Funny they saw it like my attorney did & I passed their removal test for their BLATANT FALSE POSITIVE TOO, eh?
Funny, that sounds like you did what they would have asked you to in the first place with no lawyers involved. It has nothing to do with your threats.
You literally followed their false positive removal process as a normal person would and still claim that you won because you paid a lawyer to tell you to do it.
All of your name calling and chest puffing is really unnecessary. You say you argue with facts, and yet you spend most of your post ranting like a lunatic in all caps and bold and not staying on topic at all. Keep your posts to the facts, and they'll be shorter and people will read them. Be nice to people in the process, and people won't call you a troll.
You didn't answer anything with this post. But you are getting a lot more unstable. It typically takes you 3-5 more rants to get to this point, but this is the point where your babble becomes completely incomprehensible for the duration of the conversation.
I don't post as AC unless I've already used mod points on a thread, but if you think that I'm the only one who uses the word "untrustworthy" you are no more crazy than I already think you are.
IF they did not, he told me I had a 250k lawsuit SURE WIN!
Lawyer's love to tell you that. It makes them money.
my ware is CLEAN & YOU NOW ADMIT IT loser!)
When did I say it was dirty? You keep trying to make this about your HOSTS file engine but I wasn't talking about it.
Nir is a nice guy who doesn't spam and doesn't troll. I even use his tools.
illogical ad hominem attacks on ME, but not disproving my points on hosts superiority on nearly every grounds conceivable! apk
That's because there's nothing wrong with your software. There's something wrong with you as a person. It's not ad hominem if you're the actual subject. It doesn't have to be that way. Just stop trolling.
You haven't denied it was you, either. Because it is. The reason you post as AC is that you've been banned from every forum you've ever signed up for for being a troll:
I really have no problem with software that helps automate hosts file generation. What I and everyone in the world has a problem with is a person spamming forums with off-topic posts and attacking people who disagree with your methods.
No, I'm not going to call your software malware. The only thing acting like malware is the way you treat Slashdot commenters.
The funny thing about the CA story is that you escalated it for no reason when they were willing to work with you on amicable terms. And in fact, they didn't lower the rating after you threatened to sue, they lowered the rating because you did what they would have asked you nicely to do in the first place:
lowered my ware to ZERO THREAT LEVELS/no threat after I passed all 21 of the removal questions they do after a false accusation & false positive
False positives are not malicious. You can't be surprised that a program that modifies the HOSTS file would be flagged.
If you have 20Mbps DSL, you probably have VDSL and some of your last mile has been upgraded to fiber - with fiber to a remote DSLAM. So it's not quite 100% Grandma's copper anymore.
I think in the Papa John's case, they argued that "better" is an objective claim as opposed to "best" which is subjective. At least when you're giving an example of what they are better than (Pizza Hut).
I decided to look it up. The ruling was overturned in an appeal. And that's why Papa Johns continues to use the slogan.
Libel/defamation isn't rooted in bias. It's knowingly false information being spread intentionally. You can have all the paid people you want saying how great you are and telling of the things legitimately wrong with your competitors and never have a problem.
They aren't in the business of being an unbiased reviewer. They're in the business of helping people get their infected computers cleaned up. And for that you need working tools.
It works best when you reasonably present good ideas, work with others, and show respect.
And you can only control yourself. Not the other people in the group.
Again, if the people negotiating weren't responsible for it's contents
I never said that. I said that a dissenting person can't be held responsible for contents that they didn't agree to- what could they have done about it? Some of the other people negotiating are responsible.
Have you never tried to do any sort of group project (college comes to mind for me) where you have no way (or authority) to fix everyone else's stupid?
It'll even go one further, and let you just enter your email address and password, and then Facebook will log into it and scour it directly. That people would provide Facebook with their email address and password defies comprehension.
I believe they at least use federated login for that so you're not actually submitting credentials to FB itself. But I've never been willing to find out.
being involved in negotiating doesn't give you much control over its contents. There's only so much one person can do when there are this many parties involved.
An office suite often needs to associate file extensions. Lots of apps use shared libraries, which only needs to exist once on a system (VB6 runtime,.NET, etc). Non-registry settings files shouldn't be in program folders (so that they can be discovered for backup and/or separated from executable files - user files should not be under the Program Files folder).
Sandboxing a Photo manager app to only its own directory means you couldn't even use the default Photos folder to manage a photo library. Reading file lists or generating thumbnails requires file access. And an OS-generated file picker just to update metadata on a photo?
There are several reasons to add registry entries, besides file associations. A CD burning program needs to be able to register UpperFilters or LowerFilters on an optical drive or add a non-hardware driver (since while Windows has userspace drivers, they haven't really been adopted widely as far as I can tell).
Even Linux package managers put default configuration files under/home/ instead of with the binaries.
Slashdot Mirror
Funny they saw it like my attorney did & I passed their removal test for their BLATANT FALSE POSITIVE TOO, eh?
Funny, that sounds like you did what they would have asked you to in the first place with no lawyers involved. It has nothing to do with your threats.
You literally followed their false positive removal process as a normal person would and still claim that you won because you paid a lawyer to tell you to do it.
All of your name calling and chest puffing is really unnecessary. You say you argue with facts, and yet you spend most of your post ranting like a lunatic in all caps and bold and not staying on topic at all. Keep your posts to the facts, and they'll be shorter and people will read them. Be nice to people in the process, and people won't call you a troll.
So you say you only argue with facts. Is that why you have no argument against me saying it's you posting as your own faux supporters?
