Slashdot Mirror


Kaspersky Lab Has Been Working With Russian Intelligence (bloomberg.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg: Internal company emails obtained by Bloomberg Businessweek show that Kaspersky Lab has maintained a much closer working relationship with Russia's main intelligence agency, the FSB, than it has publicly admitted. It has developed security technology at the spy agency's behest and worked on joint projects the CEO knew would be embarrassing if made public. The previously unreported emails, from October 2009, are from a thread between Eugene Kaspersky and senior staff. In Russian, Kaspersky outlines a project undertaken in secret a year earlier "per a big request on the Lubyanka side," a reference to the FSB offices. Kaspersky Lab confirmed the emails are authentic.

The software that the CEO was referring to had the stated purpose of protecting clients, including the Russian government, from distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, but its scope went further. Kaspersky Lab would also cooperate with internet hosting companies to locate bad actors and block their attacks, while assisting with "active countermeasures," a capability so sensitive that Kaspersky advised his staff to keep it secret. In this case, Kaspersky may have been referring to something even more rare in the security world. A person familiar with the company's anti-DDoS system says it's made up of two parts. The first consists of traditional defensive techniques, including rerouting malicious traffic to servers that can harmlessly absorb it. The second part is more unusual: Kaspersky provides the FSB with real-time intelligence on the hackers' location and sends experts to accompany the FSB and Russian police when they conduct raids. That's what Kaspersky was referring to in the emails, says the person familiar with the system. They weren't just hacking the hackers; they were banging down the doors.
Kaspersky Lab has issued a statement in response to Bloomberg's report. It reads in part: "Regardless of how the facts are misconstrued to fit in with a hypothetical, false theory, Kaspersky Lab, and its executives, do not have inappropriate ties with any government. The company does regularly work with governments and law enforcement agencies around the world with the sole purpose of fighting cybercrime. In the internal communications referenced within the recent article, the facts are once again either being misinterpreted or manipulated to fit the agenda of certain individuals desperately wanting there to be inappropriate ties between the company, its CEO and the Russian government, but no matter what communication they claim to have, the facts clearly remain there is no evidence because no such inappropriate ties exist."

175 comments

  1. Big Nothing by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

    To be fair, Eugene Kaspersky did meet with Russian intelligence, but they only discussed adoption.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Big Nothing by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 0

      To be fair, Eugene Kaspersky did meet with Russian intelligence, but they only discussed adoption.

      Someone's finally going to adopt Eugene? Aww, that's cute. ;)

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  2. At the risk of my oath of patriotism by rmdingler · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I mean, political influence is a two-way street.

    What nation with a powerful central government doesn't demand indelicate acts from its major corporations?

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:At the risk of my oath of patriotism by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What nation with a powerful central government doesn't demand indelicate acts from its major corporations?

      It's more about scale of such acts, and these days Russia and the US are doing this to a ridiculous degree.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:At the risk of my oath of patriotism by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      What nation with a powerful central government doesn't demand indelicate acts from its major corporations?

      It's more about scale of such acts, and these days Russia and the US are doing this to a ridiculous degree.

      Right. If, as the evidence your claim implies, you are not from one of these two nations you mention, the chances your own country is free of this blight is on the order of the lottery... as likely to free of powerful influence in gov't & industry as you'd be having missionary sex with a polar bear and a regular bear, on the same day.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    3. Re:At the risk of my oath of patriotism by KiloByte · · Score: 2

      Actually, my country government can't find their asses with both hands. They're thoroughly busy firing any employee with a shred of competency and replacing them with 20 years old nephews of their party members. So even though they violate the Constitution at almost every step, they're so incompetent they're not a threat to anyone living abroad.

      The previous government had its flaws but neither gross incompetence nor illegal spying was seriously alleged.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    4. Re:At the risk of my oath of patriotism by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 5, Funny

      a polar bear and a regular bear,

      I sexually identify as a polar bear and find this to be highly offensive. You think grizzly bears, brown bears, panda bears, water bears, etc are all "regular bears" but somehow polar bears are not "regular bears". I can't believe in this day and age that we have bigoted polar-arkoudaphobic people like you on the internet.

    5. Re:At the risk of my oath of patriotism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US had a very strict law about technology export (Cryptography specially), also all central gouverments ask loyalty from companies they can use, in exchange those companies can use the government for their own purposes, for example: only some companies outside the US can buy chips with cryptographic features.
      Also those backdoors in most products (Cisco is the greatest of all).
      US always point our finger to China because of this but almost every single central government does it, is a way to control their societies because those governments don't like to improve, they want to make look others worse so their people won't complain too much, I know is hard to acknowledge it but no country has seen democracy, we had been living in several mixtures of monarchy, now we are still living in a democratic monarchy, the head can chenge from time to time and the power is dispersed in a small amount of people that "represent" the rest but there is a mentality about "Only a few people are better than others and those in power are better than the rest".

