Slashdot Mirror


Elon Musk Confirms Tesla Pickup Truck Coming 'After Model Y' (electrek.co)

Tesla CEO Elon Musk has confirmed that a Tesla pickup truck is coming "right after Model Y." He said that he already has "the core design/engineering elements" in his mind and wants to bring it to market right after Model Y. Musk later added that the Tesla pickup will be "similar in size" or "slightly bigger" than a Ford F150 "to account for a really gamechanging (I think) feature I'd like to add." Electrek reports: Musk had previously confirmed that Model Y, a small SUV or crossover built on the Model 3 platform, would be Tesla's priority once Model 3 production is ramped up. That's why it was surprising for Tesla to unveil the next generation Roadster at the Tesla Semi event since the vehicle was expected to come out after Model Y, which has yet to be unveiled. At the same event, Musk also released the first image of a Tesla electric pickup truck, but some people still think it's a joke. He claimed that it was a smaller version of Tesla Semi and "a pickup truck that can carry a pickup truck." While it sounded like a joke, Musk had previously mentioned his intention to leverage work on the Tesla Semi to create a Tesla pickup truck.

200 comments

  1. Not really by eclectro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They need to meet production goals for the model 3 before they can move on to other things, really.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    1. Re:Not really by maybe111 · · Score: 2

      If they can get pre-payments for the pickups, they can use them to fullfil orders for the model-3 or Y? /s

    2. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They need to meet production goals for the model 3 before they can move on to other things, really.

      Planning a new vehicle takes a lot of R they're not going to wait until every last production issue is worked out before looking to the future

    3. Re:Not really by apoc.famine · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well fuck, I tried to mod this overrated, and hit underrated instead, So here's my comment to undo that mod.

      Who cares?

      I mean really, who cares?

      Musk has over-promised by about 40% on everything. Everything. But what was his promise? Disrupt everything. Change the world.

      Yeah, he doesn't nail it every time. But he gets so close to world-shaking that I'm not worried at all. My current car does 0-60 in about 12 seconds. For $40k I can buy a number of cars that can cut that down to 6s. All sucking down a ton of fuel. But the Model 3? 4 seconds. Maybe less. For the same money or less.

      Yes, production is lagging, but so what? Your world-changing technology is delayed 6 months. Are you really going to throw a fit about that?

      If Musk never produced anything he claimed to have made, I'd throw him in the bin of scammers and charlatans. But he fucking does what he says! On schedule? Nope. But not that far later, and not that much less.

      There aren't many futurists who have a record anything near what Musk has for delivering world-changing technology.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    4. Re:Not really by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If they can get pre-payments for the pickups, they can use them to fullfil orders for the model-3 or Y? /s

      You make Tesla sound like a pyramid scheme... and maybe you have a point.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    5. Re:Not really by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Naw, production and development are on different tracks, you would never want current production constraints to delay future development; especially when production is going really well, but growing pains limit growth speed.

    6. Re:Not really by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Isn't "pyramid scheme" an excessively simple thing for you to misunderstand by that much? Surely at your age you've heard a lot of things described as "pyramid schemes" before, are really so dull you never once considered looking up what that means, or at least asking somebody to explain it?

    7. Re: Not really by c6gunner · · Score: 3, Insightful

      By that definition, every company which started off by getting venture capital is a pyramid scheme.

      The difference between a pyramid scheme and a legitimate venture is that the former creates nothing of value and must inevitably collapse when it runs out of new suckers, while the latter uses borrowed money to develop legitimate products, improve efficiency, and reduce costs.

    8. Re:Not really by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      If you paid $100k for a car that lacks basic features, and with promises of self driving capability this year that just got pushed back to 2020, you might care.

      I admire that Musk has done, but it's also reasonable to criticise Tesla's failings too.

      Thanks for commenting. In future, perhaps you could consider evaluating how comments contribute to the discussion, not just if you agree with them or not. And commenting is always better than down-mods.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re: Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Uh. Just off the top of my head the mustang GT is only 34k and does 0-60 in the 4 second range. You might want to look at cars a little bit more if you think 6 seconds is quick for. 40k car.

    10. Re: Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      the latter uses borrowed money to develop legitimate products, improve efficiency, and reduce costs.

      Which Tesla has utterly failed at.

    11. Re: Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Madoff converted his fund into a pyramid when the market started failing and he still wanted to maintain the "genius investor" profile. There were many smaller examples during the Great Recession.

      If a market correction/recession were to occur, I fully expect Musk to follow and start cooking the books in hopes things will get better and he can uncook them later.

    12. Re:Not really by lucm · · Score: 1

      If they can get pre-payments for the pickups, they can use them to fullfil orders for the model-3 or Y? /s

      You make Tesla sound like a pyramid scheme... and maybe you have a point.

      That's not a pyramid scheme, that's a ponzi scheme. It takes a lot less effort.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    13. Re:Not really by Jodka · · Score: 2

      1) Musk has explained that with very steep rates of growth small errors in predicting timing mean large errors in predicted output. If you are planning to ramp up from manufacturing a few prototypes to manufacturing 5,000 cars per week within a few months, then a one month delay means your estimated production is then off by a factor in the thousands.

      2) He has warned, loudly, that this rapid growth is going to be rough. He calls it "Manufacturing Hell".

      3) People notice because he is selling stuff so unique and so awesome that large numbers of people crave it. Would anyone even notice if the next redesign of the Cadillac Escalade ships a few months behind schedule? Ok, except maybe the people who hate it would celebrate.

      4) The model 3 is scaled-down model S designed for faster and lower-cost manufacturing. It is not a blind leap into the unknown, it is as an incremental design. It is the fourth electric vehicle which Tesla has brought into commercial production. Predictions that manufacturing will fail seem insane.

      It's important to call out CEO clownboatary but only when that is genuine. If you assess the production delays in context: Those are only consequence of going fast and you were all warned. Elon Musk seems on the up and up here.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    14. Re: Not really by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      You sleepy? That's the first goofy thing I've ever seen you post... ;)

    15. Re: Not really by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      You sleepy? That's the first goofy thing I've ever seen you post... ;)

      If that's the first... you have really not been paying attention.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    16. Re: Not really by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      and I can buy a Mustang GT and drive it home tomorrow. Try that with a Model 3.

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    17. Re:Not really by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      Tesla advertises the standard Model 3 as doing 0-60 in 5.6 sec, with a base price of about $35k.

      If your primary use case for a car is quick acceleration that probably is a bargain. But for most people the world isn't going to changed by a car that can do rabbit starts more effectively (unless they end up rear-ending someone in the process).

      Instead of a Model 3, someone could go pick up a Prius One for about $23k. Sure you won't turn many heads and playing "Fast & Furious" will be less satisfying, but even if gas averaged $5/gallon the $12k in savings is enough to dive over 120,000 miles. And that comes with a decent amount of cargo space (25 vs only 15 in the Model 3) and similar if not greater passenger volume. Tesla doesn't advertise the passenger volume, but since it is classified as a compact it is somewhere between 85-94.9 versus 93.1 for the mid-size Prius.

      With the price and trade-offs the Telsa 3 is still a luxury purchase, albeit a more broadly obtainable one. When it comes to serving practical transportation needs, there are far more affordable options. Even if you just want performance you can beat 5.6 in a $28k V6 Camaro.

    18. Re:Not really by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      If they can get pre-payments for the pickups, they can use them to fullfil orders for the model-3 or Y? /s

      Tesla doesn't have the mountain of built up capital of a Ford, GM, or Toyota. They're still a relatively new company and are still relying on investors to fund their ambitious plans.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    19. Re:Not really by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      If they can get pre-payments for the pickups, they can use them to fullfil orders for the model-3 or Y? /s

      Tesla doesn't have the mountain of built up capital of a Ford, GM, or Toyota. They're still a relatively new company and are still relying on investors to fund their ambitious plans.

      I hit reply too soon...

      My point being, they have to announce plans 2 or 3 models in the future to keep the buzz about them alive to keep attracting investors.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    20. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A pickup truck is an interesting thing from the point of view of battery tech. Usually, for a gas engine, most of the weight is in the front and you have rear wheel drive, thus making them slightly treacherous in inclement weather.

