>..seemed quite perplexing...
>
>Bringing the Internet to Borneo -- By Sea
>
>So, what does that mean?
Ahhh - it got lost in the subediting - heres the original second para, before the sub decided he needed to cut another 13 words to fit the article between the ads...
"The vessel will cruise the jungle-fringed Rajang River in the state of Sarawak, towing a high bandwidth cable recently liberated from the seabed just off Singapore, docking at villages every few hours..."
>Try to check them with 10.0.0.1 or 192.168.0.1. You are in -- Netherlands!:-)
Which is kinda odd, considering that a traceroute shows that www.bordercontrol.com is one hop behind fw.jumptv.com - I bet *that* box isn't in the Netherlands:-)
>Cookies are only retrievable by the site that put
>them there - so if amazon is the one that cookied
>you in the first place, they'd be able to read it.
heh heh - you got *any* idea how many sites set
cookies for the ".com.au" domain???
>Most people who know much about MySQL know it
>doesn't have transactions and is best used as a
>read mostly write some database. It's fine for
>that. It is not fine for big systems.
Errrr, I know it hasn't been in long, but MySQL now has transactions. It uses the BerkleyDB stuff behind MySQL's SQL engine. The transaction capable tables are slower than the MyIASM tables, but you do now have the choice to run (slower) transactions or not on a table by table basis.
I've been running 3.23.22beta1 (with transactions) for about 4 weeks now and its been working great, its not currently under any load tho...
cheers
Iain
Re:Provide Links to good articles please
on
Silicon Hell
·
· Score: 1
>>>Sure nitric >>>acid is a hazardous chemical and if you mix it (carefully) with >>>another hazardous chemical ammonia >>>(one of those "two step gasses") what you get? >>> >>>Ammonium Nitrate AKA fertilizer woooooo nasty!!!
>>heh heh - then just add a little diesel, throw it >>all in the back of your SUV, and park it outside >>your local FBI office...
>Are you kidding me?
With a post that started "heh heh"??? Do you think I _might_ have been???
>Jeez.
Jeez indeed...
When I make a serious post about serious topics like cancer rates, environmental destruction, or systematic employee abuse, I'll remember not to start it with a laugh, ok?
big
(wondering if anybody is doing research into the irony deficit of some slashdot readers:-)
Re:Provide Links to good articles please
on
Silicon Hell
·
· Score: 1
>Their lead piece about nitric acid is a great example. Sure nitric >acid is a hazardous chemical and if you mix it (carefully) with >another hazardous chemical ammonia >(one of those "two step gasses") what you get? > >Ammonium Nitrate AKA fertilizer woooooo nasty!!!
heh heh - then just add a little diesel, throw it all in the back of your SUV, and park it outside your local FBI office...
just 'cause it has common uses, doesn't mean its _not_ nasty...
Even if data corruption should occur, a source said, the result would be nothing more than a system freeze, easily fixed with a restart.
Statements like this worry me. Restarts are NOT ok, and i'm sickened that people think they are.
Yes, *but*, although not well written, in its original context, the rest of your comment isn't really relevant. The bit you quoted was preceeded by "the glitch would more likely effect more-efficient embedded operating systems." Its not clear what the original "source" was asked, or talking about, but an "embedded operating system", is not what you're going to run your e-commerce website on.
(tho maybe it _is_ what you'd use on a $170 million probe going to mars:-)
>Except they wouldn't use the term "crash." Rather, "Temporary Security Enhancement Through Service Restriction" >or similar. >Hard to beat the name "IntelliCrash," though;-)
ummm, how about "Temporarily Restrict Availabilty to Server Hardware"???
> What about if everyone had encrypted connections > i.e. every http request, every email, every > packet of traffic between a > server and a surfer was encrypted?
doesn't fix the problem, https://playboy.com could send you encrypted porn, but you cant encrypt the domain name, and thats what I suspect they'll filter on...
The first link in the post:
http://sights.seindal.dk/img/orig/9456.jpg
has no leaf...
big
It can be.
It uses (according to the doco I've got here) any of 5 different table types, BerkleyDB being just one of them.
see the mysql doco for details
>..seemed quite perplexing...
