Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Launches Initiative To Attract More Minorities and Women To Coding (thestack.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Facebook has launched TechPrep, a new initiative to attract more minorities and women into coding. The project draws a very strong analogy between the learning of computer coding skills and the learning of spoken languages, a field which is important to people whose first language is not English, and which engages with the popular understanding that women are better at learning languages. TechPrep is seeking to engage with parents and guardians to get its target audience into coding earlier in life.

281 comments

  1. How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about hiring more people over 40 as well.

    1. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut your ageist face you cis-het white male shitlord!

    2. Re:How about... by RingDev · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can't speak for Facebook, but my team is currently comprised of

      8 Caucasian men
      1 Caucasian woman
      5 Indian men
      4 Indian women
      2 Asian men

      (Note that my metro area is ~78% white). I can only hire from the applications I receive, so I can't bring in Latino or African American devs/BAs/PMs/etc... I've been thinking about doing an outreach program to see about visiting some of our local high schools' CS programs and see what I can learn about our next generation of coders.

      The youngest people on my team are late 20s. A couple of months ago one of the women on my team retired. I have multiple team members that are looking at full retirement in the next 5 years (one of whom I hired last year). Probably half of my team is in the 40+ category and a good portion of that has been hired on in the last 3 years.

      There are dev managers in the world that don't give a crap about your age or skin color as long as you can code, document, lead, teach, test, implement, or what ever else we need done.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    3. Re:How about... by tripleevenfall · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are dev managers in the world that don't give a crap about your age or skin color as long as you can code, document, lead, teach, test, implement, or what ever else we need done.

      Maybe we should stop putting people into categories and treating them differently (+ or -) based on the amount of pigment in their skin?

      Maybe we should judge people not based on the color of their skin but on the content of their character?

    4. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, I think we need to create category labels for different age groups!

      Under 21: tenderfoot
      21-30: ute
      30-45: daddies and mommies
      45-60: overhills
      60-65: gram(p)s
      70+: gravebait

    5. Re:How about... by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      Sorry that won't work. That would mean paying people actual market rates for skilled jobs. We just can't have that. Particularly when there is an endless supply of 3rd world talent willing to work for a fraction of what you and I would work for. So let's just open the H1-B floodgates and let them all in. It's the Walmart-ization of high tech. Careful what we wish for.

    6. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germans are doing experiment in that but without visas. It is still arguably even 'better'. Still you cannot complain anyway or you land in resoc camp. In my corporation some PC shitheads send 10-20 mails a week about how multicultural we all are and how great it would be if we replaced our current bias and prejudice with one that is currently desired by said shitheads. We also get legal threats sent by the same crew for not following the advice. I wonder why the heck these idiots in my ol' land fought the communists. I guess the only reason is free pr0n.

    7. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait... The Communists were giving away free porn?

      Also, your country fought the Communists because they wanted their land and thought that the Russians were sub-human, only marginally better than the Jews. They kicked your ass, by the way.

    8. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just don't work them ragged until they quit, or fire them when they get too expensive.

      Young people become old people eventually if you retain them. In that sense, age is completely different from other demographics.

    9. Re:How about... by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      I can only hire from the applications I receive, so I can't bring in Latino or African American devs/BAs/PMs/etc

      Then you need to do more recruiting. If the corporation is more interested in meeting diversity targets, then you don't need to worry about qualifications; just go find someone and hire them for the job. I'm sure the cafeteria janitor can become a PM or developer.

    10. Re:How about... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Asians don't count towards your diversity quota. They are an over represented group, and their sum should just be added to the caucasian group.

    11. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about hiring more people over 40 as well.

      Nope, sorry. We would much rather hire young ignorant slave labor than deal with those armed with the wisdom and experience to know what a living wage is.

      Fuck You Very Much and Have a Nice Day.

      Hugs and Kisses,

      - American Capitalism

    12. Re:How about... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      You better hope he's just a white geezer. If that's a black lesbian, you're in SO deep shit...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re: How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, what is with the hateful insult? The poster has a point, it becomes harder to get jobs once you reach a certain age, especially in the tech field. Older people come with a lot of experience and skills, companies don't want to pay for that. Companies will tell you that they can mold younger people to do what they want. The truth is the younger people are cheaper.

      I'm 47 and had to leave my network administrator position due to my disability 14 months ago. If the doctors some how find a cure. I can't image how long it might take me to find a job in the tech industry where most jobs get outsourced or they only want kids.

    14. Re:How about... by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Listen, if I get an application that fits the profile and the person provides what I'm looking for, I'm hiring him or her.

      I am not going to compromise the financial situation of my company for the sake of pandering to some PC fad.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:How about... by x0ra · · Score: 2

      "I am a non-semicolon terminated line, I DEMAND to be considered as any other semicolon terminated line is."

    16. Re:How about... by maharvey · · Score: 1

      Is your metro area population also 50% H1B foreigners?

    17. Re: How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Friday was social justice warriors day where we need to make sure vaginas are equal to or greater than penises. Christian conservative white males are used for target practice. Isn't that how liberals want things?

    18. Re:How about... by RingDev · · Score: 0

      Maybe we should judge people not based on the color of their skin but on the content of their character?

      Absolutely. But part of our social responsibility is to evaluate our ability to do so. So if we follow hiring practices that we believe allow us to hire based on only the candidate's performance, yet we find that our team's breakdown differs wildly from the local racial distribution, then we have a problem.

      It means that either
      A) Our hiring methodology is not unbiased and we are engaging in some for of racial or social profiling.
      B) Society has a function of racial or social profiling that is skewing the labor pool.
      C) The identified subgroups are in some way disadvantaged in the competition for the positions we fill.

      If the problem is A, then it is something we need to resolve within our practices. It is something that is litigable. It is a risk to the organization. And it likely means that we have someone on the hiring process that is a complete douche nozzle.

      If the problem is B, then we should be looking within our communities to see why the labor pool is being affected. Typically this is where we are going to start looking into disproportionate imprisonment of minorities, low income neighborhoods resulting in low income schools, with lower performance measures in graduation and college participation, racial real-estate problems. and so on...

      If the problem is C, then it may be something that shouldn't be solve, or that takes a very specific approach to solve a portion of. For example, I'm not likely to get a significant middle eastern labor pool for a hog farm, I don't think that we as a society should force people to change their beliefs in order to achieve a perfectly balanced workforce. More likely to occur though, is hiring a project manager/analyst who speaks English as a second language. ESL devs I don't have a problem, as long as they can communicate well enough to handle requirements, testing, and reporting. But I need my project managers to be able to hand direct and sometimes tense discussions with senior management, business users, customers, etc... I need someone in that role who has an excellent grasp of the English language and the mannerisms in which people express themselves. Just as I worked with fluent Portuguese speaking PMs in Brazil, German speaking PMs in Germany, I look for English speaking PMs in the US. I have PMs who are ESL speakers, but they have studied and practiced extensive and have a great command over the language. But if I want to get more minority people into this career path, I'm going to need to drive for more ESL training to get non-native speakers to be able to perform at the levels we need.

      So yeah, hiring in order to hit racial population % is only important if your hiring process is racist. But looking at racial % of labor to identify if you have a hiring problem, and what type of problem you have is an extremely valuable exercise.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    19. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      That's racist.

      If you don't hire a black woman with no useful skills to become a "tech evangelist" or "diversity consultant" then you're a terrible person. It's much better for you to go out of business while being diverse than to produce a useful product and add value to society.

    20. Re:How about... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Fuck racism along with political correctness. I'd rather be a terrible person than march along to that PC bullshit.

      Play the race card on me only if you really want to forfeit the game early.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    21. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is your metro area population also 50% H1B foreigners?

      No, but his absurd laundry list of qualifications and utter lack of salary information means only they will apply. These kinds of people never post a link to their legitimately reasonable and allegedly "great pay" yet perpetually unfulfilled job posts.

    22. Re:How about... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Why are you worried about the financial situation of your company? The company doesn't belong to you.

      What's important is what your bosses want. Do they want diversity, or do they share your attitude? If they're pushing diversity uber alles, then you should propose promoting one of the janitors to high-skill jobs so they can fill those quotas. See what the CxOs say about that.

    23. Re:How about... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Why would a black lesbian want to hunt someone down for calling them a cis-het white male shitlord? Assuming they would, what about them being black or lesbian suggests they would be able to do as you would like us to fear?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    24. Re:How about... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "Maybe we should stop putting people into categories and treating them differently (+ or -) based on the amount of pigment in their skin?"

      Typically, sure, but when we are picking someone to cross the desert for us, I think I'll stick with racism :-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    25. Re:How about... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Shit, up until now I didn't even know you was a nigga

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    26. Re:How about... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "Why are you worried about the financial situation of your company? The company doesn't belong to you."

      You didn't seriously just post that on Slashdot for everyone to read did you?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    27. Re: How about... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "I thought Friday was social justice warriors day where we need to make sure vaginas are equal to or greater than penises."

