Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Introduces One-Time Passwords

angry tapir writes "Worried about logging into Facebook from a strange computer? There's now a way to get into the popular social network without entering your regular Facebook password. It's called a temporary password. To use it, users must list their mobile phone numbers with their Facebook accounts. They can then text a number from their phones and Facebook sends back a temporary password that is good for 20 minutes. The service will be available worldwide in the next few weeks."

215 comments

  1. Great idea. by Timmmm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now can we please get one-time credit card authorisation?

    1. Re:Great idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Move to Sweden and you already have it :)

    2. Re:Great idea. by Rijnzael · · Score: 4, Informative

      BOA does this already if you're in the US.

    3. Re:Great idea. by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      The downside to these one-time cc numbers is that some american (I've yet to see a swedish company deny these numbers) companies tend to deny them. I had that problem with Blizzard when it came to WoW upgrades, I could pay for game time but for game upgrades my purchases were denied...

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    4. Re:Great idea. by n0dna · · Score: 1

      Discover also does this.

    5. Re:Great idea. by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 4, Informative

      Now can we please get one-time credit card authorisation?

      Amex did this for a while about 10 years ago. I used it and liked it. Then it went away.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    6. Re:Great idea. by barzok · · Score: 1

      And here I thought they just buried it on the site and I couldn't find it. They completely did away with it? Jerks.

    7. Re:Great idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Citicards/Citibank does this.

    8. Re:Great idea. by Mascot · · Score: 1

      The tech has been there for years. For any online store supporting verified by visa/mastercard, I'm sent to my bank's authorization page and required to enter my security token's current code and personal password.

      For whatever reason though, there are still tons of sites out there that do not support verified by visa/mastercard.

      On the other hand, it's only a matter of time before we get cards with built-in token generators. At which point I would expect CC companies to start refusing transactions based on nothing but the printed info on the card.

    9. Re:Great idea. by narooze · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is at least one Swedish company that does deny them, SF Bio (the largest movie theater chain in Sweden). However, in their case there is a good reason; to get the tickets you've bought online with your credit card you have to swipe the same card in their ticket printing machines. You could definitely come up with another way to get the tickets once they are bought, but as long as you have to have the credit card with which you paid to get the tickets, one-time cc numbers are probably out of the question.

    10. Re:Great idea. by pspahn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Swedes see movies in actual theaters? I assumed everyone just torrented everything.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    11. Re:Great idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no idea how much I hate my fucking job, and how fucking bored I am right now. :(

    12. Re:Great idea. by vlm · · Score: 1

      For any online store supporting verified by visa/mastercard, I'm sent to my bank's authorization page and required to enter my .... personal password.

      Sounds like a great phishing opportunity... Thats why I don't like it. Especially since "most people" use the same password for everything.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    13. Re:Great idea. by JLangbridge · · Score: 1

      I'm in France, and I have 2 options. One is, as said above, create a temporary credit card number that is good for only one transaction for a specified amount, but the other option allows me to buy on most sites in France, and on the authorization screen, my bank sends me a text message that I have to enter in on the site. No password, no payment. These codes are one-shot codes, and I don't have to enter any personal information. I love this system, it doesn't add a lot of complication for me, except for having a cell phone next to me 24 hours a day (which I have anyway), and no personal information is sent.

      --
      The urgent is done, the impossible is on the way, for miracles expect a small delay.
    14. Re:Great idea. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I have a LOT of phone numbers stored in my phone. This new "feature" would let me jack with any of their accounts if TFS is accurate.

    15. Re:Great idea. by Mascot · · Score: 1

      What's your point, precisely? That it's somehow worse to require extra information compared to only what's physically printed on a credit card? If so, I think most would disagree rather strongly with you. Even a simple password verification like that (which I simplified, one also needs information from birth certificate) prevents a stolen card from being used in online stores.

      Obviously I prefer my bank's solution (token). But I don't think we're going to get there until the token generators are actually on the cards themselves. Otherwise people will tend to prefer their bank's credit card offerings over others, since "others" would mean having to handle even more token generators.

    16. Re:Great idea. by Peach+Rings · · Score: 1

      ...
      Having someone as a contact doesn't mean you can read their texts. Not that SMS is even remotely secure.

    17. Re:Great idea. by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      Sure. Give me your card details and I'll set it up for you.

    18. Re:Great idea. by maxume · · Score: 1

      You can rest assured there huckleberry, I'm sure that the Facebook will only send a onetime password for an account to the phone number linked to that account.

      (The 'text a number' in the summary means that they can send a text message to a specific number Facebook has setup, Facebook will then examine the sender of that message and send a password to them if they have an account on the Facebook)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    19. Re:Great idea. by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      What if there's another reason Facebook are doing this?
      It's a good idea, but it's also one that will increase the number of people who put their mobile phone number in their facebook profile. What if Facebook were looking at leveraging this for a Facebook/Skype/Facebook-branded mobile phone OS as has been rumoured recently? It'd be very handy for them if they already had a lot of users who'd already input their numbers, so when they launched any mobile services the "dial friend" option was already working...

    20. Re:Great idea. by dillpick6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What happens when your phone gets stolen? I wouldn't them to have my phone and access to things like my email and facebook, let alone my credit cards and bank accounts. This seems even more risky considering the chance most smart phones could be hacked or some app on the phone turns out to be malicious.

    21. Re:Great idea. by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      At the theatre here (Canada) you can buy online and get a PDF to print and have scanned on the way in, or enter the CC / reference number in a terminal at the theatre, or have it sent to your smartphone, and have the screen scanned.

    22. Re:Great idea. by scosco62 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the company makes it not worth it......

    23. Re:Great idea. by Himring · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I used it and liked it. Then it went away.

      My ex-gf did one time pass too with a bunch of different guys. I used to like her. Then she went away....

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    24. Re:Great idea. by paeanblack · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but when will the carriers support one-time phone numbers?

    25. Re:Great idea. by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      Bank of America has this.

      Caught someone using a number I had used and they canceled my number and got me a new card.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    26. Re:Great idea. by trentblase · · Score: 1

      Citibank does this also (for credit cards.. not sure about check cards)

    27. Re:Great idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Giving your phone numbers to your bank is not the same than giving it to FACEBOOK (which business model is all about selling users' private data)...

    28. Re:Great idea. by alexo · · Score: 1

      BOA does this already if you're in the US.

      And if I'm in Canada, what options do I have?

  2. texting by Theoboley · · Score: 5, Funny

    867-5309 will give you a password of "Jenny"

    --
    Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    1. Re:texting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL good reference, though not the best with that number.

