hmmm... not to many people i know have any respect for plumbers or electricians.... mostly they think they are over rated and over paid group of thieves.
I think this guy has seen The Matrix way to many times.
Be sides how could you begin to test a theory about the boundaries and basis of your reality is true while trapped in that reality. This theory of "if reality was to do something that information processing cannot, then it cannot be virtual" is completely insane. What could reality do that with enough processing power and data storage information processing could not do? All he is saying is that if reality were able to do something that we could not recreate in information processing then reality could not be virtual. Ummmmm lets see... using the rules of reality that we know as a basis for a virtual reality how would reality be able to do some then that the virtual one we created couldn't do... unless maybe we missed a rule or do not completely understand some rules.... Then if we do not understand them how could we right a rule to create that behavior in out virtual reality in the first place.
In short this idea is flawed and his testing method is also flawed.
Slashdot Mirror
Umm sorry to burst your bubble there buddy but pool of radiance and the others are older the NWN on aol pool was out on the Commodore 64
hmmm... not to many people i know have any respect for plumbers or electricians.... mostly they think they are over rated and over paid group of thieves.
I think this guy has seen The Matrix way to many times. Be sides how could you begin to test a theory about the boundaries and basis of your reality is true while trapped in that reality. This theory of "if reality was to do something that information processing cannot, then it cannot be virtual" is completely insane. What could reality do that with enough processing power and data storage information processing could not do? All he is saying is that if reality were able to do something that we could not recreate in information processing then reality could not be virtual. Ummmmm lets see... using the rules of reality that we know as a basis for a virtual reality how would reality be able to do some then that the virtual one we created couldn't do... unless maybe we missed a rule or do not completely understand some rules.... Then if we do not understand them how could we right a rule to create that behavior in out virtual reality in the first place. In short this idea is flawed and his testing method is also flawed.