Thanks for taking the time to read the article and offer feedback. We have revised the language in that paragraph to clarify the fact that the holding of Reno v. ACLU struck only two provisions of the CDA, rather than the entire statute. We have also corrected the year identified as the CDA's inception, which was 1996 rather than 2007.
Scrabble can be, and has been Copyrighted. A colleague of mine, Steve Glista, wrote a detailed and insightful piece about exactly that.
Check it out: http://www.thelegality.com/archives/11
Slashdot Mirror
Thanks for taking the time to read the article and offer feedback. We have revised the language in that paragraph to clarify the fact that the holding of Reno v. ACLU struck only two provisions of the CDA, rather than the entire statute. We have also corrected the year identified as the CDA's inception, which was 1996 rather than 2007.
Scrabble can be, and has been Copyrighted. A colleague of mine, Steve Glista, wrote a detailed and insightful piece about exactly that. Check it out: http://www.thelegality.com/archives/11