>(and no, One Big Kernel Lock is *not*
>SMP support)
What a silly thing to claim, of course it is. In your opinion, how many "spinlocks" does the system have to use to have SMP-support? More than 1? More than 2? Is your limit the same for tiny message passing kernels as well?
>I mean had TCP been released under the GPL
>instead of the BSD license, micro$oft would not
>have a TCP stack...
What are you talking about? Microsoft have made their own stack. It doesn't matter what license the original stack had/has.
Regards, Tommy
Well you know, those GNOME folks are used to programs like "ghostname 0.0.1-alpha" so there's no problem for them. *Muhahaha* ;-)
Regards, Tommy
Regards, Tommy
Not everyone agrees with you.
http://www.platypus.ro/essays/linux/vfs.html
And he isn't the only one saying this.
Regards, Tommy
>(and no, One Big Kernel Lock is *not*
>SMP support)
What a silly thing to claim, of course it is. In your opinion, how many "spinlocks" does the system have to use to have SMP-support? More than 1? More than 2? Is your limit the same for tiny message passing kernels as well?
Regards, Tommy
I think you read too much into what I wrote.
In Ruby Integers don't have a length method(unless you define one).
Regards, Tommy
> I just don't find x.length all that
> superior to len(x).
The thing is, ".length" is something you always can use. While len(x) only works for a limited set of types.
Regards, Tommy
One big advantage of a paper mag over an eZine is that you can "forget" the mag at strategical places at work. :-)
Thanks!
Regards, Tommy
Hah, I'd say it's pretty far from "Microsoft Works".
Regards, Tommy
The new Linux 2.4.x doesn't boot even faster.
:^)
Regards, Tommy
I think I'll have to stop posting sarcastic jokes on Slashdot.
Regards, Tommy
Indeed, RMS is an insightful man. He once again proves he's the King of Open Source. Without him, Linux wouldn't have been where it is today.
:^)
Regards, Tommy
>swiped^H^H^H^H^H^Hborrowed BSD licensed code
I think the word you're looking for is "reused".
Regards, TommyOS
A majority of my friends use FreeBSD, not Linux. You gotta choose friends :)
Regards, Tommy
In what way is the SMP support of Linux 2.4 mature? :)
Also, you're implying that mature performs better.
I, for one, can't understand your reasoning.
Regards, Tommy
AFAIK, they needed to make some counters bigger so they don't overflow if the CPU is really fast.
Regards, TOmmy
You make it sound like it would be the end of the world to switch to BSD from Linux. I did that switch 4 years ago and never regretted it.
Regards, Tommy - FreeBSD enthusiast
Mr. Volkerding is an insightful man.
Regards, Tommy - FreeBSD enthusiast
Not only for Linux, they have a version for FreeBSD as well.
Regards, Tommy
>if you want your code to swell corporate coffers
>continue to work on *BSD.
Tell that to RedHat, TurboLinux, SuSe, VA Linux etc.
Regards, Tommy
It's probably because X can map several copies of the videoram into different places.
Regards, Tommy PS. "/kernel" is just an example. DS.
www.qnx.com
Regards, Tommy
Too bad you didn't understand it until after you pressed "Submit". :-)
Regards, Tommy