There is nothing wrong with hardware assisted security if the owner contols all the keys and nothing can touch the trusted hardware without the owner specifically installing it(i.e. root/administrator)
As a user,u may not be able to evaluate that trust directly,u may trust the design, professional evaluation or opinion but the end, it is your responsibility to sanction the degree of trust that u require.
So administrator must set all protection mechanism within a computer system, including hardware,firmware, and software that together enforce a unified security policy over a product system to make the trusted computing good.
there is nothing wrong with hardware assisted security if the owner controls all the keys and nothing can touch the trusted hardware without the owner specifically installing it.(i.e. root/administrator)
trust is perceived by the system's receiver or user, not by its developer,designer or manufacturer. as user you may not be able to evaluate that trust directly. you may trust the design, professional evaluation or the opinion, but the end it is your responsibility to sanction the degree of trust that you require.
so the owner of the hardware must have control over the software on the machine or set all protection mechanism tomake user trust the system.
try to use cellpoint product to secure mail gateway to protect email. it has capability to filter out email threats unmatcheds by traditional firewalls.also provides a complete secure mail reporting and management. it is a 7 A's of secure email protection which is anti-spam, anti-virus, anti-spyware,anti-phishing,anti-relay,anti-DoS, and anti-hacking.
Slashdot Mirror
There is nothing wrong with hardware assisted security if the owner contols all the keys and nothing can touch the trusted hardware without the owner specifically installing it(i.e. root/administrator) As a user,u may not be able to evaluate that trust directly,u may trust the design, professional evaluation or opinion but the end, it is your responsibility to sanction the degree of trust that u require. So administrator must set all protection mechanism within a computer system, including hardware,firmware, and software that together enforce a unified security policy over a product system to make the trusted computing good.
there is nothing wrong with hardware assisted security if the owner controls all the keys and nothing can touch the trusted hardware without the owner specifically installing it.(i.e. root/administrator) trust is perceived by the system's receiver or user, not by its developer,designer or manufacturer. as user you may not be able to evaluate that trust directly. you may trust the design, professional evaluation or the opinion, but the end it is your responsibility to sanction the degree of trust that you require. so the owner of the hardware must have control over the software on the machine or set all protection mechanism tomake user trust the system.
try to use cellpoint product to secure mail gateway to protect email. it has capability to filter out email threats unmatcheds by traditional firewalls.also provides a complete secure mail reporting and management. it is a 7 A's of secure email protection which is anti-spam, anti-virus, anti-spyware,anti-phishing,anti-relay,anti-DoS, and anti-hacking.
its true but we must make sure that voting that we get must not from the same person =)