Slashdot Mirror


Build the 2006 Prototype $25 PC

An anonymous reader writes "As the launch of the $25 PC gets ever closer (sometime next month), members of the Raspberry Pi team have found time to start blogging about the history of the project. Eben Upton, director of the Raspberry Pi Foundation, has been working on the project for many years, and decided to share a couple of very early prototypes for the $25 PC with the community. The 2006 edition of the PC used an Atmel ATmega644 microcontroller. It ran at 22.1MHz with 512K of SRAM. Compare that to the final version of the PC, which will use a 700MHz ARM11 processor and 128MB/256MB of SDRAM. Five years clearly brings a massive leap in performance. For those of us happy to play around with components at this level, Eben has made the schematics and PCB layout available to download (ZIP file). Armed with this information you can create your very own 2006 Raspberry Pi machine."

120 comments

  1. Needs more Ram by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    how about a $50 PC with one GB of ram :)

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:Needs more Ram by kelarius · · Score: 1

      because 1GB RAM is so useful on a 700MHz CPU...

      --
      Personally I'd rather have my idiots at home glued to the TV than out doing idiotic things
    2. Re:Needs more Ram by 0racle · · Score: 1

      I'd rather it have 2 network ports.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    3. Re:Needs more Ram by psergiu · · Score: 2

      Raspberry PI uses a package-on-package technology (RAM chip on top on the CPU).

      They covered this on their forum:
      - There are no 1Gb SDRAM chips with that size available;
      - The 512Mb ones are too expensive - if Raspberry PI rev.A (128Mb) and rev.B (256Mb) are a success, they will consider a more expensive rev.C with more options.

      --
      1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
    4. Re:Needs more Ram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is to keep it to $25. If you want a second network port, just get a USB to Ethernet adapter.

    5. Re:Needs more Ram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could.
      Man, you could totally run Crysis on that badboy.
      And I call it: Crysis on a Chip. CoC for short.

    6. Re:Needs more Ram by Mysterious+Stranger · · Score: 1

      Tell that to my phone.

    7. Re:Needs more Ram by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      It does have USB and and SPI port so you could add another network port if you wanted too.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:Needs more Ram by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Sweet but I was half way kidding. What I really want is to find and SPI to SATA bridge so one could add a harddrive without using the USB port or network. But I have yet to see one.
      i will probably pick up one of these for hacking just because.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    9. Re:Needs more Ram by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Heh... It'd have been useful to a PIII. That's what it roughly is like in performance in many of the areas.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    10. Re:Needs more Ram by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      They covered this on their forum:

      And they seem to cover it as a bit of a recurring theme. People keep assuming that this isn't going to be anywhere near as useful without the 512-1024MB of RAM on it. The conversations come back to the reality that it's a lot more than they think it is- and it's going to be more capable than they're giving it credit.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    11. Re:Needs more Ram by randomErr · · Score: 1

      They have a lot of discussion about this on the RasPi message boards. The only reason they don't offer more everything is that they're targeting $25 on a board that will fit on a credit card. The project is about making a system kids (and many adults) can tinker with. Also remember this version 1.0 of the board.

      --
      You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    12. Re:Needs more Ram by Sleepy · · Score: 1

      >I'd rather it have 2 network ports.

      You can add USB hubs and switches if need be, OR you can choose an already available low-end single-board system which has multiple ports onboard.

      This is -supposed- to be minimalist, low-energy tiny-footprint platform. And adding more hardware changes what it is. I like the fact that it's basically the cost of an Arduino, but can do so much more.

       

    13. Re:Needs more Ram by JMandingo · · Score: 1

      I have a Dell Latitude with 256 MB of RAM running Antix that I use for 2D game development in C++. It works perfect for when my kids are tying up my big gaming rig, and I bought it on eBay for $30. I bet the Raspberry PI using decade newer tech will kick that old Latitude's arse.

      --
      Vonnegut was right: Of all the words of mice and men, the saddest are, "It might have been."
    14. Re:Needs more Ram by grub · · Score: 2


      I'd rather it have 2 network ports.

