I have one, as does my brother and a friend, and 2 friends from work have special ordered them. All the I have seen do have the debug "you should not be here" menu, despite rumors that there are some being produced that do not have it. Also, wrt outputs, mine has Composite Video, S-Video and Component outputs and 2 sets of analog stero outs and a coax digital output. To Pan the zoom, use the big directional buttons in the center of the remote.. you cant miss 'em.
Given that most internet users would not have the first clue about where to go to opt out or even that they COULD opt out, DoubleClick (and other demographic-collecting companies) should only collect that data which is available without help from cookies (ip addresses, browser versions...).
Since someone can't be tried for the same crime twice, if the files contained evidence of the crime for which he was already convicted, then he is immune from prosecution anyway. If it may contain evidence of another crime, he has the 5th admnedment right to not incriminate himself. Either way, there's nothing the government can do with it unless they decipher it without his assistence.
Slashdot Mirror
See my post "Apex AD600" for answers to your gripes.. http://www.nerd-out.com/apex for more info
I have one, as does my brother and a friend, and 2 friends from work have special ordered them. All the I have seen do have the debug "you should not be here" menu, despite rumors that there are some being produced that do not have it. Also, wrt outputs, mine has Composite Video, S-Video and Component outputs and 2 sets of analog stero outs and a coax digital output. To Pan the zoom, use the big directional buttons in the center of the remote.. you cant miss 'em.
Given that most internet users would not have the first clue about where to go to opt out or even that they COULD opt out, DoubleClick (and other demographic-collecting companies) should only collect that data which is available without help from cookies (ip addresses, browser versions...).
Since someone can't be tried for the same crime twice, if the files contained evidence of the crime for which he was already convicted, then he is immune from prosecution anyway. If it may contain evidence of another crime, he has the 5th admnedment right to not incriminate himself. Either way, there's nothing the government can do with it unless they decipher it without his assistence.