SPF 50 blocks 98% of UVB, while SPF 100 blocks a whole 99%. For UVA protection, you can't rely on SPF because it does not account for UVA at all. You can still get a sunburn from just UVA exposure.
The hardware is not incompatible with Windows 10 (if it's like the many I've dealt with), but Windows thinks it has a "better" graphics driver than the one you're using. Their "better" driver doesn't work at all. So you can roll back and block that driver. Next semi-annual update of Windows, the exact same driver has a new version number and new timestamp and you go through the whole process all over again.
Granted, this is usually AMD hardware that only works with a Windows 8 driver, but the fact is that it works until MS breaks it again.
Perhaps I'm thinking of the issue with SSL certs is that domain wide certs are an extra fee above "A" record specific certs. And A records require an IP, and I wouldn't expect to be able to insert a private class "C" for an "A" record into the DNS records for my domain.
Certs are issued by hostname without regard to what they resolve to (or whether it's an A record or CNAME). And it doesn't matter, because the router can intercept DNS requests and replace its local IP anyway.
For Netgear, you visit http://www.routerlogin.net/ or http://www.routerlogin.com/ to log into the router. They only need one SSL certificate and no matter how many routers are involved, or how many different IP addresses are involved, the biggest concern is that the firmware doesn't auto-update before the certificate expires. I don't know how they handle the private key, but it could be stored elsewhere than the flash and it may be hard to get at if you aren't able to get flashed firmware to boot.
You had a keyboard? Luxury! I had to hand-crank my own 5V signal and pulse data directly into memory as ones and zeroes. And this without any lights in a cardboard shack in the rain.
The general rule is shown by the example of the specific case.
The general rule contradicts the specific case. Your initial statement is still wrong. Unless and until this entire country is overcrowded, it's utterly and completely wrong.
The criticism might be the only canary in the coal mine that we have. They have limited options if they don't want to just shut down operations (and somehow explain that to shareholders without violating their national security letter).
Having a warning on a 301 redirect would be fine. But I wouldn't want to see it on a 302 redirect. URL shorteners should probably all be using a 301 redirect, though.
That's all true under Magnusson-Moss too. Though it's unlikely that the plaintiff will have an expert witness besides the manufacturer or themselves, so the manufacturer's flaky reasoning is often trusted as sufficient evidence.
The real issue is that most case law does involve ruling in favor of the manufacturer. But these cases are all where the problem was actually caused by the modification - which they had to prove. So it covers half of it, but the other half is likely hard to find because defect rates are actually pretty low for the most part.
I finally remembered the details. It was an airflow sensor that was bad, but it tripped the ABS light and the ABS system would only work intermittently until it was fixed. It still made no sense.
Yeah, and the last time the ODB scan pointed to an oxygen sensor issue on my old car, it was actually the anti-lock brake system that needed fixed (which just happened to have an oxygen sensor on the failed piece). I had to tell the mechanic the real cause because I had already had the same problem on the other side a few years prior.
So who is playing word games now? You know there are things like case law and guidance by federal agencies, right? Installing RAM in your computer does NOT void your PC warranty. The law does not mean that modifications can void a warranty, because the original product still exists. If the warranty issue is not related to the modification then it's simply not part of the equation.
if a manufacturer replaces them free during warranty, they can require you to use whichever ones they want.
This is an extremely rare situation in practice and doesn't apply to any of the cases being discussed. In the case of a PS4 hard drive, no free replacement is on offer except in the case of a warranty claim. They don't offer free replacements in general (like an imaginary vacuum cleaner that had free replacement bags for life) so it is not covered. Aftermarket parts have been shown to not void warranties in actual court cases, except when the parts or modifications caused the issue in the warranty claim. And that includes upgrades. And generic printer ink. Simply offering free repair is not the same thing as what's mentioned in the act.
No, I'm not going to go research case law for you. Just know that you're wrong and you can find out anywhere you look on the Internet.
There's a huge difference between tripping a code and knowing the real reason it was tripped. Takes a level of expertise. And there are a lot of issues that involve the interaction of multiple systems or don't involve computer controlled components.
You really think that replacing a hard drive is a modification in a way that replacing spark plugs or oil filters aren't?
Getting a console wet would directly damage it and void almost all possible warranty claim, but it's not because it's a service that Sony doesn't offer.
Replacing one part with an equivalent part does not make it a modification. That's a service using different parts. Otherwise replacing your oil filter in your car with a non-OEM brand would void your warranty.
Neither dust nor opening for inspection are necessary, and either would be tampering
That doesn't matter. One, nothing says that a service has to be necessary. And "tampering" is just another word for service.
A localized hyperinflationary market is not the same thing as general inflation. You intentionally conflated the two in your original post, even though the general market can balance out as poorer people can find the inefficiencies and live cheaper elsewhere. And this country is HUGE in terms of land mass.
The only thing I'm saying is that the warranty sticker is a lie - not that you can't possibly void your warranty. Everything you said is correct, of course. Most manufacturers do not trace back the cause. They do not even look at the unit if the warranty sticker is not intact unless you sue or threaten to sue, judging by most of what I see on the Internet.
Slashdot Mirror
I have a 6TB of RAID storage and it's nearly full. Almost all of that is ripping all Blu-Rays, DVDs and CDs to central storage.
SPF 50 blocks 98% of UVB, while SPF 100 blocks a whole 99%. For UVA protection, you can't rely on SPF because it does not account for UVA at all. You can still get a sunburn from just UVA exposure.