      I can't speak for you specifically, but most of us here on Slashdot concluded that vaginas are greater than penises many, many years ago.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    28. Re:How about... by flajann4415 · · Score: 2

      I'm over 50, and my phone rings off the hook with recruiters falling over themselves to plug me into a new job. These days, it only takes a week or less to find new work in the software arena. If there is age discrimination anywhere, I am scratching my head why I am not seeing it.

    29. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      .... social responsibility .... local racial distribution .... racial or social profiling .... identified subgroups .... disadvantaged ....

      And I stopped after only the first few sentences as my brain hurt from all the idiotic buzzword spouting drivel. You come off as the type of guy/girl/... who gives talks at all the TEDx type stuff about what an amazing person you are etc... And you and DEFINITELY come off as a hipster with no idea about anything coding related yet your in a tech company.

      Take a good long hard look in the mirror and say out loud "I'm a cliche, I'm what's wrong with the tech industry right now."

    30. Re:How about... by evilsofa · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should stop putting people into categories and treating them differently (+ or -) based on the amount of pigment in their skin?

      Maybe we should judge people not based on the color of their skin but on the content of their character?

      Facebook did that, and in 2013, out of a total of 1,231 people hired, 7 were African-American.

    31. Re:How about... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Is this kinda the reverse race card?

      It's a new move, I gotta give you that.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    32. Re:How about... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      "Why are you worried about the financial situation of your company? The company doesn't belong to you."

      You didn't seriously just post that on Slashdot for everyone to read did you?

      Not everyone works for a startup. If you work for a bank or large established corporation, it would be pointless to worry too much about its finances (unless you're the finance director or something).

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    33. Re:How about... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      I can only hire from the applications I receive, so I can't bring in Latino or African American devs/BAs/PMs/etc...

      The trick is to increase the number of applications you receive. Try networking with people from those groups when you meet them (LinkedIn or just adding them to a list of people you email job specs too). Then they will pass notice of jobs on to their contacts and so on. Your talent pool is increased and you get more applicants.

      Take it as an indication that there are pools of talent you are not yet tapping in to, and make an effort to access them for the benefit of your business.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    34. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one am eagerly waiting for more S&M leather&latex clad women midgets in computer programming. The diversity will increase productivity tenfold.

    35. Re: How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming that their hiring practices were otherwise fair, exactly why is that their problem?

    36. Re: How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit.

      What minorities have is a problem. Tech is doing just fine.

    37. Re:How about... by RingDev · · Score: 1

      Nope. My contractor group is about 35% H1B visa workers.

      I work for the State, so we do not sponsor anyone for Visas, they have to work out sponsorship on their own. They must be legally able to work in the US, and that is vetted thoroughly. But by state statute, I am not allowed to ask or judge by their type of residence status, only that they are legal. I typically only find out that someone is on an H1B visa when elections come around and they volunteer the information, or they request a 2+ week absence to return to their home country to renew their visa.

      For FTEs, since the state will not sponsor, all of them are legal residence, some of them are 1st or 2nd gen Americans, but they are all full citizens.

      From the contractor side, it's rough. The problem we face is that IT unemployment in the metro area hovers around 1-2%, which means getting new local talent in is limited to poaching skilled employees, picking up layoffs/terminations, or getting college grads at the end of the school year. And as this is a State gig, we don't really have the money or benefits to poach :(

      So yeah, when we post contractor positions, I'll get 70-100 resumes, and 90%+ of them are likely H1B visa workers.

      So like I said, I can only work with what I get.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    38. Re:How about... by RingDev · · Score: 1

      Then you need to do more recruiting. If the corporation is more interested in meeting diversity targets, then you don't need to worry about qualifications; just go find someone and hire them for the job. I'm sure the cafeteria janitor can become a PM or developer.

      I'd recommend actually working in a hiring management position prior to spouting off such nonsense.

      The Corporation in this case, is the State, so we get held under a pretty hard magnifying glass when it comes to hiring practices.

      The State has diversity statutes that deal with HOW we hire people, not WHO we hire. For example, FTEs must be interviewed by a panel that includes 3 people: 2 from management, 1 from the same/similar classification. Of those 3, at least 1 must be a woman and 1 must be a minority.

      The point of that requirement is to minimize the impact of a racist line manager (which absolutely still exist).

      The statutes don't say that I MUST hire a diverse team. I as a manger though, with experience in working in a homogenous white-bread young-middle aged dev shop where out of 80 developers we had 1 girl, 1 Indian, and nothing but white guys, feel that having a more diverse team creates a much better work environment.

      Having a multi-cultural team of people who respect each other and each other's cultures has created great bonds within the team. Sure, it's a bit more challenging to get through the storming, but at the end of the day, I have a better team to show for it.

      I would never hire someone for a position I did not feel they were more than capable of handling. I look for candidates that show not only the immediate skills I need, but the knowledge, ability, and desire to grow into what I'll need next year. And those people are all around, of all races, and of any gender.

      So IF that cafeteria janitor has spent their nights completing their college degree, and has the cafeteria staff running like a well oiled machine with schedules, inventory management, new employee training, etc... then yeah, they might be the very person I'm looking for. But if they aren't looking to move into a PM role, and they aren't looking to expand their skillsets, then no, they would not likely be eligible for the position regardless of their race or gender.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    39. Re:How about... by RingDev · · Score: 1

      In the local metro, Asia represents just over 7% of the population. At my full staff level, the two Asian employees I have represent less than 10% of my team. So I wouldn't consider their position as significantly over represented.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    40. Re:How about... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Because racism. Because you assume that she's a cis-het white male and that's racist.

      Don't ask me, I don't make the rules. I only mock them.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    41. Re:How about... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      You have 9 Asian employees, which represent over 50% of your team.

    42. Re:How about... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      ...err exactly 50% even.

    43. Re:How about... by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      I have a wife and kids, and am over 40. I also just read an article about how rents in Mouintain View make some folks rather live in their car and use Google corporate perks as part of their "home" (food, showers, laundry services, etc.)

      The "have a family" and "living in a car" are mutually exclusive. This skews Googlers to non-family people, and also younger people. Whether that's an accident or by design, i'm not sure. But Google gets a bunch of people just out of school, fewer competing responsibilities, ability to get less sleep at night, etc...

    44. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'm over 50, and my phone rings off the hook with recruiters falling over themselves to plug anyone into a new job.

      There, FTFY.

      Recruiters are bottom-feeders, I don't even bother replying to them anymore. Sometimes the job doesn't even really exist, they just want to get your personal information and information about your previous employers that they can sell as "job market research."

      Here's how it usually goes...
      HR drone: "This guy only has 2 of the 10 required acronyms on his résumé. He's not qualified."
      Recruiter: "You have 2 of the 10 required acronyms on your résumé! We think you're a great fit!"

    45. Re:How about... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree that a more diverse team (esp. with women) is a better work environment. However, you can't get blood from a stone. So my point with the prior post was basically pointing out that if diversity is sooo important (that you're going to try to get blood from a stone anyway), then you might as well forget about the qualifications part.

      It's worse for you too, if you're working for a government (state or national, probably worse for federal jobs though). Not only do you not have a lot of "diverse" candidates to choose from out of the entire labor pool, you probably have even fewer good ones who actually want to work for you and are willing to apply. You don't pay very well, and they'll have to put up with all kinds of ridiculous bullshit on the job because the organization is completely broken. So the good candidates are going to work in private industry instead.

      I used to work at an extremely large semiconductor company, and the diversity there was much, much, much better than what you describe. I will say around half of the women, if not more, were Indian (or close, like Bangladeshi). And most of the women I worked with seemed very competent too, in fact most everyone I worked with did. But that was a company that had a very good reputation, had a pretty grueling interview process (to weed out any lackluster candidates), and had excellent benefits and which looked really good on a resume. You probably can't offer most of that, so you're not going to get the greatest applicants, or you're going to get applicants who like some other aspect that you do have to offer (perhaps your location is some out-of-the-way place where locals would like to stay, but you're never going to be able to recruit many Indian women to move to).

    46. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Facebook did that, and in 2013, out of a total of 1,231 people hired, 7 were African-American.

      OK, but how many were black?

    47. Re:How about... by Tyrannicsupremacy · · Score: 1

      Its only fair that the NBA and NFL need to step up their game as well. They've always preferred 'minority' employees. It's time they stopped their racist hiring practices.

      --
      http://i.cubeupload.com/T6cyLu.png
  2. It's a daily SJW treat now! by cyber-vandal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hooray smash the patriarchy!

    1. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm still waiting on all the "Why aren't there more straight men in the fashion industry?" articles that I just know must be coming any day now. ....still waiting......

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That will fall flat. Better to ask "why aren't there more women in the trades?"

    3. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are all the straight male baby sitters? Or kindergarten teachers? Nowhere, of course, because all men are pedophiles and rapists.

    4. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sexual harassment and discrimination by high school trades teachers.

    5. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You won't see that for the same reason you see these articles. The only thing keeping straight males out of the fashion industry is feedback from straight males. Also, chances are those industries skew much closer to population averages than others, so the problem doesnt exist.