      I was at the mall after picking up Civ IV, sitting down while I waited for the bus. People pass by, I hear conversations. A couple of gals, none of which could be over 18 were talking about a party while walking by. One was bragging that someone she was not interested in tried to get her number, and she gave him 867-5309. It took me a second, hadn't heard the song in a while. Then I realized - oh yeah, the song. I was surprised someone that young knew the reference (under 18 at the time Civ IV was released).

    2. Re:texting by gijoel · · Score: 1

      What do expect from a number you found on a bathroom wall?

    3. Re:texting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a good time from your mom.

    4. Re:texting by sho-gun · · Score: 1

      Or possibly, Gem Plumbing

  3. yeah, just give us your phone number by YouWantFriesWithThat · · Score: 1

    i am sure that there is no chance that they were scraping around for an excuse to collect cell phone numbers from their users. adding that very unique information to their already massive database on every user will make it much more valuable. as i tell my friends, it's just a pyramid scheme. you get a free website with communication tools bolted on and they get to know everything about you and will sell it to whoever they want.

    1. Re:yeah, just give us your phone number by TheKidWho · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't think you know what a pyramid scheme is...

    2. Re:yeah, just give us your phone number by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      Yes, he most definitely does not, however the rest of the GPs post does seem to be reasonable.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    3. Re:yeah, just give us your phone number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what an informative and exhaustively detailed response.

      in a pyramid scheme the person (or people) on top make money off the efforts of the people on the bottom who don't ever really have a net gain from their involvement. the reason it works is that there are more suckers at the bottom than people at the top. if you can't see how this pertains to facebook then you are too dull to be helped.

    4. Re:yeah, just give us your phone number by TheKidWho · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't think you know what a Pyramid scheme is either...

      Let's wikipedia it:

      A pyramid scheme is a non-sustainable business model that involves promising participants payment primarily for enrolling other people into the scheme, rather than from any real investment or sale of products or services to the public. Pyramid schemes are a form of fraud.

      What you're describing on the other hand is just exploitation.

      if you can't see how this pertains to facebook then you are too dull to be helped.

      I've never heard that one before.

    5. Re:yeah, just give us your phone number by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      So you are claiming that face book somehow pays the people who were in early with the personal data of those who got in later?

      Or you are ignorant of what a pyramid scheme, and too retarded to know that responding to a correction on a topic you are ignorant about is foolish.

         

    6. Re:yeah, just give us your phone number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has nothing to do with a Pyramid Scheme you idiot. Are there people at the top who make money off people at the bottom adding new users to the scheme?

    7. Re:yeah, just give us your phone number by choongiri · · Score: 1

      The key point is that for it to be a pyramid scheme, the people underneath need to think they are going to make money the more people they subscribe into the scheme. Money is the incentive. Without a doubt, facebook makes more money the more people you convince to join it, but there never was, and never will be a promise of money from facebook to you for signing people up. Therefore, it's not a pyramid scheme.

    8. Re:yeah, just give us your phone number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grammar police alert: use of qualifying the word unique detected.

      Something is either unique or it isn't. You cannot say that something is quite unique, very unique, totally unique etc.

      Please be a good citizen and repent of your crimes against language.

    9. Re:yeah, just give us your phone number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in February of this year our account wasn't yet "verified" and we had to type a captcha for *every single* new friend that needed to be added.

      The FB solution was to have us authenticate ourselves: provide your cell number. Now, I'm not sure if my mother succumbed to that, because she added about 30 friends without giving in; at some point I realized that the bullying had just gone away.

      Finding that Android returns your cell # to Google's location services is making me think twice about them too.

    10. Re:yeah, just give us your phone number by Himring · · Score: 1

      Vizzini: HE DIDN'T FALL? INCONCEIVABLE.

      Inigo Montoya: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    11. Re:yeah, just give us your phone number by baKanale · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's the one where they steal your cellphone number, and use it to track your movements, then wait until you're all alone and kidnap you, taking you to the desert and forcing you to build giant pyramids all day, right?

    12. Re:yeah, just give us your phone number by kiwimate · · Score: 1

      Something is either unique or it isn't. You cannot say that something is quite unique, very unique, totally unique etc.

      Grammar police alert pedantic alert: of course you can say this. I think it's even grammatically correct. It would be more accurate in stating this is semantically incorrect, and perhaps that you should not say this.

      Now, let us by all means return to the continuing debate...

    13. Re:yeah, just give us your phone number by imthesponge · · Score: 1

      They already do worse than this; they allow you to "conveniently" add everyone that's in your phone's list. If you have a friend that's done this, then Facebook already has your phone number.

  4. Real advantage over SSL? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yet another way for a big Internet organization to collect phone numbers.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by Rijnzael · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't think this is an attempt to prevent interception of passwords in transit over the network; I believe it's an attempt to prevent keyloggers or other nefarious software/hardware on a machine from impacting the user's privacy.

    2. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Since when has Facebook started caring about user privacy? This is, as noted, an attempt to get more people to divulge their cell phone numbers.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    3. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by sinclair44 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      How exactly are phone numbers useful to them?

      --
      Omnes stulti sunt.
    4. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by bball99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      won't matter if you use a throwaway phone - all my phones are $4.88 from Dollar General or the local FYE

    5. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by silverglade00 · · Score: 2, Funny

      *RING* Hello?
      This is an automated call from Farmville reminding you to harvest your crops. Farmville would also like to remind you that you can get a free Special Edition Purple Cow!!!11!!!ZoMg! for your farm just for trying out the new Facebook Mastercard...

    6. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by tgd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sometimes there's a conspiracy.

      Sometimes you just really don't understand.

      If you think this has anything to do with SSL, guess which camp you're in?

    7. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How exactly are phone numbers useful to them?

      One more vector of information which can be correlated to you, spammed, sold, analyzed, or mined.

      People won't know all of the ways this could be a bad idea until it's way too late -- same with most of Facebook and privacy. Give everything away and hope for the best, or don't use it at all ... and still hope for the best.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    8. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Until one of your Facebook friends wants to contact you, and uses the number you've listed on Facebook.

      (Since this integrates very well with my HTC Android phone I use this all the time without realising it.)

    9. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by JustOK · · Score: 4, Insightful

      they've always cared about user privacy...just not in the traditional sense of protecting it.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    10. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by suso · · Score: 1

      Facebook caring about user privacy? Pulease!

    11. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by DrgnDancer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In this case it could be both. I mean, it's a really good system for protecting your password, but it also gives your cell number to Facebook which they really like. If you use a lot of public computers this becomes kind of a win-win. You get increased security, Facebook gets your number. If I want to access Facebook and I have my phone I use the Facebook app, so for me this isn't very useful.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    12. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by gparent · · Score: 1, Troll

      Or maybe they just want to help people who login from school computers, "Free WiFi" places, and such?

      Oh wait nevermind, you're right. All your phone numbers are belong to them, 9/11 was a hoax, we never landed on the moon, the titanic was bombed. *Salutes* Sir! Yes! Sir! Carry on!

