Yes, but they've spent billions to develop these ones. Therefor they are better. And you need to buy these tests, because otherwise your kids will starve.
Look into that a bit, and you may discover that the start of work on that website was delayed for years by lawsuits from Republican governeors.
Why would a lawsuit from a governor stop the federal government from building and testing a website?
Or do you mean the Republican governors filed lawsuits instead of bending over for Obamacare, and that was unconscionable?
Problems with the new compressed schedule were noted during development, but any solution that required an act of Congress (eg: adjusting the deadline, the requirements, or adding money so more developers could be hired) was right out, as the Republican-led Congress would only vote to defund the entire effort altogether.
The effort to de-fund Obamacare failed because, as we found out, the money was already allocated and could not be prevented after the fact by Republicans. So what "solution that required an act of Congress" are you referring to?
So yes, anything ACA-related that Republicans had a say in has turned to a complete fiasco, just like the Republicans wanted. Party affiliation had everything to do with it.
No, it was only incompetence in those legislating, planning, and implementing it. They failed to foresee the actions of governors who acted within the dictates of the law as passed. You can't properly blame the governors for that.
Yeah, it did that to me too. Like so many other sites over the years that have some sort of auto-redirect function. Going back just reloads the redirect function.
So right click on the 'back-arrow' so a menu drops down, and choose the page from before the redirect page. No real reason to complain about it.
Yes, it's amazing that the states led by people who don't believe the law is Constitutional don't want to have a hand in ripping the Constitution to shreds.
Slashdot Mirror
Well, I taught my daughter the Pythagorean Theorem when she started kindergarten. Is that close enough?
You think the question isn't difficult? OK, then
5 pennies and a cup of milk with 6 written on the side. What is missing?
WHAT IS YOUR ANSWER?
I would say sinij's brain, but that's just cuz I'm an asshole.
Yes, but they've spent billions to develop these ones. Therefor they are better. And you need to buy these tests, because otherwise your kids will starve.
You're a sick individual, mister.
Well, obviously it depends on which side the steering wheel is on.
Might have been cheaper to try to buy it, and no one would have died/been injured.
But then we wouldn't have gotten a great movie out of it.
So you managed to link to a piece that states what you said, and the Supreme Court case that is based on.
Please finish the other part of the request, and actually quote the line "corporations are people" from that court decision.
Having just downloaded it, and searched for all instances of the word "people", I see nothing that says "corporations are people".
Please point it out, quoting the paragraph, and noting the page number for us.
Thanks.
I don't think Grenada took too long to finish up. Don't know what the cost was, either projected or actual.
But Microsoft could have brought back Clippy.
I miss Clippy. :(
Google and Oracle are both involved - they probably intend to rewrite it in Jawa.
How about in Klingon? I don't speak Jawa.
As long as CGI doesn't resurrect as SCO, we'll be good.
...because Linus doesn't provide "knowledgeable oversight" to kernel development?
Methinks the "senior" in your title applies in the same sense as "senior moment."
Quoted so the Anonymous get heard.
Well, the basket of beautiful red strawberries will become feces soon, so may as well go for that option.
You'd burn your tally-wick off!
Wow, so insightful and biting. How are you not a leader of your community already?
The Supreme Court has made many 'wrong' decisions over the years, that have later been overturned. Obamacare will be one of those examples.
Look into that a bit, and you may discover that the start of work on that website was delayed for years by lawsuits from Republican governeors.
Why would a lawsuit from a governor stop the federal government from building and testing a website?
Or do you mean the Republican governors filed lawsuits instead of bending over for Obamacare, and that was unconscionable?
Problems with the new compressed schedule were noted during development, but any solution that required an act of Congress (eg: adjusting the deadline, the requirements, or adding money so more developers could be hired) was right out, as the Republican-led Congress would only vote to defund the entire effort altogether.
The effort to de-fund Obamacare failed because, as we found out, the money was already allocated and could not be prevented after the fact by Republicans. So what "solution that required an act of Congress" are you referring to?
So yes, anything ACA-related that Republicans had a say in has turned to a complete fiasco, just like the Republicans wanted. Party affiliation had everything to do with it.
No, it was only incompetence in those legislating, planning, and implementing it. They failed to foresee the actions of governors who acted within the dictates of the law as passed. You can't properly blame the governors for that.
Well the Democratic leaders of Healthcare.gov sure didn't manage to make a usable site. So party affiliation has less to do with it than you think.
Thank you dear Drudge reader. Did you see the one about the homeless high schooler too?
Yeah, it did that to me too. Like so many other sites over the years that have some sort of auto-redirect function. Going back just reloads the redirect function.
So right click on the 'back-arrow' so a menu drops down, and choose the page from before the redirect page. No real reason to complain about it.
Yes, it's amazing that the states led by people who don't believe the law is Constitutional don't want to have a hand in ripping the Constitution to shreds.
What hypocrites!
Excuse me, could you clarify the color references in your post?
Specifically, "yellow dog", "blue majority", and "coal vouchers".
Thank you.
So was Hazzard County.
It's good to hear from you two on this. A local perspective is always a plus, even on such a common topic as a functional website.
I love that one.