      VLANs, baby!

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    15. Re:Needs more Ram by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I do know. I have done development on a StrongArm board with only 64MB of memory. The RasPi is probably a lot more powerful than a DEC VAX 11/780 was in the day.
      However some software like browsers seem to really want a lot of memory these days.
      You are right but more ram is always better on a system but 256MB is not a small amount of ram... Until you put a full browser on the box. And let's be honest how many sites support Dillo these days?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    16. Re:Needs more Ram by BenoitRen · · Score: 1

      It's amazing what you can do with 256 MB of RAM when you don't have an OS that eats all of it for breakfast. Hell, my primary computer has 'only' 160 MB of RAM, and it's enough for most of my computing needs.

    17. Re:Needs more Ram by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      After getting rid of X, I' running a Torrent (transmission), DLNA (miniDLNA), SSH and NAS (just a plain 3TB USB drive) server in 50-70MB on a similar ARM platform, so 256, even 128, should be plenty for a lot of things.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    18. Re:Needs more Ram by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1

      In a few (or 5) years this $25 PC will be as powerful as a dual-core smartphone. I love technology's exponential increase in power.

    19. Re:Needs more Ram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could stick an IDE drive on (or get a SATA to IDE interface) possibly using this design:
      http://sbc.rictor.org/io/IDE.html
      FAT16 only it seems but meh, it's a start...

    20. Re:Needs more Ram by mirix · · Score: 1

      SD cards support SPI natively, speed is somewhat reduced over whatever mode they usually use, though, IIRC.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    21. Re:Needs more Ram by The+Askylist · · Score: 1

      Bloody kids! I remember getting an IBM PS/2 model 50 (IIRC - this was 2 decades ago) with 2MB RAM, and being frustrated that I no longer had time to go for a coffee and a cigarette while Statgraphics did my correlation analyses. Hell of a step up from an XT with 640KB... You don't know you're born....

    22. Re:Needs more Ram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My N900 runs pretty well with only 256MB RAM, and it's browser (Gecko-based, i.e. the same engine as Firefox) is pretty good too and doesn't seem to suffer from a lack of RAM (a faster processor wouldn't hurt though), on the other hand Firefox mobile does suffer from a lack of RAM, though it is just about usable if you forego multitasking. It is possible to make a modern browser run on a system with limited RAM, it just has to be designed to do so.

  2. Finally... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    Finally... I can afford to upgrade my home PC to something more powerfull!

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  3. Death of the desktop means cheaper desktops! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    I would expect now that the popularity of desktops is waning, a lot of the prices to make really beefy systems in the short term will go down to much of a cheaper rate. Hopefully it will revise the revival of build it yourself computers. Perhaps we can get the whitebox equlivlant of a tablet PC.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Death of the desktop means cheaper desktops! by psergiu · · Score: 1

      Well ... the Broadcom BCM2835 SoC in Raspberry PI can directly control an LCD (all required pins available on a header on board) and you can also interface with a touchscreen:

      http://elinux.org/RaspberryPiBoard#Interfacing_to_Raw_LCD_Panels

      So you can use the Raspberry Pi to build a whitebox Tablet PC.

      --
      1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
    2. Re:Death of the desktop means cheaper desktops! by Sduic · · Score: 1

      [N]ow that the popularity of desktops is waning

      I'm genuinely curious, is there significant evidence of this (i.e. that I might look over), or is this somewhat like with the ever-prolonged death of PC gaming I keep hearing about?

      --
      *this space intentionally left blank
      "One of the four pointers saying 'come and see', and I saw, and beheld a white
    3. Re:Death of the desktop means cheaper desktops! by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I think they are using Wall Street math when they say the popularity of PCs are waning. It isn't that the numbers are going down. It is that there is no longer double digit growth of the industry. My house is a perfect example. In our 3 person home, we have 8 PCs that are used on a regular basis. How many more can we possibly have a use for? We don't replace them nearly as often as we used to either. Instead of a yearly upgrade cycle, our upgrades range between 3 and 5 years depending on which system we are talking about. From a Wall Street perspective, that is a dramatic drop in year over year sales. It doesn't change the fact that we have twice as many computers in our home than toilets.