    13. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by Sancho · · Score: 1

      It's not about privacy--it's about keeping the people behind the account as the account owner so that aggregated information about that person/account remains accurate.

    14. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by Yer+Mom · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, but most Facebook users have already added their number to their profiles so their friends can call them...

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
    15. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by Theoboley · · Score: 2, Funny

      are those the ones that come with the candy inside?

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    16. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What good does my cell number do Facebook? Where I am, it's illegal for a business to make unsolicited calls to a personal cell phone, what else would someone want my cell number for?

    17. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by Locutus · · Score: 1

      if they cared one bit then they would default to using SSL/https for login but they do not. The next time you login, look for that tiny 'lock' icon to show it's a secure connection. You won't find it. Now, login with SSL/https like this, https://www.facebook.com and you'll see that little lock icon.

      yes, they still suck at even the most basic of security tasks.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    18. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I likes me a good conspiracy, and it only took me 4 hours to figger out what this has to do with solid-state lighting. the only problem now is I can hears helicopters and there's a strange van parked two trailers down.

    19. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facebook themselves won't need them, but their marketing partners and advertisers would sure love this sack of phone numbers. Doesn't matter if it's intentional or not.

    20. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by CSMoran · · Score: 1

      SSL/https does not help agains keyloggers... On "school computers" I would worry about keyloggers, not mitm attacks.

      --
      Every end has half a stick.
    21. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by CSMoran · · Score: 1

      To correlate your FB profile with other instances where the same phone number occurs on the net?

      --
      Every end has half a stick.
    22. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by gparent · · Score: 1

      SSL does nothing to prevent keylogging, this is a different issue. Network sniffing is less of a problem for most people than getting the password from say, IE's / FF's password safe or from an actual keylogger.

    23. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Facebook knows more about you than anyone else, then they can offer you ads that you're more likely to click on than ads from someone else. That means they can charge more money to advertisers than others. It's in Facebook's interest for your information NOT to leak out.

      Besides, what the hell does Facebook want people's cell phone numbers for? You can't use them for marketing or most commercial activities (thanks to lots of legal restrictions), but they're great as a trusted side channel.

    24. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're savvy enough to use a one-time password and hooked on FB to where you're willing to sign in on an "unsafe" computer, you've probably got text alerts or Facebook Mobile set up already. In which case they've already got your number.

    25. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Exactly. And as an added bonus, anyone who gains access to your cell phone now has access to your Facebook account as well.

    26. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by Locutus · · Score: 1

      just saying that they haven't even started with the basics. IMO

      I think the wider audience are not those without computers and who use public computers but those with mobile devices. anyways, this seems like PR more than anything.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    27. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by gparent · · Score: 1

      Might have to do with server load and cost vs benefit. I doubt sending texts is much of a server load when they already do it for users, however SSL is used by only us at the moment, imagine if all of Facebook started using it... Not that I agree, but it's probably an economics thing.

    28. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by Locutus · · Score: 1

      but wouldn't you think when everyone is using an open login system and they are not securing that it just seems silly to be addressing the cases when people use someone elses computer?

      maybe what's needed is a way for a virtual machine to grab the keyboard driver before anyone else and allow booting clean and secure media without worrying about key loggers. Besides, are these school computers not running re-imaged after every user? This is 2010 is it not?

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    29. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by Locutus · · Score: 1

      a fine example of why this could just be a PR event more than anything of much value to more than a small portion of the user base.

      or maybe they are finding out that more and more Windows computers are infected with key loggers and
      this is the first step in moving everyone to a dynamic login option.

      I'd rather see those public systems shut down as opposed to just providing patches for each service used on them. Send a bootable liveCD to each user found to have lost their access by using a keylogger infected computer. Hiding the security issues is like a dog chasing their tail.

      LoB

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    30. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by gparent · · Score: 1

      No one is going to use that LiveCD. They aren't all nerds.

    31. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by sinclair44 · · Score: 1
      Except Facebook doesn't sell or give this information to advertisers:

      We never share your personal information with advertisers. We never sell your personal information to anyone. These protections are yours no matter what privacy settings you use; they apply equally to people who share openly with everyone and to people who share with only select friends.

      --
      Omnes stulti sunt.
    32. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Except Facebook doesn't sell or give this information to advertisers

      Unfortunately, I don't think I believe Facebook when they say anything about privacy. They seem to do everything they can to make sure that at some point you make all of your information public.

      Their track record on privacy is, IMO, a joke. They don't seem to care. I think Zuckerhead is on record as saying as much.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    33. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by Locutus · · Score: 1

      sad that you have to be a nerd to know how to put a CD in and restart your computer and get a browser running.

      we must be getting dumber instead of smarter or our education system is lacking seriously. Then again, these computer things are just a fad.

      Ya ya I know, most people don't even know how to connect a DVD player to their TV set and have to hire a Media Installation Expert to do it. As I said, sad.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    34. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by gparent · · Score: 1

      It's not that it is hard, it's that for most people, it's completely unnecessary. Using a completely different and less than obvious operating system just so they can log in to Facebook? If you did that and explained it to your non-geek friends you'd probably get laughed that. Hell, I'm a geek and I wouldn't even do it because I really don't care that much about my Facebook account.

      And that doing the simpliest things ever. Now imagine the harder stuff (NoScript and properly allowing only legit sites, checking SSL fingerprints, looking for proper CA information in case your network admin decides to sign gmail.com with his own CA that your domain trusts at work, etc.)

      It becomes increasingly hard for a non-geeky user to do all this.

    35. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by gparent · · Score: 1

      that's just*

    36. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by Raul+Acevedo · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how SSL protects you from a key logger.

      --
      In a real emergency, we would have all fled in terror, and you would not have been notified.
    37. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      SSL will be helpful to protect your password against people listening the network.

      A key logger on a machine (that belongs to the hotel for instance) is going to act before the transmission is performed and therefore can hardly be prevented. However, if the hotel client is IT aware, it will be easier for her to detect the spy tool on the very hardware she has in her hands, than it would be to detect a distant network device spy.

      An hotel implementing a key logger on the computers takes a bigger risk to be caught.

      Ideally, one should bring her own laptop and use only authentications via SSL to reduce dramatically the risk of password stealing.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    38. Re:Real advantage over SSL? by Backward+Z · · Score: 1

      Then why can't I do the same from the email account that's registered to my Facebook account?

      I think the truth is that it's a little of both. It's a means for them to collect phone numbers without being the bad guy.

  5. Re:Phone Theft. by bilbravo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wouldn't stealing your phone also give them loads of other personal information? And the first thing you think of is they will have your facebook account?