The hardware is not incompatible with Windows 10 (if it's like the many I've dealt with), but Windows thinks it has a "better" graphics driver than the one you're using. Their "better" driver doesn't work at all. So you can roll back and block that driver. Next semi-annual update of Windows, the exact same driver has a new version number and new timestamp and you go through the whole process all over again.
Granted, this is usually AMD hardware that only works with a Windows 8 driver, but the fact is that it works until MS breaks it again.
Perhaps I'm thinking of the issue with SSL certs is that domain wide certs are an extra fee above "A" record specific certs. And A records require an IP, and I wouldn't expect to be able to insert a private class "C" for an "A" record into the DNS records for my domain.
Certs are issued by hostname without regard to what they resolve to (or whether it's an A record or CNAME). And it doesn't matter, because the router can intercept DNS requests and replace its local IP anyway.
For Netgear, you visit http://www.routerlogin.net/ or http://www.routerlogin.com/ to log into the router. They only need one SSL certificate and no matter how many routers are involved, or how many different IP addresses are involved, the biggest concern is that the firmware doesn't auto-update before the certificate expires. I don't know how they handle the private key, but it could be stored elsewhere than the flash and it may be hard to get at if you aren't able to get flashed firmware to boot.
You had a keyboard? Luxury! I had to hand-crank my own 5V signal and pulse data directly into memory as ones and zeroes. And this without any lights in a cardboard shack in the rain.
Found the stalker.
The general rule is shown by the example of the specific case.
The general rule contradicts the specific case. Your initial statement is still wrong. Unless and until this entire country is overcrowded, it's utterly and completely wrong.
The criticism might be the only canary in the coal mine that we have. They have limited options if they don't want to just shut down operations (and somehow explain that to shareholders without violating their national security letter).
Standing out along the ocean wearing a Waldo costume?
Wow, that's nothing the same as the summary or headline at all. But at least it sounds actually useful.
Maybe we can replace the heating elements on our toasters with old Pentium 4's and when we want hot bread we can join a render farm.
Yeah I'm sure that was it. And it wasn't oppressive governments saying "no basic Internet or no Facebook at all, your choice."
Having a warning on a 301 redirect would be fine. But I wouldn't want to see it on a 302 redirect. URL shorteners should probably all be using a 301 redirect, though.
That's all true under Magnusson-Moss too. Though it's unlikely that the plaintiff will have an expert witness besides the manufacturer or themselves, so the manufacturer's flaky reasoning is often trusted as sufficient evidence.
The real issue is that most case law does involve ruling in favor of the manufacturer. But these cases are all where the problem was actually caused by the modification - which they had to prove. So it covers half of it, but the other half is likely hard to find because defect rates are actually pretty low for the most part.
Of course it is. But you said that maximum wage drives inflation (general rule). Just use better words.
I finally remembered the details. It was an airflow sensor that was bad, but it tripped the ABS light and the ABS system would only work intermittently until it was fixed. It still made no sense.
Yeah, and the last time the ODB scan pointed to an oxygen sensor issue on my old car, it was actually the anti-lock brake system that needed fixed (which just happened to have an oxygen sensor on the failed piece). I had to tell the mechanic the real cause because I had already had the same problem on the other side a few years prior.
So who is playing word games now? You know there are things like case law and guidance by federal agencies, right? Installing RAM in your computer does NOT void your PC warranty. The law does not mean that modifications can void a warranty, because the original product still exists. If the warranty issue is not related to the modification then it's simply not part of the equation.
The FTC specifically says that aftermarket parts are legal under the act: http://www.semasan.com/semaga/...
if a manufacturer replaces them free during warranty, they can require you to use whichever ones they want.
This is an extremely rare situation in practice and doesn't apply to any of the cases being discussed. In the case of a PS4 hard drive, no free replacement is on offer except in the case of a warranty claim. They don't offer free replacements in general (like an imaginary vacuum cleaner that had free replacement bags for life) so it is not covered. Aftermarket parts have been shown to not void warranties in actual court cases, except when the parts or modifications caused the issue in the warranty claim. And that includes upgrades. And generic printer ink. Simply offering free repair is not the same thing as what's mentioned in the act.
No, I'm not going to go research case law for you. Just know that you're wrong and you can find out anywhere you look on the Internet.
There's a huge difference between tripping a code and knowing the real reason it was tripped. Takes a level of expertise. And there are a lot of issues that involve the interaction of multiple systems or don't involve computer controlled components.
Found the Sony employee.
You really think that replacing a hard drive is a modification in a way that replacing spark plugs or oil filters aren't?
Getting a console wet would directly damage it and void almost all possible warranty claim, but it's not because it's a service that Sony doesn't offer.
What difference does it make whether the bot is from Facebook or an outside platform? This new service would enable it.
Replacing one part with an equivalent part does not make it a modification. That's a service using different parts. Otherwise replacing your oil filter in your car with a non-OEM brand would void your warranty.
Neither dust nor opening for inspection are necessary, and either would be tampering
That doesn't matter. One, nothing says that a service has to be necessary. And "tampering" is just another word for service.
A localized hyperinflationary market is not the same thing as general inflation. You intentionally conflated the two in your original post, even though the general market can balance out as poorer people can find the inefficiencies and live cheaper elsewhere. And this country is HUGE in terms of land mass.
The only thing I'm saying is that the warranty sticker is a lie - not that you can't possibly void your warranty. Everything you said is correct, of course. Most manufacturers do not trace back the cause. They do not even look at the unit if the warranty sticker is not intact unless you sue or threaten to sue, judging by most of what I see on the Internet.