Slashdot Mirror


User: p4nther2004

p4nther2004's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
125
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 125

  1. No one's ever made a high-budget version of any of Heinlein's books (let's not pretend Starship Troopers shared anything but the name), even the "Big 3".

    Predestination

  2. Re:The book they need isn't a CS book. on High School Computer Science: Look Ma, No Textbooks! · · Score: 2
    Actually his point was that "traditional" CS isn't valued by business.

    Which is mostly true. Most businesses can't tell the difference between a DFA/CFG/Turing Machine if they tried.

    However the argument that CS doesn't HAVE value is completely false. (And thus my comment about storing monetary amounts in standard floats -- a practice I've personally seen businesses doing in 2016. Why are we getting rounding errors?)

    BTW: We're talking AP exams - these are college credit exams for CS. I'd might allow allow them to skip Intro to Programming Languages with that test...but COT?

  3. Re:The book they need isn't a CS book. on High School Computer Science: Look Ma, No Textbooks! · · Score: 1

    OK, I'll play. You know there are no jobs for computers scientists

    Can you provide an explanation of P vs NP? Does it apply to the search of Prime Numbers? What real world examples of P vs NP?

    Too difficult? Can you explain what a DFA/NFA is? What the corresponding architecture is in electronic circuits? What sort of problems (real world) can a DFA/NFA solve? What sort can't it solve (think Pumping Lemma)? Can you provide an example (real world)?

    Yeah. Everyone wants programmers. Even if they go to boot-camp schools and come out in 26 weeks knowing a gee-wiz-bang-language. Then they use floats for storing monetary amounts and the CEO wonders why they're losing money.

    Not that we can complain. Even computer scientists (a la Marvin Minsky) can get things wrong.

  4. An interesting argument on 'How We Made Starship Troopers' (theguardian.com) · · Score: 1

    No, you had to be given the opportunity to serve. They had to find a place for you. But you weren't guaranteed never to be fired.

    Actually - to be fair - there wasn't a guarantee that you wouldn't be killed either.

    There's a big decision in the novel about if Rico should be dismissed, or 'salvaged' with 'administrative punishment.'

    And again - to be fair - that big decision has to do with a felony. (Both book and movie - book: he would've 'nuked' a teammate and movie: a fellow soldier dies while he's attempting to fix the soldier's helmet - something he wasn't qualified to do (I prefer the book version))

    The point is misleading - it's not about denying someone the vote - but rather how the military policed their own. The book runs a chapter prior to this talking about a fellow soldier who, in the heat of the moment, jumps up and slugs his commanding officer (Zim) - a hanging offense. A review of the situation occurs - and a court marital (field) later and this soldier is flogged and discharged (dishonorably).

    But these cases weren't about voting - they were about breaking the law.

    I'll grant you that a group of dishonest military people COULD rig the system - prevent only whom they deem worthy to be allowed in. But the premise is that everyone, in general, agreed to follow the rules and allow people a chance to earn their voting privilege. (In fact, being "washed out' (fired) in the military didn't mean you couldn't go on and attempt to earn your privilege through other service - he cites one person who does.)

    But could it be rigged? In fact, in the book, Heinlein basically admits that's how it started out: The system of requiring military service before voting simply "happened' because a group of vets had to decide to hang another vet....and they weren't going to allow anyone else to do it / have a say in it.

    The comment on it: That this system worked. Not right, not wrong....it simply worked.

    And that takes us to the US system of government. Heinlein points out (in Expanded Universe, iirc) that his mother was denied the vote for decades. Others are denied the vote for a myriad of reasons, even now. (Felons for example, lose the right to vote)

  5. Re:I'm shocked, shocked! on 'How We Made Starship Troopers' (theguardian.com) · · Score: 1

    Yep, Ishtar and Galahad. (Not the original poster)

  6. There were two, you're forgetting the LaserWriter

    The laserwriter came out in 1985....a year after the original mac. (Never used it myself, it was more expensive than the mac)

    You may not be aware of this but modern versions of CUPS on Linux can and will set up your printer without you the user actually doing anything.

    Usually...depending on how unique a setup you have. It's also 2018. (Not 1984) :-)

  7. What was the setup required for the old image writer printer?

    Hint - there wasn't any installation. It literally was "plug-n-play".

    Of course, the downside was that was the ONLY printer you could use.

    But compare that setup with say Linux CUPS.

  8. Re:it's not about the computer on Apple's 'What's a Computer?' Ad is Annoying People: Business Insider (businessinsider.com) · · Score: 1
    Amiga came out in 1985 - a year after the Mac.

    But my point was the complexity that some people prefer. (I know I do).

    What was the command to get to a hard drive with a C64? OPEN 1,8,15,"N:NEWDISK,01":CLOSE 1 ?

    Mac? Stick the disk in the slot. (Not that Vanilla Macs came with hard drives) Using a Mac was like driving a car with an automatic transmission. Yeah, it did what I wanted...but if I WANTED control....

  9. Re:it's not about the computer on Apple's 'What's a Computer?' Ad is Annoying People: Business Insider (businessinsider.com) · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Yawn. It's no about the computer. It's about the computer experience.

