Get a Roku. For now. Before Roku tries too hard at becoming a media company in its own right. They have Youtube AND Amazon. Just nothing Apple, because they are exclusively vendor lock-in across the board.
This has nothing to do with Net Neutrality and everything to do with actually making a better product. Both make products that have nearly every video content competitor out there. Except for their direct technology competitors. It's the worst kind of vendor lock-in.
No, compare this to the attack ads or lower-third crawls that your cable/satellite company runs when a local broadcast affiliate or national network wants to raise its rates - they are both being greedy and selfish and making the experience worse for the customers.
If the consumer doesn't know the cause is the battery, then I disagree. Most consumers would rather spend ~$100 on a new battery than $699 on a new phone.
I would bet that this isn't even to preserve battery life, but intentionally to make the phone seem old/slow. If someone pays the Apple tax and gets a new battery, they get some more performance for a while.
Everyone knows that the last iOS device made available for a given iPhone is always going to be a performance killer. It happens every time. Not to mention new features are artificially hardware restricted many times too.
rsync alone is not a good enough backup because it's identical to production and is tough to keep a history. However, I do use rsync with hard links to previous backups in a manner similar to Apple's Time Machine (each backup is its own folder).
If that's true, the training method is flawed. There's still a button in the bottom-left corner to get to a list of programs. The same power symbol shape appears there that's in Windows XP+. That's it for knowing how to use Windows.
Bitcoin is undergoing massive deflation. Which means you're spending fewer Bitcoin because it has a larger buying power. Transaction fees are actually going up (not just in absolute BTC terms, but relative to BTC spending power), because it's computationally expensive to process those transactions.
This works the same with everything being in BTC. The currency is undergoing massive deflation (purchasing power increases per BTC). That means that the transaction fees are way too high on a relative scale for smaller transactions. At the time Bitcoin was conceived, if anyone realized it would deflate to that level (to become a global currency it would HAVE to), they did not think about the transaction fees.
I have 24 tabs open right now, two of which are Slashdot. My browser CPU usage is 0.6%. I don't know where you dug up your Pentium 90, but put it back in the ground.
This is just plain Malware. If you want to add an exception to the signature, go for it. If you really intend to mine coins, you're going to use native code or even dedicated GPU/ASIC hardware.
There is no web site worth 100% of your CPU cycles.
I could see there being something where each camera manufacturer embeds certificate in each camera, which can then be used to digitally sign each frame of video.
I could see that too. It would have nothing to do with fake news. It would be about DRM and your rights to use video that you shot on your own hardware without paying extra.
Did you ignore all the people that corrected you the last time you posted this drivel?
The court challenge resulted in reclassifying the internet as Title II - which actually put the internet under FCC jurisdiction. So sure, they said the FCC didn't have the authority, but then they gave it to them.
Apparently not. And people who spend a lot of time marketing on there are desperate for attention. It's like the wild West of SEO from the late 90's in there.
Slashdot Mirror
Because Apple doesn't have any cloud computing or API services.
Get a Roku. For now. Before Roku tries too hard at becoming a media company in its own right. They have Youtube AND Amazon. Just nothing Apple, because they are exclusively vendor lock-in across the board.
This has nothing to do with Net Neutrality and everything to do with actually making a better product. Both make products that have nearly every video content competitor out there. Except for their direct technology competitors. It's the worst kind of vendor lock-in.
No, compare this to the attack ads or lower-third crawls that your cable/satellite company runs when a local broadcast affiliate or national network wants to raise its rates - they are both being greedy and selfish and making the experience worse for the customers.
If the consumer doesn't know the cause is the battery, then I disagree. Most consumers would rather spend ~$100 on a new battery than $699 on a new phone.
What that means is that if you keep your phone charge in the ideal 20-80% charge level, you will get 50% of the stated specs 100% of the time.
I would bet that this isn't even to preserve battery life, but intentionally to make the phone seem old/slow. If someone pays the Apple tax and gets a new battery, they get some more performance for a while.
Everyone knows that the last iOS device made available for a given iPhone is always going to be a performance killer. It happens every time. Not to mention new features are artificially hardware restricted many times too.
rsync alone is not a good enough backup because it's identical to production and is tough to keep a history. However, I do use rsync with hard links to previous backups in a manner similar to Apple's Time Machine (each backup is its own folder).
If that's true, the training method is flawed. There's still a button in the bottom-left corner to get to a list of programs. The same power symbol shape appears there that's in Windows XP+. That's it for knowing how to use Windows.
The rest is knowing how to use Office.
All of those are now available on a Mac.
I've managed to get a +2 Troll before. Anything is possible.
If Netflix is throttled to 14.4Kbps, that's still "up to 60Mbps" as far my unilateral contract with my ISP is concerned.
that means any smaller fee transaction queues up behind them since miners always process the biggest fee transactions first.
Which is sort of the whole point. At what point would cost-effective mining keep up with demand?
Just be aware that any existing competing ISP will sue you (or worse) if you try.
publicly owned conduit, such as a 12" PVC pipe, that any bonded company could later use to pull cable or fiber.
The provider would respond by using 11.5" cables.
Not at all true.
Bitcoin is undergoing massive deflation. Which means you're spending fewer Bitcoin because it has a larger buying power. Transaction fees are actually going up (not just in absolute BTC terms, but relative to BTC spending power), because it's computationally expensive to process those transactions.
This works the same with everything being in BTC. The currency is undergoing massive deflation (purchasing power increases per BTC). That means that the transaction fees are way too high on a relative scale for smaller transactions. At the time Bitcoin was conceived, if anyone realized it would deflate to that level (to become a global currency it would HAVE to), they did not think about the transaction fees.
I have 24 tabs open right now, two of which are Slashdot. My browser CPU usage is 0.6%. I don't know where you dug up your Pentium 90, but put it back in the ground.
This is just plain Malware. If you want to add an exception to the signature, go for it. If you really intend to mine coins, you're going to use native code or even dedicated GPU/ASIC hardware.
There is no web site worth 100% of your CPU cycles.
I don't know what shady eBay seller you bought your SSD on, but they aren't supposed to vibrate.
I could see there being something where each camera manufacturer embeds certificate in each camera, which can then be used to digitally sign each frame of video.
I could see that too. It would have nothing to do with fake news. It would be about DRM and your rights to use video that you shot on your own hardware without paying extra.
Did you ignore all the people that corrected you the last time you posted this drivel?
The court challenge resulted in reclassifying the internet as Title II - which actually put the internet under FCC jurisdiction. So sure, they said the FCC didn't have the authority, but then they gave it to them.
"obabas congress" is a rather misleading term.
Sure. Maybe even a meaningless one.
The perfect people to send a message to Congress!
Apparently not. And people who spend a lot of time marketing on there are desperate for attention. It's like the wild West of SEO from the late 90's in there.
I take it you've never seen a meeting of church leadership before.