    6. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is actually sad. We all went on trough liberation from the patriarchal society only to end up in some hysteric surveillance joint where anything you say can be taken out of context and used against you or alternatively anything can be fabricated if perpetrators of currently fashionable crimes are missing. I never thought this would be possible but I miss the commies I had to endure back then in my years of youth. There were idiots and bastards but the same can be easily said about current elites in almost any Western society. At least there were less crime. I would miss the pr0n tho.

    7. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The only thing keeping straight males out of the fashion industry is feedback from straight males.

      Nope, these articles have taught me that the only possible explanation for the underrepresentation of a gender or race in a given field is that the field is either hostile or discriminatory (or both). It can't possibly be by personal choice or because of social pressure from within the gender or race itself.

      If someone isn't present, it's because they're being excluded or discriminated against by the powers in the field.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    8. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... so the problem doesnt exist.

      Denial! Denial! Denial!
      I'll hire some picketers to scream that outside the next fashion show ad nauseam, call the local press and buy a hit article on you, and demand reparations.
      See, payback's a bitch, bitch.

    9. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you aren't reading it correctly. There can be negative outside pressure as well. but in the case of this and in coding, there is a strong stigma that can be simplified as "X can't/shouldn't do Y"

    10. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by MacTO · · Score: 1

      Some school boards do try to attract male teachers for the younger grades. Some recreation programs do try to target attract male leaders for programs that serve children. Many parents and children appreciate male role models for their children, particularly if they have boys. Many children appreciate male teachers and recreation program leaders as well.

      The stereotypes certainly exist, but they are not universal. Men do have to be somewhat more careful because of those stereotypes, so it is better to work in group settings where you won't be alone with one or two children (e.g. you probably won't see much encouragement on the babysitting front, but child care settings are fine). On the whole though, the biggest thing preventing men from entering these fields are men themselves. Some of it is based upon overblown fears. Like I said, you won't face allegations if you don't work with children alone. Some of it is purely practical. Few men want to work in these fields because they don't pay very much. And that's before you face societal pressures as to what men should and shouldn't be.

    11. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by serviscope_minor · · Score: 0

      I'm still waiting on all the "Why aren't there more straight men in the fashion industry?"

      You're waiting for an article about the fashion industry on a tech website? Why precisely?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    12. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by x0ra · · Score: 1

      Trade is an aggressive, testosterone driven, field, often implying to be away from home for large period at a time. Not very feminine.

    13. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, clearly men are underrepresented in the fashion industry:

      31 of the top 50 designers are men. It's clear that men just can't get ahead in the fashion industry! When will men be given a chance?!

      These are names that almost everyone reading this comment have heard at least a few of. Tell us again what your data is that shows "men just can't get ahead"? Where's the similar list of "top 50 developers" that shows a similar proportion of females at the head of their industry?

    14. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, most school districts try avoid male teachers, because they are afraid of sexual harassment lawsuits. Explaining that it is actually the men's fault, because they just shouldn't "work with children alone" if they want to avoid rape and sexual harassment allegations, is absurd sexism.

      And no, school teachers are not paid that little. In many places, like San Francisco or Chicago, they get paid well over $100,000/year - often twice or three times the combined family income of the students they teach.

    15. Re: It's a daily SJW treat now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I bet you at least 30 of them are faggots.

    16. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      " there is a strong stigma that can be simplified as "X can't/shouldn't do Y""

      You just hit the nail on the herad there pal. The question isn't why aren't there more women in high tech, but rather why are there so many men? Just because you can (sort of) doesn't mean you should. Seriously. If you got into computers because it is "where the money is", please leave the industry ASAP. You are ruining it for the competent among us. Thanks.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    17. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Adults in nursery schools (kindergartens) in the UK are not supposed to work with children alone, whether they're male or female. There have been some notorious female paedophile cases here too.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    18. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you missed the STRAIGHT part of "straight men."

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    19. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you! I'm making all this chedda and I'm not leaving until they throw me on the cart!

  3. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not just get people who are actually interested in coding to participate? Why do they have to be women or minorities? That seems rather bigoted.

    1. Re:Why? by x0ra · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because STEM is paying well, and the induced physical risk and requirement is null. You will never see a progressive campaigning to have more women working in mines.

    2. Re:Why? by plopez · · Score: 2

      Are you assuming there are no women and minorities who are interested? Or who might be interested if it were presented in the correct manner (which does not imply easier).

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    3. Re:Why? by plopez · · Score: 1

      Actually I have. I have seen women recruited for industrial electrical work, driving big as trucks in open pit mines, and running equipment underground. Or launched into space using liquid oxygen and or HME.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    4. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does stem have to do with coding ? We can teach monkeys to code, even business majors. Engineering is something entirely different

    5. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      It's also funny you won't find progressives campaigning to have more women and minorities working in the law field. And why not? It's a typically high paying job, with low physical requirement and risk as well. Law degrees carry just as much variety within within the field in terms of what you can actually do with them as a CS degree does.But someone with a U.S. law degree can go anywhere they want in the U.S. and get certified by the state's Bar Association and work in private practice, for local government, et. al. You get a CS degree, you end up going to a handful of cities, to work for a handful of different companies (like Facebook) and you're locked out of switching with non-compete agreements and other rights you sign away with your contract.

      Seems to me all this Code.org, Fwd.us BS is just another way people with a lot of power and money try to exploit those extremely lacking in both. Not even the fact that they're doing it under the guise of helping those whom they're exploiting is new. I guess...maybe I'm starting to see why some /. members get all rankled whenever M$FT, FB, Kid's Soup, iFruit [...] push for more K-12 computer science learning: they're not doing it for good reasons.

    6. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC here: I was not saying there aren't any women or minorities who might be interested. I am saying that that covering all people would gain you more who are interested, rather than trying to brainwash a specific subset of people into thinking they HAVE to do this.

    7. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. No one is stopping women or minorities from writing software. People are free to learn whatever the hell they want. Companies should be free to hire people based on their merit, rather than worrying about their type of genitals or where their parents came from.

    8. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A monkey can build code the same quality that can a bridge. Engineers, mathematicians, and similar tend to write horrible unmaintainable stuff.

       

    9. Re:Why? by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Because the people who tend to buy into this crap believe that anything other than an even gender/sex ratio must be due to discrimination and couldn't possibly be explained by other causes such as differences in the male and female brains over hundreds of thousands of years of evolution that shape our culture just as much as societal norms and influence vocational interests.

      As such, they either don't regard the treatment as sexist or racist, or if they do see it that way feel that it is justified in order to treat the imagined issue of discrimination in hiring practices, etc. that must be to blame for the imbalance.

    10. Re:Why? by x0ra · · Score: 1

      Driving a truck doesn't account as "being a miner".

    11. Re:Why? by c · · Score: 1

      You will never see a progressive campaigning to have more women working in mines.

      It does happen. A friend of mine spent about 20 years as a welder because of one of those "get women into the trades" programs.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    12. Re:Why? by plopez · · Score: 1

      Yes it does. In an open pit mine.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    13. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What does stem have to do with coding ?

      engineering, n. The application of mathematics and the physical sciences to the needs of humanity and the development of technology.

    14. Re:Why? by x0ra · · Score: 0

      Then I guess flying drone from a simulated vaginapit make you a fighter pilot...

    15. Re:Why? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 0

      Brilliant. When your point is demonstrated to be actually false, you simply start flinging poo.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    16. Re:Why? by x0ra · · Score: 2

      My point has not been demonstrated to be false, because we don't have the same definition of "miners". Point that highlighted by the comparison between fighter pilot and drone pilots.

    17. Re:Why? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Oh yes, I forgot. Your definition of "miners" is not the common one of "people who work in mines".

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    18. Re:Why? by x0ra · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So an administrative secretary working in a mine would fit as "miner" ?

    19. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the people who tend to buy into this crap believe that anything other than an even gender/sex ratio must be due to discrimination

      Whenever you see campaigns like this there are always two different groups of people. First you have the useful idiots who swallow the bullshit hook line and sinker and then you have the masterminds behind them who don't actually believe the bullshit but are pulling the strings of those who do to advance their own agenda.

    20. Re:Why? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      While we all take you at your word that you have lots of experience with minors, or as you call them "miner"s, that's no account of ours here on Slashdot.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    21. Re:Why? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      STEM. The E is for "Engineering". That still leaves three.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    22. Re:Why? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      A wrote a story about a monkey once, but it was a horrible unmaintainable mess (the story I mean; the monkey was actually rather gifted)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    23. Re:Why? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Guy with a login here. We know if you are an AC already. There is no need to announce it. Thanks.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    24. Re:Why? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Where did the OP say anything about administrative secretary?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    25. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also funny you won't find progressives campaigning to have more women and minorities working in the law field. And why not?

      Because the majority of lawyers, prosecutors, judges and legal advisors are women as it is. If anything, SJWs should be campaigning for more men in law.

    26. Re:Why? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Because the majority of lawyers, prosecutors, judges and legal advisors are women as it is

      Not where I live.

