Exactly, we went through this on day is a stats course I took years ago. it seems counter intuitive but it is not a good idea to test for medical problems without a lot of thought put into the +es and -es involved.
From what I understand from documentaries it is not really a lie to say it is addictive, everything is addictive on one level or another. but unlike hardcore drugs it is not one of those drugs where you take it once or twice and are instantly addicted to it. It is not even has as addictive as coffee but if you use it enough regularly then you can forget how to function without it.
What I want to know is how he knows that he lives a private life? And why he thinks it is so hard for anyone to find out anything about him simply because they is more then average out there. Even if all the data is in untaged pictures there more then a few ways to process it.
"they did not store any of the data, and no browsing information was captured about users." So basically they just wasted their own and their users bandwidth for no reason, sure then sent themselves the data but then it was instantly destroyed.
"The compounds are so complex that their chemical structures resemble the makeup of coal and petroleum" Who cares if it produced a little bit or even a lot of fuel like substances, could they have produced the organic matter needed to kick start life? From what I understand the only real missing link in explaining how life started on this planet is the formation of some relatively simple organic compounds (not that they do not have some very good theories and promising results).
Well there are lots of reasons, but there is one that basically sums up the the others pretty well. C++ does not even do order of operations correctly and like the rest of the language they just hacked in a "fix" without actually solving the initial problem.
Because a group of people purposely thought out how to best make a language and then made it all in one go for Java and C++ has been hacked together as a better alternative to assembly over the course of a decade and it shows.
So are they talking about links to copyrighted material again, because the only possible illegal thing you could post directly on facebook or twitter is possibly a book spread over hundreds of posts.
http://www.raspberrypi.org/?page_id=8 "Is there power over USB? No. Raspberry Pi is a USB host, not a USB device, and you can’t draw power from the uplink port of a hub." "What are the power requirements? The device is powered by an external AC adapter, and the Model A consumes around 1W at full load."
More like you can tell the FCC and then they might get around to eventually filing a official complain with Verizon and years pass and nothing comes of it.
You seem to be very mistake about the specifics of the device. I am pretty sure the it does not use USB power and you cannot SSH unto a device with no Ethernet port on the $25 edition.
The bills exist but the value that they represent is imaginary and changes all the time. The number in your bank account does not point to anything specific, you could say that is a promise from them to give you back some number of bills (but it does not point to anything specific and solid, AKA it is data) and the value of these bills will have changed from the time you put them in and took them out.
AKA they do not exist is a real physical, property sort of sense.
But you could only SSH into it if you already bought a fully priced computer and personally i did not think the point of this entire thing was to allow nerds to get their 2nd, 3rd, etc. computers very cheaply.
Still you have to admit that it is far less of an amazing thing when you actually use it like a computer it costs more like the cost of a netbook/tablet.
Well the number is in companies not people. And I am sure that more then a few of those companies have some of the same inventors/people on the board of directors.
And you know that number in your bank account and those bills in your wallet that are only made valuable because everyone believes that they are, they are also imaginary and just a concept.
So it is just like real money, it is artificially scare (you can print it very easily and cheaply and the government can and sometimes does print it large amounts) and it only has any value because everyone believes that it does.
But their objective has never been to make as much money as possible, so it is wrong to say that they have made mistakes because something did not turn out as financially good for them.
I am against him and everything that he stands for but he has a point. The cost of college/university in the US is huge and something has to be done about this. And giving student loans will invariably increase the cost of schooling and the US just might be so capitalistic that the student loans are the main reason that tuition is so high. The biggest issue i see is what about those who are halfway through there education. who have hundreds of thousands of dollars of debt and will simply be unable to continue getting a Harvard/MIT education (because there is no way those schools will ever be in the price affordability range because they will have no trouble getting rich kids to fill in for smart poor kids).
So in general it might actually work. It could also go horribly wrong and be the quickest route to turning US into a honorary third world country with a unemployable population.
Because the government is supposed to want the best for its citizens, and turning the entire US population into a uneducated, hardly qualified for minimum wage, workforce is not good for anyone living in the USA.
Slashdot Mirror
Exactly, we went through this on day is a stats course I took years ago.
it seems counter intuitive but it is not a good idea to test for medical problems without a lot of thought put into the +es and -es involved.