      A battery based design could easily put batteries
      1. Under the bed. The ideal place is probably between the structural members under the bed, though anywhere may be fair game.
      2. Under the hood. Scratch that you don't really need a hood or front section too much. At the very least it could be shorter. Still some may be there.
      3. Possibly in the bed sides.

      Electric motors could be right next to tires. Instant full time four wheel drive.

      The point being is you have spaces to put them, and the spaces are weight distributed, as are possibly the electric motors. These could be very fast trucks that also can be used in cities with high pollution levels with no complaints. I doubt they are going to have dramatically more range. Of course, given it is a truck you could theoretically stick an auxiliary pack in the back, or other places.

    21. Re:Not really by segedunum · · Score: 1

      The penny seems to be dropping with a lot of people on that one, doesn't it? You can only keep making big promises for so long.

    22. Re: Not really by segedunum · · Score: 1

      By that definition, every company which started off by getting venture capital is a pyramid scheme.

      Correctamundo. Tesla is more like a ponzi however, with some exceptionally dodgy accounting practices to boot.

      The difference between a pyramid scheme and a legitimate venture is that the former creates nothing of value and must inevitably collapse when it runs out of new suckers, while the latter uses borrowed money to develop legitimate products, improve efficiency, and reduce costs.

      As time goes on it becomes increasingly clear that Tesla is not the latter. How many Model 3 orders have been fulfilled so far before Musk goes on yet another magical mystery tour of the next terribly exciting product he's dreamed up to drum up more investor cash and deposits?

    23. Re:Not really by segedunum · · Score: 1

      My point being, they have to announce plans 2 or 3 models in the future to keep the buzz about them alive to keep attracting investors.

      We should all have no difficulty in finding historical examples where the rope runs out on that strategy. At some point you have to deliver what you say you would otherwise it all unravels.

    24. Re:Not really by segedunum · · Score: 1

      If Musk never produced anything he claimed to have made, I'd throw him in the bin of scammers and charlatans. But he fucking does what he says!

      I'm afraid he hasn't, but he's done a very skilful job of making suckers think that he has.

    25. Re:Not really by Horatio_Hellpop · · Score: 1

      Could of sworn we (taxpayers) really helped some of the automakers with a giant infusion of cash in the last decade ... Don't think Tesla is asking for that.

      --
      Frammin' on the jim-jam, frippin' at the krotz!
    26. Re: Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and pay for gas

    27. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Could of sworn" !!!! FFS it's "could HAVE sworn"

    28. Re: Not really by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      There's goofy and then there's goofy...

    29. Re:Not really by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      My point being, they have to announce plans 2 or 3 models in the future to keep the buzz about them alive to keep attracting investors.

      We should all have no difficulty in finding historical examples where the rope runs out on that strategy. At some point you have to deliver what you say you would otherwise it all unravels.

      I think they are delivering... just slowly at first. A positive example of how the hype train works is Amazon. They were losing money hand over fist and coming out with new services that were losing money (and pumping the hype) before their primary model was profitable. Amazon is very profitable now. Tesla is hoping to follow Amazon's model. Won't tell if they succeeded or not for a number of years yet.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    30. Re: Not really by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      How many Model 3 orders have been fulfilled so far before Musk goes on yet another magical mystery tour of the next terribly exciting product he's dreamed up to drum up more investor cash and deposits?

      I don't understand why this has become a talking point amongst the handfull of grouches obsessed with criticising Tesla. I mean, if you want to criticize them for falling behind on their original production estimates, sure, that's fair game. They're far from being the only company to ever fall behind early projections, but the criticism is still warranted. What I don't get is why you would then go from legitimate criticism to the utter absurdity of suggesting that production delays are somehow related to R&D.

      Do you honestly think that that's how manufacturing works? That a reduction in R&D can somehow magically eliminate production line problems?

      How exactly did you manage to convince yourself that the two are in any way related? It seems like you're just flailing blindly, grasping at whatever random phrases you can find to justify your hatred of Tesla / Musk.

    31. Re: Not really by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      there's what, a 40k difference between the two? The price premium of the tesla would equal out to a fair amount of gas (hell, you could even get premium grade for the life of the car).

      Maybe one could get two mustangs, and still have a few thousand left over for gas?

    32. Re:Not really by segedunum · · Score: 1

      I think they are delivering... just slowly at first.

      You deliver on what you say, then you move on to the next shiny new thing. Tesla and Musk are promising half a dozen shiny new things every few months, and what's even more laughably funny is they are doing it in the most capital intensive thing imaginable.

      Amazon is very profitable now.

      Amazon is not profitable ;-).

    33. Re: Not really by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      How many Model 3 orders have been fulfilled so far before Musk goes on yet another magical mystery tour of the next terribly exciting product he's dreamed up to drum up more investor cash and deposits?

      Yeah, all those engineers working on vehicle design should get out of their offices and get down to the assembly lines.

    34. Re: Not really by segedunum · · Score: 2

      I don't understand why this has become a talking point amongst the handfull of grouches obsessed with criticising Tesla.

      Tesla and Musk's fanboys never seem very interested in results, or with the obvious problems other companies have been dealing with for some time that magically don't apply to them.

      Do you honestly think that that's how manufacturing works? That a reduction in R&D can somehow magically eliminate production line problems?

      Let me clue you in to how things work in the vehicle manufacturing world since you obviously haven't the faintest idea. Releasing any new vehicle model, even for the Toyotas and VWs of this world, is hugely capital intensive in terms of money, resources, time and any variable you care to mention. Massive. These are companies who are making something called a 'profit' and aren't relying on their share prices to churn cash ;-). For any of these companies, to announce two or three new models while they're still trying to increase production to get a brand new model out the door, and one Tesla didn't even have a prototype for in March of this year and have had no prototype testing for when they filed, is so stupid it isn't even funny.

      How exactly did you manage to convince yourself that the two are in any way related? It seems like you're just flailing blindly, grasping at whatever random phrases you can find to justify your hatred of Tesla / Musk.

      Because they are, but you aren't the only one to want to hallucinate these problems away. Unless of course, all Musk is announcing are R and D projects and not actual vehicles that will go into production and that people are going to use :-).

    35. Re:Not really by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Sure, and Musk has been delivering cars people want, albeit behind schedule. We should have no difficulty in finding historical examples where that strategy works.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    36. Re:Not really by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      What hasn't he done that he said he would, aside from meeting certain schedules? Space-X is doing an excellent job of launching stuff into orbit. There's Tesla cars around, and people appear to like them. Paypal is a going concern.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    37. Re:Not really by segedunum · · Score: 1

      Sure, and Musk has been delivering cars people want, albeit behind schedule.

      He hasn't delivered anything. It's amusing that some seem to think he has.

    38. Re: Not really by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      For any of these companies, to announce two or three new models while they're still trying to increase production to get a brand new model out the door, and one Tesla didn't even have a prototype for in March of this year and have had no prototype testing for when they filed, is so stupid it isn't even funny.

      Well good thing Tesla didn't do that. Did you hallucinate some new product announcement?

      Because they are

      Well that's convincing. Thanks for the detailed explanation.

    39. Re:Not really by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, I personally know two people who bought Tesla cars. That's very clear evidence that Tesla delivered at least two cars. I can find other references to people in physical possession of Tesla cars, so it's more than two deliveries.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    40. Re: Not really by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Let's see: Announce Model 3, take money for Model 3, lose lots of money, don't deliver the Model 3s, announce semi and Roadster, take money for them, lose even more money, still don't deliver anything, announce Model Y and pickup.

      Until Tesla prove they are capable of actually delivering on their promises, consider ordering their product like buying a lottery ticket. Remember that when they go bust, the depositors won't be the highest priority creditors. They've been going for 14 years, still don't know how to manufacture, and still can't make cars professionally: the Model X is officially the least reliable car of the year.

      What other car company's shareholders would tolerate a part time CEO with no experience in the industry, who refuses to hire anyone who does have experience, and continually loses top talent?

    41. Re:Not really by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Those are not electric cars though, so why even make that comparison?