      Law is certainly one of the fields which women can do well in but you'll find that the vast majority of the partners in big law firms (for instance) are still men.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    27. Re:Why? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      Women do lots of unpleasant and dangerous jobs. Let's look at the most dangerous jobs, shall we?

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/fin...
      http://www.mirror.co.uk/featur...

      Teachers, librarians and estate agents all make the top 10. There are plenty of female farming staff as well, of course, although less than there used to be due to automation. Going back further women's work used to be extremely dangerous, e.g. working in cloth making factories with primitive machinery.

      There reason there isn't much effort to get more women into mining because no-one is trying to force people into jobs they don't want. I know it's a common straw man argument against these programmes, that they are forcing women into STEM when they just want to play with ponies and become nurses and hair dressers, but actually there are women saying they want to study certain subjects but find that there are gender based barriers. So in response to that there are efforts to correct the problem.

      If you can find some women who want to become miners but find gender based barriers in their way, you can expect support for their cause.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    28. Re:Why? by Greystripe · · Score: 1

      A truck driver is not a miner, they are a truck driver regardless of where they drive that truck. A miner is someone who uses tools to mine ore. This really isn't that difficult.

    29. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miner

    30. Re:Why? by plopez · · Score: 1

      A truck is a tool. As is a drag line and explosives. I have also seen front end loaders, side dumps, and D8 Cats in underground mines. Are people using that equipment not miners?

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  4. Coding is irrelevant by x0ra · · Score: 2

    The way concepts are expressed is irrelevant, what matter is how structured they are to one another. To make a culinary parallel, everybody can use a pan and a pot, but not everybody can marry food in delicate and tasty way.

    This, or Facebook is looking for code monkey.

  5. Facebook to abuse minorities and women! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So basically Facebook wants more women and minorities to code so they can export their jobs or have them work for janitors pay.

    Fuck you Facebook you racist misoginist bastards.

    1. Re:Facebook to abuse minorities and women! by plopez · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yep. Women and minorities work for lower pay.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  6. I know a lot about this comment by thedonger · · Score: 3, Insightful
    FTA:

    Another notable finding was that men were five times more likely than women to say that they knew a lot about computer programming.

    Holy shit, really? Men are more likely to claim they know a lot about anything.

    --
    Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    1. Re:I know a lot about this comment by plopez · · Score: 2

      That's not the only thing they lie about. ;)

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:I know a lot about this comment by avandesande · · Score: 1

      LOL and how much do men outnumber women in programming.... maybe 5 to 1?

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    3. Re:I know a lot about this comment by turning+in+circles · · Score: 1

      Confidence is rarely related to competence, and may be a factor why there are so few women leaders. Similarly, I suggest sometimes coding requires more confidence than competence, making men more suited to this discipline. (Ugly code out there, eventually made to work by brute force).

      --
      Might as well face it I'm addicted to data.
    4. Re:I know a lot about this comment by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Sure but that was the results of one of the research papers. Women feel they must know 100% about something before attempting it where Men feel like they must know about 60% about something before attempting it and will learn the rest on the job.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    5. Re:I know a lot about this comment by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      confidence and bullshitting will get you a job. and a raise.

    6. Re:I know a lot about this comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FTA:

      Another notable finding was that men were five times more likely than women to say that they knew a lot about computer programming.

      Holy shit, really? Men are more likely to claim they know a lot about anything.

      That's OK. Most women are more likely to lie about everything.

      Facebook got this one. Who's picking up the tab on the next round of bullshit generalizations?

    7. Re:I know a lot about this comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The batting order is

      Google
      Facebook
      HP
      IBM
      Twitter
        with Apple stepping in as a pinch hitter.

    8. Re:I know a lot about this comment by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      FTA:

      Another notable finding was that men were five times more likely than women to say that they knew a lot about computer programming.

      Holy shit, really? Men are more likely to claim they know a lot about anything.

      Yeah, ask men about their dick size and then ask their wives the same question.

    9. Re:I know a lot about this comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit, really? Men are more likely to claim they know a lot about anything.

      I knew that already.

    10. Re: I know a lot about this comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That may work in Brazil or Thailand.

    11. Re:I know a lot about this comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never met a girl who spends 1/5th the time I spend in front of a computer

  7. Define minority by srees · · Score: 2

    Define minority please. Heck, for that matter these days, define women! This is baloney. I don't give a rat's ass about a programmer's sex, color, background, etc. I care that they like what they do and that they do a good job of it, without being offensive to the team. Frankly, I care more if they smoke or wear too much cologne and come in stinking up the office several times a day.

    1. Re:Define minority by NotDrWho · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's any racial group that's in the minority in a given population--except Asians of course, because they just learn, work hard, and refuse to play victims.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re:Define minority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dangerous words those. Next thing you'll hear some crazy feminist at work demanding to change "master" and "slave" to something that sounds more inclusive and collaborative, followed up by a redesign of the application architecture because the current one "reflects the patriarchical mindset"

    3. Re:Define minority by NotDrWho · · Score: 2

      Here are the 2015 Scripps National Spelling Bee finalists:

      https://lintvkoin.files.wordpr... ...or, as like to call them, "7 reasons why the myth of Asian high achievement isn't a myth, and also 3 white kids."

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    4. Re:Define minority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't a myth. Don't insult them by saying it is.

    5. Re:Define minority by Raseri · · Score: 1

      You mean Southeast Asians (China, Japan, etc.). South Asians (India, Bangladesh, etc) are a completely different story.

      --
      Writhe your naked ass to the mindless groove.
    6. Re:Define minority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, it's a myth because the asian achievements go down the more integrated they are into US culture. So it's probably something magical about Japan and not the anti-intellectual climate over here where we tell people that only losers and nerds try hard in school.

    7. Re:Define minority by chipschap · · Score: 2

      I read through the linked article and it's enough to make me sick. In the end it's just another feminist who hates evil white males, 100% of whom are oppressors and 100% of whom deserve to die. The ostensible thesis, though, is that by praising successful Asians we promote prejudice against blacks. Seriously ... white people can't get anything right, apparently ... even when they praise people who have overcome hardship and done well, there has to be a reprehensible motive for it.

      Many people have worked their way up. With great courage and perseverance they earned their success. They deserve praise. And we ought to, now, withhold that praise because some others didn't succeed in the same way?

    8. Re:Define minority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, we have a lot of them working for us. minorities? in australia white males are the minority in corporate IT

    9. Re:Define minority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? What's wrong with South Asians?

    10. Re:Define minority by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Define minority please. Heck, for that matter these days, define women! This is baloney. I don't give a rat's ass about a programmer's sex, color, background, etc. I care that they like what they do and that they do a good job of it, without being offensive to the team. Frankly, I care more if they smoke or wear too much cologne and come in stinking up the office several times a day.

      Only knobends unironically uses the word "team" to describe their co-workers.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    11. Re:Define minority by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Being good at rote learning is not a sign of high achievement, just of a different educational emphasis.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    12. Re:Define minority by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Really? What's wrong with South Asians?

      They have brown skin. This really annoys racists.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    13. Re:Define minority by dywolf · · Score: 1

      nope.
      not a troll post.
      just an article about how the model minority stereotype is as harmful (and bigoted) as the lazy minority stereotype.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    14. Re:Define minority by dywolf · · Score: 1

      if that's what you got, then its a reflection of your own biases and a lack of reading comprehension.

      no, you shouldn't withhold praise, but neither should you engage in stereotyping consisting of "this is how to be a good minority". both the model minority and lazy minority stereotypes are harmful bigoted myths that no one should engage in.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    15. Re:Define minority by Raseri · · Score: 1

      If you've never had to clean up after a few hundred shit-tier "programmers" from India, you should count yourself lucky. Strangely, good programmers seem to come from every other part of the world: the US, Mexico, the UK, Norway, Spain, Japan, China, you name it. Hell, I even worked with a guy from Nigeria for about a year (turns out that Nigerians who have moved to the US *really* hate 419 scammers, to the surprise of absolutely no one). Who knows why Indians can't program? Beats me. Maybe look into their school system.

      --
      Writhe your naked ass to the mindless groove.
  8. Why not just hire the best people for the job. by Fragnet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It doesn't matter what shape their genitals are.

    1. Re:Why not just hire the best people for the job. by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because SJW.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re:Why not just hire the best people for the job. by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      The people have to exist if you're going to hire them.

      TFA isn't about hiring unqualified people just because they're from underrepresented groups. It's about encouraging people from underrepresented groups to seek and acquire the qualifications in the first place.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    3. Re:Why not just hire the best people for the job. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the octagon shaped genitalia holders, they are lazy.

    4. Re:Why not just hire the best people for the job. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then it makes all of us in the group suspicious to everyone else because they assume we got our job because of something completely unrelated to ability. In my current job, I get no respect because the company announced they were hiring a female Java dev. Everyone assumes I was hired just I'm female, and it even makes me doubt myself. It taints everyone in the group, not just the people who aren't qualified.

    5. Re:Why not just hire the best people for the job. by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like your company was being incredibly obtuse when they announced they were hiring a female Java developer. They should have just said they were hiring a Java developer, and left it at that.

