Ok i read it...
What seems pretty clear to me is that they know how to make a document clearly christian... "In the name of God" this and "by the Grace of God" that.
If the mayflower compact was what they were looking at when they wrote the constitution, it seems pretty clear what they did not want in the foundation of this country.
this means grenades, machine guns, guided missiles, tanks etc., up to and including thermonuclear bombs.
I believe the most common interpritation is that the weapon must be "man portable" such that it is a weapon that a foot soldier would carry.
so yes to machine guns and grenades, maybe to guided missles (depending on type), but no to tanks and thermodunclear bombs.
from TFA
"We were never interested in joining that long humiliating list of miserable artists who made lousy deals, got exploited and ended up broke and with no control over how their life's work was used, and no say in how their names and likenesses were bought and sold."
Is this aimed at the RIAA labels or what?
Ok i read it... What seems pretty clear to me is that they know how to make a document clearly christian... "In the name of God" this and "by the Grace of God" that. If the mayflower compact was what they were looking at when they wrote the constitution, it seems pretty clear what they did not want in the foundation of this country.
this means grenades, machine guns, guided missiles, tanks etc., up to and including thermonuclear bombs.
I believe the most common interpritation is that the weapon must be "man portable" such that it is a weapon that a foot soldier would carry.
so yes to machine guns and grenades, maybe to guided missles (depending on type), but no to tanks and thermodunclear bombs.
from TFA "We were never interested in joining that long humiliating list of miserable artists who made lousy deals, got exploited and ended up broke and with no control over how their life's work was used, and no say in how their names and likenesses were bought and sold." Is this aimed at the RIAA labels or what?