    42. Re:Not really by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      To illustrate that electric vehicles are a luxury item and the Tesla 3 doesn't change that.

      The comment I was responding to was comparing the vehicle (favorably) to non-EVs, overestimating both the speed of the Tesla 3 and the cost of conventional gas vehicles that could match it.

    43. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Musk never produced anything he claimed to have made, I'd throw him in the bin of scammers and charlatans. But he fucking does what he says!

      I'm afraid he hasn't, but he's done a very skilful job of making suckers think that he has.

      Really? So those Tesla cars I've seen are figments of my imagination?

      Presumably, SpaceX is also all CGI by some company in Hollywood.

      Or, you're a nut.

      Hmmm. Let me think about that for a while.

    44. Re:Not really by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      I think they are delivering... just slowly at first.

      You deliver on what you say, then you move on to the next shiny new thing. Tesla and Musk are promising half a dozen shiny new things every few months, and what's even more laughably funny is they are doing it in the most capital intensive thing imaginable.

      Amazon is very profitable now.

      Amazon is not profitable ;-).

      They have been operating on a profit for the last three years now.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  2. Seems too early to care by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can we wait on the Tesla news until it's less than 2 years out?

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  3. Re:Elon Musk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is worse than Hitler.

    at speaking German

  4. /. "news"; what musk is thinkng about by sittingnut · · Score: 1, Insightful

    must say this is becoming ridiculous. that musk, who has a record of under delivering, thinks about doing something is not tech news, i my opinion. but it is obviously /.'s.

    1. Re: /. "news"; what musk is thinkng about by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Musk has a record of under delivering, and 1995 will be the year of the Linux Desktop.

  5. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Huh? Electric vehicles are torque monsters which is *exactly* what you'd want in a pickup truck.

  6. I'm seeing a theme here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We'll have Tesla models S 3 X Y...

    1. Re: I'm seeing a theme here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Model F for pickup
      U for utility
      C for cargovan ....

      Tesla kayak anyone?

    2. Re: I'm seeing a theme here... by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

      I'll genuinely be surprised if they make a portable cell phone battery charger, personally.

    3. Re:I'm seeing a theme here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'll have Tesla models S 3 X Roadster/Semi Y...

      Fixed that for you.

    4. Re: I'm seeing a theme here... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Check out the Tesla store... they do.

    5. Re: I'm seeing a theme here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $45, but you have to wait until they're back in stock.

      https://shop.tesla.com/us/en/p...

  7. Right after the Model 3, the Roadster, Semi, and Y by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's now 5 generations out that he's hyping up. They don't have any meaningful production of the Model 3 yet, then there's the Roadster, the Semi, the Model Y and then the pickup. I'll be shocked (pun intended) if Tesla is still around to produce a Model Y or a pickup.

  8. redneck tesla by ohgary · · Score: 0

    How much work do you need, slap a truck body on the power cell body and your done...

    1. Re:redneck tesla by x0ra · · Score: 1

      We're talking about a truck, not a petty SUV. So let me guess, it'll need a beefier suspension, beefier brakes, room for 30" tires, and all the bells and whistle to pull between 7000lb to 12000lb and up to 3000lb cargo (to match a 2018 F-150).

  9. A truly game-chaning feature by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Price it under $30,000 so people who are considering (or already own) a pickup truck will actually look at this.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:A truly game-chaning feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously haven't been truck shopping lately. Sure, that'll buy you a base model F-150, but add any options at all and you've already blown that budget. A new Duramax is over $60,000.

    2. Re:A truly game-chaning feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The batteries alone will cost $30,000.
      Then in true Tesla fashion they'll remove most of the interior, and use the cheapest, most poorly assembled materials they can find for the rest, to keep the price from becoming astronomical.

    3. Re:A truly game-chaning feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You obviously haven't been truck shopping lately.

      Obviously neither have you.

      Ford 150: $27,380
      Chevrolet 1500: $28,285
      Ram 1500: $26,495

    4. Re:A truly game-chaning feature by Baron_Yam · · Score: 2

      Pickup trucks are often sold where they aren't practical or needed to people who want the 'tough' image that comes with one.

      I think there will be a big job convincing them electric is 'tough'. On the other hand, maybe they won't care so long as the shell looks like a classic pickup, because that is usually all they really want anyway.

    5. Re:A truly game-chaning feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously haven't been truck shopping lately.

      Obviously neither have you.

      Ford 150: $27,380
      Chevrolet 1500: $28,285
      Ram 1500: $26,495

      He said $30K would get you a base model, and that's what you provided. Very few people buy a stripped down F-150 XL 2WD. Go to a Ford dealer and look at what's on the lot, most F-150s are priced at $40-$65K and that's what people are buying.

    6. Re:A truly game-chaning feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You cannot buy a Tesla for under $30,000. You can’t even buy a model 3 for under $60,000.

    7. Re:A truly game-chaning feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'd be nice, but I don't think it's going to happen.

      Decent mass-production cars with useful safety options are about $25-28k right now and trucks go for more than that.

      I've been looking to buy a new car for over a year and the price is always a sticking point for anything but the most basic econo-box. Most of it has to do with bundled options. As an example, I can't get automatic braking that I do want without a sunroof and butt-warmers that I don't care about. Toyota and Honda have made a lot of safety options standard in the past year, but US auto makers imply (via their pricing) that better safety is still only for rich people. I'll remember that for a long time.

  10. Remember Folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All these new products are just ways to get people to pre-order.

    Pre-orders are interest free loans which they need to counter the massive Model 3 cash burn. If Model 3 does not get on track, many of these new products won't see the light of day. I have no doubt Tesla will continue to exist as a battery company. But as far as vehicles are concerned, other manufacturers are nipping at their heels and they don't have cash flow or production issues.

  11. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Bartles · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yeah, electric motors are the superior form of propulsion for vehicles. Any vehicle. The energy storage system is what is sorely lacking.

  12. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Let me guess... you're a liberal that lives in a big city and thinks because you have no use for a pick up truck, think that no one could possibly have a valid need for one.

  13. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see what being liberal has to do with it. I'm a die-hard liberal, living in a very rural area, and I use a truck nearly every weekend. Pulling a horse trailer, managing my property, hauling firewood, etc.

  14. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Informative

    More likely he is simply someone with non-trivial requirements and isn't a total blithering fanboy. It's not enough to slap the right logo on the thing. It actually has to be fit for purpose. Once you get away from the "big city", an EVs anemic range and lack of infastructure quickly becomes a likely show stopper. This is even more true for smaller non-cargo trucks that could end up in all sorts of interesting places.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  15. Re:Will never replace F150 or Silverado by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pickup trucks are about American steel and brawn, tugging a boat and your gun rack into the woods.

    First of, Anonymous Coward, if you're talking about "buy American" then a Tesla is way wicked more American-made than a Ford F150.

    ...and as for "tugging a boat and your gun rack into the woods" you're probably describing about 5% of pickup truck owners. The only thing most pickups 'tug' is their owners' fat asses down to the Dunkin' Donuts.

  16. Yes really by crow · · Score: 1

    They need to keep their design team working on new things. The design of the Model 3 is done. Sure, their designers will be doing some tweaks, but they need to be doing interesting stuff, or they'll move on to other companies where they can.

    You can't run a successful company for the long term by focusing exclusively on the current product, even when the survival of the company depends on the success of the current product. You have to keep the product pipeline running.

    1. Re:Yes really by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      My guess as to the killer new feature is a swivel and tilt bed!

    2. Re:Yes really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They need to keep their design team working on new things.

      Like the production line that still isn’t working.

    3. Re: Yes really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The design of the Model 3 is done.

      Aren't they still working on the AM/FM radio?

    4. Re: Yes really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's work for those qualified to do just that, while the design team works on what they're the best at.

    5. Re: Yes really by crow · · Score: 1

      First, the firmware developers are a completely different team from the vehicle designers.

      Second, the FM radio has been working for a month now. Tesla has dropped AM radio starting with the Model X because too many people complained about poor reception due to interference from the inverters or motors. We could go on at great length as to whether this is a reasonable decision--there are dozens of threads on the topics on the Tesla discussion boards.