      Whether a person is qualified or not becomes obvious enough after they start contributing. And everyone has to deal with self-doubt from time to time. All I can say is ... persevere.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    6. Re:Why not just hire the best people for the job. by Orgasmatron · · Score: 3, Informative

      That sounds cruel.

      The underrepresented group is the "low IQ" group, and unless I missed some big developments, IQ isn't something that can be acquired by seeking.

      The root problem is that membership in the fundamental group is not distributed evenly across superficial demographic groups. But reality (genetics) can't be moved by wishing, shrieking or blaming.

      The implications of IQ distribution by demographic groups has been discussed in gruesome detail elsewhere. Pay particular attention to the parts about thresholds and tails.

      Of course, everyone already knows this, and are increasingly recognizing that these stories are about power, not programming.

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
    7. Re:Why not just hire the best people for the job. by x0ra · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like your company was being incredibly obtuse when they announced they were hiring a female Java developer.

      FTFY

    8. Re:Why not just hire the best people for the job. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone assumes I was hired just I'm female, and it even makes me doubt myself.

      Hmm... If you code like you write, perhaps you're not qualified?

    9. Re:Why not just hire the best people for the job. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is AmiMojo making shit up again. they're posting AC so they can mod the thread. notice the lack of posts on a thread they'd absolutely be involved in if they had mod points.

    10. Re:Why not just hire the best people for the job. by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      IQ tests measure how good you are at doing IQ tests. They don't necessarily correlate to an individual's abilities in all areas.

      In any case, my post was not about average IQ of a particular group. It was about opening the door to groups that might perceive that they are closed. People still need to make the grade. We just need to make sure they aren't discouraged to try.

      Not long ago, women represented about 10% of physics majors. In recent years, that number has increased significantly, and not because women got smarter. It's because they were encouraged to consider physics as a career.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    11. Re:Why not just hire the best people for the job. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact this is a "Troll" speaks volumes of how this site has gone to shit.

    12. Re:Why not just hire the best people for the job. by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      IQ tests measure how good you are at doing IQ tests. They don't necessarily correlate to an individual's abilities in all areas.

      They (IQ scores) correlate very strongly with success. They've always correlated very strongly with success.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    13. Re:Why not just hire the best people for the job. by Fragnet · · Score: 1

      Precisely. It's just virtue signalling.

    14. Re:Why not just hire the best people for the job. by LessThanObvious · · Score: 2

      I would hire a black person, I would hire a woman, I would hire a latino, I would never hire a SJW.

  9. YAMICI by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

    I reckon these initiatives are close to outnumbering the people in the target groups. They'll have to start moonlighting to keep up with the supply.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  10. "stereotype" by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 0

    >> popular understanding that women

    I believe that the word you are looking for is "stereotype."

    E.g., do you care to share any "popular understandings" about ethnic groups and athletics?

    1. Re:"stereotype" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> popular understanding that women

      I believe that the word you are looking for is "stereotype."

      E.g., do you care to share any "popular understandings" about ethnic groups and athletics?

      Oh yes, got to love that article : "Last, mothers teach their children the correct use of the spoken words preferred at home and probably two to three other languages that they think the child must learn." What?

    2. Re:"stereotype" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> popular understanding that women

      I believe that the word you are looking for is "stereotype."

      E.g., do you care to share any "popular understandings" about ethnic groups and athletics?

      Oh yes, got to love that article : "Last, mothers teach their children the correct use of the spoken words preferred at home and probably two to three other languages that they think the child must learn." What?

      I speak multiple languages and about the only thing my mother did was give me opportunities to learn them--both of us are female, and of the languages we speak...we've got two in common, English and Koine Greek. None of the languages were intentionally taught to me, and certainly my secondary native language was entirely accidental given it was basically learned because the ladies who considered me a substitute daughter/granddaughter spoke it around me. (And I'm pretty certain that my mother had no desire or intention for me to end up in Classical Studies--it's about as useful today as Anglo-Saxon...which I'm picking up, actually, because language geekery.)

      This seems pretty normal, too. Most women don't speak multiple languages and teaching small children multiple languages in the cradle causes issues with being able to speak any of them well as children are definitely not wired to distinguish easily between languages at that stage. Basically? The unfortunate kid will end up with an accent at best, at worst speaking a pidgin and confused by why adults are being so weird about how they speak.

    3. Re:"stereotype" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Most women don't speak multiple languages and teaching small children multiple languages in the cradle causes issues with being able to speak any of them well as children are definitely not wired to distinguish easily between languages at that stage.

      Oh god, thank you! I work in education, and it seems like most of the "special needs" students are not suffering from a cognitive or physical problem. Instead most of the borderline illiterate cases are bilingual children, who grew up between two languages. They never have any morphological awareness at all. Moreover, they have no idea how to use tenses. They exist in some kind of world were all the language is present tense, and they just try to intuit tense from context. Their bilingual childhood, far from a "gift", has actually left them functionally illiterate, and will limit the rest of their life to one of menial labor at best.

    4. Re:"stereotype" by _merlin · · Score: 1

      I disagree with your last assertion. I had exposure to multiple languages from the day I was born, and I think it was great for me because it gave me that disconnect between concepts and words. I have far less trouble learning languages than my wife, who grew up with a single language and learned English later.

    5. Re:"stereotype" by _merlin · · Score: 1

      What the actual fuck? I was born in an environment where English, Kanada, Hindi and Dutch were spoken. I can speak five languages now. I understand how to use tenses, and that different languages have different tenses available. That's never been an issue for me. Are you going to claim next that bilingual children can't use articles? Or the verb to be? Oh I know, verb conjugation! That's an easy one! Bilingual children can't conjugate verbs!

      I'll grant that a child whose parents aren't fluent English speakers isn't going to learn to speak perfect English at home, that's to be expected. But isn't school supposed to remedy that? What's the point of sending the kids to school if it isn't even providing basic language education? Don't they teach English/ESL?

      I think there's another issue at play, in that some teachers simply take English for granted and never put in the effort to actually understand it fully, leaving them unable to teach it properly. Perhaps one should be required to speak at least one other language in order to be qualified to teach English. You learn a lot about how a language works when you see how another language does it differently.

  11. How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    --compilers that replace error messages with positive affirmations
    --special women/minorities-only campus computer labs so they don't have to look at scary white or Asian men

    (A third item is left as an exercise for the reader.)

  12. whipping girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But not trans women. Oh, I'm sure they have some bullshit that says otherwise. Won't believe it for a second.

    Why don't you assholes hire a trans woman I knew who wanted a tech job, had decent skills, but had to detransition to avoid homelessness.

    Why don't you assholes hire any of the technically-inclined trans women I know.

    Why don't you assholes acknowledge how odd it is that there's a preponderance of trans women who get into tech careers just fine.

    Why don't you assholes look into why trans women get shitcanned when a new director takes over despite being liked and respected by all her technical co-workers?

    Why don't you assholes come down on the HR bunnies, the high school counselors, the parents, and everybody else who tells women that computers are for boys? Guess who I left out of that list? Geeks! The same demographic you're loudly proclaiming is just a bunch of misogynerds, and double so if we're talking about a gay geek who isn't being a good little sex object for a woman.

    Why don't you assholes come down on womyn-born-womyn who go "tee hee math is hard!" Why don't you assholes come down on women who say, "Oh, but computers are easy for you because you're a boy." God I want to slap them into next Tuesday every time I hear sexist, misogynist shit from womyn-born-womyn. Call it internalized misogyny or whatever you want, but that shit needs to stop now!

    Sure, call me a misogynerd for pointing all this out. How many women programmers have you mentored? I have 2 successes (50% womyn-born-womyn, but some asshole gashlighting dickhead two-faced manager, a manager sexually harassed and psychologically abused her until she quit ), 3 failures, and the current apprentice's success or failure is uncertain. But I am fucking trying!

    What that fuck are you assholes doing beside just calling names?

    Captcha: control

    1. Re:whipping girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because they only know how to code in Fortran?

    2. Re:whipping girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GP here. Fuck off and die. Try Ruby, C/C++, Java, Grails (wasn't something one of the successes enjoyed, but hey, it paid until the company said whoops, what's a faggot doing working here!), PHP, lots of stuff.

      This whole issue is a distraction. Distractions are for cows! Watch as the internet harassment angle supposedly keeping women from becoming programmers gets rammed through in support of TISA. Wait for TPP, TTIP, and TISA to be ratified. I know where I'll be going when Queen Hillary is coronated. Do you? I've got my spare can of gas. Do you? Enjoy your FEMA concentration camps. Stay away from large cities starting around 2019. Write in vote Bernie Sanders in 2016 or be cows! The walk to the gas station will be for your own good!

      This comment will not be saved until you click the Submit button below. You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later.

    3. Re: whipping girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Life pro tip: don't be a tranny.

    4. Re:whipping girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GP here. Fuck off and die. Try Ruby, C/C++, Java, Grails (wasn't something one of the successes enjoyed, but hey, it paid until the company said whoops, what's a faggot doing working here!), PHP, lots of stuff.

