That guy Thunderfoot was saying that the test just conducted was impossible.
I wonder if he will try to spin things now, or if he will go silent on it. If silent, I think I will barrage all his others videos with mention of his failure at predicting.
he has actually proven to be quite biased against Elon Musk.. maybe he didnt get that job he wanted.
Before I hire a plumber, I ask him how he pronounces all the pipes he will be working on. If he says "shit tube" for the kitchen sink supply I do not hire him
Really? I make sure they know which one is the shit tube before they start work. Its not good when they don't.
The thing about internet access is its a two way street. It isnt just you that needs to pay, its the people sending stuff to you.
Way back, Netflix had a problem because their ISP, Cogent, was demanding settlement free peering from Level 3, however Cogent was dumping way more data onto their network than vise-versa so Level 3 told them to shove off. In response to this, Netflix negotiated with Level 3 and switched to using them as an ISP. it turned out that Netflix got the cheapest rate ever from any ISP for so much data. Almost overnight, it was then Level 3 demanding settlement free peering from Cogent but turns out Cogent no longer wanted settlement free peering since it was now Level 3 dumping more data onto their network than vise-versa.
The problem has always been that Netflix is a cheapskate when it comes to their ISP choice. They go with the lowest bidder and then... surprise... the lowest bidder couldn't deliver the enormous and still growing volume of Netflix traffic to other backbones.
So then Netflix went on a campaign. Vilify your local ISP for the fact that Netflix's ISP couldnt deliver enough data over the interlinks between ISPs at the cost they were charging Netflix.
This whole damn thing w.r.t. Netflix has been them manipulating your opinion by hiding details about the economics of the Internet. The sender pays the cost of delivery, and it must be this way because the receiver may not have asked for the data. That bill you are paying to your local ISP may seem like it covers the costs, and maybe it even does, but the fact remains that it is not only illogical for the receiver to pay, making it so allows quite simple abuse that cant be prevented. Packets would be hot potatoes that the ISP's would dump off their network as soon as possible, even if its destination was within their network. Imagine if you had to pay a penny for each email you received. Yes, all that spam too. Netflix argument, once all the facts are on the table, is exactly that. They want the receiver to pay because... they are the sender.
Comcast did some bad shit with torrent packets... but they were in the right to limit the interlink between their backbone and Level 3's because Level 3 was insisting on keep their settlement free status even though the facts on the table were that they were no longer even close to qualifying for such status. Not even close. We are talking hundreds-to-one ratios where even a 2:1 ratio is on the verge of unacceptable.
If you want to do the right thing, demand that Netflix accepts the consequences of going with the lowest bidder. Refuse to let AT&T, whose crappy twisted pair cant deliver HD content to most of its customers, defend its crap network via legislation.
MOST OF ALL THO - Refuse to let the ISP's be defined as common carriers while the DMCA is still in effect. Common Carrier status comes with benefits as well as downsides. They will use the DMCA to eliminate the downsides and you wont be able to do anything about it because... common carrier. STOP BEING SUCKERS
What you are saying is not what the legislation does. Its just what you wish it does, and while it may be what you may even think it does, it isnt what it does.
You've been told before. You were given a link to the legislation. Did you bother to read it?
The European Union was trying to get the financially struggling Ukrainians to join their Union and offered a tad under $1 billion in aid.
The Russians said "We'll give you $15 billion if you don't"
The democratically elected government of the Ukraine chose Russia's $15 billion over the E.U.'s $1 Billion.
The U.S. then spent $5 billion overthrowing the democratically elected government of the Ukraine, installing what are essentially NAZI's into power.
Russia then seized Crimea.
So yes, NATO was annexing parts of Russia, by overthrowing democratically elected governments and installing fascists.
But lets not let the facts get in the way of your fake dumbass ignorant news that doesnt know fucking shit about anything other than "Russia bad! Russia bad! Russia bad!"
This is literally all the fucking Democrats doing. Our press, which loves the Democrats, has been and continues to cover for them.
It seems to me that the US and Russia should be natural allies.
We were. Putin visited the U.S. on more than a few occasions as a friend, and then Obama decided that Syria should be a target. I'm sure that had nothing to do with how much money our Secretary of State's "Foundation" got from the Saudi's after Syria refused to let them build a pipeline to Europe.
Shared memory is superior in general because the code can simply avoid sharing to avoid nearly all of the negatives. Its called Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA).. maintaining cache coherency with simple algorithms while giving each thread its own pool of fast memory.