      To be fair, I am counting laptops in with the PCs I am counting, but the point still stands.

    4. Re:Death of the desktop means cheaper desktops! by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      I can be witness. I used to have a regular PC, now I'm down to a nettop + arm server + netbook + tablet + smartphone, and I'll try out 2 Pis to replace the nettop. Also, the marketshare of tablets and laptops/netbooks compared to desktops is ever rising.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  4. No Thanks by psergiu · · Score: 1

    I think i'll wait a bit (end of November) for the 2011 version :)

    --
    1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
  5. Re:Useless by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of course it isn't useless.

    Students can learn about the components that make up a computer and learn the basics of computers all for $25.

    That's way cooler than anything we did in IT when I was in high-school.

    At the end of it- you get a takehome computer capable of playing Quake 3.

    That's how you get the kids interested in this.

    I've never used Linux. For $25 I may buy a kit for my son for Xmas. He can learn about computers- and then I can steal it from him and teach myself linux.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  6. Nah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No thanks. Can I just emulate it in a VM on my quad-core?

  7. Re:Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sir are completely wrong this project is very important and will undoubtably save the lives of many people just think of the poor farmers in bolivia and afghanistan what can they do now without comptuers thats right nothing but with a low priced comptuer with GNU?LINUX they will be able to check prices on line and get better prices for their goods. Point proven.

  8. needs a VGA output by Blaskowicz · · Score: 2

    HDMI displays are rare, VGA displays are plentiful, higher quality and more versatile than the offered alternative which is a old TV with composite input.

    a Rasperry with VGA would be better for its obvious use, as a game console loaded with emulators. there are truckloads of perfectly good 15" and 17" displays awaiting destruction as hazardous waste, having to buy a new hdmi display for a $25 toy or haul a big ass CRT TV and live with interlaced 640x480 is not fun.

    1. Re:needs a VGA output by lobiusmoop · · Score: 1

      Not really - every flat-screen TV made in the last couple of years has HDMI in, and every recent flat-screen monitor has DVI-D (basically HDMI). You have to think ahead, HDMI is the future and we're talking about a device that isn't even in production yet.

      --
      "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
    2. Re:needs a VGA output by psergiu · · Score: 2

      As it turns out, the Broadcom BCM2835 SoC they have chosen for the project has only HDMI, Composite & DSI-LCD outputs. No VGA, no Component, no S-Video.

      And it seems that there are no SoC's with VGA output available that:
      - are cheap enough;
      - are low-power enough;
      or
      - have all the other required interfaces (USB, Ethernet, sound, SDIO ...)

      --
      1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
    3. Re:needs a VGA output by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just FYI, the SoC they chose doesn't have Ethernet either. On the Model B, a second chip is connected to the SoC's single USB port and provides two downstream USB ports and one Ethernet port. Model A has only 128MB of RAM and lacks this chip, so there's only one USB port and no Ethernet.

    4. Re:needs a VGA output by HappyPsycho · · Score: 1

      There are adapters (passive if memory serves) that can convert from HDMI to VGA (http://www.amazon.com/HDMI-VGA-HD15-Male-Cable/dp/B001OLCHJ6)

      Given that HDMI is a much higher quality signal dropping quality isn't too much of a problem. Going the other way, it is pretty much impossible to get HDMI quality from a VGA output.

    5. Re:needs a VGA output by hplus · · Score: 1

      Those passive adapters require that the device output a VGA signal, they aren't actually DACs.

    6. Re:needs a VGA output by HappyPsycho · · Score: 1

      Hmm, indeed. I was mistaking HDMI with DVI which seems to carry the analog signal separately (hence can support passive connectors).