    6. Re:Yes really by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      They need to keep their design team working on new things.

      Like the production line that still isn't working.

      Maybe they could hire some bakers to come help too. Seems about as logical as asking a designer to do it.

    7. Re:Yes really by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Design and manufacture are part of the same process. Maybe the designers should be paying attention to the manufacturing so they can make the future vehicles easier to make.

  17. Re: Will never replace F150 or Silverado by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not steel anymore. The f-150 is now aluminum. The Silverado uses some composite material.

  18. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Known+Nutter · · Score: 4, Funny

    Never mind that Elon probably did 0 market research here and is going against all empirical evidence; make an announcement, and sell more stock!

    How is he going against all empirical evidence if he did 0 market research to develop empirical evidence?

    Your statement doesn't make a whole lot of fucking sense.

    --
    Beware of the Leopard.
  19. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Aighearach · · Score: 0

    Your statement doesn't make a whole lot of fucking sense.

    You just have to learn how to translate it from Hater into English before assigning semantic value.

    Never mind that Elon probably did 0 market research here and is going against all empirical evidence; make an announcement, and sell more stock!

    "I don't know" "about market research" "but that guy is bad" "because he's rich and loud"

  20. Re:Will never replace F150 or Silverado by Desler · · Score: 1

    The F150 is manufactured in both Dearborn, Michigan and Claycomo, Missouri. How would that make them “less” American-made?

  21. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

    If the truck is at a large ranch, the range may not matter as much, since there would be charging stations on areas of the property. In fact, an all electric truck would be nice, because if it had a decent inverter, one could use the batteries to power a welder, lights, or other items needed for upkeep.

    My hope is that Tesla makes a one ton truck. A half-ton tends to be more of a grocery-getter than a work truck.

  22. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I thought the same, but riding around the countryside here I'm seeing a LOT of solar panels going in. 100's of kW on single farms being used for irrigation. And thinking about that, if you already have the panels and aren't too far from the nearest town it's going to be a very cheap pickup truck to run.

    I was thinking farming would be a late adopter but I may be exactly wrong there.

  23. Re:Will never replace F150 or Silverado by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    F150s are 85% American.

    Teslas are about to hit 95%.

    https://chargedevs.com/newswir...

  24. Re:Will never replace F150 or Silverado by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ever run a farm?

    If you are in the country, you won't be using a F-150 for much because your cargo and towing needs are a lot greater than what a half-ton provides. Yes, the half-tons look "tough" in the commercials, but run them anywhere near towing capacity, and you will be buying new transmissions and turbos for the Ecoboost models [1].

    F-150s, and 1500s in general are intended for suburbia. They usually have four doors and a 5.5" bed. Yes, you can tow a trailer with it, but there is a world of difference between a vehicle intended for towing like a 3/4 or one ton, and a half-ton which is made to be fuel efficient to deal with CAFE standards.

    As further proof of this, do you see factory dual alternators, or a PTO drive for half-tons? Rarely, at best.

    If you try to add a fifth wheel or gooseneck to a new model... well, good luck, as it will tear through the thin aluminum bed as soon as you put load on it. A 3/4 ton or higher will have the ability to have the tow hitch ready to go from the vehicle maker.

    Nothing wrong with a half ton, but don't call it a work truck. It is more of a SUV for people who don't want SUVs.

    [1]: The turbocharged V-6 is great for MPG ratings and not losing power at higher elevations, but not for heavy duty towing. There is a reason why the heavier duty vehicles use bigger gasoline engines or diesels -- there is no substitute for cubes.

  25. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You might not want it to be your only vehicle, but an electric pickup might do quite well as a farm truck and in the construction industry. There are also a LOT of status symbol pickups in the city.

  26. Re: Will never replace F150 or Silverado by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except for their batteries. Which makes up a huge portion of their cars. Which are made by Panasonic (why do people think Tesla actually makes batteries?)

  27. Re: Will never replace F150 or Silverado by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 5, Informative

    Did you RTFA, Anonymous Coward?

    When Tesla begins using its new 2170 battery cell, which for Model 3 is expected to happen in the second quarter of this year, its vehicles will be 95% made in the US, making them the "most American" cars available.

    Panasonic continues to produce battery cells in Japan and elsewhere, but will be steadily expanding production at the Gigafactory in Nevada. Tesla also plans to source much of the raw materials in those cells from the US. The company is believed to be developing a source of lithium at Silver Peak, not far from the Gigafactory, and Nevada lawmakers have proposed new tax incentives aimed at increasing lithium production in the state.

  28. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    300-500 miles isn't anemic range, nor is the capacity to recharge from a solar panel after a day layover. Batteries can be swapped faster than 60 gallon diesel tanks can be filled, nobody has done it in a widespread system yet but that doesn't make it infeasible. You almost sound like a gasoline fanboy.

  29. What's the government subsidy on these? by Nexus7 · · Score: 1

    Or are those going away in the tax bill?

    1. Re:What's the government subsidy on these? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      What's the government subsidy on these?

      Nothing.

      To be clear, the only surviving national electric vehicle subsidy is the $7500 federal tax credit. That tax credit has had a sunset clause in it since the day it was passed; when a manufacturer has 200,000 registered plug-in electric vehicles in the United States, that triggers collapse of the credit. At the end of the quarter the 200,000th vehicle is registered, the subsidy drops in half. It continues at $3,750 for the next 6 months, then drops in half again. It continues at $1,875 for the final six months, then drops to zero.

      Tesla has had over 110,000 vehicles registered in the US already. They are well past the halfway mark. Model 3 production and sales in 2018 will trigger the end of the subsidy for Tesla Motors. All Tesla vehicles sold sometime in 2019 on will receive no federal subsidy.

      The Tesla pickup truck will not be in production before 2019, so no Tesla pickup will be subsidized when they're finally sold.

      (For EV market observers to be wrong about that prediction, Tesla would have to find $3 billion in the couch cushions tomorrow. Not gonna happen.)

  30. Re: Will never replace F150 or Silverado by javaman235 · · Score: 1

    Ford will be fine for a long time, but if he can get semis in industrial niches, his trucks will find a market. More than half of trucks are just for work. I hope he truly makes a mini semi, which is to say w/sleeper, or mod to box truck or rv: what's needed in truck is modularity, to turn it into exactly what you want need. Ford is great with this invtrucks vans.

    --
    -The art of programming is the pursuit of absolute simplicity.
  31. Re:Will never replace F150 or Silverado by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    The F-series is pretty much the construction industry in my part of Canada at least. If you look around at a construction site, either residential or commercial, you will see a variety of cars for the workers that don't need to carry much and a bunch of F-series pickups if they need to haul stuff. Mostly they are F150s but some larger models too.

    If Tesla could come out with the equivalent of an F-150 with a large towing capacity the market would be quite large.

    It would be interesting if they could make it larger and the equivalent of an F-350. Some ambulances are built on that. An electric ambulance would be a decent market and ambulances could charge when dropping off patients.

  32. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you're just another clueless trumptard, just like that parent.. who is the opposite of a 'liberal'.

  33. "game changing feature" ? by morethanapapercert · · Score: 2
    I wonder if Elon is referring to a trunk in the front? I seem to recall that, back in the 90's GM did some design studies on electric vehicles. That was were the "skateboard platform" for vehicles came from. (assuming I am remembering it correctly)

    Since then, a company called Bollinger has come up with an all electric SUV (that is really reminiscent of old Land Rovers or maybe a LEGO version of a Jeep). Jalopnik had a good article on it with a focus on the "front trunk" Something like that in a pickup truck could very well be a game changer and since Bollinger isn't nearly as well known as Tesla, Elon's outfit could easily garner credit for the invention in the public perception.

    --
    I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    1. Re:"game changing feature" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last car I remember with a front trunk was the original Volkswagen Beetle. Pretty interesting to throw your suitcase in the front and close the crazy hood - I vaguely remember it from when I was a kid.

