doesn't magically make it subject to twitter's terms. You have violated the implied warranty of authority by attempting to act without the permission of the copyright holder as their agent.
Which means you get busted for infringement and your rogue post to twitter gets taken down in compliance with the DMCA. It's no different from posting a copyrighted video on Youtube and having it deleted when someone drops a DMCA notice on their legal department.
Maybe the whole WORLD just plain sucks ass.
ICE could always seize the domain on grounds of support for terrorism...
Copyright is already enough of an excuse and it doesn't even get anyone killed.
Not require them to test it, merely not allow them to make it fragile for the express purpose of locking out everything but their own firmware.
What if they make it flake out on purpose if you don't use their firmware?
That's a form of DRM.
Twitter can still be served with a DMCA takedown notice.
Imagine if someone tweeted the PS3 root keys?
I think your tweets will disappear faster if you send them a DMCA notice and threaten to sue their pants off.
Some pastebin links to legally hot material have mysteriously gone 404.