  9. Re:Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what Americans actually believe.

  10. Re:Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever considered killing yourself? You should give it some serious thought imho.

  11. Spreadsheets by tepples · · Score: 1

    As Wikipedia's article about reactive programming explains, spreadsheets are a form of programming. Someone running a business might write a spreadsheet to handle the business's accounting, run various "what if" scenarios to plan for the next year, etc., whether in a developed country or in a less-developed country.

  12. What about the monitor/keyboard/mouse by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    The computer might be only $25 but without a few hundred dollars extra you will not be able to do anything with it.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    1. Re:What about the monitor/keyboard/mouse by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      So? Surely that's better than a box that costs a few hundred dollars, uses much more power, and still requires a monitor, keyboard and mouse? Not to mention that plenty of uses either don't actually require any peripherals or can use ones that are already owned.

      I'm planning to grab a Raspberry Pi next month to replace the Xbox in the living room for media streaming, for example - no whirring fans, better flexibility in terms of codecs and interface, and the total cost will be $35 for the Model B.

    2. Re:What about the monitor/keyboard/mouse by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Still you have to admit that it is far less of an amazing thing when you actually use it like a computer it costs more like the cost of a netbook/tablet.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    3. Re:What about the monitor/keyboard/mouse by hierophanta · · Score: 1

      uhh no. a cheap lcd monitor costs ~$50 (here is an example http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824009345)
      a mouse and keyboard costs ~$11

      here http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16826193041

      and here http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16823201010
      all told and we are still at less that $100.

    4. Re:What about the monitor/keyboard/mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you buy used accessories from garage sales, thrift stores, craigslist, eBay, or just use what you have lying around in the garage it can be even cheaper.

    5. Re:What about the monitor/keyboard/mouse by klingens · · Score: 1

      You should have looked at your $50 monitor more carefully: it only has a VGA input and won't work on a raspberry pi

    6. Re:What about the monitor/keyboard/mouse by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      Hundreds ? Rather, tens: an SD card and USB cable to power it are the bare minimum, for a headless server or station via SSH. If you want interactivity, add keyboard, mouse, and screen if you don't want to ssh into it, and micro-USB power supply if it's far from a PC. The most expensive by far is a screen , which most use don't require.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    7. Re:What about the monitor/keyboard/mouse by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      But you could only SSH into it if you already bought a fully priced computer and personally i did not think the point of this entire thing was to allow nerds to get their 2nd, 3rd, etc. computers very cheaply.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    8. Re:What about the monitor/keyboard/mouse by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      find a thrift store, bam 5$ vga monitors and 25 cent keyboards and mouses all day long

      kindly pull your head from your ass please

    9. Re:What about the monitor/keyboard/mouse by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      find a thrift store, bam 25$ used computer.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    10. Re:What about the monitor/keyboard/mouse by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      You seem to be very mistake about the specifics of the device.
      I am pretty sure the it does not use USB power and you cannot SSH unto a device with no Ethernet port on the $25 edition.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    11. Re:What about the monitor/keyboard/mouse by YouDieAtTheEnd · · Score: 0

      $42.60 actually.

      Hub, mouse, keyboard, monitor(may or may not require a small amount of hacking to get connected).

    12. Re:What about the monitor/keyboard/mouse by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

      You'd still need those things for a $250 PC. If you buy this one, you will be able to afford that monitor/mouse/keyboard a lot more easily.

    13. Re:What about the monitor/keyboard/mouse by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      ha where? Obviously you have not been to one or else you would not have thought that the only way to get a keyboard monitor and mouse is to spend hundreds of dollars. Goodwill? nah they ship them to a central location and Charge like new. Ma-pa places, they are too dumb to know what they have so you see a 100mhz pentium for 100 bucks. (its not my fault your original argument is full of fail)

      Besides I dont know where people keep coming up with this being a desktop replacement, are you going to use a plug computer or a thin client in the same way as a desktop? and if you are in the market for a small computer do you want to use a 3 cubic foot 300 watt monster to run a local ftp server off of AAA batteries?

