Since we're on the subject of foreign gambling sites, the US has been openly flouting a WTO resolution that prohibited the US from outlawing these foreign gambling sites. So it's all a hypocritical notion of wrong or right depending on how the US wants to interpret it to its advantage - in this instance, the lobbying of vested interest groups in the US (read as Vegas!)
This is not the first time that EMI has been associated with such deeds - whether by design or accident. The New York Times, Billboard, Digital Music News and South China Morning Post have all reported Beatles digital tracks being sold by an EMI endorsed vendor before. More details here in the article entitled 'Is EMI profiting from Beatles digital piracy?' at http://www.music2dot0.com/archives/8
Slashdot Mirror
Since we're on the subject of foreign gambling sites, the US has been openly flouting a WTO resolution that prohibited the US from outlawing these foreign gambling sites. So it's all a hypocritical notion of wrong or right depending on how the US wants to interpret it to its advantage - in this instance, the lobbying of vested interest groups in the US (read as Vegas!)
This is not the first time that EMI has been associated with such deeds - whether by design or accident. The New York Times, Billboard, Digital Music News and South China Morning Post have all reported Beatles digital tracks being sold by an EMI endorsed vendor before. More details here in the article entitled 'Is EMI profiting from Beatles digital piracy?' at http://www.music2dot0.com/archives/8