    6. Re:At the risk of my oath of patriotism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      > a polar bear and a regular bear

      A polar bear is a regular (rectangular) bear after a coordinate transform.

      captcha: teenage

    7. Re:At the risk of my oath of patriotism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Close co-operation with Russian intelligence is now a normal activity on Trump's cabinet, so the Kaspersky might become tool of choice for the whole US government.

    8. Re:At the risk of my oath of patriotism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      White bear power!

    9. Re:At the risk of my oath of patriotism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're trans-species like Barbara Hudson?

  3. You don't say by slick7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Imagine that, a Russian company working for/with the Russians. How quaint. Much like the Cripts and Bloods working for the CIA.

    --
    The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    1. Re:You don't say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Imagine that: a government hiring a cyber security company to assist with cyber security. Insane, right ?!?!

      It's precisely due to comments (and sentiments) such as yours that Kaspersky felt compelled to keep this secret. The anti-Russian hysteria pushed by western media was already a joke, and is fast approaching ludicrous.

    2. Re:You don't say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word! All Kaspersky is even accused of here is helping catch cyber criminals at FSB request, isn't that reasonable enough on the face of itself? What other shoe drops, I don't know but that seems fine to me.

    3. Re: You don't say by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Not 1785 the same because FSB is the domestic security service of Russia. The closest US equivalent would be FBI with the difference that FSB is also responsible for border and coast guard. They are literally the Russian feds.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    4. Re:You don't say by slick7 · · Score: 1

      Google cia admission of drug dealing in LA. and look at the comments such as that. these are not my sentiments, but the sentiments of really greedy people.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    5. Re: You don't say by slick7 · · Score: 1

      There are criminals in the FBI, FSB, CIA, in all political arenas on this planet. Not all cockroaches scatter when the lights are turned on.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    6. Re: You don't say by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Obviously, but that was not my point. For some reason most people think that FSB spies in foreign countries which simply isn't the case. SVR does that, FSB is Russian FBI.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    7. Re: You don't say by slick7 · · Score: 1

      The FSB is the former KGB, and that organization was and imho is still active world-wide. The NAZI's are still active as well and that is my point. The same goes for any clandestine intelligence group.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    8. Re: You don't say by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      The FSB is not the former KGB, it is only a fairly small part of the former KGB (mainly second, sixth and seventh directorate, later also the border guard directorate and a part of the 16th directorate) and is not active world wide, that is the responsibility of SVR, which is far more the spiritual successor of KGB than FSB will ever be. Is that so difficult to comprehend?

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  4. Why is our media... by Rockoon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is our media trying so hard to start a war between the U.S. and Russia?

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
    1. Re:Why is our media... by NuclearCat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because hysteria attract viewers, improve ratings
      More viewers = more money for ads
      Who cares that world may fall apart in nuclear tornado, media bosses pockets are more important.

    2. Re:Why is our media... by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      I've been wondering the same thing. It seems to me that the US and Russia should be natural allies. They have much more in common than they do differences. Maybe the globalists want to make sure the two most nationalistic countries never figure out that they could be friends.

    3. Re:Why is our media... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Clicks, views and ratings.
      Gov/mil contacts have free stuff to offer. Govs and mil always have lots of domestic and international stories to share.
      Also the money to investigate one story might have to go further and take less time.
      So more interviews are done to keep up with blogs, the 24 h news cycle.
      Also consider the role of news aggregation websites. Suddenly news is fast, accurate and from all over the USA and the world.
      News that was once published for and consumed inside the Beltway is now national or international.
      The USA has also changed its Smith–Mundt Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...–Mundt_Act.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Why is our media... by Rockoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It seems to me that the US and Russia should be natural allies.

      We were. Putin visited the U.S. on more than a few occasions as a friend, and then Obama decided that Syria should be a target. I'm sure that had nothing to do with how much money our Secretary of State's "Foundation" got from the Saudi's after Syria refused to let them build a pipeline to Europe.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    5. Re:Why is our media... by decep · · Score: 1

      Rule of Acquisition #34: War is good for business.

    6. Re:Why is our media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is our media trying so hard to start a war between the U.S. and Russia?

      How deep do you figure you'll have to bury your head in the sand to escape this war?

    7. Re:Why is our media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not from the US or Russia, but I have two requirements to trust a country. One, do they (the government in an official capacity) support human rights and the LGBT population. Two, does the top leader of the country have a fixed term with no chance of ever being re-elected to that position again or any chance of every being appointed either.

      If either of those is a negative, you're on the shit list.

    8. Re:Why is our media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Syria as a target directly impacts Russia. Their only forward permanent military base is located there. Syria has been an ally of Russia for a long time. They're what Israel is to the US.

      It boggles the shit out of me how many "liberals" blindly supported Queen Spy Clinton during her campaign as she was banging the drums for a war with the most heavily nuclear weaponized nation in the world.

    9. Re:Why is our media... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Do you guys have zero knowledge of what's been going on the past 100 years? The US and Russia/USSR have been adversaries far more often than they've been allies.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    10. Re:Why is our media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do you guys have zero knowledge of what's been going on the past 100 years?

      I only know what I read on the internet.
      Russia and USA were long-time allies until the democrats ruined the relationship!!!