  6. makes sense by sakura+the+mc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    but that limited password better come with limited privledges to protect the account from getting jacked.

    1. Re:makes sense by Rhaban · · Score: 2, Insightful

      agreed, you should not be able to change your e-mail/password/privacy setting with it.

    2. Re:makes sense by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      What difference does it make? The intent of someone breaching a FB account is very rarely to prevent access on the part of the original account holder; rather to read personal information like messages, post spam, or possibly steal items from Facebook applications (games). Protecting against password changes won't prevent any of that.

  7. What about privileges? by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    With sufficiently complex spyware, an untrusted computer could do much damage even with a temporary access: Install applications, scrape your email, change your real password... this is only secure if the temporary access is severely restricted in what it can do with the account.

  8. Possibly a good move by Rijnzael · · Score: 1

    I think this is a step in the right direction, assuming spoofing is difficult or impossible for these SMS messages (anyone care to weigh in there?). Still, my personal policy is to never login to a system which contains somewhat sensitive data from a computer that I don't fully control or whose controller I don't fully trust. Their solution seems like a workaround, while users could just stop any potential privacy violation at the source and opt not to provide their credentials via others' machines.

    1. Re:Possibly a good move by camcorder · · Score: 1

      Maybe you can live with not logging in from a "computer" that you don't fully control in your basement, but in real world, there happens to be a lot of times that you need to login through a computer (and sometimes only available ones are public). On the other hand, it's not over only with control of the computer you used as client. You need the control of the network as well.

      General rule of thumb should be, never put anything secret at all to databases that could be accessed over public networks, like Internet. If you don't do that, just admit that the thing is not a secret anymore and live with it.

    2. Re:Possibly a good move by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      If Facebook now stores people's sensitive data, we are in a lot of trouble...

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    3. Re:Possibly a good move by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      What situations do you wind up in where you need to log in to an untrusted computer, and you don't have any time to go find one you trust?

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    4. Re:Possibly a good move by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Public labs at a university. While I have a hard time thinking of any time that I -need- to log into Facebook and can't just use, say, a smartphone app. There are a lot of occasions where in university you realize that there is something you need to do online (such as quickly type and turn in a paper you just remembered is due in 2 hours) but you can't trust the security of a lab computer (its pretty easy to install hardware keyloggers that just go between the PS2 or USB port and capture keystrokes) so you end up logging into an unsecured machine.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    5. Re:Possibly a good move by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, although I think that scenario says more about universities than anything else (like the fact that you have to log in to lab computers just to type a short essay). I do not find myself in that situation too frequently though, although it could just be the way I work (I usually have my laptop available).

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    6. Re:Possibly a good move by xaxa · · Score: 1

      What situations do you wind up in where you need to log in to an untrusted computer, and you don't have any time to go find one you trust?

      On holiday
      At some point between home and the amazing party you have an invite to on Facebook, but can't remember the location of
      At school/college/university

      Maybe when you want someone else to log in for you, e.g. to ask someone else to look up a phone number when you aren't near a computer.

    7. Re:Possibly a good move by tepples · · Score: 1

      What situations do you wind up in where you need to log in to an untrusted computer, and you don't have any time to go find one you trust?

      Traveling without a laptop, for one. Some people aren't wealthy enough to own more than one PC. Others who have purchased an iPod touch or iPad no longer feel the need to carry a laptop, but a lot of Facebook apps require Flash, which doesn't work on iPod touch or iPad. Or traveling to the home of a relative who can't or won't give you the WEP key. Or in the break room at work.

    8. Re:Possibly a good move by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Fire up the on-screen software keyboard. If you have any students at all who have reduced mobility in their hands / arms, it'll be on every computer across the campus.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    9. Re:Possibly a good move by Sancho · · Score: 1

      but a lot of Facebook apps require Flash, which doesn't work on iPod touch or iPad.

      If you need to log in to Facebook and use a flash app, you might want to consider seeking help.

    10. Re:Possibly a good move by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      work, I can FB at work without fear of my password being logged by the Overlords.

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
  9. Please tell me this isn't serious... by cfriedt · · Score: 1

    Please tell me I'm not the only one who sees this.

    What if someone else uses your cellular phone, or worse, someone uses your cellular phone while you aren't aware of it? That's practically like giving anyone free access to your account.

    I think the facebook geniuses are confusing the one-time-pass with the one-time-pad ... particularly in this case, they are two very different things, specifically because the pad is requires that the key be exchanged *securely*.

    1. Re:Please tell me this isn't serious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      More to the point, if you need your phone anyway, why don't you just browse facebook on your phone, like all my friends already do?

    2. Re:Please tell me this isn't serious... by Gamma747 · · Score: 1

      Most people don't have smartphones.

  10. Re:Phone Theft. by ByOhTek · · Score: 0

    Typically this type of login requires both the one time passwords AND your normal passwords.

    Then again, it is implemented by FB and I didn't RTFA, so it is quite possible that they intend to use the OTP without the original passwords.

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  11. Stolen Phone? by friedmud · · Score: 1

    I wonder what happens if someone steals your phone (or just if a roommate picks it up).... can they then get into your Facebook account by requesting a one-time password?

    I'm sure they've thought of this trivial case... but I wonder how they're going to handle it.

    1. Re:Stolen Phone? by Rhaban · · Score: 3, Informative

      a lot of people who use have smartphones with a facebook app, so if someone steals the phone they already have access to your fb account.

    2. Re:Stolen Phone? by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Like another poster said most phones already have a Facebook app. But really, that is why you have a lock on your phone if you are around people who you don't trust.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    3. Re:Stolen Phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just have the user identify themselves normally on their trusted device (mobile phone).
      The user then get the temporary password which can be used without worry on untrusted device (public computer).

    4. Re:Stolen Phone? by Mordaximus · · Score: 1

      Someone who is security conscious enough to use this service, is also probably bright enough to actually secure their smartphone with a PIN.

    5. Re:Stolen Phone? by vlm · · Score: 1

      I don't use facebook, but obviously post that you used the service to your wall. Then when your little minions comment on how you "forgot your password this morning" ... but you didn't ... then you'll get the idea.

      It would also be semi amusing to require a cellphone photo of a human as part of the password request.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    6. Re:Stolen Phone? by compro01 · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you've got a touchscreen phone, that PIN may be much less secure than you think.

      http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/08/11/128244/Touchscreens-Open-To-Smudge-Attacks

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    7. Re:Stolen Phone? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Someone who is security conscious enough to use this service, is also probably bright enough to actually secure their smartphone with a PIN.

      If they have a smartphone -- in which case, they can log into Facebook without a computer from the phone -- they probably have little need for this service. This service would seem to be most useful for people with dumb phones that use facebook from untrusted computers.