      I have a dozen ideas for this thing and none of them is anywhere close to "uh derp lets log on to slashdot and pretend that monitors cost as much as a used car dee hee hee"

    14. Re:What about the monitor/keyboard/mouse by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      No, it's still pretty amazing.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    15. Re:What about the monitor/keyboard/mouse by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      We'll have to split the difference on that one:
      - the device does use USB power. this changed very recently, cf their site.
      - indeed, the $25 model A does not have Ethernet, sorry. the $35, 256 MB RAM that I plan to get does.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    16. Re:What about the monitor/keyboard/mouse by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      Do you think a lot of people reading this, on slashdot, do not have a computer yet ?

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    17. Re:What about the monitor/keyboard/mouse by Arlet · · Score: 1

      If you already have a computer, you could even leave out the Raspberry Pi, and just use the computer you already have. That should lower the cost to $0 (including handling and shipping).

    18. Re:What about the monitor/keyboard/mouse by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      http://www.raspberrypi.org/?page_id=8
      "Is there power over USB?
      No. Raspberry Pi is a USB host, not a USB device, and you can’t draw power from the uplink port of a hub."
      "What are the power requirements?
      The device is powered by an external AC adapter, and the Model A consumes around 1W at full load."

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    19. Re:What about the monitor/keyboard/mouse by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      The thing's power input is MicroUSB, and it has a dedicated port for that (it can't go through the "data" ports:
      http://www.raspberrypi.org/?p=260

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    20. Re:What about the monitor/keyboard/mouse by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      1- What's the fun in that ?
      2- Plus, some people can use (or need) several computers. I for one have a NAS/Torrent/DLNA server. Used to be an old regular PC (100-ish watts), then a nettop (40-ish watts), is currently a misused ARM netbook (15-ish watts)... I'm fairly sure the Pi will be able to take over competently. And I'll keep another one around for Linux education purposes.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    21. Re:What about the monitor/keyboard/mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people will have a TV, this has composite and HDMI out, almost all TV's should have composite in. A USB keyboard and mouse can be picked up pretty cheap new, you may even be able to get old ones for next to nothing.

    22. Re:What about the monitor/keyboard/mouse by hplus · · Score: 1

      The Goodwills around you must all suck, mine always seem to have cheap peripherals, including mice/keyboards.

    23. Re:What about the monitor/keyboard/mouse by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      yes they do, they take anything computer related, ship them down town, put them in a plastic bag, and ask 20$ for a used ball mouse

  13. very useful for kindling interest in coding by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    funny, my cell phone is an ARM powered linux device. A 3rd world person learning to code on this would be light-years ahead of most first world students taking the typical intro to programming fare at college. People might complain that it must be hooked to keyboard and monitor, but cubic meters of those are disposed of by first world homes and businesses.

    1. Re:very useful for kindling interest in coding by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      and another thing, I used to do CAE/CADD on a system with 32MB RAM and 24MHz processor. Hook this little thing up to a $5 flash drive, donated/cast off keyboard, monitor and mouse, and you have more computer than the Sparc 2 workstation circa 1992 I'm remembering.

    2. Re:very useful for kindling interest in coding by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      I was only making a statement about computing power. The use for the 3rd worlder is education, which is the project's goal.

      As to access to massive infrastructure, there is this thing called the internet that even 3rd world countries have and are building up. And a usb drive can bring IN a massive amount of information to an area.

    3. Re:very useful for kindling interest in coding by HappyPsycho · · Score: 1

      You mean infrastructure like this?

      http://reprap.org/wiki/Main_Page

      Just add
      Blender (or similar program, offhand can't remember what the memory requirements are)
      +
      Raspberry Pi

      That sounds like I need hundreds of people and massive infrastructure, US$1k. Given that the price is heavily influenced by the 3d printer the overall cost of the setup can be dropped substantially if the price of that item drops.

