Because it already exist. That's how you can follow a plane travel from sitting comfortably in your couch surfing the internet. The real problem appears where the uplink to the ground is broken and the plane "crash".
No. The car industry should provide the mean for people to protect themselves, but ultimately, it is to the people to decide whether or not they want that extra protection (and pay for it). The Government *IS* protecting people from themselves by imposing mandatory seat belt law and alike.
Good password manager ? I consult regular website from 5 or 6 differents machine (including laptop, desktop, tablet, phone, ipod,...), all running different kind of OS. There is NO password manager for this, which is typical nowadays.
All in all, these are all the worst hints ever:
1) prone to typo error, especially as the password is generally hidden
2) number & capitals are a pain on mobile devices
3) ever harder to remember (ie. where the @!#$ did I put the capital)
I HATE this kind of company. It will no matter what ALWAYS end up the same: "I forgot my password, send me a new one".
Heck.. I'm not even able to remember password for my utility company whose I consult every 6 month...
how is more death on the road necessarily "bad" ? If Joe the Plumber crash and was not wearing a sit belt, well, too bad for him. Why should the government try to protect people from themselves ?
Because it has fallen into quasi-oblivion. If it was that much of a perfect society, it would still rules over Mediterranean coast, Latin would not be a dead language.
Moreover, if current society is so much like the Ancient Rome, we have to worry, because the next age, namely the Middle Age, has been a long period of general regression.
What is the reason you like so much to have cop around ? Because they can deter violence though threat of violence, remember, they *do* have firearms. The very basic thing you are irresponsible enough to handle. Moreover, YOUR answer to the problem is the very same I am proposing, that is MORE guns. A LEO without a sidearm and a select-fire rifle (ie. the real "assault" weapon) in the trunk would not be much of a deterrence for criminals...
To some extend, it is just like the Starbucks stance on OC and CC. But I fear that they are actually alienating against both side, by refusing to take a stance. This is the problem with compromise, it's not pleasing ANYONE...
Thanks for correction, though, the same argument applies. The now-defunc Federal Assault Weapons Ban was classifying 20-rounder as "large capacity" (with a cutoff for "normal" at 10-round).
Btw, if you think a firearm is difficult to make, think twice. With a 3k investment, you can get all the tooling (essentially a mill, a lathe, and a few bits) needed to build firearms, including AR-15 lower receiver. Heck, you can build a single shot 12 gauge shotgun for $30 worth of hardware (steel pipe, cap, nails) from Home Depot, you should even be able to get it for free in construction site scrap.
What we called today the "Wild West" was probably more civilized than some poor metropolitan area today... As for the gun ban argument, have a look to Australia and UK, whose rate of violent crime has never been so high, while they have utter strict gun law.
You don't "need" to control who buy gun. If I am a criminal, if I WANT to buy a gun, I can get a handgun easily, and I will not go through an FFL. The point is, criminals are CRIMINALS, they don't care about the law, breaking another one is not gonna bother them. However, if 30% of a society pack a weapon and *train* to use that weapon, criminals will probably think twice before committing a crime.
ATI has made an aftermarket polymer stock which accepts a 10 rounds, single stack, mag. Buy a few extra mag and smoke the sh*t out of that printer ! You might end up dislocating your shoulder once or twice, but that's a detail !
Slashdot Mirror
The question is up to what /price/ point is science worth it ?
because the math behind the system will no longer work.
Because it already exist. That's how you can follow a plane travel from sitting comfortably in your couch surfing the internet. The real problem appears where the uplink to the ground is broken and the plane "crash".
No. The car industry should provide the mean for people to protect themselves, but ultimately, it is to the people to decide whether or not they want that extra protection (and pay for it). The Government *IS* protecting people from themselves by imposing mandatory seat belt law and alike.
Good password manager ? I consult regular website from 5 or 6 differents machine (including laptop, desktop, tablet, phone, ipod,...), all running different kind of OS. There is NO password manager for this, which is typical nowadays.
All in all, these are all the worst hints ever:
1) prone to typo error, especially as the password is generally hidden
2) number & capitals are a pain on mobile devices
3) ever harder to remember (ie. where the @!#$ did I put the capital)
I HATE this kind of company. It will no matter what ALWAYS end up the same: "I forgot my password, send me a new one". Heck.. I'm not even able to remember password for my utility company whose I consult every 6 month...
Let's think about this again... if you think there ought to be a law, there probably oughtn't.
how is more death on the road necessarily "bad" ? If Joe the Plumber crash and was not wearing a sit belt, well, too bad for him. Why should the government try to protect people from themselves ?
Because it has fallen into quasi-oblivion. If it was that much of a perfect society, it would still rules over Mediterranean coast, Latin would not be a dead language.
Moreover, if current society is so much like the Ancient Rome, we have to worry, because the next age, namely the Middle Age, has been a long period of general regression.
Not to mention in the wilderness :-)
What is the reason you like so much to have cop around ? Because they can deter violence though threat of violence, remember, they *do* have firearms. The very basic thing you are irresponsible enough to handle. Moreover, YOUR answer to the problem is the very same I am proposing, that is MORE guns. A LEO without a sidearm and a select-fire rifle (ie. the real "assault" weapon) in the trunk would not be much of a deterrence for criminals...
Isn't that what taxes are ? Paying for the "protection" of violence which might comes upon us if we don't "pay".
There is a reason it is now called ANCIENT Rome...
So ? Just allow the "civilian" to get their CCW...
And I'm working out my front deltoid and upper chest :-)
To some extend, it is just like the Starbucks stance on OC and CC. But I fear that they are actually alienating against both side, by refusing to take a stance. This is the problem with compromise, it's not pleasing ANYONE...
Thanks for correction, though, the same argument applies. The now-defunc Federal Assault Weapons Ban was classifying 20-rounder as "large capacity" (with a cutoff for "normal" at 10-round).
Btw, if you think a firearm is difficult to make, think twice. With a 3k investment, you can get all the tooling (essentially a mill, a lathe, and a few bits) needed to build firearms, including AR-15 lower receiver. Heck, you can build a single shot 12 gauge shotgun for $30 worth of hardware (steel pipe, cap, nails) from Home Depot, you should even be able to get it for free in construction site scrap.
What we called today the "Wild West" was probably more civilized than some poor metropolitan area today... As for the gun ban argument, have a look to Australia and UK, whose rate of violent crime has never been so high, while they have utter strict gun law.
You don't "need" to control who buy gun. If I am a criminal, if I WANT to buy a gun, I can get a handgun easily, and I will not go through an FFL. The point is, criminals are CRIMINALS, they don't care about the law, breaking another one is not gonna bother them. However, if 30% of a society pack a weapon and *train* to use that weapon, criminals will probably think twice before committing a crime.
ATI has made an aftermarket polymer stock which accepts a 10 rounds, single stack, mag. Buy a few extra mag and smoke the sh*t out of that printer ! You might end up dislocating your shoulder once or twice, but that's a detail !
It's black, the magazine is overly protruding, and it has a barrel shroud... must be an "assault weapon" [sic] :-)
I am about to put a Spanish Mauser for sale, for the sheer pleasure of pissing them off.
Not all of them, unless it does not address ammunition. I have 7 rounds of 7.62x39 for sale, and it's still up.