      And I think it is a mistake to think that someone who uses one feature that is promoted as offering security is likely to be security-conscious and use layered security and defense in depth. They are just as likely, if not moreso, to be generally security-ignorant and to have picked up the presented technique and assume that they don't need other security around the same information.

    8. Re:Stolen Phone? by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      easy - activate the pin number lock for your phone. It's a feature every phone has had for years.

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    9. Re:Stolen Phone? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I'm incredibly bright (have an advanced degree!) and I don't secure my phone with a PIN. Having to punch in 4 numbers 100 times a day is a much bigger hassle than the rare chance somebody steals my phone and is able to do anything with it before I remotely wipe it.

  12. Hooray! by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 1

    Now nobody will ever know what you post on Facebook from an untrusted computer! Wait..

    --
    This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
  13. Re:Phone Theft. by Khuffie · · Score: 1

    Umm, the whole point of this login system is not to use your original password at all. Avoid keyloggers/malware on computers you don't know/trust.

  14. Re:Phone Theft. by poetmatt · · Score: 1

    if your phone is being stolen you have security problems other than facebook.

  15. Copied from windows live. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Copied from windows live.

  16. Re:Phone Theft. by Rhaban · · Score: 1

    Typically this type of login requires both the one time passwords AND your normal passwords.

    No, the goal is that you can use this 1-time password on a non-trusted computer and it would not be useful if keylogged. Requiring you to also type your normal password makes no sense in this context.

  17. Stay calm and you won't by Compaqt · · Score: 1

    get hurt.

    Hand over your cell phone and tell me your Facebook email.

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
  18. My Discover Card Does This ... by eldavojohn · · Score: 2, Informative

    Now can we please get one-time credit card authorization?

    You mean like my Discover More Credit Card offers me?

    You have the option of re-using the same one for a retailer or just continually requesting a new one if your dealings with them are infrequent or shady.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:My Discover Card Does This ... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Funny

      Fry: Do you take Visa?
      Clerk: Visa hasn't existed for 500 years.
      Fry: American Express?
      Clerk: 600 years.
      Fry: Discover Card?
      Clerk: Sorry, we don't take Discover.

  19. Yay...ummm..except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...now Facebook has your phone number.

  20. ZeusBot by n0dna · · Score: 1

    "Man in the Mobile"

    Smartphone variant already set to harvest OTP.

  21. Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can implement as many security features you want, but it won't fix human laziness and stupidity.

    1. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, everything is hopeless.
      Why don't we all just kill ourselves and get it over with?

  22. facebook: what an incredible waste of time by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    Hurry! I need my password to I can login and complain about my miserable life and post pictures from the bar celebrating my miserable life!

    Whatever did people do before facebook? Oh yeah, they actually talked to people face-to-face and spent 'quality time' in full 3-D social interaction.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:facebook: what an incredible waste of time by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      So I guess you don't email or talk on the phone... because those both eliminate the need for face-to-face conversation. Oh, so does /.

      I don't hang out with my friends nearly as much as I use to... but that's not due to facebook, that is because we're all in our 30s now and most have spouses and young children. But I am able to keep in contact with them on a daily basis, if I need.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    2. Re:facebook: what an incredible waste of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure! If every single one of your friends and relatives are all immediately nearby, and all happen to have free time coincidentally at the EXACT same time as everyone else.

      But for the rest of the civilized world, family moves away, people have different work hours or days off, or are *gasp* doing different things than you on your day off, or are just plain on the other side of the city, and if you want to show them or talk to them about something interesting, it doesn't require a 45 minute drive. One way. In a smaller city. When the streets are NOT busy.

      So if I happen to enjoy communicating with friends more often than the once or twice a month that we happen to both have the same time off, with nothing previously planned elsewhere, then it's convenient to have a website where not one, but SEVERAL people can all communicate and share with eachother, at times that are convenent to EVERYONE, not just centered around your little world.

  23. Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how much will Zuckerberg be making off of the sale of all these phone numbers?

  24. Re:Phone Theft. by Cwix · · Score: 1

    What if you had to text your regular password to facebook to get a one time pass.

    --
    You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
  25. Steal A Phone by kellyb9 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So if someone steals my phone they not only have my phone, they now have my facebook account. Great job Facebook!

    1. Re:Steal A Phone by hjf · · Score: 1

      Got a better idea?

    2. Re:Steal A Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, don't be so needy of Facebook.

    3. Re:Steal A Phone by hjf · · Score: 1

      OH! I found the solution to contamination too! Don't be so needy of cars and electricity!!!

      Cunt.

  26. Re:Phone Theft. by Rhaban · · Score: 1

    What if you had to text your regular password to facebook to get a one time pass.

    Then you would have to delete your text history every time you use this feature.

  27. TEXT - What is that? by jimwelch · · Score: 1

    I have it disabled on all 5 of my family phones. COST!

    --
    Never trust a man wearing a coat and tie!
    1. Re:TEXT - What is that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sucks for you.. I have Immix and their $29.99 500 minute plan includes unlimited texting to anyone

    2. Re:TEXT - What is that? by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I do too. I just use the Google Voice app to get free texting to all 5 of my family phones! COST!

      --
      It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
    3. Re:TEXT - What is that? by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      At 2 cents a text on my prepaid, it doesn't add up too fast.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
  28. just wait for those textvertisements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with facebook's regards to privacy, I wouldn't be surprised you were then weren't targeted with texted advertisements on your cell phone.

  29. Re:Phone Theft. by elewton · · Score: 1

    What if you have to prepend the first character of your password to the temporary one.
    Doesn't help the malware all that much, if you're the kind who cares enough about security to use this and have a good password.

  30. creators introduce more than one life/time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no password/gadgets required.

    the corepirate nazi holycost is increasing by the minute. you call this 'weather'?

    continue to add immeasurable amounts of MISinformation, rhetoric & fluff, & there you have IT? that's US? thou shalt not... oh forget it. fake weather (censored?), fake money, fake god(s), what's next? seeing as we (have been told that) came from monkeys, the only possible clue we would have to anything being out of order, we would get from the weather. that, & all the monkeys tipping over/exploding around US.

    the search continues;
    google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=weather+manipulation

    google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=bush+cheney+wolfowitz+rumsfeld+wmd+oil+freemason+blair+obama+weather+authors

    meanwhile (as it may take a while longer to finish wrecking this place); the corepirate nazi illuminati (remember, (we have been told) we came from monkeys, & 'they' believe they DIDN'T), continues to demand that we learn to live on less/nothing while they continue to consume/waste/destroy immeasurable amounts of stuff/life, & feast on nubile virgins while worshipping themselves (& evile in general (baal to be exact)). they're always hunting that patch of red on almost everyones' neck. if they cannot find yours (greed, fear ego etc...) then you can go starve. that's their (slippery/slimy) 'platform' now. see also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisocial_personality_disorder

    never a better time to consult with/trust in our creators. the lights are coming up rapidly all over now. see you there?

    greed, fear & ego (in any order) are unprecedented evile's primary weapons. those, along with deception & coercion, helps most of us remain (unwittingly?) dependent on its' life0cidal hired goons' agenda. most of our dwindling resources are being squandered on the 'wars', & continuation of the billionerrors stock markup FraUD/pyramid schemes. nobody ever mentions the real long term costs of those debacles in both life & any notion of prosperity for us, or our children. not to mention the abuse of the consciences of those of us who still have one, & the terminal damage to our atmosphere/planet (see also: manufactured 'weather', hot etc...). see you on the other side of it? the lights are coming up all over now. the fairytail is winding down now. let your conscience be your guide. you can be more helpful than you might have imagined. we now have some choices. meanwhile; don't forget to get a little more oxygen on your brain, & look up in the sky from time to time, starting early in the day. there's lots going on up there.