From what I understand from documentaries it is not really a lie to say it is addictive, everything is addictive on one level or another.
but unlike hardcore drugs it is not one of those drugs where you take it once or twice and are instantly addicted to it.
It is not even has as addictive as coffee but if you use it enough regularly then you can forget how to function without it.
You don't need to be a heavy user to suffer withdraw, though the withdrawal is obviously lessened with the consumption.
What I want to know is how he knows that he lives a private life?
And why he thinks it is so hard for anyone to find out anything about him simply because they is more then average out there.
Even if all the data is in untaged pictures there more then a few ways to process it.
"they did not store any of the data, and no browsing information was captured about users."
So basically they just wasted their own and their users bandwidth for no reason, sure then sent themselves the data but then it was instantly destroyed.
"The compounds are so complex that their chemical structures resemble the makeup of coal and petroleum"
Who cares if it produced a little bit or even a lot of fuel like substances, could they have produced the organic matter needed to kick start life?
From what I understand the only real missing link in explaining how life started on this planet is the formation of some relatively simple organic compounds (not that they do not have some very good theories and promising results).
Well there are lots of reasons, but there is one that basically sums up the the others pretty well.
C++ does not even do order of operations correctly and like the rest of the language they just hacked in a "fix" without actually solving the initial problem.
Because a group of people purposely thought out how to best make a language and then made it all in one go for Java and C++ has been hacked together as a better alternative to assembly over the course of a decade and it shows.
Are these people safe reformed citizens who should be free intermix with normal people.
Or are the dangerous criminals who should be locked up.
But as far as I know there are already interactive maps showing this same info out there, New York just make it slightly easier to access.
So are they talking about links to copyrighted material again, because the only possible illegal thing you could post directly on facebook or twitter is possibly a book spread over hundreds of posts.
http://www.raspberrypi.org/?page_id=8
"Is there power over USB?
No. Raspberry Pi is a USB host, not a USB device, and you can’t draw power from the uplink port of a hub."
"What are the power requirements?
The device is powered by an external AC adapter, and the Model A consumes around 1W at full load."
More like you can tell the FCC and then they might get around to eventually filing a official complain with Verizon and years pass and nothing comes of it.
You seem to be very mistake about the specifics of the device.
I am pretty sure the it does not use USB power and you cannot SSH unto a device with no Ethernet port on the $25 edition.
find a thrift store, bam 25$ used computer.
The bills exist but the value that they represent is imaginary and changes all the time.
The number in your bank account does not point to anything specific, you could say that is a promise from them to give you back some number of bills (but it does not point to anything specific and solid, AKA it is data) and the value of these bills will have changed from the time you put them in and took them out.
AKA they do not exist is a real physical, property sort of sense.
But you could only SSH into it if you already bought a fully priced computer and personally i did not think the point of this entire thing was to allow nerds to get their 2nd, 3rd, etc. computers very cheaply.
Still you have to admit that it is far less of an amazing thing when you actually use it like a computer it costs more like the cost of a netbook/tablet.
The computer might be only $25 but without a few hundred dollars extra you will not be able to do anything with it.
Well the number is in companies not people.
And I am sure that more then a few of those companies have some of the same inventors/people on the board of directors.
And you know that number in your bank account and those bills in your wallet that are only made valuable because everyone believes that they are, they are also imaginary and just a concept.
So it is just like real money, it is artificially scare (you can print it very easily and cheaply and the government can and sometimes does print it large amounts) and it only has any value because everyone believes that it does.
But their objective has never been to make as much money as possible, so it is wrong to say that they have made mistakes because something did not turn out as financially good for them.
I am against him and everything that he stands for but he has a point.
The cost of college/university in the US is huge and something has to be done about this.
And giving student loans will invariably increase the cost of schooling and the US just might be so capitalistic that the student loans are the main reason that tuition is so high.
The biggest issue i see is what about those who are halfway through there education. who have hundreds of thousands of dollars of debt and will simply be unable to continue getting a Harvard/MIT education (because there is no way those schools will ever be in the price affordability range because they will have no trouble getting rich kids to fill in for smart poor kids).
So in general it might actually work. It could also go horribly wrong and be the quickest route to turning US into a honorary third world country with a unemployable population.
Because the government is supposed to want the best for its citizens, and turning the entire US population into a uneducated, hardly qualified for minimum wage, workforce is not good for anyone living in the USA.