  14. Re:Useless by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

    In the meantime I'd put linux on a VM on your main pc. So you're less likely to screw up and having to reformat the littlepc. A vm snapshot on a 400$ pc restores faster than a 25$, i suspect.

    Happy hacking.

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  15. Getting cheaper by bigredradio · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If they are sticking to the $25 cost, this is getting cheaper every year even though they are increasing performance. If you figure the future value in 2005 of the cost at 2011, it should be around $39.

    FV=(25*(1+4.5%)^6)*(1+3%)^6
    = $38.87

  16. Refurbished Dell by SydShamino · · Score: 1

    I realize that there are benefits to having large numbers of identical machines to ease management, but I assume these machines are going out into remote places where there won't be hundreds of them to control anyway.

    Wouldn't refurbished Dell boxen, acquired 50-100 at a time, be more powerful and cost less than $25 each to deploy? This could be especially true if skilled laborers in the destination country did the refurbishing, imaging, and deployment.

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    1. Re:Refurbished Dell by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Heh...

      1) A refurbished PIII is not much, if any more powerful than this board.
      2) The refurbished PIII retails for 2-3 times what this costs.

      To answer your question, NO, it wouldn't be cheaper or better. :-D

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    2. Re:Refurbished Dell by spire3661 · · Score: 2

      And they would consume orders of magnitude more power. Also, all refurbished means is that the board is tested for electrical continuity, its still old, in a power hogging design. The goal is not CPU power, it is low cost and ubiquity.

      --
      Good-bye
    3. Re:Refurbished Dell by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the power requirements - this will probably use 1/10 of the energy required by a full PIII system.

    4. Re:Refurbished Dell by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Can it run on a couple of AAs?

    5. Re:Refurbished Dell by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      with 230 watt power supplies nearly maxed out? you would loose your cost benefit in less than a day in just power use

    6. Re:Refurbished Dell by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      What? Who's paying $50-$75 for PIII systems? I have PIII systems I'm trying to give away and I can't find any takers.

    7. Re:Refurbished Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't the OLPC project. They'll sell this to whoever wants to buy it. The goal is to give kids something they can play around with and program, to get kids interested in computers and programming. Why don't you read their website to see what they are about rather than guessing.

  17. Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Who ... is going to use a crappy little computer that can only run [L]in[ux]?"
    Andrioid? Web OS? TiVo? Tons of embedded computers around the world?
    Yeah, this is lower spec than those, but the purpose is different also.

    "...politically correct left wing imbeciles"
    That's a sweeping and untrue generalization.

    "[Y]ou recall the OLPC folks turned down both OS X and Windows in favor of lin-sux, which killed the project"
    OLPC was never killed, it is still here, delivering computers and working on a new model.
    http://one.laptop.org/map http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO-2

  18. ARM by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Can you call it a "PC" if it's not IA-86 compatible?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:ARM by micsaund · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, because PC doesn't necessarily mean Wintel -- it means Personal Computer as well. One particular flavor of the Personal Computer happens to be the IBM PC, which features the xxx86 architecture. Remember, the concept of a "personal computer" came from the days when the big iron was locked-up in universities and companies, so it was a revolution to make a computer one could own personally, hence the phrase. This "2006" Atmel based computer is very certainly a "personal computer" since you build and own it.

      --
      Pinball, arcade video, tech and more: www.micsaund.com
    2. Re:ARM by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can. "PC" stands for "Personal Computer", not Personal X86 Computer- though for many, it's come to mean the same thing- and they conflate Windows PC with that concept, which is even MORE wrong.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    3. Re:ARM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially since a Windows system hardly is a computer anymore anyway. Or how much does it support automating* your work away? (* You know.... the very point of a computer... over a mere gadget/appliance.)
      Last time I looked, MS worked very hard to dumb its user down to a mere sack of meat with one eye, one arm with a single finger, and a wallet, that you wouldn't even let near a car, power tool, or deep fryer,

    4. Re:ARM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But "PC" has be marketed for 20+ years as a screen, keyboard, hard drive, and all the other parts most of the public has come to know to be a "PC".