      This whole issue is a distraction. Distractions are for cows! Watch as the internet harassment angle supposedly keeping women from becoming programmers gets rammed through in support of TISA. Wait for TPP, TTIP, and TISA to be ratified. I know where I'll be going when Queen Hillary is coronated. Do you? I've got my spare can of gas. Do you? Enjoy your FEMA concentration camps. Stay away from large cities starting around 2019. Write in vote Bernie Sanders in 2016 or be cows! The walk to the gas station will be for your own good!

      This comment will not be saved until you click the Submit button below. You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later.

      You sound like a national socialist. Go back to burning books and catching HIV.

    5. Re: whipping girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If her attitude is half as bad as yours why would anyone hire her?

       

    6. Re: whipping girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Life pro tip: don't be a tranny.

      Or you might have some tranny trouble and cause a car accident like Bruce.

    7. Re: whipping girl by x0ra · · Score: 1

      I'm a V8.

    8. Re: whipping girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? Transgendered people are who they think they are. So, you can sex a transgendered woman and not catch the gay! It's awesome!

      I'm only marginally kidding. Seriously, the transfolk I know are down to earth, cool, and doesn't afraid of anything. I like every single one I've met and they don't take themselves too seriously.

      KGIII - Can't login, VPN is being silly.

  13. Please tell me I'm not the only one bothered by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Please tell me I'm not the only one bothered by "The project draws a very strong analogy between the learning of computer coding skills and the learning of spoken languages"

  14. Re:Please tell me I'm not the only one bothered by by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People who think computer languages are anything like natural languages know nothing about either.

  15. because ebonics by rtkluttz · · Score: 2

    Not mine, copied from a forum...

    sup
    {
        gimme fibo bitch
        a be 1 bitch
        b be 1 bitch
        putou a bitch
        putou b bitch
        fibo be fibo widout 2 bitch
        slongas (fibo bepimpin 0)
            c be a an b bitch
            a be b bitch
            b be c bitch
            putou b bitch
            dissin fibo bitch
        nomo
    }

    --
    Digital is, by definition, imperfect. Analog is the way to go.
    1. Re:because ebonics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #include <stdio.h>
      #define sup int main()
      #define gimme(x) scanf("%d",&x)
      #define bitch ;
      #define be =
      #define widout -
      #define slongas(x) while(x) {
      #define bepimpin >
      #define an +
      #define putou(x) printf("%d\n",x)
      #define dissin --
      #define nomo }
      int fibo,a,b,c;

      Just add some parentheses to gimme and putou...

  16. The purpose is to reduce wages not increase them. by trout007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You can be sure anytime employees want more people in a field it means they want to reduce labor costs.

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
  17. Programming is not a language by tomhath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    seeks to analogise coding skills with language skills to make the subject of computer science less forbidding and opaque

    Good luck with that. Programming is about logic, not language.

    1. Re:Programming is not a language by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      seeks to analogise coding skills with language skills to make the subject of computer science less forbidding and opaque

      Good luck with that. Programming is about logic, not language.

      How do you explain a logic problem to someone else? With language. Get your head out of your arse. Programming is not strictly a science.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    2. Re:Programming is not a language by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Programming is about logic, not language.

      oh yeah? well then how do you explain LISP?! ;P

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    3. Re:Programming is not a language by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      With a minimum of "S" sounds.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    4. Re:Programming is not a language by fnj · · Score: 2

      Get your head out of your arse. Programming is not strictly a science.

      It sure as hell isn't a liberal art. And you can't treat it like a language used to communicate with people. You don't get your head out of your ass and distinguish clearly between to, too, two, Two, TWO, etc., and you are a shitty programmer. If you write about a car's breaks, or braking a dish, a human can figure out what you actually mean inside that besotted head, but a compiler cannot.

    5. Re:Programming is not a language by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      More like an applied art because sometimes there is no single right answer. Just because it compiles and works doesn't mean it couldn't have been done better or worse.

    6. Re:Programming is not a language by avandesande · · Score: 2

      Yeah by writing it, not speaking it. I don't know how many times a customer has given me a nonsensical requirement and when I asked them to write it down they then realized it didn't make any sense.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    7. Re:Programming is not a language by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Get your head out of your arse. Programming is not strictly a science.

      It sure as hell isn't a liberal art. And you can't treat it like a language used to communicate with people. You don't get your head out of your ass and distinguish clearly between to, too, two, Two, TWO, etc., and you are a shitty programmer. If you write about a car's breaks, or braking a dish, a human can figure out what you actually mean inside that besotted head, but a compiler cannot.

      Yes, I must be a shitty programmer. Are you familiar with NER or Coreference Resolution? Named Entity Recognition is a subset of natural language processing. Software like SIRI uses various methodologies like Corefrence resolution to determine who or what you are talking about or what subject is inferred by your question based on past questions.

      I am focused more on complex event processing to detect patterns of behaviour but I am also familiar with entity resolution and I leverage that as well to detect behaviour across multiple entities that might not at first glance appear to be exactly the same entity.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    8. Re:Programming is not a language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Programming is not strictly a science.

      No. Programming is a minor subset of mathematics, just one that happens to pay rather well at the moment.

    9. Re:Programming is not a language by x0ra · · Score: 1

      with much more parenthesis.

    10. Re:Programming is not a language by tomhath · · Score: 1

      You could say the same about *any* field of study - Law, Particle Physics, Psychology, whatever. The language used to explain a problem isn't the same as expertise in the field.

    11. Re:Programming is not a language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Programming is about /talking/ to a computer, not people. I have a feeling that your basing your entire argument on how they are called "languages" which is a throwback to the very early days of computing.

    12. Re:Programming is not a language by flajann4415 · · Score: 1

      Women, in general, are good at language and its use to appeal emotionally. Explain to me how that translates, say, in writing system code in C++, or an algorithm in Java or Ruby or Python? I am all ears.

    13. Re:Programming is not a language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Programming is a minor subset of mathematics

      Well, sort of... it's designing and building machines. Computers are a medium that allow you to build machines out of math, often quite complicated machines.The silicon + the math gives you a functional machine - which neither will do alone.

      So your assertion is superficially true, but it's sort of like saying choreography is a minor subset of kinesiology.

  18. Re:Please tell me I'm not the only one bothered by by trout007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Programming languages exist because natural languages are ambiguous. This is why the whole legal profession exists.

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
  19. Women are better by mesterha · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So if woman are better at languages then there are differences (surprise) between the sexes. If you open that door, maybe men are better at programming.

    --

    Chris Mesterharm
    1. Re:Women are better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but who is better at playing the victim and attacking and vilifying you for pointing that out? You see, the net sum of all of these differences between the sexes really is zero.

    2. Re:Women are better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Physical advantageous traits for women and blacks are well understood and documented.

      Just don't mention IQ distributions..

    3. Re:Women are better by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      I believe the IQ factoid on this is really just a good trap.

      If you want to spark a flame-war, or look like an anti-PC bad-ass on the Internet, bringing it up is a good way to do it. I believe this because any intelligent, productive conversation afterwards is usually impossible. It's like Godwin's Law, only better. An actual productive conversation could go in a few interesting directions, with points that could be debated on their own merits, but I almost never see that happen.

    4. Re:Women are better by x0ra · · Score: 1

      But, aren't men, women, black or whites all equal ?!? I'm lost...

    5. Re:Women are better by TuringTest · · Score: 1

      So if woman are better at languages then there are differences (surprise) between the sexes. If you open that door, maybe men are better at programming.

      Sure, as long as you're aware that those facts allow you to make inferences only about populations, not specific individuals.

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    6. Re:Women are better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nutrition and environmental factors do a very good job of explaining the differences.
      So does intelligence heredity, though, unfortunately. Multiple generations of healthy, clean children having healthy, clean children can help... but the quality of education and parental involvement dwarf the genetic effect.

    7. Re:Women are better by flajann4415 · · Score: 1

      Being "better" at spoken languages does not necessarily translate to being "better" at writing code, which requires logical thinking, mathematical ability, and being able to visualize and analyze problems, abstract reasoning, etc.


      So much for woolly-headed liberal thinking.

    8. Re:Women are better by flajann4415 · · Score: 1

      I see no value in lumping individuals into groups. Yes, there will be various differences in distribution in any arbitrary grouping for any number of reasons, but what really matters is the Individual.

      As long as the Individual is free to take action, that's all that is needed. The rest is up to the Individual.

    9. Re:Women are better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you even bring that up, isn't "populations" what this article is talking about ? Or is Facebook launching an initiative to attract Latisha T. and Jose P. to coding ?

  20. Re:It is about culture. by truck_soccer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All those things you mentioned as "geek culture" are the new mainstream. Look at the news media: Today is back to the future day? Star Wars merchandising permeating EVERY media outlet? Your logic has failed. My "geek" friends no longer wish to identify with "geek culture" and have since kept all of their inherent "geekiness" under wraps because it has become a giant pain in the ass, and the most obnoxious thing any "geek" can experience is having people talking to them about common interests. To be a geek is to be socially inept, and as such this new found corporate fascination with all things "geek" has created a cultural paradox. Much like how the word "hipster" is regularly used today to describe the exact opposite of what a hipster is.

