What confuses me, though, is why China doesn't just bite the bullet and allow that to happen. For a country of over 1.3 billion people, which builds brand new multi-million-person cities on a routine basis, cleaning up the mess of a collapsed North Korea wouldn't be unmanageable.
Maybe this is the backup plan behind all of their empty megacities like Kangbashi.
That's not what they're saying. The point is that insufficient funds won't reverse a credit card transaction, whereas this could happen with a check or Bitcoin.
Right now, I think the cheapest ATSC "modulator" (probably not the right term) is in the neighborhood of $1000. Would be nice to connect something like this to in-home wiring to stream video over existing wiring.
For a font it definitely does, if you do not have the rights to use the font the output is also tainted since it's just many copies of a copyrighted work.
You may not be able to embed the font in a PDF due to copyright, but if you're printing there are zero legal restrictions. You just can't embed the font (copyright) or use the font's name (trademark).
A 3D Printer isn't printing out an image. It sort of depends on the file format structure - if it's a 3D "image" vs programmatic instructions. The output of a computer program is not subject to the same copyright as the program itself. AutoCAD files are where you have established case law, but those are definitely more in the form of drawings than instructions.
Solar power is a distraction from energy production schemes that actually work.
Solar power is the root of all energy production schemes that actually work. With maybe an exception for nuclear. It's the only energy input into our otherwise closed system. Oil and coal are both sequestered solar power, while wind and hydro are both driven by solar power converted to heat.
To be honest, as a US Paypal user (and as someone who sets up Paypal payments for clients), Paypal is overly generous with refunding customers, to the point of sellers not wanting to deal with it anymore and enabling fraud by the consumer.
Isn't hetero-normality pretty pervasive in itself? To be honest, Hollywood as a whole is overdoing it with the inclusiveness to the point that it subverts reality.
It's nothing to do with license. The output of running code is not subject to the copyright of the code itself. A font is a program for generating text. A drawing made in Photoshop is not subject to Adobe's copyright either.
And what if it was a Font distributed under a CC license? If you make a printed poster with words rendered from those fonts, does it have to have attribution of the font authors? A font is instructions for producing a shape (much like the 3D design files).
However, that might just illustrate the limitations of copyright law. I'm not sure it's 100% fair to the creator, either.
phone networks long ago quit charging for SMS messages on most contracts.
This is only true on the more expensive plans. I am on a much cheaper plan and I get only 100-500 msgs per month without going to the next tier. In developing markets, getting the monthly fee to the lowest possible number and then overcharging for overages is the more profitable business model. In the US, you just pay extra by default for features you may not even be using.
This is just posturing against NK's launching a satellite into orbit. Another thing a rocket is good for is delivering a destructive payload to another country.
Do you think it should take weeks of cooperation to move a single nail? Or should the job just get done with no harm to anyone? If there's damages, sue for damages - otherwise, just trust each other and get along. It seems pretty reasonable.
It's more just in favor of any newcomer. Google won't be the only one. and AT&T can likely use this to their advantage when doing their own maintenance.
It's just a Greek word being used for clarity. Not above human love, but above human nature. I don't think you'd even find self-sacrificial love (such as parent for child) being debated as anything but better in most contexts.
Slashdot Mirror
What confuses me, though, is why China doesn't just bite the bullet and allow that to happen. For a country of over 1.3 billion people, which builds brand new multi-million-person cities on a routine basis, cleaning up the mess of a collapsed North Korea wouldn't be unmanageable.
Maybe this is the backup plan behind all of their empty megacities like Kangbashi.
That's not what they're saying. The point is that insufficient funds won't reverse a credit card transaction, whereas this could happen with a check or Bitcoin.
With a 5-digit UID, your patent probably expired by now.
bound and prostate
Prostrate != Prostate. Unless you're imagining something a lot more unusual than I am.
OK. Geothermal, yes. But the cause of the energy in solar power isn't really relevant since that in itself is outside the Earth's energy system.