      This is a single board computer for geeks like you.

      How much over $25 do I need to spend to get the "PC" you believe is in there ?

    5. Re:ARM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wikipedia classifies it as a "home computer".

  19. Re:Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like the going rate for Cocaine and Opium on the open market? :P

  20. Vaporware by Animats · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They've been talking about this since 2006. They've built prototypes. They have a web site, logos, a wiki, and a fan club.

    What they don't have is shipping product.

    They really need to shut up and ship. They we get to see if their price point is real.

    GuruPlug, the $99 Linux wall wart, is real and available. Gumstix has been offering machines around $100 for years.

    1. Re:Vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but the chip they decided to use is one that they can't tell you anything about. Evidently, it's so secret that they need the okay from the manufacturer before they release any info to you. That's pretty much as anti-opensource as you can get.

      Binary blobs for everyone! As a developer I'm staying away from this one.

    2. Re:Vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hasn't the guruplug various issue with power supply ? And gumstix do not really offer the same set of tools.

      Also, for a vaporware, there is a pretty good damn video on youtube, with pictures. of course, they could be faked but I doubt a teacher would risk his reputation for that.

    3. Re:Vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've only heard about them since this year.

    4. Re:Vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      David Braben is not the vaporware type guy...He has a reputation...

    5. Re:Vaporware by CrazyBusError · · Score: 1

      Really? So you only use graphics cards with open source firmware, do you? No, thought not.

      Look carefully - the firmware blob is closed, just as it is an most commercial graphics cards. The driver, on the other hand, is open.

      --
      -Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience-
    6. Re:Vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EVERYTHING about the gpu is CLOSED.
      NOTHING about it is OPEN in any way.

  21. Re:Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who the fuck is going to use a crappy little computer that can only run lin-sux?

    All of the internet routers are of that design, which let you post your trolls and download your kiddie porn from 4chan. Routers don't run Winblows ya know!

    Not to mention traffic lights, network cameras, scientific calculators, your microwave oven for cooking up those tasty cheese treats that keep you hovering just above 300lb, and even possibly in your central air conditioner to keep your fat ass cool in the winter likely has a microcontroller such as this in it.. Well, unless you live with mom in a house from the 1920's anyway..

    I would wager that no less than 100 such devices were used by you between when you woke up and when you posted your drivel, without you even knowing it.

    Of course you do know this, and would cry and kill yourself if suddenly all the unix technology you take advantage of was to disappear overnight. Almost a good troll thou!

    p.s. wtf is this shit?!:

    Slow Down Cowboy!
    It's been 53 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment

  22. Deja Vendu: 30,000 PCs at below $25 cost by retroworks · · Score: 1

    Been there, done that. Between 2002 and 2009 I sold about 30,000 sub-$25 PCs to Egyptian geeks, who resold them in "Technology Malls". Our last 3 containerloads were seized by Egyptian customs and declared "e-waste" because they were "used." Our buyer was upset, but predicted that Mubarak was just "trying to put the genie back in the bottle", and it was too late. See German Language 3Sat.de coverage on how these used PCs played a role in the Arab Spring. http://bit.ly/soIn3G

    Seriously, why do wealthy nations spend $25 to shred 3 year old PCs and then try to find ways to make "new" ones with less RAM and Mhz than the shredded ones for $25?

    --
    Gently reply
  23. Re:Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is consensus. Bravo.

  24. Re:Useless by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Looks like a fantastic controller for robotics projects or anything that needs more power than a typical ATMega based Arduino. Also, since it exposes things like the SPI port directly to a computer with a shell it would be awesome for electronics prototyping and learning.

  25. Re:Useless by iiiears · · Score: 1

    You have (courage?) to deride open source on Slashdot?
    It wasn't Linux that sank the OLPC it was price.