The advantage is that when you do need to share, its not nearly as bad as trying to push data across a cluster.
It was in fact AT&T lobbyists/consultants that wrote the Net Neutrality regulations.
Consider AT&T's position in the ISP market for a moment and you realize that this was all about their DSL bandwidth limitations and how that twisted copper pair can't deliver HD content let alone 4K content at any price level to most of their customers. They can't keep their competitors from delivering high bandwidth, but they can prevent their competitors from optimizing the cost of doing so with selective practices.
Imagine cable companies offering "Base DSL speeds + ultra fast netflix, amazon, hbo, etc" for the same price as AT&T's crap service. It wold obliterate AT&T as an ISP.
To sum it up, some news organizations still care about journalistic integrity and Facebook doesn't. People are too stupid to know the difference, so that is what the fight is over.
"We need an anti-trust exemption to fight for journalistic integrity!" - CNN
Now that I've learned that Spotify might be screwing the RIAA, my interest has peaked enough that I am considering actually trying the service now.
I've been using Pandora since forever, and the client I use saves every track its played to my hard drive. Its called Time Shifting and the supreme court has ruled it legal. Go fuck yourself RIAA.
Slashdot Mirror
..and yet he still gets government grants for research.
This guy has been wrong again and again for 50 years, and he is still getting government funding, and his papers still pass peer review.
Meanwhile the press is calling him "not an alarmist"
Open your eyes people. Words are cheap.
This guy also previously predicted that England would be gone by the year 2000.
That guy Thunderfoot was saying that the test just conducted was impossible.
.. maybe he didnt get that job he wanted.
I wonder if he will try to spin things now, or if he will go silent on it. If silent, I think I will barrage all his others videos with mention of his failure at predicting.
he has actually proven to be quite biased against Elon Musk
Science. Hard stuff for many. Impenetrable for you.
Before I hire a plumber, I ask him how he pronounces all the pipes he will be working on. If he says "shit tube" for the kitchen sink supply I do not hire him
Really? I make sure they know which one is the shit tube before they start work. Its not good when they don't.
What competent programmer converts the abstraction of code to ENGLISH to grok it?
None so far.
No it doesn't. It translates to, "Iterate 'itemlist'" , You're Welcome.
"loop"
The thing about internet access is its a two way street. It isnt just you that needs to pay, its the people sending stuff to you.
Way back, Netflix had a problem because their ISP, Cogent, was demanding settlement free peering from Level 3, however Cogent was dumping way more data onto their network than vise-versa so Level 3 told them to shove off. In response to this, Netflix negotiated with Level 3 and switched to using them as an ISP. it turned out that Netflix got the cheapest rate ever from any ISP for so much data. Almost overnight, it was then Level 3 demanding settlement free peering from Cogent but turns out Cogent no longer wanted settlement free peering since it was now Level 3 dumping more data onto their network than vise-versa.
The problem has always been that Netflix is a cheapskate when it comes to their ISP choice. They go with the lowest bidder and then... surprise... the lowest bidder couldn't deliver the enormous and still growing volume of Netflix traffic to other backbones.
So then Netflix went on a campaign. Vilify your local ISP for the fact that Netflix's ISP couldnt deliver enough data over the interlinks between ISPs at the cost they were charging Netflix.
This whole damn thing w.r.t. Netflix has been them manipulating your opinion by hiding details about the economics of the Internet. The sender pays the cost of delivery, and it must be this way because the receiver may not have asked for the data. That bill you are paying to your local ISP may seem like it covers the costs, and maybe it even does, but the fact remains that it is not only illogical for the receiver to pay, making it so allows quite simple abuse that cant be prevented. Packets would be hot potatoes that the ISP's would dump off their network as soon as possible, even if its destination was within their network. Imagine if you had to pay a penny for each email you received. Yes, all that spam too. Netflix argument, once all the facts are on the table, is exactly that. They want the receiver to pay because... they are the sender.
Comcast did some bad shit with torrent packets... but they were in the right to limit the interlink between their backbone and Level 3's because Level 3 was insisting on keep their settlement free status even though the facts on the table were that they were no longer even close to qualifying for such status. Not even close. We are talking hundreds-to-one ratios where even a 2:1 ratio is on the verge of unacceptable.
If you want to do the right thing, demand that Netflix accepts the consequences of going with the lowest bidder. Refuse to let AT&T, whose crappy twisted pair cant deliver HD content to most of its customers, defend its crap network via legislation.