    "The current rate of extinction is around 10 to 100 times the usual background level, and has been elevated above the background level since the Pleistocene. The current extinction rate is more rapid than in any other extinction event in earth history, and 50% of species could be extinct by the end of this century. While the role of humans is unclear in the longer-term extinction pattern, it is clear that factors such as deforestation, habitat destruction, hunting, the introduction of non-native species, pollution and climate change have reduced biodiversity profoundly.' (wiki)

    "I think the bottom line is, what kind of a world do you want to leave for your children," Andrew Smith, a professor in the Arizona State University School of Life Sciences, said in a telephone interview. "How impoverished we would be if we lost 25 percent of the world's mammals," said Smith, one of more than 100 co-authors of the report. "Within our lifetime hundreds of species could be lost as a result of our own actions, a frightening sign of what is happening to the ecosystems where they live," added Julia Marton-Lefevre, IUCN director general. "We must now set clear targets for the future to reverse this trend to ensure that our enduring legacy is not to wipe out many of our closest relatives."--

    "The wealth of the universe is for me. Every thing is explicable and practical for me .... I

  31. I agree, I waste so much time on Facebook by asdfington · · Score: 2, Funny

    I barely have time left for my Serious Business on /.!!

  32. Having to remember even more passwords by tepples · · Score: 1

    For whatever reason though, there are still tons of sites out there that do not support verified by visa/mastercard.

    I seem to remember some sites using Verified by Visa and then abandoning it. Perhaps they found that shoppers were abandoning their shopping carts after having set up VBV before and then forgetting their VBV username and password.

    1. Re:Having to remember even more passwords by pasamio · · Score: 2, Informative

      The worst thing about VBV was not actually having it set up properly and then having a merchant require it compared to others that didn't. I had this happen to me when I was overseas trying to get internet and all of a sudden I got slammed by this Verified by VISA thing that wasn't setup and I could get internet to get the details I needed to get it set up (catch 22). Sounds like a good idea until it gets inconsistently applied in practice.

      --
      I always wondered where this setting was...
    2. Re:Having to remember even more passwords by Mascot · · Score: 1

      If stores universally used it, you better believe people would start remembering their passwords.

    3. Re:Having to remember even more passwords by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I seem to remember some sites using Verified by Visa and then abandoning it. Perhaps they found that shoppers were abandoning their shopping carts after having set up VBV before and then forgetting their VBV username and password.

      Well, few reasons.

      1) Merchants love it because the customer gets stiffed with the charges (you can't chargeback a merchant if it was done via 3DS (3D Secure, aka Verified by Visa and MasterCard's equivalent). I only do VBV on a merchant I know. Unknown merchants, I'd probably trust Paypal a bit more.

      2) It seriously screws up with NoScript. I keep forgetting to enable the 3rd party site which usually results in screwing up the checkout process.

      3) It makes it harder to do "one-click shopping". If you're a merchant that gets a lot of impulse buys, the more steps betwen "I want it" and "We got your order, it'll be shipped soon!" is more chances the user will cancel the order prior to completion. (And this is a very important point)

      4) It's extremely insecure, and can offer a great way to phish. Heck, we've got previous Slashdot articles on the subject. Why "Verified by Visa" system is insecure and Net Shoppers Bullied into "Verified by Visa" program.

      5) Forgetting your password can get your credit card locked out.

      Quite honestly, 3DS is just another form of Wish-it-was two-factor security. It pretends to be more secure, but in reality it isn't.

      There are two ways to do it properly - you could SMS people a password, but that screws with people like me who don't always carry their cellphone around, or perhaps build in an RSA key thingy inside the card itself. Chip cards (which have their own issues - really - the PIN's in the chip and the chip sends an "OK" or "Failed PIN" response - not any form of challenge-response packet to the bank, who should know your PIN, not your card) have powerful enough processors to do some RSA token like task. Given we can buy a calculator for under a dollar, there's no real reason why we can't have credit cards with two-factor support on them (and no PIN needs to be stored - the card will generate a code based on the entered PIN which the bank can validate).

  33. Re:Phone Theft. by DrgnDancer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is why my phone has a PIN on it and can be remotely wiped. Actually this isn't why. I'm a lot more worried about the banking app, my address book, my calendar and probably a dozen other things... This is a nice tangential benefit to having a PIN and remote wipe on my phone. Seriously though. You think the first thing someone is going to do on stealing your phone is see if they can use it to get into your Facebook account?

    --
    I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
  34. Improving in the wrong direction... by Haedrian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When people want more security on their facebook, they usually mean protection from Facebook and other corporations - not passwords themselves.

    How about fixing the lack of privacy instead?

    1. Re:Improving in the wrong direction... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Facebook have a great solution for keeping your information private.

      If you don't like what they do with your data, don't give it to them. Nobody is putting a pistol to your head.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    2. Re:Improving in the wrong direction... by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      Using Facebook is 100% optional. If privacy is an issue, you don't have to give them any personal/private data.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    3. Re:Improving in the wrong direction... by Haedrian · · Score: 1

      I fully agree with this. Now tell that to the rest of the few million idiots and we should be a-ok.

  35. Alternative Solution by killmenow · · Score: 1

    Or you could do like I did recently and just delete your facebook account. Problem solved. Added bonus: they don't have my cell number and can't automatically opt-me-in when they roll out their new FaceText feature.

    If you're not paying for it, you're not the customer, you're the product.

    1. Re:Alternative Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could do like I did recently and just delete your facebook account. Problem solved.

      You deleted my facebook account, Mr Monospace? Bastard.

    2. Re:Alternative Solution by Quirkz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry, but deleting one's account is not actually a solution for people who want to access their account.