SSLv3? TLS 1.0 is no longer even PCI compliant due to vulnerabilities.
And was forked from OpenSSL long after this bug was in the codebase.
Right now, I think the cheapest ATSC "modulator" (probably not the right term) is in the neighborhood of $1000. Would be nice to connect something like this to in-home wiring to stream video over existing wiring.
It's apples to oranges unless the fonts set a dangerous precedent. I agree with the font ruling for a lot of good reasons.
SVG is really not code. It's still a description, just using polygons and color fills instead of pixels. Fonts are literally programmatic code.
By your logic if I make a bit of code to print out a barbie doll it's perfectly legal to do so?
That's a violation of trademark, not copyright.
downloading them for commercial use broke copyright well before any prints were made of them.
You can't violate copyright without copying. Downloading to your computer does not count as a copy.
For a font it definitely does, if you do not have the rights to use the font the output is also tainted since it's just many copies of a copyrighted work.
Not in the US: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
You may not be able to embed the font in a PDF due to copyright, but if you're printing there are zero legal restrictions. You just can't embed the font (copyright) or use the font's name (trademark).
A 3D Printer isn't printing out an image. It sort of depends on the file format structure - if it's a 3D "image" vs programmatic instructions. The output of a computer program is not subject to the same copyright as the program itself. AutoCAD files are where you have established case law, but those are definitely more in the form of drawings than instructions.
Solar power is a distraction from energy production schemes that actually work.
Solar power is the root of all energy production schemes that actually work. With maybe an exception for nuclear. It's the only energy input into our otherwise closed system. Oil and coal are both sequestered solar power, while wind and hydro are both driven by solar power converted to heat.
Like H2?
Chaos theory. Have to be sure the female dinosaurs at the park don't get any egg-generating ideas on their own.
To be honest, as a US Paypal user (and as someone who sets up Paypal payments for clients), Paypal is overly generous with refunding customers, to the point of sellers not wanting to deal with it anymore and enabling fraud by the consumer.
pervasive hetero-normative themes
Isn't hetero-normality pretty pervasive in itself? To be honest, Hollywood as a whole is overdoing it with the inclusiveness to the point that it subverts reality.
It's nothing to do with license. The output of running code is not subject to the copyright of the code itself. A font is a program for generating text. A drawing made in Photoshop is not subject to Adobe's copyright either.
And what if it was a Font distributed under a CC license? If you make a printed poster with words rendered from those fonts, does it have to have attribution of the font authors? A font is instructions for producing a shape (much like the 3D design files).
However, that might just illustrate the limitations of copyright law. I'm not sure it's 100% fair to the creator, either.
phone networks long ago quit charging for SMS messages on most contracts.
This is only true on the more expensive plans. I am on a much cheaper plan and I get only 100-500 msgs per month without going to the next tier. In developing markets, getting the monthly fee to the lowest possible number and then overcharging for overages is the more profitable business model. In the US, you just pay extra by default for features you may not even be using.
This is just posturing against NK's launching a satellite into orbit. Another thing a rocket is good for is delivering a destructive payload to another country.
Is this only because of North Korea's rocket test?
Do you think it should take weeks of cooperation to move a single nail? Or should the job just get done with no harm to anyone? If there's damages, sue for damages - otherwise, just trust each other and get along. It seems pretty reasonable.
This is discriminatory in Google's favor.
It's more just in favor of any newcomer. Google won't be the only one. and AT&T can likely use this to their advantage when doing their own maintenance.
Yeah - the exit nodes that the person is using is likely also being used for DDoS or some other attack.
Agape as somehow "above" merely human love
It's just a Greek word being used for clarity. Not above human love, but above human nature. I don't think you'd even find self-sacrificial love (such as parent for child) being debated as anything but better in most contexts.
It's more of a testament to the fact that mankind was going to get it wrong all along.