Which explains why FreeBeasties only used to quote loopback numbers to compare to the new Linux stack. "Ooh! FreeBSD is faster over loopback than Linux over the wire. Film at 11." -- Linus T.
They're both good, and my P100 with an EEPro 100 card has no problems saturating a 100BT line.
As long as you do not distribute it, there's this little annoyance law (annoyance for RIAA) which basically allows you to copy and not distribute anything you have purchased.
There is a big difference. Maybe one day you'll figure it out.
MediaOne is not the crappiest cable company.
on
Saving MST3K
·
· Score: 1
The one in Sandpoint, ID is. We're finally getting the Sci-Fi channel on the most expensive cable plan. We have just added Starz as an option (and it costs 2x as much as it does 80 miles away), and they have no clue what a cable modem is.
Microsoft says that IE is the most standards-compliant browser. They say that nothing renders more to the standards than IE.
Now, shit for brains, do you get to play with pre-alpha copies of IE5? Did you compare NS 4.51 to the pre-alpha copy of IE5? No, of course not. Gee, that would be terrible to do because it would disadvantage IE.
No, I don't look at the code. I've never even compiled it. What Open Source means is that users who chose to can submit bug reports to get things fixed faster with more liklihood of them actually getting fixed.
Maybe so, but it's still statistically wrong.
on
Feature:Free Linux
·
· Score: 1
He made the comments about a single install from a single distribution with a specific set of options. Probably had the box setup as a programming box.
Then, the fact that IE5 can't even properly render plain HTML is going to hurt.
But, oooo, this is something that we would never normally see, now isn't it. We have the release that would normally only be used inside Netscape. Gee....
And it tells just about zero regarding their methodologies.
Yeah, there's more to a study than the results. You must manage something. Pity.
Which explains why FreeBeasties only used to quote loopback numbers to compare to the new Linux stack. "Ooh! FreeBSD is faster over loopback than Linux over the wire. Film at 11." -- Linus T.
They're both good, and my P100 with an EEPro 100 card has no problems saturating a 100BT line.
Yeah, numbnuts, it's a subscriber-only document. The available one doesn't have a discussion of Linux.
With the appropriate binaries, you can cross-compile from your PII to your Sparc20 and cut down a whole pile of problems.
Heck, a lot of kernel work is done via cross-compiling for older architectures.
I knew that one with the "too many users" message, which I've never seen an Apache server give. Sure, it probably can, but I've never seen it.
It happened almost a year ago, I believe, but the occasionally happened on irc.ggi-project.org (I forget the real name of the server).
Sheesh. :)
As long as you do not distribute it, there's this little annoyance law (annoyance for RIAA) which basically allows you to copy and not distribute anything you have purchased.
Let me quote (from the IRC talk you were on, I remember you :)
Aweful damn pissy, IMNSHO.
...who had seen Simply Irresistible. Wow.
I have no idea if they're independent or owned, though.
There is a big difference. Maybe one day you'll figure it out.
The one in Sandpoint, ID is. We're finally getting the Sci-Fi channel on the most expensive cable plan. We have just added Starz as an option (and it costs 2x as much as it does 80 miles away), and they have no clue what a cable modem is.
Microsoft says that IE is the most standards-compliant browser. They say that nothing renders more to the standards than IE.
Now, shit for brains, do you get to play with pre-alpha copies of IE5? Did you compare NS 4.51 to the pre-alpha copy of IE5? No, of course not. Gee, that would be terrible to do because it would disadvantage IE.
No, I don't look at the code. I've never even compiled it. What Open Source means is that users who chose to can submit bug reports to get things fixed faster with more liklihood of them actually getting fixed.
He made the comments about a single install from a single distribution with a specific set of options. Probably had the box setup as a programming box.
So don't get so uppity.
They describe this series of 35 steps to wipe data, and I'd guess shred does that?
Then, the fact that IE5 can't even properly render plain HTML is going to hurt.
But, oooo, this is something that we would never normally see, now isn't it. We have the release that would normally only be used inside Netscape. Gee....
Viewer works much nicer.
Every time I click on something in Gecko, my walkie-talkie goes staticy on me.
Now, let's count the total number of servers to power all of microsoft.com. Over 200.
...do not constitute a Linux flaw on our part.
Linux handles 64-bit with the sole exception of physical RAM.
the mail servers are Solaris
Only on Sun boxes, but it is true.
Plus, we have the (hands down) fastest network layer and process creation times.