100% rationality perhaps. But someone can have still have standards of rationality in mates, the way one has standards in other areas of personality and appearance.
There is nothing wrong with refusing to date people who assert things that are blatantly stupid. Just because something is part of a person's spiritualism doesn't make it blatantly stupid.
I would also refuse to date someone who seriously asserted that the dinosaurs died because of the evil galactic overlord Xenu.
I think there is a good argument to be made that the "best" candidate is the candidate with the "best" stances on various issues. You know, judge them by their ideas rather than their network of contacts within the media and halls of power.
Slashdot Mirror
100% rationality perhaps. But someone can have still have standards of rationality in mates, the way one has standards in other areas of personality and appearance.
There is nothing wrong with refusing to date people who assert things that are blatantly stupid. Just because something is part of a person's spiritualism doesn't make it blatantly stupid. I would also refuse to date someone who seriously asserted that the dinosaurs died because of the evil galactic overlord Xenu.
Really? I met about half of my ex-girlfriends through playing D&D.
I think there is a good argument to be made that the "best" candidate is the candidate with the "best" stances on various issues. You know, judge them by their ideas rather than their network of contacts within the media and halls of power.
The purpose of this topic is to discuss the BEST democratic presidential candidate, not the MOST LIKELY TO WIN candidate.
Yeah, I'm a big fan of Gravel. Why was he excluded?