That's right. You didn't. Asterisks don't increase the weight of an argument or statement. They just make the author look like someone who used to write in all caps. What makes you think my mind has never been changed? Logic and reason are important to me. That makes perfect sense because you now seem to think asterisks are more important than logic and reason.
Companies are run by humans. Most humans don't think that way. We have been conditioned by pop-culture and the media to believe that all corporations are evil. I think our perceptions are probably wrong.
You must have been reading your own posts where you devolved to accusing your opponent of being a faux-noise watcher. Such indomitable proof. Yeah, I no longer care at this point. You don't even have a coherent position, because you just make up definitions to suit your world view.
I'm not going to do your homework for you. Net neutrality is a set of rules that must be imposed on people; it is a legislative and regulatory initiative. It is not libertarian. It is not liberal. It is authoritarian. I oppose net neutrality because I support economic freedom in the libertarian sense. You haven't figured it out yet. Every time one of you pinheads decide to impose your vision of freedom and equality on society, it hurts people. Do more with less, not less with more.
Is this some kind of joke? Progressives don't value individual rights. In the progressive bastions that are our public universities, they implement speech codes. Progressives do everything they can to restrict property rights, economic rights, and self-defense rights (even claiming as collective, rights that that have been recognized as individual). They shout down speakers that don't share their fascist ideology at every opportunity. I would say libertarian=free speech, but progressive=free speech is down right laughable. I'm not sure where I admitted that my definition of libertarian is biased. I don't really see how a definition can be biased.
Absolutely. Someone made a terrible decision, and this misspelled name story is the smokescreen. This administration has done it before, and they will do it for as long as they can get away with it.
They don't require a perfect match. That's the smokescreen. This is 2014, nothing requires a perfect match these days. The extra "y" is the official story explaining why this bombing was unavoidable and how it couldn't be helped. Some people are choosing to believe that steaming pile of bullshit.
They know all this. They're just making up a story to mitigate accountability. They've done it before (Benghazi, FF), and they'll do it again. Judging by the reactions of the posters here at Slashdot, successfully.
No, it's a clear case of we fucked up and people died. The explanation is that it was unavoidable, and funny enough, you see, someone just made a spelling mistake and that's why we didn't catch the guy. Totally unavoidable.
You will note that I put libertarian and progressive at opposing ends of the spectrum. And then I equated progressivism and authoritarianism. I meant exactly what I said, not what you imagine I said, or wish that I had said. Progressives advocate individual conformity at every opportunity. It is ingrained in their imagined solutions for all that ails us. You are only furthering my argument.
Liberal means liberal, libertarian means libertarian, and progressive means progressive. They are three different ideologies. Libertarian and progressive are at different ends of the spectrum. A progressive has never seen a rule they didn't like that grants more power to the state. They are the opposite of libertarian. They are authoritarian, and when they wield the power of the federal government that we have today, they trend towards totalitarian. Wake up you ignorant fool.
Seems pretty obvious then, that the state of Oregon is incompetent and are to be blamed for contracting with company that is so widely known to be arrogant, evil, and incompetent.
Then why do you work with them? And more to the point, why did Oregon hire such a shitty company to work on a mission critical product? Who's fault is this, really?
That's ridiculous. If it's widely known that Oracle has a %99.999 chance of screwing a project up, it's the fault of the people that hired them and expected to get a functional product. I'd bet that it's Oregon's fault for picking Oracle considering I have not seen one person on this discussion praise Oracle.
That's right. You didn't. Asterisks don't increase the weight of an argument or statement. They just make the author look like someone who used to write in all caps. What makes you think my mind has never been changed? Logic and reason are important to me. That makes perfect sense because you now seem to think asterisks are more important than logic and reason.
No, it's a political report that presents a scientific viewpoint. At least call it what it is.
Companies are run by humans. Most humans don't think that way. We have been conditioned by pop-culture and the media to believe that all corporations are evil. I think our perceptions are probably wrong.
You win!!!
You must have been reading your own posts where you devolved to accusing your opponent of being a faux-noise watcher. Such indomitable proof. Yeah, I no longer care at this point. You don't even have a coherent position, because you just make up definitions to suit your world view.
Holy shit, I just realized that you're a complete idiot. I hardly know who Bill O'Reilly his, and you obviously watch his show.
I'm not going to do your homework for you. Net neutrality is a set of rules that must be imposed on people; it is a legislative and regulatory initiative. It is not libertarian. It is not liberal. It is authoritarian. I oppose net neutrality because I support economic freedom in the libertarian sense. You haven't figured it out yet. Every time one of you pinheads decide to impose your vision of freedom and equality on society, it hurts people. Do more with less, not less with more.
Is this some kind of joke? Progressives don't value individual rights. In the progressive bastions that are our public universities, they implement speech codes. Progressives do everything they can to restrict property rights, economic rights, and self-defense rights (even claiming as collective, rights that that have been recognized as individual). They shout down speakers that don't share their fascist ideology at every opportunity. I would say libertarian=free speech, but progressive=free speech is down right laughable. I'm not sure where I admitted that my definition of libertarian is biased. I don't really see how a definition can be biased.
Absolutely. Someone made a terrible decision, and this misspelled name story is the smokescreen. This administration has done it before, and they will do it for as long as they can get away with it.
All of this. This misspelled name story is a pile of bullshit. This is 2014. They did not miss him because of a single additional phonetic "y".
They don't require a perfect match. That's the smokescreen. This is 2014, nothing requires a perfect match these days. The extra "y" is the official story explaining why this bombing was unavoidable and how it couldn't be helped. Some people are choosing to believe that steaming pile of bullshit.
They know all this. They're just making up a story to mitigate accountability. They've done it before (Benghazi, FF), and they'll do it again. Judging by the reactions of the posters here at Slashdot, successfully.
No, it's a clear case of we fucked up and people died. The explanation is that it was unavoidable, and funny enough, you see, someone just made a spelling mistake and that's why we didn't catch the guy. Totally unavoidable.
You will note that I put libertarian and progressive at opposing ends of the spectrum. And then I equated progressivism and authoritarianism. I meant exactly what I said, not what you imagine I said, or wish that I had said. Progressives advocate individual conformity at every opportunity. It is ingrained in their imagined solutions for all that ails us. You are only furthering my argument.
Liberal means liberal, libertarian means libertarian, and progressive means progressive. They are three different ideologies. Libertarian and progressive are at different ends of the spectrum. A progressive has never seen a rule they didn't like that grants more power to the state. They are the opposite of libertarian. They are authoritarian, and when they wield the power of the federal government that we have today, they trend towards totalitarian. Wake up you ignorant fool.
To a left-wing totalitarian, Obama being in office is the most beautiful thing that has ever happened.
...are not correlated like Mazda is claiming. Stoichiometry dictates how much CO2 a 100% efficient engine will emit by burning gasoline.
Usually? When has communism ever worked amazingly well?
I don't think the words, "quotations", "executive orders", "responsible", or "criminals" mean what you think they mean.
How does a hammer help you chase down a gut shot deer?
...are pretty much illegal now. Great.
Seems pretty obvious then, that the state of Oregon is incompetent and are to be blamed for contracting with company that is so widely known to be arrogant, evil, and incompetent.
Each gets half a baby?
Then why do you work with them? And more to the point, why did Oregon hire such a shitty company to work on a mission critical product? Who's fault is this, really?
That's ridiculous. If it's widely known that Oracle has a %99.999 chance of screwing a project up, it's the fault of the people that hired them and expected to get a functional product. I'd bet that it's Oregon's fault for picking Oracle considering I have not seen one person on this discussion praise Oracle.