Slashdot Mirror


User: gparent

gparent's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
750
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 750

  1. Re:Fuck you. on Can Large Scale NAT Save IPv4? · · Score: 1

    My email should be obvious if you want to have a talk. I like Google.

  2. Re:Fuck you. on Can Large Scale NAT Save IPv4? · · Score: 1

    Good come back. Does she know you're that much of a loser? Would she mind? What about the rest of your family? I hope not.

  3. Re:Fuck you. on Can Large Scale NAT Save IPv4? · · Score: 1

    So that's a yes, then. What a coward.

  4. Re:Fuck you. on Can Large Scale NAT Save IPv4? · · Score: 1

    Are you scared to answer my question?

  5. Re:Fuck you. on Can Large Scale NAT Save IPv4? · · Score: 1

    Does Trudy know about this? I don't think she'd be happy to find out you threaten people over the internet for days and days.

  6. Re:Fuck you. on Can Large Scale NAT Save IPv4? · · Score: 1

    The only post not by me at that point was by either you, or hedwards (or the obviously excluded Anon Coward). What are you afraid of? Post a picture of yourself with your name, address, and driver's license, and I will do the same. You should already have my name right now, but I suspect your IQ is too low. You're a coward. You are nothing.

  7. Re:Fuck you. on Can Large Scale NAT Save IPv4? · · Score: 1

    No, some of them were me (they are pretty obvious and less trollish, and some of them even include my username).

    Consider my lack of name a test, if you're not a complete retard you'll have my full name and address within 10 minutes.

  8. Re:Fuck you. on Can Large Scale NAT Save IPv4? · · Score: 1

    I was right. Use context, dickhead. And how come you don't have my address yet? Are you retarded?

  9. Re:Real advantage over SSL? on Facebook Introduces One-Time Passwords · · Score: 1

    No one is going to use that LiveCD. They aren't all nerds.

  10. Re:Fuck you. on Can Large Scale NAT Save IPv4? · · Score: 1

    hedwards was way too many posts ago for me to care. It was obvious by the content of my post who was talking to anyone but a fuckwit like you who can't even find my name by himself when it's blindingly obvious.

  11. Re:Fuck you. on Can Large Scale NAT Save IPv4? · · Score: 1

    To be honest, if you weren't completely retarded, you'd have my address, full name, and would have killed me already. I'm getting too popular for my taste right now and a child could find me.

  12. Re:Real advantage over SSL? on Facebook Introduces One-Time Passwords · · Score: 1

    Might have to do with server load and cost vs benefit. I doubt sending texts is much of a server load when they already do it for users, however SSL is used by only us at the moment, imagine if all of Facebook started using it... Not that I agree, but it's probably an economics thing.

  13. Re:Fuck you. on Can Large Scale NAT Save IPv4? · · Score: 1

    I was the only one who posted 'above' back when I said that. You're dumb. And no, I'm not cowering, I explained it clearly above kid.

  14. Re:Real advantage over SSL? on Facebook Introduces One-Time Passwords · · Score: 1

    SSL does nothing to prevent keylogging, this is a different issue. Network sniffing is less of a problem for most people than getting the password from say, IE's / FF's password safe or from an actual keylogger.

  15. Re:Fuck you. on Can Large Scale NAT Save IPv4? · · Score: 1

    yes, I did say it was me. A few posts ago, when I mentioned 'I'm the same guy as above'. But you're a moron so you probably didn't realize. Apologies accepted in advance.

    I'm not going to give you my name and address because A. I live in another country, so it's a pointless exercise. B. You're such a fucking freak that I wouldn't be surprised if you weren't just a 12 year old kid trolling and actually wanted to kill me for real. C. I won't stoop that low for a pathetic retarded child. And #33881316 isn't me. He's quite a funny guy, though, so props if it's you.

  16. Re:Define "Public" on Researchers Test WiFi Access From Moving Vehicles · · Score: 1

    Logging onto an unsecured WiFi connection can be done incredibly easy while I'm in my pajamas in the middle of a blizzard. It can also be done innocently and unknowingly. "Wait, there are 4 "linksys" networks, which was mine again?".

    *laugh* For one, there is no "it was so easy I did it in my underpants" defense. Ease doesn't equate with right -- stealing candy from babies is trivial, for instance. ;-)

    The difference is that you do not begin automatically stealing candy from babies as you walk around them. The argument is perfectly fine.

  17. Re:Real advantage over SSL? on Facebook Introduces One-Time Passwords · · Score: 1, Troll

    Or maybe they just want to help people who login from school computers, "Free WiFi" places, and such?

    Oh wait nevermind, you're right. All your phone numbers are belong to them, 9/11 was a hoax, we never landed on the moon, the titanic was bombed. *Salutes* Sir! Yes! Sir! Carry on!

  18. Re:Fuck you. on Can Large Scale NAT Save IPv4? · · Score: 1

    i already stated i was gparent, you're retarded.

  19. Re:Fuck you. on Can Large Scale NAT Save IPv4? · · Score: 1

    so those people who overcame the limitations when there were 0 ISPs, and created the ISP option you have today... how did they create that ISP? people today don't have the same option to create an ISP in the same way?

    what changed?

    Nothing changed. There's no need for a new ISP. Why create an inferior one?

    i did not assume or state you were american. i dismissed your ignorance and then recalled the reason americans rose up to rid themselves of the company of idiots LIKE you.

    You're allowed to admit you're wrong.

    you're an idiot.

    Hearing it from you is meaningless.

  20. Re:Fuck you. on Can Large Scale NAT Save IPv4? · · Score: 1

    You're such a fucking dumb stupid troll, but here I go anyway.

    The ISP in my area was, in fact, created by people who overcome the limitations placed on them. Other ISPs wouldn't run high speed cable internet up to where I live, so a few people formed a cooperative and did it themselves.

    As for getting a new ISP, it isn't an option. There aren't any other ones here. Not that there would be a reason to switch - They're the best one around. They're a better ISP than the ISP they lease their backbone line from. Better prices, better service, better technical support.

    And by the way, nice assumption, I'm not american. You're pathetic.

  21. Re:Fuck you. on Can Large Scale NAT Save IPv4? · · Score: 1

    Yeah, lemme just go in my ISP's server room and reconfigure the routers.

  22. Re:Accelerometers in phones? on Could Anti-Texting Laws Make Roads More Dangerous? · · Score: 1

    I take it you've never used a vehicle, ever. They tend to accelerate. Buses do it too.

  23. Re:Just in Time! on Methane Survey Reveals Mars Is Far From 'Dead' · · Score: 1

    Hell yeah, that was quick. Maybe we should wait until Netcraft confirms it before claiming something isn't 'dead' though.

  24. Re:And that was to be expected on Security Concerns Paramount After Early Reviews of Diaspora Code · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not a jab at all. It's perfectly normal for inexperienced coders to have security issues in their applications, just like you can have any other bug.

  25. Re:Comparisons like this don't mean squat... on Windows 7 vs. Ubuntu 10.04 · · Score: 1

    That's my plan right now. For VS2010 it's easy, but for Starcraft 2 it's another story. I have to test it with Wine first.