    2. Re:"game changing feature" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in the automotive big 3 as an engineer building engines for the heavy duty trucks. I say he has a long way to go to understand the needs and wants of the truck customer. The current generation of technology cannot be up to the requirements of the customer or else this would have been done a long time ago. The energy density of batteries is not yet there. If you're taking about the girlie trucks then that's fine.

    3. Re:"game changing feature" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just cut off the front. The hood is a waste of space and dangerous due to blocking views.

      Game changing feature could be air spring suspension so you can actually pick stuff up with your pickup.

      Or elecric power takeoff to run power tools or industrial attachments.

      Or interchangeable bed.

       

    4. Re:"game changing feature" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make a plot of improvement in energy density over time the extrapolate a few what if scenarios and think about how likely they are. No further improvement scenario seems pretty unlikely. Where do you draw the line for when energy density *is* there. What year might that happen? Will all three of the big three even survive it? Honestly, I doubt it. Hell, GM wouldn't even have survived the last decade without a government bail out. They aren't exactly in the most solid position. Will they get a bail out to help them build electric cars after their engineers have told them exactly the wrong thing until it is years too late? Sounds about right. The fact is good enough is more like a band than an line and we have already entered the band. Once we come out the other side there will be no more ICE vehicles made. How long will that take? Twenty years from now kids won't know what big 3 means.

    5. Re:"game changing feature" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A front trunk on a pickup truck wouldn't be a game changer. It wouldn't be seen as wildly innovative. It would be seen as sort-of cool and that's about it.

    6. Re:"game changing feature" ? by morethanapapercert · · Score: 2

      oh, I agree that an electric truck might not be able to match many of the specs typical trucks have. I can't see an electric (current tech) pick-up up-fitted to be a tow truck for example. But, to be fair, there are a sizeable number of truck owners out there who never come near the edges of their trucks performance envelope. As we've seen with the cars and semi, an electric truck could absolutely boast better torque and better 0-60 times while being able to supply enough range to satisfy a significant fraction of the market for each vehicle class. I'm one of those people who would drive a truck and rarely make use of its towing and hauling capacity. (I need the room, the seating angle is more favourable to arthritic joints and I just like having a truck for those rare occasions I do need the capacity)

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    7. Re:"game changing feature" ? by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1
      Cut off the front? VW tried that with the Transporter. They stopped making it when it turned out to be real hard to build in the crash safety in a cab-over that was becoming required in their major markets. The Japanese Kei trucks have the same problem. Medium duty and larger trucks go cab-over to maximise cargo space for a given wheelbase, but they don't have to pass passenger vehicle safety requirements. They also tend to create far more drag, which is one reason why the big semi's moved away from that after the 80's. And, for what it's worth, the concept art of the Tesla truck really shows the semi truck DNA in its design, it's not quite a hood, not quite a true cab over.

      Air spring suspensions? Many light trucks have this already as an option, sometimes found in conjunction with the tow package or upfitters package.

      Electric power points? Powerpoints supplying AC in line voltages and amperages have been available for decades, originally as an aftermarket for work trucks, but now even some mini vans have them. (Though a minivan 110VAC port is probably limited to under 10 amps, so running power tools would be asking to much of it) Hell, I used to drive a Dodge truck that had a welding generator installed on the engine like a bigger auxiliary alternator. That was a dealership option, not factory though IIRC.

      Interchangeable beds? Again, already done in the aftermarket, with two basic approached: one is a winch and rollers that pulls the bed up onto a tilting frame. The other uses a travelling hook and arm like some dumpster trucks use. Both seem to raise the CG of the truck appreciably. Having an option that didn't do that would be a big improvement for that market segment, but not really a game changer IMHO.

      Now, putting all of the above into a factory stock truck aimed at the work truck demographic would be a game changer, but my feeling is that Tesla wouldn't try to do all of these things at once. Things like the interchangeable beds would pretty much require a body on frame design, but doing so throws away the weight advantages of unibody. On the other hand the Honda Ridgeline and Chevrolet Avalanche design teams can tell you how hard it is to get a unibody pickup rigid enough. Body on frame pick-ups are designed to have a certain amount of torsion in the frame when moving over rough terrain whereas a classic unibody would have to have a soft suspension to handle it and soft suspensions and work loads don't mix well.

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    8. Re: "game changing feature" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VW never stopped making the Transporter. They make hundreds of a year.

    9. Re: "game changing feature" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hundreds of thousands, that is.

    10. Re:"game changing feature" ? by d0rp · · Score: 1
      From TFA:

      One of the things that I think should be present in trucks is something like an air suspension that dynamically adjusts the load and sorta keeps the angle of the truck correct and the ride height even and adjust the dampening in real-time. Because the challenge you have with any vehicle where there’s a big potential difference between the minimum and maximum load is that the suspension is always wrong and usually wrong by a lot.

      So my guess is, that "dynamic air suspension" is his "game changing feature"

    11. Re:"game changing feature" ? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      The current generation of technology cannot be up to the requirements of the customer or else this would have been done a long time ago. The energy density of batteries is not yet there.

      You'd better check your assumptions, or you're doing your employer a major disservice.

      The 2020 model Roadster has been announced with a 620 mile range. It's the first announced that will use the new 2170 form factor lithium cells. Obviously the drag coefficient on a pickup truck is higher than for a 4 passenger sports car, but pickup trucks are also expected to be bigger and heavier than a sports car, giving plenty of room for additional batteries. I expect the non-towing range of a Tesla pickup to be at least 600 miles, and I wouldn't be surprised if they manage to push it to 800 miles. A Superduty version of a Tesla pickup could have a 1200 mile non-towing range.

      Using current technology in volume production today. You need to pay very careful attention. Things are moving much faster than you're accustomed to.

      And an electric work truck with an inverter is a game changer for everyone in the construction industry. Take the money you would have spent on a generator and use it to buy a Superduty Tesla. If your job site is 100 miles away, you could easily arrive with 80%-85% of your battery pack to spare, which you can then use all day long to run power tools. No need to buy a generator, fuel a generator, change the oil in a generator, mess with a balky generator that doesn't want to start in the cold, or any of that crap. You arrive, you park next to the job site, you engage your parking brake, you push the button that turns on the 110V NEMA plug panel, you hop out and plug in the extension cord you left coiled last night, and walk away. Your tools are powered for the day, and you never have to worry about your generator being broken, out of gas, or stolen.

      Oh, and every time you turn on your saw, it's up to speed just a little bit faster than it was with the generator, because there's no lag between application of the load and the truck providing power like there is with a generator spinning itself up a little faster. All day long, you're just a little bit faster than you were. Not a lot, but over the course of a few weeks of work, it adds up. You might be done a day earlier than the guy down the street still using a genset, and that's money in your pocket.

      Electric pickups are viable now. Not 10 years from now, not 5 years from now, not 3 years from now. Right now. The only thing stopping you is availability of lithium cells. Maybe your employer should have built a battery factory...

  34. redneck mode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Capable of laying down some serious rubber and just making Bobbie Sue all sorts of hot and bothered. Composite gun rack. Solar powered fridge for the long necks.

    What other stereotypes did I miss...

    1. Re:redneck mode by lucm · · Score: 1

      What other stereotypes did I miss...

      The poser. The truck is always clean, there's not a single dent, not a scratch in the bed, and not a single empty can of Budweiser stuck in the tailgate crack. Also bluetooth works and AWD is off to save gas.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  35. Re:Will never replace F150 or Silverado by swillden · · Score: 2

    Hey Elon, you can sell your horribly overpriced snake oil to the gullible "app" crowd but it's not going to work on TRUCK people.

    I'm a truck person. My vehicle is a Ford F350, w/ a 6.7L diesel. My other car is a Nissan Leaf -- all electric.

    Pickup trucks are about American steel and brawn, tugging a boat and your gun rack into the woods.

    Actually, it's mostly Chinese steel, but yeah, my truck tugs a boat to the lake, a camp trailer to the woods, and a gun or three everywhere. Of course, my Leaf also hauls a gun everywhere, too.

    Electric simply has no place, outside of a super-niche toy for .... Whom exactly? The people who have the $ to drop on a Tesla (rich liberals and techie wimps) likely aren't driving a truck in the first place.