  36. Their scheme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While the proposed scheme may save your password from a dumb keylogger, once you log in (perhaps with a password you get on your cellphone), the (supposedly rogue) computer now has whatever it needs (e.g., a cookie) to do whatever it wishes on your facebook account. Perhaps it can't keep this access for later, but it can use it now.
    So your future may be safe, but your present and past are all compromised.

  37. Someone else's number? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens if you register someone else's phone number with your account?

  38. Disadvantage of dumbphones by tepples · · Score: 1

    all my phones are $4.88 from Dollar General or the local FYE

    BREW phones like these tend not to have a wide variety of applications because the BREW application development process has substantial entry barriers against small developers. It's even more expensive than the iPhone developer program. So you'd end up carrying two phones, each with its own service plan: a smartphone to run apps and a dumbphone for anonymity.

  39. privacy by jDeepbeep · · Score: 1

    Because Facebook's version of privacy is like McDonald's version of nutrition. It's not part of their formula.

    --
    Reply to That ||
  40. If only I had a phone by slashdyke · · Score: 1

    Finally! Now when I am traveling around the world - which I do quite a bit, I can securely access my facebook account. That is, so long as my phone works where ever I am, and ummm, oh yeah! I need to buy a phone too.

  41. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by Codename+Dutchess · · Score: 0

    Protip: Everyone else here is also of African descent.

  42. If none of your neighbors shares a given interest by tepples · · Score: 1

    Whatever did people do before facebook? Oh yeah, they actually talked to people face-to-face and spent 'quality time' in full 3-D social interaction.

    There were also fewer people with whom to interact, meaning less chance of finding somebody in the same town who shares some specific interest with you.

  43. For extra-light users, prepaid is cheaper by tepples · · Score: 1

    their $29.99 500 minute plan

    Because I use fewer than a tenth of that many minutes per month, I pay Virgin Mobile about $5 per month. COST!

  44. Re:Phone Theft. by lxs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And facebook gets your cellphone number. Good thing that fb is a reputable company ran by people of high integrity who would never abuse that information.

  45. Your temporary Facebook password by CatsupBoy · · Score: 1

    This message brought to you by FACEBOOK... Hungry? Try McDonald's new double Big Mac extra value meal only 4.99 at participating McDonald's

    Your temporary password is:
    [message part 1/2]

  46. RSA Encryption by Kildjean · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What they really need to do is add RSA Encryption to the account, then create an app for iPhone to get the key from. they could also create a dongle that people buy from for $6.95 and that way their accounts will be encrypted, and issue is solved. This is pretty much what Blizzard did with their WoW accounts.

    --
    Nom de dieu de putain de bordel de merde de saloperie de connard d encule de ta mere.
    1. Re:RSA Encryption by Maarx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I regret to inform you that you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. There is absolutely no encryption going on with your WoW account, let alone something as complex as RSA Encryption.

      There is an additional password, generated from a hardware dongle, which is required for you to log in, but it is simply a password, not an encryption key. Once it has been successfully provided, the rest of your traffic is identical to traffic on an account without an authenticator. Your account is not "encrypted". You have a second password. Nothing more, nothing less.

    2. Re:RSA Encryption by unk98 · · Score: 1

      Verisign has this, and free to download. Works on Paypal, eBay, and a few others. Would be nice to see this on other sites too. http://vipmobile.verisign.com/

    3. Re:RSA Encryption by sorak · · Score: 1

      The facebook plan seems better in that it does not require you to buy extra hardware (unless you don't have a cellphone), it does not require you to carry an extra gadget around, just in case you may decide to access facebook from your public library, and it does not require you to plan your first facebook session from a public terminal several days ahead of time.

    4. Re:RSA Encryption by ukyoCE · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's quite right either. I have several of these dongles and some of them say RSA right on them. I think the encryption comes in with how the sequence of passwords is non-reversable. IE: you can't (trivially) watch 5 or 10 or even 100 of the temporary passwords and be able to determine what the next one will be.

    5. Re:RSA Encryption by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

      I suspect the confusion comes from RSA Security, which is well known for its SecurID one-time-password token / key fobs, as well as an app version for mobile phones. The company was founded by RSA public key cryptography's inventors.

      However this is still as space Facebook or Google or some other nice-guy-behemoth company could step into, which would offer better-than-usual password security for the great unwashed. (As long as they use it correctly, no writing their name and/or password on the key fob, that sort of thing.)

      .

    6. Re:RSA Encryption by rsborg · · Score: 1

      There is absolutely no encryption going on with your WoW account, let alone something as complex as RSA Encryption.

      Your authentication verification is encrypted. This is exactly how, for example, most web-based auth systems (ie, try logging into mail.yahoo.com or battle.net, you'll see https) work... your actual content may be unencrypted but the auth validation should at least be secured.

      If not, a simple Man in the Middle would compromise any account leading to mass item thefts and account hijacking.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    7. Re:RSA Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, that's because there's a company called "RSA Security" that makes them. They have nothing to do with the RSA algorithm. Yes, they are doing some kind of fancy math to make the passwords unguessable even given the previous sequence of passwords... but that's still not encryption.

    8. Re:RSA Encryption by ukyoCE · · Score: 1

      Eh, looked it up, and it's hashing a 128-bit seed with the time for validation. You're probably right it isn't using the RSA algorithm though.

      So is hashing encryption? I really have no clue - a brief search looks like it is technically considered (one way) encryption:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptographic_hash_function#Verifying_the_integrity_of_files_or_messages

      That would also mean MD5 is encryption, as strange as that sounds.

    9. Re:RSA Encryption by Maarx · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure "one way encryption" is an oxymoron.

    10. Re:RSA Encryption by Maarx · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely right. That also wasn't the point either of us were trying to make, but I'm pretty sure you already know that too.

  47. It's a Trap!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not really sure I want facebook to have my phone number, it's like stores that have started asking for phone numbers at the checkout, they have no legitimate need for that number they just want to be able to call you to sell you things.

  48. We do. But it doesn't affect that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The amount of piracy has little to do with how often people go to the movies. You pirate a movie because you are bored or procrastinating and don't know what else to do. You go to a movie theatre for the sake of going there: It is an excuse to see your friends, eat somewhere nice, etc... Or just generally get out of the house.

    Piracy could theoretically have impact on movie renting, etc... If there was a decent legal service to compete with piracy. (IE: a service to which you could log on, pay a couple of euros and get to watch the movie in good resolution... I doubt I would be bothered to fire up bittorrent just to save a few euros. But as far as I know, such services aren't available here)

  49. Re:Phone Theft. by Khuffie · · Score: 1

    You don't want this feature...don't use it? Simple concept, no? Facebook already has other mobile features (ie, notification via text) if you choose to signup for them.

  50. Re:If none of your neighbors shares a given intere by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

    Has to be said I have met new people in my town via the likes of Facebook and Twitter, one less than 5 minutes walk from my house.