MOST OF ALL THO - Refuse to let the ISP's be defined as common carriers while the DMCA is still in effect. Common Carrier status comes with benefits as well as downsides. They will use the DMCA to eliminate the downsides and you wont be able to do anything about it because... common carrier. STOP BEING SUCKERS
Wrong.
What you are saying is not what the legislation does. Its just what you wish it does, and while it may be what you may even think it does, it isnt what it does.
You've been told before. You were given a link to the legislation. Did you bother to read it?
Did she lie about it?
Yes.
The trick to asking questions in a debate where you want to prove something... is to know what the answer is first.
Did they assist her in the election?
The Saudi's? Yes. Millions of dollars. Public record. Facts.
The events, in order:
The European Union was trying to get the financially struggling Ukrainians to join their Union and offered a tad under $1 billion in aid.
The Russians said "We'll give you $15 billion if you don't"
The democratically elected government of the Ukraine chose Russia's $15 billion over the E.U.'s $1 Billion.
The U.S. then spent $5 billion overthrowing the democratically elected government of the Ukraine, installing what are essentially NAZI's into power.
Russia then seized Crimea.
So yes, NATO was annexing parts of Russia, by overthrowing democratically elected governments and installing fascists.
But lets not let the facts get in the way of your fake dumbass ignorant news that doesnt know fucking shit about anything other than "Russia bad! Russia bad! Russia bad!"
This is literally all the fucking Democrats doing. Our press, which loves the Democrats, has been and continues to cover for them.
It seems to me that the US and Russia should be natural allies.
We were. Putin visited the U.S. on more than a few occasions as a friend, and then Obama decided that Syria should be a target. I'm sure that had nothing to do with how much money our Secretary of State's "Foundation" got from the Saudi's after Syria refused to let them build a pipeline to Europe.
Why is our media trying so hard to start a war between the U.S. and Russia?
Its powered by Wishful Thinking. The fastest data lines ever devised.
Shared memory is superior in general because the code can simply avoid sharing to avoid nearly all of the negatives. Its called Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA) .. maintaining cache coherency with simple algorithms while giving each thread its own pool of fast memory.
The advantage is that when you do need to share, its not nearly as bad as trying to push data across a cluster.
Hillary also met with the Russians. Her Foundation even got lots of money from them, and they paid her husband handsomely for speeches.
...and we went after Syria right afterwards.
Then there was the time Hillary met with the Saudi's....
It was in fact AT&T lobbyists/consultants that wrote the Net Neutrality regulations.
Consider AT&T's position in the ISP market for a moment and you realize that this was all about their DSL bandwidth limitations and how that twisted copper pair can't deliver HD content let alone 4K content at any price level to most of their customers. They can't keep their competitors from delivering high bandwidth, but they can prevent their competitors from optimizing the cost of doing so with selective practices.
Imagine cable companies offering "Base DSL speeds + ultra fast netflix, amazon, hbo, etc" for the same price as AT&T's crap service. It wold obliterate AT&T as an ISP.
Also its unlikely that Microsoft invented the font, rather than acquired it from a 3rd party.
I am not going to pretend to know whats going on in Pakistan politics, or even Pakistan computer system.
Still doesnt explain why you let the email determine what font is loaded off disk, parsed, and then used.
Do you also let it load, parse, and display images?
Does it reach into your attachments and try to parse those also?
ah yes thank you.
It really didnt look right to me, but I knew peeked was wrong.
So you want your news aggregator to decide whats true and what isn't for you?
It is literally links to news articles from newpapers, cable news web sites, and so on... without a filter.
THATS WHAT A NEWS AGGREGATOR DOES
The series-of-links model, such as found in the Drudge Report, has already been called "fake news" by the press.
To sum it up, some news organizations still care about journalistic integrity and Facebook doesn't. People are too stupid to know the difference, so that is what the fight is over.
"We need an anti-trust exemption to fight for journalistic integrity!" - CNN
Now that I've learned that Spotify might be screwing the RIAA, my interest has peaked enough that I am considering actually trying the service now.
I've been using Pandora since forever, and the client I use saves every track its played to my hard drive. Its called Time Shifting and the supreme court has ruled it legal. Go fuck yourself RIAA.
That actually sounds like a band I might like.
The sky is the limit....
...because they are very very bad at math. For instance, they think taxing the rich more can balance the budget.