I wonder what your software development customers in Syracuse would think if they saw your Slashdot history.
You didn't answer anything with this post. But you are getting a lot more unstable. It typically takes you 3-5 more rants to get to this point, but this is the point where your babble becomes completely incomprehensible for the duration of the conversation.
I don't post as AC unless I've already used mod points on a thread, but if you think that I'm the only one who uses the word "untrustworthy" you are no more crazy than I already think you are.
IF they did not, he told me I had a 250k lawsuit SURE WIN!
Lawyer's love to tell you that. It makes them money.
my ware is CLEAN & YOU NOW ADMIT IT loser!)
When did I say it was dirty? You keep trying to make this about your HOSTS file engine but I wasn't talking about it.
Nir is a nice guy who doesn't spam and doesn't troll. I even use his tools.
illogical ad hominem attacks on ME, but not disproving my points on hosts superiority on nearly every grounds conceivable! apk
That's because there's nothing wrong with your software. There's something wrong with you as a person. It's not ad hominem if you're the actual subject. It doesn't have to be that way. Just stop trolling.
Please. It's you, APK. Do you want me to run your posts through linguistic analysis software? Because I won't. I don't care that much.
This is the face of a troll:
https://web.archive.org/web/20...
You haven't denied it was you, either. Because it is. The reason you post as AC is that you've been banned from every forum you've ever signed up for for being a troll:
https://forums.techguy.org/thr...
http://arstechnica.com/civis/v...
I'm honestly don't feel like finding more right now, but you know they're out there.
I really have no problem with software that helps automate hosts file generation. What I and everyone in the world has a problem with is a person spamming forums with off-topic posts and attacking people who disagree with your methods.
No, I'm not going to call your software malware. The only thing acting like malware is the way you treat Slashdot commenters.
The funny thing about the CA story is that you escalated it for no reason when they were willing to work with you on amicable terms. And in fact, they didn't lower the rating after you threatened to sue, they lowered the rating because you did what they would have asked you nicely to do in the first place:
lowered my ware to ZERO THREAT LEVELS/no threat after I passed all 21 of the removal questions they do after a false accusation & false positive
False positives are not malicious. You can't be surprised that a program that modifies the HOSTS file would be flagged.
If you have 20Mbps DSL, you probably have VDSL and some of your last mile has been upgraded to fiber - with fiber to a remote DSLAM. So it's not quite 100% Grandma's copper anymore.
You could still play DTMF tones through the handset to dial the call, so it's just an extra tool required to place calls.
Omnichad you'd say every ac = me & it's a good reply on correlation!
No, you literally linked to it and said it was you.
Oh. I guess you threaten to do that, but never follow through: http://www.thorschrock.com/200...
You just proved that you were pretending to be someone other than APK when replying to that comment - http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
Can't you just be honest and say that it's you? Why do you need to pretend that other people support you?
He also CALLED ME A PEDO (read the link) - that fool mmell apparently doesn't understand LIBEL law!
He implied it. That's not libel.
But please, go ahead and dox yourself by filing a publicly documented lawsuit.
I think in the Papa John's case, they argued that "better" is an objective claim as opposed to "best" which is subjective. At least when you're giving an example of what they are better than (Pizza Hut).
I decided to look it up. The ruling was overturned in an appeal. And that's why Papa Johns continues to use the slogan.
Libel/defamation isn't rooted in bias. It's knowingly false information being spread intentionally. You can have all the paid people you want saying how great you are and telling of the things legitimately wrong with your competitors and never have a problem.
They aren't in the business of being an unbiased reviewer. They're in the business of helping people get their infected computers cleaned up. And for that you need working tools.
Wouldn't need it's own power source. Just NVRAM to keep track of how far into the PRNG sequence it's at. It doesn't use a running clock.
It works best when you reasonably present good ideas, work with others, and show respect.
And you can only control yourself. Not the other people in the group.
Again, if the people negotiating weren't responsible for it's contents
I never said that. I said that a dissenting person can't be held responsible for contents that they didn't agree to- what could they have done about it? Some of the other people negotiating are responsible.
It does work by consensus, but if consensus is already reached, you might fail the CAPTCHA.
Have you never tried to do any sort of group project (college comes to mind for me) where you have no way (or authority) to fix everyone else's stupid?
It'll even go one further, and let you just enter your email address and password, and then Facebook will log into it and scour it directly. That people would provide Facebook with their email address and password defies comprehension.
I believe they at least use federated login for that so you're not actually submitting credentials to FB itself. But I've never been willing to find out.
But do you have a TV?
I still use it myself, but I'm done recommending it to anyone. There's no alternative I like and it's relatively full-featured.
being involved in negotiating doesn't give you much control over its contents. There's only so much one person can do when there are this many parties involved.
An office suite often needs to associate file extensions. Lots of apps use shared libraries, which only needs to exist once on a system (VB6 runtime, .NET, etc). Non-registry settings files shouldn't be in program folders (so that they can be discovered for backup and/or separated from executable files - user files should not be under the Program Files folder).
Sandboxing a Photo manager app to only its own directory means you couldn't even use the default Photos folder to manage a photo library. Reading file lists or generating thumbnails requires file access. And an OS-generated file picker just to update metadata on a photo?
There are several reasons to add registry entries, besides file associations. A CD burning program needs to be able to register UpperFilters or LowerFilters on an optical drive or add a non-hardware driver (since while Windows has userspace drivers, they haven't really been adopted widely as far as I can tell).
Even Linux package managers put default configuration files under /home/ instead of with the binaries.