    I deposited $1K to reserve a Model 3, which is far from a "super-niche toy". My Leaf is fairly "niche"; its niche is "running errands around town and commuting" which isn't actually such a small niche. The Model 3 isn't niche at all, it's a solid performer that meets the needs of 90% of new sedan buyers.

    As for pickups, I've been talking about how awesome an electric pickup would be for years. The torque and power of electric are ideal for trucks. Big, heavy, expensive batteries fit right in to big, heavy, expensive pickup trucks -- one-tons diesels like mine start at about $60K, decently-equipped, and weigh six tons. Range while towing heavy loads will be an issue. Mine has a 37-gallon tank which gives it 600 miles of range under "normal" conditions, not because anyone needs 600 miles of range, but because when you're hauling 10,000 pounds behind it that range is cut in half. BUT, pickups also have another advantage: a bed, which is an ideal place to put an ICE generator on those occasions when you need to extend the range. Which, frankly, isn't all that often. I'd like a generator with built-in jacks that I can back under and lower in place.

    I do think an F150 replacement is the wrong angle, though. Working down from the semi is the right way. Big work trucks are expensive, heavy and require lots of torque. An electric can meet the needs of a work truck, and no one will bat an eye at a $60-80K price tag. The little half ton can come later as battery prices continue falling.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  36. Re:Will never replace F150 or Silverado by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    As for pickups, I've been talking about how awesome an electric pickup would be for years. The torque and power of electric are ideal for trucks.
    [...]
    I do think an F150 replacement is the wrong angle, though. Working down from the semi is the right way.

    It seems to me like pickup trucks are the ideal use case for hybrids. You want that torque, but you also want range. You can have both. I for one want a four door Jeep with per-wheel electric motors and no traditional drivetrain, and I would also actually like the vehicle to use hub motors. Having per-wheel motors to provide maximum torque vectoring and traction control more than makes up for the unsprung mass for a vehicle like that, IMO. It can also have reduced-size friction brakes. But I still want the range extension of liquid fuels in a vehicle like that.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  37. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by lucm · · Score: 1, Informative

    Huh? Electric vehicles are torque monsters which is *exactly* what you'd want in a pickup truck.

    Wrong. What you'd want in a pickup truck is a dirty piece of cardboard, a 6-pack on the front seat, and a box of chicken wing.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  38. Re: Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    You can't tell a [rather unintelligent] industry shill from a "liberal??"

  39. Towing Is No-Go by avandesande · · Score: 1

    Your range can get cut almost in half and you are usually going a long distance.... these are for people that want to run around town with a cover on the bed.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  40. Yo! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Elon my man, I want a gaddamed Jeep equivalent.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:Yo! by mentil · · Score: 1

      He'll make a Humvee equivalent, with mounted machine gun to shoot down Elon haters.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    2. Re:Yo! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      He'll make a Humvee equivalent, with mounted machine gun to shoot down Elon haters.

      Those things are rather gross.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re:Yo! by q4Fry · · Score: 1

      He'll make a Humvee equivalent, with mounted laser to shoot down Elon haters.

      FTFY

  41. Re: Will never replace F150 or Silverado by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most tech people get into it, buy it, make a living off of it because they really are passionate about science fiction and hope to be a part of their favorite stories coming true. They want to believe the fiction. They want to believe the hype. Bitcoin, Tesla, the whole app ecosystem, all of the insane valuations and promises are believed because of suspension of disbelief carrying over into the real world.

    Why was this modded down? It's correct. We have had countless discussions about it on slashdot. How sci-fi was the gateway into technology and how inspiring it is.

    Star Trek personal communicators became cellphones, padds became tablets, the ship's computer became Alexa.

    There's too much "I dislike this so I'm going to mod it down." going on here. Which amusingly proves the "suspension of disbelief" coming in where it does not belong.

  42. Re: Will never replace F150 or Silverado by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They will once the Gigafactory is fully running

  43. Start your own EV company, and... by Brannon · · Score: 1

    you can do things in any order you want. Oh, that's right, you're irrelevant. I forgot.

    In that case, please enjoy criticizing relevant people on the internet.

  44. What's the government subsidy on oil? by Brannon · · Score: 2

    How many trillion $ did we spend on the gulf wars?

    So you only hate certain subsidies.

  45. Re: Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sure, if you just want to drive a little while. using that torq uses power. pickup engines, while not typically having a high max power output, are usually used near to their max output, far more so than sportscars or even sedans. a shitton of weight needs a shitton of batteries.

    a pickup also needs to be cheap, and he doesnt get the advantage of it being a "truck" vs. chevy, ford, nissan, isuzu, toyota etc who are in the pickup game. .. elon is just in yes man mode now. you have design elements for a pickup in your head? let me guess, its a pickup and the batteries go under the bed?

    he would be a fool to not make some cheapo delivery van though, but then again his car company so far has been foolish in chasing apple status with none of apple profit margins to show for it.

    like, he should have made a standard modular system for his cars a long ago.

    pickups are wickedly popular in asia though - but you really think elon can make a pickup under 25k dollars?

  46. Re: Will never replace F150 or Silverado by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An electric truck might run 1 million miles, be cheaper to drive and cheaper to maintain than a conventional truck. Everyone who uses trucks as fleet vehicles will want one. Electric cars will last significantly longer than conventional and that means Ford will sell significantly fewer of them *if* they even make the transition from ICE to electric. Research market transitions based upon disruptive technology and you will learn that most incumbent companies fail to survive it. Every indication is that technology trends we are currently seeing will continue and it will make no economic sense for anyone to buy an ICE vehicle only five years from now. Is Ford really in a good place to meet that future? Ford has gone from putting buggy whip manufacturers out of business to being in the same position themselves. I don't think they'll be able to adapt and they'll be dependent upon battery manufactures.

  47. What are you hauling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds good, now I can load a whole load of extra loaded batteries in the loadbay....

  48. It depends on the price. by BlueCoder · · Score: 1

    If it's around 80K and can go 300 miles with a full load it would probably be worth it; at least for Los Angeles. Not for people that live in the boonies and commute 600 miles in a truck everyday.

    The killer feature:

    Automated swapable beds?
    Completely swapable top vehicle on a battery frame? So get a dually, double cab, SUV, or standard truck. The SUV would be of interest to people that toe trailers.
    Swapable batteries?

    1. Re:It depends on the price. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Swapable batteries where a (subsidized) experiment by Tesla. It failed. The technical wear and tear and infrastructure cost made it much more expensive than charging, and if you look at the whole process and include a few files to/from the swapping station, it wasn't much faster than the currently planned superchargers. For the Tesla semi, the battery is most of the cost of the truck. Instead of making it even more expensive and building battery swapping infrastructure and additional spare batteries, it makes more economic sense to have spare trucks and swap only the driver to a fully charged truck. Battery swapping for vehicles isn't coming back.

    2. Re:It depends on the price. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It worked just fine in my RC10. In 1989 too!

  49. Re: Will never replace F150 or Silverado by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, as if there weren't enough reasons not to buy a Tesla.

  50. Re:Elon Musk by Mats+Svensson · · Score: 2

    Fun fact

    The only person confirmed not worse than Hitler:
    Hitler!

  51. Re:Will never replace F150 or Silverado by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

    There's a lot of speculation and conjecture in that article, but in all fairness you did say "about".

    One thing about the study from American University (that neither chargedevs or Bankrate link to) is that the F-150 comes with several different engine options, of which some are made in different countries. For example, the V-8 5.0 liter is produced in Canada, whereas the V-6 is made in Ohio.

    I don't know which engine that study used to determine that 85%.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
  52. Re: Will never replace F150 or Silverado by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    I'd rather prefer it to scale up production instead of bragging about supporting overpaid American "working" class

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  53. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I don't see what being liberal has to do with it. I'm a die-hard liberal,"

    That's then why your truck doesn't have any truck-nuts, your hick-factor is too low. :-)

  54. Re:Will never replace F150 or Silverado by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "Pickup trucks are about American steel and brawn, tugging a boat and your gun rack into the woods"

    I'd prefer an electric truck to tug a boat or anything any day of the week. Those F150s just don't have the torque of an e-truck, even with truck-nuts as big as baseballs

  55. Elon is a fucking scammer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't wait to see his stocks fall.

  56. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Tom · · Score: 1

    Actually yes. A lot of trucks are apparently already pre-ordered. I think you vastly underestimate the size of the trucking industry, and how much it means if even 1% of it is interested in a new truck.