  21. Re:It is about culture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is possible that OP is also female, by the way.

  22. Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What I learned today: It's okay to say women are better at language, but clearly men can't be better at programming.

  23. Please explain. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Please explain how a statement such as "popular understanding that women are better at learning languages" is acceptable while "popular understanding that men are better at mathematics, applying the scientific theory and thinking in a logical manner" will get you lynched. They're both inflammatory statements.

    It seems that any statement which includes women must be respectful and filled with praise to avoid social outrage. Any statement which includes men is permitted to disparage them, paint them as unintelligent, as buffoons and as dangerous criminals.

    How is this social justice?

    1. Re:Please explain. by x0ra · · Score: 1

      Positive discrimination is not discrimination...

  24. is this really a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There might be 60 developers in my office. 2 of them are white male natural born citizens.

    1. Re:is this really a problem? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      When I worked at Cisco, I was part of a minority group that two white guys and one Latino guy, all native born. Everyone else was from India.

    2. Re:is this really a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At some point one of our customers explicitly refused to sign purchase order unless there was a guarantee the maintenance would not be done in our office in India. This is not because Indian guys (of whatever gender) are worse, it was because the ones working in our offices in India are worse than almost everybody else which is caused mainly because they are there due to their hourly wage and not skills. The same happens with everything else. If selection criteria for some utility X is Y, whereas there is no detectable correlation between amount of X in a process and amount of Y in a product then shit happens. If shit pile is not too huge to disturb whole operation you can fix it with money. The real problems (if the activities we talk about have any relationship with any real problems) do not get solved by this, new ones can be created however. It is win-win really....

  25. Women in STEM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Women in STEM!! Women in STEM!!!

  26. Transgender Women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it count if the women are transgender? Because I think I am miscounted.

    1. Re:Transgender Women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At this point, I'm willing to just say I'm transgender and/or trans-african-american in order to get access to some of the favorable hiring guidelines and 'acceleration' programs.

      I was in an interview recently where I overheard one of the interviewers say they were looking for a "diversity hire". I was told that my skills and experience didn't match up with what they were looking for. This is a position where a talent manager at the company contacted me out of the blue and practically begged me for a face to face interview.

    2. Re:Transgender Women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. They'll see it doesn't, but it does. If you're a trans woman, to these SJWs you are simply a metaphysical rapist trying to use your male privilege to invade their spaces.

      See Brianna Wu's example. She's earned her temporary cisgender privilege by SJWing and being a professional victim. She doesn't want to hang out with "trans" women. She won't even acknowledge the word trans means anything other than a mental illness and sexual perversion.

      So, you might get counted, but only if you're an asset to the SJW Narrative. If you're just a normal, middle-aged, successful professional who happens to be a trans woman and isn't connected to wealth and the media, you're chop liver.

    3. Re:Transgender Women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      miscunted*

  27. Re:It is about culture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Possible, but not likely based on this quote:

    There is the side benefit that accomplishing this will make it a helluva lot easier for me to find a woman with whom I can really have a mutually-satisfying, meaningful relationship. So....GET ON IT!

  28. Politically Correct Compliance Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's see what passes the PC compliance test:

          "Women are better at learning spoken languages" - PASS
          "Therefore men are not as good as woman at learning spoken languages" - Eyebrow inperceptively raised, but PASS
          "Men are better [on average] than women at computer programming" - RED ALERT RED ALERT RED ALERT !!!

  29. Question by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Is "wiling to work for minimum wage" considered a valid minority now?

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  30. Remember the story how FB won't hire grey beards? by CQDX · · Score: 2

    And multiple posts by people over 30 were saying they won't even consider working for FB? It's SJW shit like this that experienced engineers loathe.

  31. Re:It is about culture. by x0ra · · Score: 2

    Not only a girl, but the typical, if not stereotypical, SJW, as far as I can see...

  32. Re:Please tell me I'm not the only one bothered by by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    When I was looking through college catalogs in the early 1990's, some degree programs allowed the substitution of foreign language classes with programing language classes. Alas, eight years in Commodore 64 BASIC didn't qualify as an acceptable programming language for college.

  33. Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Facebook wants female, as well as male, code monkeys. Other than this, I want my daughter to be well versed on critical thinking, mathematics, physics, etc. I most certainly don't want for her to become a code monkey.

  34. Re:It is about culture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could be bi-sexual, by the way.

  35. Re:The purpose is to reduce wages not increase the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Facebook Launches Initiative To Attract More Cheap Slave Labor" doesn't really have the same cachet to it.

  36. Re:It is about culture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's 2015. Many women already ARE endeared to geek culture. It's people like you who believe that they couldn't possibly be "authentically interested" in geek culture that are driving them out. They simply don't want to put up with that noise. I suspect your preconceptions concerning women are what's keeping you from finding a relationship, not anything inherent to women themselves.

  37. Re:It is about culture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing in there says the author is not a woman. To say otherwise is misogynistic.

  38. Re:It is about culture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way to keep the blinkers on homophobe! sex positive feminist lesbians exist!

  39. learning spoken vs writing by avandesande · · Score: 1

    "The project draws a very strong analogy between the learning of computer coding skills and the learning of spoken languages"

    Seems to imply speaking a language, which is not right at all. It's about writing a language. Maybe not coincidentally, male authors outnumber women authors by about the same proportion as in software development.
    http://www.theguardian.com/boo...

    BTW one of my favorite authors is Mary Stewart, her Arthurian Saga is awesome!

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  40. what about trades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would love to see an all female roofing team doing shingles at 100 degrees as I drink starbucks at my desk. real tough guy here.

    1. Re:what about trades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell a group of female IT workers that they don't get to take breaks or lunches today because we need to close out tickets and see how that goes over.

      Tell a group of female network cable installation techs that they have to come in for a 12 hour shift on their day off to do an emergency job for a big client without a lunch of breaks.

      This kind of shit happened to me everywhere I've worked. The only thing we could do is shrug and start looking for other jobs. My state's labor laws allow an employer to 'cancel' or disallow breaks and lunch periods no matter how long their employees have been working.

      If a woman was treated like this, it would blow up into a national news story with celebrities and news show people talking about how labor laws need to be reformed to protect women.

    2. Re:what about trades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is an all-female construction company in Canada. Some of them are kind of cute. They mostly do rehabs but they also do roofing rehabs. They do use a manlift (err - womanlift?) to get material onto the roof but that's just logical regardless of gender.

  41. Women are better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the linked article .. "It seems that various studies have been able to prove that women are better than men when it comes to speaking a foreign language.".....
    "Studies conducted on this topic"
    [citation needed]

  42. Demographics by ajzimm3rman · · Score: 0

    Before they institute another program aimed at targetting specific sections of the population they should study whether doing so (in any subject) has ever worked in the past. [It hasn't.]

  43. Re:It is about culture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why I said possible.

  44. Re:It is about culture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Keep whining, or why don't you just shave your neckbeard, buy some decent clothes, and bathe once in a while shitlord? I'm a girl btw.

    And why don't you lose some weight, stop wearing butch-dyke overalls, and shave your armpits occasionally, you land-whale?

    See how bigoted assumptions work both ways? Or is it only fashionable to insult males?

  45. Re:The purpose is to reduce wages not increase the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Are they cheap labor, or slaves? Make up your mind.

  46. Just in time for some other ship to sail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whenever I hear about stuff like this, I look back on my white suburban youth in the 70s and 80s. I want to reach out to the other races and say: Guys, the ship sailed. Insist on a good general education and pray your parents aren't idiots who ignore you. That way when the next ship is getting ready to sail you might have a chance of boarding. Don't listen to these schmucks who want to "teach you how to code". Go back to the fundamentals of math and logic that created the need for code, and think about that while you're in the class. If you can't think about one thing while listening to another, this message isn't for you. You're not smart enough and nothing will really make a difference. If you just follow the program you'll get dumped into the work force just in time for code to be a commodity. That's where we're moving. "learn to code" is here today and gone tomorrow. Logic, knowledge, and discipline are timeless.

    1. Re:Just in time for some other ship to sail by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Logic, knowledge, and discipline are timeless.

      Too bad they don't teach that in school.

  47. Re:It is about culture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No you're not. Quit with the lies, thanks.

  48. Re:The purpose is to reduce wages not increase the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's what I thought. "Attracting minorities and women" is code for, "we're aiming tp pay minimum wage with no benefits".
    Would you like files with that?

  49. Re:The purpose is to reduce wages not increase the by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

    There isn't that much difference. The main reason you'd want slaves is so that your labor cost is close to zero: the only cost involved with a slave is the initial purchase price, and then the ongoing maintenance costs (mainly food, but also housing and medical care). Of course, these days with government welfare programs it's probably cheaper to hire cheap laborers than to buy slaves: by paying the workers minimum wage, they qualify for government assistance, so you effectively outsource some of the cost of that worker to the government, and by extension the taxpayers at large. With slaves, you have to pay for all their costs, plus you have to go to the trouble of managing their daily lives too, instead of letting them do it themselves like you do with non-slave workers.