    Like Apple or hate it. Apple (and Jobs in particular) has worked for the last 20+ years trying to remove the "computer" from people who had to work with it.

    Did you ever get to work with an original Mac? The one that had a training cassette that was to be played with the original tutorial programs? The entire purpose of that machine was to make working with it so simply anyone could do it. (Even my mom...god rest her soui...as mathematically incompetent as she was had no problem using it.)

    Now compare that with trying to get a C64 to read from a floppy drive.

    Is the ad annoying? Sure. Apple haters are really going to hate it.

    But they should be running chrome books by now, anyway. :-)

  10. Re:It's their fault! on Salmonella Probably Killed the Aztecs (theguardian.com) · · Score: 1

    If you're talking about the army blankets then you heard wrong. It's bullshit made up by Ward Churchill.

    If you talking about Ward Churchill. Then yes - its bs.

    If you're trying to say no blankets were distributed....
    http://www.straightdope.com/co...
    https://www.umass.edu/legal/de...

  11. Check back to Fort Pitt. on Salmonella Probably Killed the Aztecs (theguardian.com) · · Score: 1

    in 1763. (Not the US Government...but...)

  12. Re:Another âoeFake Newsâ Disease on Salmonella Probably Killed the Aztecs (theguardian.com) · · Score: 1

    That should read....

    I know it's crabby, but he's being a basshole, just for the halibut.


    -- She drank like a......she drank a lot.

  13. Re:old news. At least 6 months old on Salmonella Probably Killed the Aztecs (theguardian.com) · · Score: 1

    I can't see how. The article was published on Jan 15th, 2018.

  14. Re:Smallpox blankets on Salmonella Probably Killed the Aztecs (theguardian.com) · · Score: 2
    No offense regarding Ward Churchill....

    But blankets and smallpox rumors go back to 1763 and Fort Pitt. Sources of that story go back to 1898. (And no, in 1763 - it would not be the US Government, obviously).

  15. Re: FISA Section 702 = Mass surveillance on Americ on House Passes Bill To Renew NSA Internet Spying Tool (reuters.com) · · Score: 4, Informative

    Much of the opposition came from Democrats, though the vote did produce a striking coalition of conservatives and liberals who backed an alternative that would have imposed stricter protections for Americans whose information got snared in the data dragnet. https://m.washingtontimes.com/...

  16. Really? - cause prior to Obama the same investigations were going on...and the same unmasking and no legal framework was around any of it. (That's what started this law in the first place).

  17. Re:This will impeach Trump on Congress Is About To Vote On Expanding the Warrantless Surveillance of Americans (vice.com) · · Score: 1
    Please - if you can convict Hillary....go for it.

    Just stop getting in our way when we're going after Trump, okay?

  18. Re: The U.S. is no longer a democracy? on Congress Is About To Vote On Expanding the Warrantless Surveillance of Americans (vice.com) · · Score: 1
    That's right kiddies.

    Donald Trump can declare that Obama isn't a US citizen and undermine his Presidency.

    But don't you *DARE* try that yourself.

    You don't have the same rights as dear Leader.

  19. Re:*STOP BLAMING TRUMP* ! on Congress Is About To Vote On Expanding the Warrantless Surveillance of Americans (vice.com) · · Score: 1
    Yeah because there weren't ANY privacy violations back in 2001-2008.

    https://www.eff.org/wp/pattern...

  20. Re:Making America Great Again on Congress Is About To Vote On Expanding the Warrantless Surveillance of Americans (vice.com) · · Score: 1
    Well, my representative are...

    Senator: Bill Nelson (D) Senator: Marco Rubio (R) Representative: Stephanie Murphy (D)

    We just got Murphy. Getting rid of Mica was a PITA.

  21. OMG! The Democrat are infecting Republicans on Congress Is About To Vote On Expanding the Warrantless Surveillance of Americans (vice.com) · · Score: 2
    with GLOBALISM! It's spreading! If only those wonderful Republicans like Dubya will protect us?

    WHAT! He SIGNED the bill. He's a GLOBAL TOO? Is there NO ONE that DIANE FEINSTEIN won't take to BED???

  22. The Republicans - and ALL I see are REPUBLICANS behind this - will pass this, Trump will sign it, and they will all blame Democrats for the bill.

    There...fixed it for you.

  23. Re:*STOP BLAMING TRUMP* ! on Congress Is About To Vote On Expanding the Warrantless Surveillance of Americans (vice.com) · · Score: 1

    Devin Nunes has nothing to do with Trump you fucking retard.

    Likewise - Devin Nunes has nothing to do with Democrats or even Obama.

  24. Re:Hillary was destined to lose on Ajit Pai Backs Out of Planned CES 2018 Appearance (techcrunch.com) · · Score: 1

    Wrong. A majority of people in the USA did NOT want her to be President.

    by that reasoning - a majority of the people in the USA did NOT want Trump to be President either.

    You're kinda proving my point. :-)

  25. Re:Hillary was destined to lose on Ajit Pai Backs Out of Planned CES 2018 Appearance (techcrunch.com) · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You mean the tens of millions which were less than the millions that voted for her?

    To quote: The electoral college is a disaster for a democracy.

    (guess who said that....)