    Which, if the claims about TCO are even halfway true, way more than 1% should be.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  57. No interest by DrYak · · Score: 1

    300-500 miles isn't anemic range

    To add that, most electrical vehicles are usually plugged-in parked, meaning that this ranges applies whenever you start driving.

    Batteries can be swapped faster than 60 gallon diesel tanks can be filled, nobody has done it in a widespread system yet but that doesn't make it infeasible.

    Actually several companies have attempted at several level of deployment (including Tesla, Renault, etc.) but eventually drop the scheme simply due to lack of interest.

    Most EV are usually charged while staying parked (in home charged during the night, chargers in public parkings during the day), and on a long trip you need to make regular breaks every few hours, so you might as well leave the car plugged in while you go pee, have a coffee, etc.

    As such, battery swaping, though a nice technology, doesn't actually answer any real-world need in most use cases.

    (It is useful, though, on racing vehicle, being very quick. The few experiment in racing EV I've read about all relied on quick-swapping battery to dramatically reduce pit stop time).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  58. Naming scheme by DrYak · · Score: 1

    And I bet the semi truck models will be named model
    - model H
    - model Zero
    - model T

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  59. More room in a truck by DrYak · · Score: 1

    A bigger vehicle like a truck mean more room, and thus more battery.

    I wouldn't be surprised if some of them came in "200kWh battery" variations.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  60. important feature left out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Where I used to work, most of the vehicles in our parking lot were shiny, never scratched, washed every weekend big pickups with large displacement engines.

    The question prospective purchasers are likely to ask is, "Will the Tesla pickups enlarge your pxxxx as much?"

  61. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Hodr · · Score: 1

    Interesting thing, most of the farms where I live start right on the outskirts of town and a good deal of them have large solar panel setups.

    If a farm is willing to invest in solar, I don't see having an electric truck or two as being a bad secondary investment. And I guess they can take a different vehicle if needed to go to the livestock auction 90 miles up the road, though that electric truck may have more than a 180 mile range even when loaded.

  62. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    The energy storage system is what is sorely lacking.

    And that has been improving dramatically over the last several years. Today's batteries are much better than batteries from a decade ago. A decade from now the batteries we have will be better than the ones we have today. They keep getting better.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  63. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    Let me guess... you're a liberal that lives in a big city and thinks because you have no use for a pick up truck, think that no one could possibly have a valid need for one.

    To be fair 99.9% of what 95% of the population do, you don't need a truck for, and usually when a truck is useful, there is always an alternative (and I'm a former pick-up driver and will probably get a pick-up again). I used to have a little Ford Ranger (single bench, not extended cab), loved it, it was fun to drive, and at the time I thought it was incredibly useful, I loved how the air or the heating heated or cooled the tiny cab instantly...

    I hated to give it up (wife convinced me to get more practical vehicle when the first kid was born). I get the love for pick-ups, and I get that a few people need them. The vast majority of people with a pick-up don't need a pick-up, and that's OK. They're fun to drive, and occasionally the bed is useful. No one needs a sports car, or a fast car, or an SUV- and plenty of people have them.

    I don't need a pick up, but would love to have one again.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  64. But here's the big consumer question.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it roll coal?

  65. Re:Will never replace F150 or Silverado by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate F150s in suburbia. They sit up high so nobody behind can see what's ahead, they're slow off the line, they get crappy gas mileage, and now you're telling me they can hardly haul anything.

    If they aren't good on a farm then they're a truck with no purpose other than to pollute. The whole line and all its clones should be taxed up the wazoo.

  66. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by dfghjk · · Score: 1

    They haven't improved significantly over the "last several years", much less dramatically. A "decade" and "several" are different things. Furthermore, "better that the ones we have today" is a given. Yes, they keep getting better, slowly. There needs to be a breakthrough in charge speed, not just incremental improvements every few years, like what has happened recently, and we need to have the infrastructure to charge them or else they will be worthless.

  67. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by segedunum · · Score: 0

    Torque does absolutely nothing. It's power that matters.

  68. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

    I suspect the only working ranch you've seen is from the highway. You don't have power run through out the property, the property is mostly for animals to graze, so range is important. If you need to weld in the field, you get a welder with a generator. Using the batteries to weld, a very power hungry process, is a good way to earn yourself a couple mile walk. Trucks are too heavy now and they get bogged down in mud pretty easily, add an extra couple thousand pounds and you will have a truck that is constantly getting stuck and can't climb hills. If Tesla can build a truck that can run for 12 hours and weights less then 6000 lbs then they will have a work truck, until then the truck will be relegated to suburban trips to the hardware store.

    --
    Knowledge = Power
    P= W/t
    t=Money
    Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
  69. Re: Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by naughtynaughty · · Score: 2, Informative

    A pickup needs to be cheap?

    $50k+ pickups are common. Ford F250 SuperDuty Supercap with diesel engine starts at $44k

    Tesla isn't going to be aiming at the stripper F150 market

  70. Re: Will never replace F150 or Silverado by naughtynaughty · · Score: 1

    The Tesla Model 3 batteries are made in Nevada, which is in America.

  71. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're a long ways from replacing a small business work truck or a farm truck with an electric one, but most truck owners in the US never take their trucks anywhere that a Prius couldn't follow. I bet a whole lot of them could be sold on an electric one.

  72. Might buy this, need to see reviews first by cyberman27 · · Score: 1

    This is a cool idea, but need to see reviews first.

  73. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what problem you're highlighting here. If you do no research you're far more likely to go against the evidence than someone who does the research. If you do the research and then go against the available evidence, well, you're an idiot.

    Musk does seem to suffer from Dunning Kruger when it comes to transportation, but he's not an idiot overall.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  74. Re: Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    I get the love for pick-ups, and I get that a few people need them.

    I suppose they're great for hauling hay and pigshit...

  75. Re: Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    I get the love for pick-ups, and I get that a few people need them.

    I suppose they're great for hauling hay and pigshit...

    And sporting goods (was a heck of a lot easier to load all my camping equipment, bikes, etc, when I had a truck) , and washing machines, and furniture you just bought so you don't pay extra on shipping, getting mulch in bulk for the flower beds, etc, transporting something messy you wouldn't want to dirty your car. They have Urban uses too; granted, you're not going to use the bed very often, but it is nice to have from time to time. Unless you're living on a farm, almost no household needs more than one. Handy to have one in the family though.

    Most urban uses, you can get by with an alternative, but a pick up truck can be handy from time to time. They can also be more fun to drive, especially if you get a smaller one with manual transmission. The larger ones with automatic transmission you might as well be driving a soulless SUV or a minivan.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  76. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Bartles · · Score: 0

    It doesn't matter if it's improving or not. That's irrelevant. Today, it's sorely lacking.

  77. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    If it can go 300 miles on a charge it really isn't; not for the overwhelming majority of times. for the few times it is lacking you can rent an ICE with money to spare from fuel savings.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  78. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by runningduck · · Score: 1

    So what you are saying is that until Tesla can solve every use-case they cannot possibly sell any trucks?

    --
    -rd
  79. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Bartles · · Score: 0

    I read that propaganda too. That doesn't work for a truck.

  80. Re:Will never replace F150 or Silverado by Amazing+Proton+Boy · · Score: 1

    LOL. A 5th wheel hitch mounts directly to the frame, not the bed. There are many, many people out there safley towing 5,000-6,000lb trailers every weekend with F150's AND staying well under the CGVWR/Payload/Tow Ratings.

    Please don't contribute to low-quality online discussions by Googleing something and pretending to be an expert. You lower the value of our community. Here is a good video showing the actual installation process: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
     

  81. Re: Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My brother in law just bought a $100,000 pickup truck. They're not cheap in the least.

  82. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    I read that propaganda too. That doesn't work for a truck.

