They're not having charges pressed for trespassing, since this is in civil court, not criminal court, and these particular plantiffs sound motivated by the deep coffers Google has. If they can't get damages, then it isn't worth their while.
I wonder if they decide to go with this proposal, if TSA might just forget to mention that the bracelet can shock you into submission, instead touting it's information storing and tracking capabilities.
It's got RFID built in, so I imagine that you could just use a directional RFID transmitter to set the wristband off.
I wonder if this is going to open a market for wrist sized Faraday cages?
Slashdot Mirror
Hey genius, do some reading. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expectation_of_privacy Privacy laws don't work like that.
They're not having charges pressed for trespassing, since this is in civil court, not criminal court, and these particular plantiffs sound motivated by the deep coffers Google has. If they can't get damages, then it isn't worth their while.
Actually, the law specifies that your privacy extends as far as you have a "reasonable expectation of privacy." I don't think your yard qualifies.
I wonder if they decide to go with this proposal, if TSA might just forget to mention that the bracelet can shock you into submission, instead touting it's information storing and tracking capabilities.
It's got RFID built in, so I imagine that you could just use a directional RFID transmitter to set the wristband off. I wonder if this is going to open a market for wrist sized Faraday cages?