look, you know that microsoft are arse holes. and you know they pedaled "DOS pretending to be something other" for years, and you know about proprietary filetypes... so stop defending a monopolistic, heel dragging set of twats like those in Seattle
we in the e.u. should point out that WW2 ended a long time ago & the us has extracted more than a fair return over the last 60yrs + and stop holding the free world over a barrel
obviously there is missing info, but it's already guessed into place by the algorithms within the camera.
I have been most disappointed with the output of my canon camera.
when one considers that a 100iso/ASA film frame has the equivalent resolution of a 60meg sensor
it is possible to know just how poor digital photo's are presently.
it is so typical that the fans of everything digital will accept such poor quality compared to "old tech"
it started with CD audio being 44.1k instead of the 2 x 64k considered broadcast quality in 1957, and has got steadily worse from then on.
why is the world messing about trying to extract data clearly not present? most "decent" camera models are only 12bit anyway & use a bayer filter on a ccd sensor
sigma released a camera last year without bayer stupidity, better to wait for the rest of the manufactures to catch up
when we get full frame foveon sensors there will be no need for all this gueswork will there?
i went on the bank's site and emailed them asking how much Nazi gold is in their vaults
look, you know that microsoft are arse holes. and you know they pedaled "DOS pretending to be something other" for years, and you know about proprietary filetypes... so stop defending a monopolistic, heel dragging set of twats like those in Seattle
we in the e.u. should point out that WW2 ended a long time ago & the us has extracted more than a fair return over the last 60yrs + and stop holding the free world over a barrel
they are the worst offenders when it comes to proprietary file types, non-replaceable batteries and odd shaped plugs on hardware DON'T BUY MAC
obviously there is missing info, but it's already guessed into place by the algorithms within the camera. I have been most disappointed with the output of my canon camera. when one considers that a 100iso/ASA film frame has the equivalent resolution of a 60meg sensor it is possible to know just how poor digital photo's are presently. it is so typical that the fans of everything digital will accept such poor quality compared to "old tech" it started with CD audio being 44.1k instead of the 2 x 64k considered broadcast quality in 1957, and has got steadily worse from then on.
why is the world messing about trying to extract data clearly not present? most "decent" camera models are only 12bit anyway & use a bayer filter on a ccd sensor sigma released a camera last year without bayer stupidity, better to wait for the rest of the manufactures to catch up when we get full frame foveon sensors there will be no need for all this gueswork will there?