Slashdot Mirror


User: Thinboy00

Thinboy00's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,572
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,572

  1. Re:To hack a patent... on Scary Smartphone Motion Control Patent Granted · · Score: 1

    That's an excellent coding analogy, but this is /. Could you please rewrite it in the form of a poorly-thought-out and clear-as-mud car analogy?

  2. Re:inalienable rights on GoDaddy Follows Google's Lead; No More Registrations In China · · Score: 1

    What about Hillary Clinton's speeches? </sarcasm>

  3. Re:Hey, Me Too! on GoDaddy Follows Google's Lead; No More Registrations In China · · Score: 4, Funny

    You'd think they'd start with Nigeria.

  4. Re:T-Based? on China Hits Back At Google · · Score: 1

    their uncensored Hong Kong-tbased google.com.hk servers

    If I know anything about genetics there must be some adenine base servers directly opposite these servers. Can they start redirecting traffic there?

    [emphasis converted to italic]

    FTFY.

  5. Re:I'm a Little More Concerned About on China Hits Back At Google · · Score: 1

    Google explicitly stated in their blog that they (the executives in the U.S.) made the decisions on their own and without consulting their Chinese employees.

  6. Re:Let the games begin on China Hits Back At Google · · Score: 1

    HTC is in Taiwan. Does China even recognize the existence of Taiwan? I think not.

  7. Re:Ping Pong on China Hits Back At Google · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Google doesn't want to provoke China to take its employees hostage or something.

  8. Re:Ping Pong on China Hits Back At Google · · Score: 1

    I don't think Google goes to the extent of saying "your query is against U.S. law so we won't give you results", as they once did in China.

  9. Re:Let me be the first to say on China Hits Back At Google · · Score: 1

    They might just wait for him to die and then overthrow the government.

  10. Re:Let me be the first to say on China Hits Back At Google · · Score: 1

    You mean the Whiskey Rebellion?

  11. Re:OMG on China Hits Back At Google · · Score: 1

    ... this whole thing must be part of some diabolically clever evil plan.

    You mean like New Coke was?

  12. Re:Healthcare debate fiasco COULD have been avoide on Bill Would Require Public Information To Be Online · · Score: 1

    It still has the individual mandate. Without the Public Option, the mandate is worse than nothing since the health insurance firms now have a captive audience.

  13. Re:Healthcare debate fiasco COULD have been avoide on Bill Would Require Public Information To Be Online · · Score: 1

    I don't know aboot that...

  14. Re:Executive Branch Only? Who cares? on Bill Would Require Public Information To Be Online · · Score: 1

    NASA already puts up tons of pretty pictures under the public domain. What more do you want? Itemized billing for all of the missions etc. dating back to Apollo 11?

  15. Re:"Common Sense Exceptions" defined as... on Bill Would Require Public Information To Be Online · · Score: 1

    Such as ACTA!

  16. Re:"Compel" with exceptions and "limited" rights? on Bill Would Require Public Information To Be Online · · Score: 1

    the real world is [...] complex

    Hmm...
    5=3+4i ?
    Nope, still don't get it. Are you talking about absolute value or something?

  17. Re:minimal conversion sounds best on Bill Would Require Public Information To Be Online · · Score: 1

    Even a spreadsheet,

    At which point you start fighting OOXML vs. ODF (i.e. *.xls vs. *.xlsx vs. *.ods).

  18. Re:minimal conversion sounds best on Bill Would Require Public Information To Be Online · · Score: 1

    Do they just have interns punching away at Word documents or have they commissioned some sort of specialized collaboration software?

    You mean, right now? Of course they have interns punching away at Word. This is America (TM). More specifically, it's the U.S. Federal government. So far as I can tell, there's only one major part of the federal gov't with a clue about technology: the FCC, and they're only slightly more important than Canada (i.e. no one cares).

  19. Re:Funny thing about "common-sense exceptions"... on Bill Would Require Public Information To Be Online · · Score: 1

    I'm sure you can find a private school that specializes in "special needs".

  20. Re:Funny thing about "common-sense exceptions"... on Bill Would Require Public Information To Be Online · · Score: 1

    Socialists? In Sarah Palin's backyard? Really???

  21. Re:How to fix the problem... on Food Activist's Life Becomes The Life of Brian · · Score: 1

    No, they might actually do that (you might well be alluding to something, but it's too obscure for me).

  22. Re:I'm not the Messiah either on Food Activist's Life Becomes The Life of Brian · · Score: 1

    <small>oh, thank you...--</small>

    <big>I'm sorry m'am, I know you're upset</big>
    <small>Pretend to be upset</small>
    (/. doesn't support those tags properly, nor does it support <font>)

  23. Re:Photos on Slashdot. on Food Activist's Life Becomes The Life of Brian · · Score: 1

    [from his sig]
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama

    cat: /dev/mem: Operation not permitted

    Yes, I did log in as root, no I don't understand what the fuck is going on (I saw something similar once).

  24. Something I saw in Ars Technica on Ask the UK Pirate Party's Andrew Robinson About the Issues · · Score: 1

    Here (warning: US-centric). What's your opinion?

  25. Re:China attacked Google on Google vs. China — Who's Got the Most To Lose? · · Score: 1

    Google is leaving China because China has been trying to "hack" Google. by that I mean, they used disreputable means to gain access to and undermine Google's technology and resources with the goal of using Google as a vector to attack other American businesses and interests.

    There are some questions as to the extent of the Chinese government's involvement in said "hacking". In other words, Google has always wanted to pull out/stop censoring, and they finally found an excuse to tell their shareholders.