    --

    Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

  51. Sounds good but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now when someone decides they want to get on my Facebook they just need to find my phone.

  52. I like this measure by erroneus · · Score: 1

    It is not quite the same as RSA's SecurID but it's good. I would like to see a system similar to this for all high-security web access services starting with my bank. Presently, I have just account/password plus "security question/answer" as authentication. Linking the account to a mobile phone is a great option in addition to the standard log-in.

  53. the state of computer security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does this say about the state of computer security in the latter half of 2010?

  54. Abusing this by mordejai · · Score: 1

    1. Grab the phone from your drunk friend
    2. Get a temporary password
    3. Do nasty stuff with his account, including posting pictures of him in this particular moment

    But nobody's gonna do that... right?

  55. Re:Phone Theft. by molnarcs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And facebook gets your cellphone number. Good thing that fb is a reputable company ran by people of high integrity who would never abuse that information.

    How? It's a serious question. I had my phone number listed already, never saw any drawbacks. Of course, it can be abused, mostly by users, but that's when "don't be stupid" kicks in - don't befriend random people you know nothing about, adjust your privacy settings, etc. So how is Facebook going to abuse this information?

  56. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obvious troll is obvious, but google "Out of Africa Theory" sometime...

  57. Re:Phone Theft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    And facebook gets your cellphone number. Good thing that fb is a reputable company ran by people of high integrity who would never abuse that information.

    So use a Google Voice number, which includes text messaging for free.

  58. It's an old number by jabberw0k · · Score: 1

    "And -- Your phone number?" "What?" "I need your phone number." "Why?" "The computer won't let me finish without a phone number." "OK... 3." "3... what?" "Just 3. It's a very old number, been in the family for generations."

    1. Re:It's an old number by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Just give them an utterly expensive number.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  59. Citicards by ViViDboarder · · Score: 1

    My Citibank credit cards offer this. I go online and I can get a temporary number and use that just fine.

  60. Or just by i-c-electrons · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There's always the option of not putting sensitive information out there for the world to see on Facebook, and there is always DON'T USE THE SAME PASSWORD FOR SOCIAL NETWORKING AS IMPORTANT LOGINS. But hey that is too simple, I think I'll just give Facebook another piece of information about me that can be exploited...

  61. CHARGES TO YOUR CELL PHONE BILL! by lonesome+phreak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Be carefull putting your mobile number in Facebook. I currently work for one of the worlds largest mobile telecoms as a CSR, and we just had a bit of training where we learned that your cell phone bill can be charged by a 3rd party game if you click and play the wrong one. Every day I remove "mobile download" 3-rd party charges because there is little obvious warning about playing some game will add a 9.99 monthly subscription because they where able to retrieve your cell phone via FB.

    It's just getting worse, I wish there was a better way to educate people. Not because I care about people, but because I'm tired of having to remove the subscriptions ten times a day every day lol.

    --
    Maybe we DID take the blue pill. You wouldn't remember anyway.
  62. Re:Phone Theft. by stewbacca · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The scary Facebook lack of privacy is highly exaggerated. I've had my number listed on my profile page for over two years now. I don't do anything out of the ordinary other than keep my info private to my friends only. Amazingly, nothing bad has happened because I listed a phone number on my page that I actually want people to have.

  63. I'm low on minutes. Can I borrow your phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just need it for a minute, honest. I'll give it right back, after all I have some Facebook stuff I need to do.

  64. Re:Phone Theft. by Quirkz · · Score: 1

    Ideally Facebook has your real password in a hash and doesn't know what it actually is. Meaning they shouldn't be able to know the first character to be able to combine it with the temporary one. If they do know your password, they're doing it wrong.

  65. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    Are you sure? There might be someone from a small planet somewhere in the vicinity of Betelgeuse.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  66. Re:Phone Theft. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    Amazingly, nothing bad has happened because I listed a phone number on my page that I actually want people to have.

    You think so. But in reality your phone has been added to a big botnet which tries to break the nuclear codes and start a global thermonuclear war. :-)

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  67. New Facebook hacking technique by kheldan · · Score: 2, Insightful
    1. Steal target's phone
    2. Get temp Facebook password
    3. Change target's permanent Facebook password
    4. ????
    5. Profit!

    ..assuming of course that Facebook allows you to change your permanent password after logging in with a temporary password. Sure hope they thought of that.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  68. Great Idea by Stregano · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since facebook does not ever come into scrutiny for your private information, I think that giving them your name, address, birthdate, current living city, and now phone number is a great idea. Now all we need to do is give them our credit card numbers and we will be set. For a website that ensures your data stays private, would could go wrong?

    --
    The world is how you make it
  69. Item not received by tepples · · Score: 1

    you can't chargeback a merchant if it was done via 3DS

    Then I guess that's one strike against Nintendo.

    But seriously, is it even legal to forbid disputing a charge on grounds of item not received, not as described, defect in materials or workmanship, or other grounds listed in the credit card contract aside from use of stolen credentials?

    There are two ways to do it properly - you could SMS people a password, but that screws with people like me who don't always carry their cellphone around

    And with people who primarily use a landline.

  70. Fees are probably higher for these transactions. by sideshow · · Score: 1

    I can't say for sure for these one time CC #'s, but the difference in fees for "regular credit card" vs "gift card" can be up to 100%. That means 2.5% in fees to the merchant for regular, 5% for gift card. This is to cover the perceived change of fraud. Transactions where the card is swiped vs. ones where the number is punch in manually will have different fees as well.

    Of course, the merchant can just decide to deny any card that causes them higher fees. That's probably what Blizzard was doing to you.

    --

    Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

  71. Amazing.... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Why does VISA not do the same thing, really I mean, to avoid fraud and all of that, you could use this same principle with every
    account, gmail, hotmail, VISA, banking, etc....if I am smart enough to link a cell phone number to my facebook account, now it has become a norm or standard in every user's life (100 million accounts???), so now we can sway the banks and CC companies, to do the same....finally some good coming out of FB for once....hope they keep it up, and help push tech further ahead like Google does....

  72. This is a great idea! by KiwiCanuck · · Score: 1

    Giving the fantastic privacy discipline of FB.

  73. insert subject here by kdemetter · · Score: 1

    While that is correct , it's not the whole picture : When our ancestors moved to colder areas ( like Sweden ) , they adapted to the colder climate , and as such , their evolution followed a different path .

    So while everyone has a common ancestry , everyone has followed a different evolutionary path .

    The result is that today's Swedes will be more resistant to cold than today's Africans . And offcourse , today's Africans will be more resistant to heat than today's Swedes .

  74. Re:Phone Theft. by aquila.solo · · Score: 1

    Heh. Too bad for them my phone only has chess and tic-tac-toe installed. :-)