My point has not been demonstrated to be false, because we don't have the same definition of "miners". Point that highlighted by the comparison between fighter pilot and drone pilots.
Because STEM is paying well, and the induced physical risk and requirement is null. You will never see a progressive campaigning to have more women working in mines.
The way concepts are expressed is irrelevant, what matter is how structured they are to one another. To make a culinary parallel, everybody can use a pan and a pot, but not everybody can marry food in delicate and tasty way.
AFAIK, there isn't gonna be any licence to fly a drone, so why would people read and *understand* whatever regs ? It's a drone, they bought it at Best Buy on sale, they don't care about regs...
Slashdot Mirror
This is irrelevant, Germany seems to have produced 500TWh in 2014, while Japan seems to require about 1000TWh annually.
Do you have any numbers confirming this ? We're talking about 1,000TWh annually...
So an administrative secretary working in a mine would fit as "miner" ?
My point has not been demonstrated to be false, because we don't have the same definition of "miners". Point that highlighted by the comparison between fighter pilot and drone pilots.
Trade is an aggressive, testosterone driven, field, often implying to be away from home for large period at a time. Not very feminine.
A 200lb black women wearing a Captain America outfit at Comic-Con is not being part of geek culture.
Positive discrimination is not discrimination...
But, aren't men, women, black or whites all equal ?!? I'm lost...
with much more parenthesis.
I'm a V8.
"I am a non-semicolon terminated line, I DEMAND to be considered as any other semicolon terminated line is."
Sounds to me like your company was being incredibly obtuse when they announced they were hiring a female Java developer.
FTFY
Then I guess flying drone from a simulated vaginapit make you a fighter pilot...
Not only a girl, but the typical, if not stereotypical, SJW, as far as I can see...
Driving a truck doesn't account as "being a miner".
Because STEM is paying well, and the induced physical risk and requirement is null. You will never see a progressive campaigning to have more women working in mines.
The way concepts are expressed is irrelevant, what matter is how structured they are to one another. To make a culinary parallel, everybody can use a pan and a pot, but not everybody can marry food in delicate and tasty way.
This, or Facebook is looking for code monkey.
it's not as it hobbyist were not *already* manufacturing "drones".
Democrats (and to some extend Republicans too) are all about legislating on phantasm.
That's merely a variation a theme, s/industry/community/. It you nit-pick at this level, you really don't have much argument...
Even the police don't stop every violation. It they did, every single car passing me when I drive *at* the speed limit would need to be stopped.
I'm pretty sure hot women do all the time when stopped by a police cruisers, and get away with it.
No, but a gun nut can put a sign in his yard specifying that his neighbor has no gun in the home :-)
it's easy: it won't. Just like gun registration won't stop killing spree...
AFAIK, there isn't gonna be any licence to fly a drone, so why would people read and *understand* whatever regs ? It's a drone, they bought it at Best Buy on sale, they don't care about regs...