    --
    15TW = 15,000 Nuclear Reactors. (Approx. one accident a month.)
  26. How about by HalAtWork · · Score: 2

    How about putting together a software suite that runs efficiently on this hardware? The hardware can be made even more cheaply through refinement, and the software can be fine-tuned to target these specs,it could lead to affordable and efficient computing in general. If the goal is to benefit the poor, or even to create a platform that will waste less resources, then don't create multiple targets, that will diminish the value of the lowest common denominator and undermine the ultimate efficiency and benefits of the platform.

    1. Re:How about by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      there is a lot you can do with that much ram and CPU. The big issue I see is getting a good full browser on it. The new Firefox might work. Your other choice is to get go with a mobile browser and hope for the best. Now if you want to run GCC you are actually in good shape. I would assume that at in say a school setting you would use the network for mass storage. You could also use these as Xterms to run more demanding software off of a local server.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  27. Re:Deja Vendu: 30,000 PCs at below $25 cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Seriously, why do wealthy nations spend $25 to shred 3 year old PCs and then try to find ways to make "new" ones with less RAM and Mhz than the shredded ones for $25?"

    Because the more wealthy they get the more ignorant, indifferent, and arrogant they become.
    Power corrupts.

  28. Networked media player for USD 50 by Trikoloko · · Score: 1

    As far as I know, this board offers:

    1) 1080P output
    2) Hardware media decoding
    3) 3D Graphics

    1 + 2 + 3: XBMC on Linux for ~USD 50 (Model B for USD 35 + guesstimating USD 15 for the case and the power adapter)

    --
    My cellphone ringtone is a ring tone.
    1. Re:Networked media player for USD 50 by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      They said it would do 1080p24 in hardware so as long as you're playing media that the GPU can decode that's enough for most purposes. If your media was encoded 1080p30 or higher you're going to have to transcode it before you can play it back, and then you might as well convert the resolution instead of the frame rate unless you're really blowing it up, in which case, spend the hundred bucks or whatever and buy the fancy Roku box. I believe it does 1080p30 :p

      I want one pretty bad, too. I want a model B, I probably have a suitable wall wart, and I will make a case from wood since I have a router, the kind that can mutilate your fingers without being 6000 series or higher.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  29. Re:Useless by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

    You have (courage?) to deride open source on Slashdot?
    It wasn't Linux that sank the OLPC it was price.

    The project is still going, but the problems stem from the rudderless direction of the organization, not the OS.

    As far as operating system I think for a project like OLPC Linux is an obvious answer, however OLPC effed it up. I think they would have done well to build it around a more or less standard environment that ran standard Linux applications. Instead they came up with sugar. Run entirely scripted applications on PII power. Brilliant! Run a sugar image in a VM sometime. RAM usage is mind boggling and performance is terrible. The idea of running everything scripted is the flawed assumption that everyone wants to tinker with the poorly documented code. And the availibleapps seem primarily based around programming and not building other skills.

  30. Really ? by Arlet · · Score: 1

    Armed with this information you can create your very own 2006 Raspberry Pi machine.

    Oh, really? Where can I order the CPU ?

    1. Re:Really ? by hplus · · Score: 1

      You can order Atmega 644s from a number of places, including Digikey and Mouser.

    2. Re:Really ? by Arlet · · Score: 1

      Yeah, after I posted, I realized that this article was about the 2006 version. I thought it was about the new design with the Broadcom SoC.

  31. Re:Useless by samjam · · Score: 1

    You must learn the difference between "everyone will" and "anyone can"

  32. Finally! I can afford to build a beowulf cluster! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of these!

  33. Re:Useless by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

    "Anyone can" with a conventional distro.

  34. Re:Deja Vendu: 30,000 PCs at below $25 cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The people getting rid of their old PCs aren't the same ones as the ones developing the new ones. And don't you see the difference between a large noisy metal box that consumes 100W and a silent credit card sized computer that uses a fraction of a watt? For one, the former is too noisy and uses too much power for me to use as a home server (work out the cost of electricity to run it 24/7 for a year) and the latter can do the job much more affordably.