  50. Re:It is about culture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You show a remarkable lack of personality, but good job bringing your gender into the discussion for no discernible reason other than to put down males you deem as unacceptable mates (because they don't fit into your off-the-shelf worldview)

  51. Re:The purpose is to reduce wages not increase the by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    If you count food, shelter, training and potential medical bills, slaves are more expensive than wages.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  52. Translation by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    We need more H1B visa. Look, in the US we only get applications from white males, but we want diversity in our company!

    For example, Indians are really underrepresented in our work force!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  53. Re:The purpose is to reduce wages not increase the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a higher salary for the new people they hire on, though.

  54. You swapped in a different claim.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You said "recruited'--of course, anyone is free to join those jobs. But he's saying you'll never see people saying the balance isn't 50/50, so we need more female miners.

    If there is such a campaign to balance the genders in mining, by all means, link us to it.

  55. Category Shift by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    grave bait

    Thanks, I always wondered what came after MILF.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Category Shift by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I always heard it was GILF; Grandmother...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    2. Re:Category Shift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Thanks, I always wondered what came after MILF.

      For me, MIF comes after MILF. ;)

    3. Re:Category Shift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't become a motherfucker (no matter what my drill instructor said) until I hit the age of 25. What? That was when my wife (now ex) had my daughter.

    4. Re:Category Shift by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "I always heard it was GILF; Grandmother..."

      Grandmother I Loathe Fondling?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  56. Big F'ing Deal - What about ageism? by bADlOGIN · · Score: 1

    Now that he's past 30, I wonder if Zuckerberg will pay attention to it.
    http://www.fastcompany.com/303...

    --
    *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
  57. Re:It is about culture. by x0ra · · Score: 2

    A 200lb black women wearing a Captain America outfit at Comic-Con is not being part of geek culture.

  58. Re:It is about culture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I just puked a little, in my mouth.

  59. Lets recruit to other male professions first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These professions are more male dominated than IT
    Lets deal with the most pressing gender imbalance problems first

    Welding
    Central Heating Installer
    Car Mechanic
    Construction Worker
    Electrician
    Truck Driver
    Brick layer
    Excavation Worker
    Gardener

  60. Re: It is about culture. by cyber-vandal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do geeks very laid more now? Do they get hassled less? Do women swoon and men feel small at the sound of a Star Wars quote from a neckbeard? The mainstream may have appropriated geek things but little has changed for the average geek. Just watch Big Bang Theory for an example of how geeks are viewed.

  61. Finally women and minorities. .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...can get the outsource shaft like everyone else lol

  62. Re:It is about culture. by russotto · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's 2015. Many women already ARE endeared to geek culture.

    Impossible. University of Washington Assistant Professor of Social Justice Sapna Cheryan has made her career demonstrating that first of all, women don't like geek culture, and second, that's why there aren't so many women in tech, and third, if we just stomped on the geeks, made them dress like normal people and put away their toys, we'd have parity between men and women in tech.

  63. Re:The purpose is to reduce wages not increase the by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    "You can be sure anytime employees want more people in a field it means they want to reduce labor costs."

    To be fair, You can be sure anytime employees don't want more people in a field it also means they want to reduce labor costs. (i.e. companies always want to reduce labor costs.)

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  64. Re:The purpose is to reduce wages not increase the by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    They are mo' cheap

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  65. Re:It is about culture. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    "There is the side benefit that accomplishing this will make it a helluva lot easier for me to find a woman with whom I can really have a mutually-satisfying, meaningful relationship. So....GET ON IT!"

    Dude, your best hope lies now, as it always has, in the hopes that cybernetic women are just around the corner. Keep on pulling for her!

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  66. Re:It is about culture. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    Dude, for someone who can't figure out how to create A Slashdot account and log in she's probably out-geaking him. Besides, what you got against BLOW?

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  67. Yet another attempt that will fail flat. by flajann4415 · · Score: 1

    I have seen this attempt time and again over the decades, and they never seem to gain traction. Why not? Simple. It's all about the passion, and especially in today's world of the Internet, with endless resources available online for free at every level to for anyone even mildly curious about software development.
    If you are interested, you already would've Googled and checked it out. Many sites allow you to write code in your browser in just about every major language out there. Development platforms can be setup and downloaded for free to any computer. Etc., etc. So what will FB do that will enhance what's already there? I think they will get maybe a handful interested, but you will not see the "sea change" they seek. You either have the knack or you do not, and no amount of flag-waving will change that much. "Women" and "Minorities". I don't see the point in targeting specific demographics like that. It's very condescending.

  68. More and more common in academia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.jobs.ac.uk/job/AME562/research-fellow-in-engineering-women-only/

  69. Re: It is about culture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had the misfortune of working with a girl in IT that didn't like to take baths very often. It would get so bad that we would light scented candles to help freshen up the air. Several of us filed complaints with HR which amount to nothing because for some reason HR wouldn't do anything. I ended up moving into the server room because she was in the cube next to mine. Thankfully she took a position in a different division of the company in a different state.

  70. I'm a Finn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Women represent more than 50% of the world's population. People of color represent something like 90% of the world's population. I'm a Finn. People of my ethnicity represent something like 0.07% of the world's population. Is this program meant for me?

  71. More misandrist articles by ruir · · Score: 2

    In a male dominated board. Bring it on fuckers, it is excellent PR.

  72. Re:It is about culture. by x0ra · · Score: 1

    I don't care about wrestling, but don't call it "geek culture".

  73. Whites are the minority - is 8% small enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is 8% of the world's population small enough to be a 'minority' for you?
    Oh, wait... somebody apparently decided that white people, and ONLY white people, have to give our countries to everybody else on the planet, and allow them all to move here. Why?

    WHY?

    1. Re:Whites are the minority - is 8% small enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jews.

  74. What? White males? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are a minority on this planet. Why re we always discriminated against?

  75. Great idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because coding is like talking to people.

    Listen up, computer. I want an app that shows pretty pictures of people. You know the kind that makes them look good. Then other people can look at these pictures and decide if they like the other person.

    And so she spoke. And there was Tinder. For she had the words and the time was right.

    Yeah, sounds like that might just work.

  76. white genocide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White countries for everyone in the name of diversity

  77. Competitive economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a good idea to make the US economy more competitive by having twice the engineers/programmers... after all, we have to compete with countries that don't have a discouraging culture who probably have more programmers, thanks to a lack of self-limiting beliefs and stereotypes.

    1. Re:Competitive economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Asian women are more likely to go in to tech not because of a lack of "discouraging culture", but because if you parents tell you that you're going to do a CS degree then that's what you do, no excuses, even if you hate being around a bunch of nerds at work all day.

  78. Moonbat (ill)ogic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same example of trying to make economic slavery look good.
    Perhaps there are differences between woman and men and among races.
    Perhaps some are interested in "coding" and others are not.
    Multiculturalism and perversity is just as bankrupt as Lysenkoism...
    Adopt the philosophy of Volunteerism and you will feel better because you can concentrate on yourself
    instead of trying to use everyone else...

  79. It's because of Asperger Syndrome by zmooc · · Score: 1

    Asperger Syndrome is about 4 times more prevalent in males. Males are about 4 times more prevalent in coding jobs. I believe the vast majority of software developers to have (undiagnosed) Asperger Syndrome and I believe that that fully explains the "lack" of female software developers.

    Now let's go invent the Overly Considerate Disorder that affects mostly females in order to explain the lack of male nurses so we can finally put an end this "equality" bullshit.

    --
    0x or or snor perron?!
    1. Re:It's because of Asperger Syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sigh* Regardless of what your stupid DSM says, there is no such thing as assburger's. That was just a bullshit made up disease that some geek came up with so he could draw disability and legally be a fucking asshole. Seriously, assburger's is an attempt to make "asshole" a disease! We do not need to legitimize and coddle assholes. They need to be kicked and told to act right.

    2. Re:It's because of Asperger Syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, not only are you ignorant, but you're actively arrogant about it.

      Oh, I'm sorry... there's no such thing as "arrogance," that was made up by thin-skinned types...

  80. Re:The purpose is to reduce wages not increase the by majid_aldo · · Score: 1

    i'm really sick of this employer cynicism i see on slashdot. it basically comes down to: "i'm am highly skilled and no one else can be".

    --
    --- widget evolution: enhanced, plus, super, ultra, extreme, exxxtreme, ultra-extreme, ..etc.
  81. Re:The purpose is to reduce wages not increase the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm really sick of employers treating us wage slaves like shit.

  82. Re: Facebook Coding Initiative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, I'm all for anyone and everyone doing things they haven't done before but I wonder once we all become coders where will the jobs be?

  83. "To Attract More Minorities and Women To Coding " by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    So with all these H1-B stories floating around, I assume they mean white people when they say "minorities"?

  84. SCIENCE isn't strictly a science! by friesofdoom · · Score: 1

    Oh, but by that logic, SCIENCE isn't strictly a science because you have to use Language to talk about anything in science!