But they have to fuck up Office as bad as they're fucking up Windows, it's part of their new take-no-prisoners strategy where they fire machine guns Rambo-style into their own feet until they've blown their legs off and dug their own grave.
I'd say that it would be another Linux renaissance as was had when Vista fell stillborn into the world, but with Canonical still on a collective LSD bender and cozy golden prisons (especially Apple's) being the hottest real estate in town...this could be a very bad time for open computing.
I find this difficult to believe. If you had said *the Republicans or Democrats* then I could believe it, but the Tea Party was started by libertarian Ron Paul in 2007, and bought off buy the Koch bros. and turned into a pro-corporatist group soon after, and was quickly filled with racists and crypto-theocrats
"It is true that we have not heard too much from Open Moko for quite some time. But one has to remember that Jolla's main goal is not to create an open source phone. We aim to create a competitive smartphone almost everybody would want for themselves," Hurmola said.
"The phone will be a smartphone for mass market. It will not be a tech phone intended for Linux hackers. Consumers are not able to hack the kernel or flash new software for the device."
If I don't get a girlfriend soon I'm gonna pwn some boxes! I'm not fat or gross or terribly ugly, it's just a long-ass flight to my little outpost, I think I'm being reasonable.
Undoubtedly the best. It's the ultimate hacker target, just getting a chance at it requires extensive costly resources and top-level social engineering skills. It's at least on par with breaking into the NSA.
Individuals who don't agree with the outcome of a group vote don't do it anyways. They just leave or create a splinter group. There's no reason to follow a decision you don't agree with. In general it sounds like this guy's idea of Anonymous is much more hierarchical / authoritarian than it actually is.
I wonder if something like this could be used inside an engine's combustion chamber to prevent preignition. That could allow for more compression/boost.
Even a suborbital hypersonic aircraft wouldn't land anywhere near those speeds. That's close to mach 1.5 at sea level. Divide by 2 and that's still close to a modern airliner's full cruising speed.
Tires will still limit cars to under 2gs (a really good handling car, without fancy downforce devices will have a sustained cornering force of close to 1g and a peak cornering force of about 2gs) so that's no problem. 2gs is the legal limit on rollercoasters.
Slower is generally more efficient, we just have to find a happy medium, and I'm pretty sure it will be higher than today's speed limits in 20-30 years when everyone is driving electric cars with lots of range to spare.
Yep this is what's gonna happen until autonomous cars are ubiquitous. The real question is, once they are, will the speed limits be bumped up significantly and will traffic lights be phased out for synchronized high-speed dodging, or will we continue to tool around like grannies? In other words, will speed limits ruin the greatest potential improvement that autonomous cars have to offer?
Slashdot Mirror
"Vegeta how many top corporations are about to dump MS office?"
"IT'S OVER NINE THOUSAAAAND!!!"
But they have to fuck up Office as bad as they're fucking up Windows, it's part of their new take-no-prisoners strategy where they fire machine guns Rambo-style into their own feet until they've blown their legs off and dug their own grave.
I'd say that it would be another Linux renaissance as was had when Vista fell stillborn into the world, but with Canonical still on a collective LSD bender and cozy golden prisons (especially Apple's) being the hottest real estate in town...this could be a very bad time for open computing.
Write speed of an average HDD: ~50MBPS
Upload speed of an average Internet connection: ~0.1MBPS
I'll pass.
Yep. Bunch of shady fucks in the Science cabal all giving each other pats on the back. Science has become much too powerful and must be stopped!
But, but HIDE TEH DECLINE! Anthony Watts showed it to me and his intentions are pure of heart(land institute)!
I've actually seen this logic used to defend extraordinary renditions and drone assassinations.
I find this difficult to believe. If you had said *the Republicans or Democrats* then I could believe it, but the Tea Party was started by libertarian Ron Paul in 2007, and bought off buy the Koch bros. and turned into a pro-corporatist group soon after, and was quickly filled with racists and crypto-theocrats
FTFY.
Not in the same article, but yes. Let's hope it doesn't suffer the same fate as the N950.
What part of "Consumers are not able to hack the kernel or flash new software for the device" says that it might not be locked?
From the article:
"It is true that we have not heard too much from Open Moko for quite some time. But one has to remember that Jolla's main goal is not to create an open source phone. We aim to create a competitive smartphone almost everybody would want for themselves," Hurmola said.
"The phone will be a smartphone for mass market. It will not be a tech phone intended for Linux hackers. Consumers are not able to hack the kernel or flash new software for the device."
And I won't be buying one :-(
If I don't get a girlfriend soon I'm gonna pwn some boxes! I'm not fat or gross or terribly ugly, it's just a long-ass flight to my little outpost, I think I'm being reasonable.
Undoubtedly the best. It's the ultimate hacker target, just getting a chance at it requires extensive costly resources and top-level social engineering skills. It's at least on par with breaking into the NSA.
Individuals who don't agree with the outcome of a group vote don't do it anyways. They just leave or create a splinter group. There's no reason to follow a decision you don't agree with. In general it sounds like this guy's idea of Anonymous is much more hierarchical / authoritarian than it actually is.
I wonder if something like this could be used inside an engine's combustion chamber to prevent preignition. That could allow for more compression/boost.
O RLY?
http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/11/02/09/1812252/the-cias-amazing-rc-animals-from-the-70s
Even a suborbital hypersonic aircraft wouldn't land anywhere near those speeds. That's close to mach 1.5 at sea level. Divide by 2 and that's still close to a modern airliner's full cruising speed.
I think he was talking about their population/resource imbalance.
Win8 makes ME, Vista, Clippy, Bob and even GFWL seem like well-thought-out good ideas in comparison.
Tires will still limit cars to under 2gs (a really good handling car, without fancy downforce devices will have a sustained cornering force of close to 1g and a peak cornering force of about 2gs) so that's no problem. 2gs is the legal limit on rollercoasters.
Hopefully. I'll show those pansies how a supercar is meant to be driven! >:)
Well some day I guess ;-P
Slower is generally more efficient, we just have to find a happy medium, and I'm pretty sure it will be higher than today's speed limits in 20-30 years when everyone is driving electric cars with lots of range to spare.
I like to think of myself as more of a Carol Shelby type (young, clever Carol Shelby, not old, litigious Carol Shelby.)
Yep this is what's gonna happen until autonomous cars are ubiquitous. The real question is, once they are, will the speed limits be bumped up significantly and will traffic lights be phased out for synchronized high-speed dodging, or will we continue to tool around like grannies? In other words, will speed limits ruin the greatest potential improvement that autonomous cars have to offer?
I am poor as fuck and I have a sick fetish for speed!