>
>Bringing the Internet to Borneo -- By Sea
>
>So, what does that mean?
Ahhh - it got lost in the subediting - heres the original second para, before the sub decided he needed to cut another 13 words to fit the article between the ads...
"The vessel will cruise the jungle-fringed Rajang River in the state of Sarawak, towing a high bandwidth cable recently liberated from the seabed just off Singapore, docking at villages every few hours..."
>Try to check them with 10.0.0.1 or 192.168.0.1. You are in -- Netherlands! :-)
:-)
Which is kinda odd, considering that a traceroute shows that www.bordercontrol.com is one hop behind fw.jumptv.com - I bet *that* box isn't in the Netherlands
>Cookies are only retrievable by the site that put
>them there - so if amazon is the one that cookied
>you in the first place, they'd be able to read it.
heh heh - you got *any* idea how many sites set
cookies for the ".com.au" domain???
>It's not how big a pipe you have, it's how you use it.
thats what everybody with a small _pipe_ says...
:-)
>Most people who know much about MySQL know it
>doesn't have transactions and is best used as a
>read mostly write some database. It's fine for
>that. It is not fine for big systems.
Errrr, I know it hasn't been in long, but MySQL now has transactions. It uses the BerkleyDB stuff behind MySQL's SQL engine. The transaction capable tables are slower than the MyIASM tables, but you do now have the choice to run (slower) transactions or not on a table by table basis.
A quick look on the mysql site reveals they were announced as "experimental" on the 9th of May, see http://www.mysql.com/news/article-18.html for the announcement...
I've been running 3.23.22beta1 (with transactions) for about 4 weeks now and its been working great, its not currently under any load tho...
cheers
Iain
>>>Sure nitric
:-)
>>>acid is a hazardous chemical and if you mix it (carefully) with
>>>another hazardous chemical ammonia
>>>(one of those "two step gasses") what you get?
>>>
>>>Ammonium Nitrate AKA fertilizer woooooo nasty!!!
>>heh heh - then just add a little diesel, throw it
>>all in the back of your SUV, and park it outside
>>your local FBI office...
>Are you kidding me?
With a post that started "heh heh"??? Do you think I _might_ have been???
>Jeez.
Jeez indeed...
When I make a serious post about serious topics like cancer rates, environmental destruction, or systematic employee abuse, I'll remember not to start it with a laugh, ok?
big
(wondering if anybody is doing research into the irony deficit of some slashdot readers
>Their lead piece about nitric acid is a great example. Sure nitric
>acid is a hazardous chemical and if you mix it (carefully) with
>another hazardous chemical ammonia
>(one of those "two step gasses") what you get?
>
>Ammonium Nitrate AKA fertilizer woooooo nasty!!!
heh heh - then just add a little diesel, throw it all in the back of your SUV, and park it outside your local FBI office...
just 'cause it has common uses, doesn't mean its _not_ nasty...
big
Even if data corruption should occur, a source said, the result would be nothing more than a system freeze, easily fixed with a restart.
:-)
Statements like this worry me. Restarts are NOT ok, and i'm sickened that people think they are.
Yes, *but*, although not well written, in its original context, the rest of your comment isn't really relevant.
The bit you quoted was preceeded by "the glitch would more likely effect more-efficient embedded operating systems."
Its not clear what the original "source" was asked, or talking about, but an "embedded operating system", is not what you're going to run your e-commerce website on.
(tho maybe it _is_ what you'd use on a $170 million probe going to mars
>Except they wouldn't use the term "crash." Rather, "Temporary Security Enhancement Through Service Restriction" ;-)
:-)
>or similar.
>Hard to beat the name "IntelliCrash," though
ummm, how about "Temporarily Restrict Availabilty to Server Hardware"???
That'd make Microsoft IntelliTrash(tm)
heh heh
big
> What about if everyone had encrypted connections
> i.e. every http request, every email, every
> packet of traffic between a
> server and a surfer was encrypted?
doesn't fix the problem, https://playboy.com could send you
encrypted porn, but you cant encrypt the domain name,
and thats what I suspect they'll filter on...