    Because you think you can't rent a truck for the rare occasions you need one that goes more than 300 mph? Or because you think most pick up drivers drive more than 300 miles at a time on a regular basis?

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  83. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by haruchai · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I don't see what being liberal has to do with it. I'm a die-hard liberal,"

    That's then why your truck doesn't have any truck-nuts, your hick-factor is too low. :-)

    He's a liberal. The nuts are on his wife's truck

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  84. Re: Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes you take the train everywhere. You're really special.

  85. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Bartles · · Score: 1

    Where do you live and what do you do? Clearly you seem to lack any experience or knowledge of what people actually use trucks for.

  86. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Don't confuse farmers with your average redneck.

    Farming is never a late adopter. Farmers are very practical. They have no patience for technology promises and dreams, but if something new and better comes out they will be one of the first adopters. If you've been to an agricultural convention, high-tech is very much in-demand. Many farmers are even complaining that they are locked out of programming their own self-driving equipment. There is a hell of a lot of interest in an electric farm truck, and electric farm equipment in general, if someone can make it work.

    Even beyond the immediately practical, there are a lot of things about electric to appeal to rural living: self-sufficiency, quieter operation, less moving parts=less breakage and more reliability. While the overall cost is king, there are enough people willing to spend a bit of a premium for what electric brings to the table. If Musk makes a decent pickup, they will have no problem selling.

  87. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

    i don't know about you, but i find myself needing a 300 MPH truck pretty frequently. Very, very hard to find though.

  88. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

    No I explicitly said the tesla truck will be a trips through suburbia to home depot truck not a work truck.

    --
    Knowledge = Power
    P= W/t
    t=Money
    Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
  89. Re: Will never replace F150 or Silverado by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

    Ford (or GM, any of the existing manufacturers) have *huge* advantages over Tesla.
    capital, production capacity, dealer networks just for a start

    Tesla needs to first overcome the engineering challenges of producing a viable electric car (mostly there), then find a way to get those cars into the hands of people (getting there), then find a way to expand production enough to lower the production costs (not even close).

    The existing makers.. they just need to design and implement the drive train and charging.

    So what's easier, coming up with all the infrastructure, logistics, and R or just completing the R&D and using your existing infrastructure to pivot to EV's?

    Ford, Chevy, Toyota, Honda.. I'd wager they cross the finish line before Tesla -- they certainly have the luxury of sitting on the fence and slowly transitioning (we see this with the fusion energi, hybrid, chevy volt, etc.) Whereas Tesla has to get it 100% right, the first time, or they're done.

  90. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    i don't know about you, but i find myself needing a 300 MPH truck pretty frequently. Very, very hard to find though.

    Most of the ones that go the fastest just go round in circles on ovals... or ovals in circles.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  91. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    Thing is, even if you use that truck bed once a month, it's still vital. It's the sort of thing that gets trumpeted from the rafters: "TRUCK DRIVERS DON'T USE THEM AS TRUCKS EVERY DAY!" and fulfills several gratifying stereotypes about deplorable Americans. But the truth is, when you drive a truck, if you need that bed twice a year, it was worth getting a truck.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  92. That's unpossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please don't contribute to low-quality online discussions by Googleing something and pretending to be an expert. You lower the value of our community.

    You know, I sympathize with your point, but I don't think it's possible to lower the value of a /. discussion of anything involving Elon Musk. To much techbro penis-envy in the room!

  93. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Torque is EVERYTHING. If you aren't making the torque, you aren't pulling the load. IC engines don't make significant torque until they're well into the power band. Electric motors make 100% of their torque at 0 rpm, and it tapers off linearly until max rpm. Imagine being able to control a truck pulling a heavy load as if you were pulling feathers. Acceleration responsiveness you could dream about at 0 or 65 mph. It's not all about raw available power, but the ability to apply power quickly and accurately. If you've ever operated a truck with a sloppy pedal and slow spooling big diesel engine you know the pedal/brake dance when backing up, and the agony of smashing the pedal and waiting 3-4 seconds for actual power to start. Electric motors are going to replace the final drive mechanism of every land vehicle. It just makes sense.

  94. Re: Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by tattood · · Score: 1

    Tesla isn't going to be aiming at the stripper F150 market

    I never knew exotic dancers drove F150s.

    --
    WTB [sig], PST!!!
  95. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by segedunum · · Score: 1

    Torque does not move anything I'm afraid sweetie, but you're not the only one I encounter who doesn't understand what actually matters in that equation, experienced engineers among them. I still encounter people, like the total nonsense you've posted, who think acceleration is all about torque and somehow top speed is about power. That crap comes up all the time. Hilarious.

    As Mauro Forghieri famously said, "Power comes from speed; torque without speed is nothing."

  96. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

    It doesn't matter if it's improving or not. That's irrelevant. Today, it's sorely lacking.

    Yeah, who gives a shit about the future? It sucks today, so we should just stop trying to improve it.

  97. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Dragonslicer · · Score: 2

    Once you get away from the "big city", an EVs anemic range and lack of infastructure quickly becomes a likely show stopper.

    Because there are no use cases for light trucks anywhere within 50 miles of a "big city" (where "big" is probably defined as 50k people)? You're absolutely right, there isn't any kind of construction work anywhere near population centers.

  98. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    What you seem to have said is that lots of people, including experienced engineers, are wrong. You've provided no support for your argument. I'm not convinced.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  99. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    No, if you do no research you aren't more likely to go against the evidence, because you won't have evidence. You're more likely to get things right if you do the research.

    So far, Musk seems to be doing pretty well at making electric vehicles and sending stuff into orbit. I'm not nearly as impressed by the Hyperloop, but two out of three ain't bad.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  100. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by segedunum · · Score: 1

    Worrying, isn't it? Thankfully, Mauro Forghieri is one of the greatest engine engineers ever and he is right because he had to be.

    The essential truth is I can produce more torque with a wrench and my bare hands than any engine you'd care to mention. Sadly, it doesn't mean anything without angular speed and it won't move a vehicle.

  101. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by Bartles · · Score: 1

    That's a pretty stupid way to look at the world. Almost as dumb as pretending the world is as you wish it to be rather than as it actually is.

  102. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by segedunum · · Score: 1

    I mean, it's almost like gearboxes don't exist to some people. ROTFL.

  103. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by segedunum · · Score: 1

    They haven't improved significantly over the "last several years", much less dramatically. A "decade" and "several" are different things. Furthermore, "better that the ones we have today" is a given. Yes, they keep getting better, slowly. There needs to be a breakthrough in charge speed, not just incremental improvements every few years, like what has happened recently, and we need to have the infrastructure to charge them or else they will be worthless.

    Indeed so. What's also a still a major problem with electric vehicles that get their electricity from battery power is that the lovely range figure goes totally out of the window when it comes to air con and heater usage making things impossible to estimate. You then add the charge time required on top to get that energy back. These are problems that still need solving, despite the blind optimism.

  104. Re:Because lots of TRUCK buyers want electric... by segedunum · · Score: 1

    If it can go 300 miles on a charge it really isn't; not for the overwhelming majority of times. for the few times it is lacking you can rent an ICE with money to spare from fuel savings.

    300 miles carrying what load?

  105. Build them in the Southeast by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

    I hope they get built in the Southeast. First, the area is anti-union and that seems to be something Tesla doesn't want to deal with. Second, the cost of land and labor is so much cheaper than out west. Third, trucks are popular in the region. Fourth, you'll be giving folks good jobs that they might just support politically in states that traditionally don't support greener things. Fifth, it'd help build up infrastructure in states that are likely ignored.

    Seems like a net win across the board to me.

  106. Re:Will never replace F150 or Silverado by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use of "Wicked" and "Dunkin Donuts" in the same sentence? Gotta be from New England. Source: I'm from New England.

  107. Re:Will never replace F150 or Silverado by t14m4t · · Score: 1

    The only thing that screams "I'm from New England!" louder than that?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --
    67.5% Slashdot Pure I guess I need to work on that.... :)
  108. Re:Elon Musk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fun fact

    The only person confirmed not worse than Hitler:
    Hitler!

    Wait, wait. This just in: Hitler also confirmed to be worse than himself.