My body, my choice. Not yours. Not the Doctors. Not some legislator in Albany or Washington. My choice.
As I understand the suggested method with this modification if you can't be identified you will not be used as a donor. Furthermore, if you have chosen to opt out you will not be used as a donor.
I fail to see how someone besides yourself is making the choice for you anymore than they would be making the choice for you today. The difference being, today you happen to agree with them.
...if we get into a car accident, we're quick to shrug it off as just that: an accident. Nobody's fault. We pick up the pieces and move on.
--In the beginning, there was nothing. Then it exploded.
In the beginning, I was driving in my lane at a reasonable speed for the conditions, following at a safe distance and paying attention. The I hit another car.
...But shouldn't they be more suspicious when they see a nervous Pakistani paying his ticket in cash, or when they see young white men in militia uniforms driving around federal buildings in a white Econoline? I mean, at some point one has to stop being self-righteous and let some common sense take over.
It's funny, you could easily say 'a nervous person paying for his or her ticket in cash' and 'people in militia uniforms driving around federal buildings in a white Econoline' and the behavior sounds equally suspicious.
Perhaps gender, age, and ethnicity have nothing to do with.
Re:My brain/eyes are incompatible with 3D TV/movie
on
Hot Or Not — 3D TV
·
· Score: 0, Redundant
Academic: My product is aimed at the people who aren't into the banal garbage that ends up on the radio. While my target audience is smaller I hope to address a hole left by your model.
Slashdot Mirror
Unacceptable.
My body, my choice. Not yours. Not the Doctors. Not some legislator in Albany or Washington. My choice.
As I understand the suggested method with this modification if you can't be identified you will not be used as a donor. Furthermore, if you have chosen to opt out you will not be used as a donor.
I fail to see how someone besides yourself is making the choice for you anymore than they would be making the choice for you today. The difference being, today you happen to agree with them.
If a cop is good, he will survive scrutiny and be elected. If a cop is bad, he loses his job and gets sued by the victims.
This sounds remarkably like the 'if you've got nothing to hide, why are you worried about losing your privacy?' argument.
Although, in this case you are on the job, providing a service to the public.
...if we get into a car accident, we're quick to shrug it off as just that: an accident. Nobody's fault. We pick up the pieces and move on.
--In the beginning, there was nothing. Then it exploded.
In the beginning, I was driving in my lane at a reasonable speed for the conditions, following at a safe distance and paying attention. The I hit another car.
And really, I'd prefer if you didn't call be "conservative"...
(emphasis mine)
Just wanted to wish you a quick recovery from your cold.
...But shouldn't they be more suspicious when they see a nervous Pakistani paying his ticket in cash, or when they see young white men in militia uniforms driving around federal buildings in a white Econoline? I mean, at some point one has to stop being self-righteous and let some common sense take over.
It's funny, you could easily say 'a nervous person paying for his or her ticket in cash' and 'people in militia uniforms driving around federal buildings in a white Econoline' and the behavior sounds equally suspicious.
Perhaps gender, age, and ethnicity have nothing to do with.
Give credit where credit is due: http://www.xkcd.com/684/
Academic: My product is aimed at the people who aren't into the banal garbage that ends up on the radio. While my target audience is smaller I hope to address a hole left by your model.