Didn't they also unilaterally decide on imposing NN 3 years ago? We're just going back to the point before the FCC unilaterally decided to regulate the internet.
No, not at all. It's become a recent trend for the true believers to use Venus as an example for what the earth will become if we don't give more power to global government and tax the rich.
Every single one of those solutions is an authoritarian, redistributive, answer that gives more power to governments and less power to individuals. It's not surprising that it's the authoritarian left that keeps pushing climate change.
Didn't they also unilaterally decide on imposing NN 3 years ago? We're just going back to the point before the FCC unilaterally decided to regulate the internet.
Well, Barack Obama didn't seem to have much trouble appointing Pai.
Thanks for reinforcing my point.
How about just some plain old liberalism?
The priesthood has spoken. The answer to all your questions is "significant". Believe or be forsaken. Sacrifice and repent!
Do you have published, peer reviewed research that supports that?
Wut? That's a pretty shitty analogy.
Yep. And he worked for the national socialists, confiscating the property of Jews who refused to submit and enjoyed it.
How many people did "experts" lobotomize in the 20th century?
But we produce more than China. Population is irrelevant. We produce far less co2 per unit of production than China or most other nations.
No, not at all. It's become a recent trend for the true believers to use Venus as an example for what the earth will become if we don't give more power to global government and tax the rich.
Every single one of those solutions is an authoritarian, redistributive, answer that gives more power to governments and less power to individuals. It's not surprising that it's the authoritarian left that keeps pushing climate change.
It has the word denier in the title. If you think that's science rather than dogmatic politics, then this is no better than free republic.
We could only hope they are coming to an end, because we are past due for another minimum.
It's funny when propagandists have to label skeptics as deniers. They spout dogma, not science.
They are barely still in the 95% confidence range. But you seem to think that means they are 95% accurate, which couldn't be farther from the truth.
...is that quality matters. Duh.
That's a pretty stupid way to look at the world. Almost as dumb as pretending the world is as you wish it to be rather than as it actually is.
Where do you live and what do you do? Clearly you seem to lack any experience or knowledge of what people actually use trucks for.
As long as the population keeps increasing, it is self-evident that the planet is not overpopulated.
I read that propaganda too. That doesn't work for a truck.
It doesn't matter if it's improving or not. That's irrelevant. Today, it's sorely lacking.
Yeah, electric motors are the superior form of propulsion for vehicles. Any vehicle. The energy storage system is what is sorely lacking.
Funny. The only place I have ever seen a bandwidth limit exceeded message, is when people post it to spread FUD in support of net neutrality.
...catch on. Mostly, because you have to wear them.