    11. Re:Why is our media... by phayes · · Score: 2, Informative

      Assad's treatment of his internal opposition (gas/exterminate them all) and fomenting of Daesh to blacken his opponents directly leading to their seizing control of much or Iraq had more than a little to do with Syria becoming a target -- and yet, unlike Russia the U.S. has only targeted Daesh & not people trying just to unseat that maniac Assad.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    12. Re:Why is our media... by Phantom+of+the+Opera · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It might have something to do with the Russian human rights record. This is especially relevant to the subject of software security when dealing with a country where it is dangerous to be a journalist.

    13. Re:Why is our media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rule of Acquisition #35: Peace is good for business.

    14. Re:Why is our media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. The Kaspersky related issues and stories are news because of the previous US government actions related to Kaspersky, as reported right here in the Slasher of the Dots.

    15. Re:Why is our media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because if the media conglomerates assist governments with their agenda, governments can be very rewarding regarding tax breaks, audits, or the next time the spectrum is up for auction.

    16. Re:Why is our media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Symantec smells Kaspersky's blood in the water, and thinks they can finish them off. And Congress is playing along, because American company.

    17. Re:Why is our media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      NATO involvement in Syria began in 2014, the same year as Ukraine's revolution. Destabilization in each country had begun much earlier.

      Russia has a naval base in Tartus, Syria.
      Russia has a naval base in Sevastopol, former Ukraine (Crimea).
      Those are Russia's only two warm-water ports on the Mediterranean or Atlantic.

      The Russians likely think that the US found pretexts for involving itself in Syria (including bombing Syrian facilities like the air base that Trump hit with cruise missiles a few weeks back) in order to deprive Russia of her only ports for projecting naval force toward Europe. Whether or not the Russians are right about that is another matter, but it must be difficult for them to avoid coming to that conclusion.

      From the Russian standpoint, the US continues to support terrorists in order to destabilize Assad and rob Russia of its naval base.

    18. Re:Why is our media... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      The Soviet Union was an evil empire. It was a legitimate superpower. Their Communist philosophy told them to conquer the whole world. They were a huge threat to the West, back when Europe and America had common ground together.

      Russia is just a country. It's not pledged to conquer the world. It has a huge, indefensible border and is ringed by NATO bases. They have a really shitty situation. Even the useless NATO allies alone, without the USA, outnumber Russia 3 to 1. Anyone telling you TEH ROOSHINS are a dire threat is pushing an agenda that smells suspiciously like the one used to justify Iraq. And we all know how well that turned out.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    19. Re:Why is our media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why is our media trying so hard to start a war between the U.S. and Russia?"

      You think a cyber security firm report is going to start a war between two former superpowers?

      Snowflake.

      I swear, there are so many fn Russian trolls these days. It's hard to tell the difference between a stupid alt-right persona and a Russian troll. I mean, post-WWII, Cold War, banging a shoe, invading eastern Europe, violating nuclear agreements, invading multiple near allied countries, dropping bombs on allies, and so so much more...but you choose the MEDIA as the culprit.

    20. Re:Why is our media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the Russian standpoint, the US continues to support terrorists

      And most of the rest of the worlds standpoint also.

    21. Re: Why is our media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And yet the Russians have taken Crimea and are working on Ukraine. I don't see NATO annexing parts of Russia.

    22. Re: Why is our media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are pretty thick around here. They disappeared for awhile right after the election but now they're back in force to defend Trump since it looks like he's in danger of going down.

    23. Re:Why is our media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit dude, you are a fucking moron. Did you miss the invasions? Did you forget Afghanistan? Are you that fucking stupid? Don't answer the hypothetical. The answer is yes. You fucking moron.

    24. Re: Why is our media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taken Crimea. I think Russia should have gone to the UN and said "we want Crimea back". They didn't. But Crimea always wanted to be part of Russia again, after Khrushchev gave them away to the Ukrainian SSR in 1954.

    25. Re:Why is our media... by csmithers · · Score: 1

      I guess I am. What invasion ? According to international law it was illegal, but still, Crimea has always wanted to be part of Russia again. But Russia went about it the wrong way. Anyway, not a shot was fired when Russia "took" Crimea. I read that somebody fell and was killed but that was it. Afghanistan ? You mean when the USSR invaded Afghanistan. Russia is not the USSR.

    26. Re:Why is our media... by someone1234 · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, both the US and the Soviets were guilty about Afghanistan. What's worse, the current evil of Afghanistan, the Taliban, were groomed by the CIA.

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    27. Re:Why is our media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pray tell what do the US and Russia have in common?

      The US has positioned itself (though it may be changing) as the defender of liberty and freedom, a bastion of democracy that wants to project that all around the world.

      Russia has reverted to authoritarianism, corruption, and oppression. It has all but killed independent media, it has some of the most oppressive rules in the developed world against homosexuality, and it's been actively undermining democracy.

      You'd struggle to find two more polar opposites if you tried.

    28. Re:Why is our media... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      You mean like China? Funny how there isn't that level of the media going on, and on, and on, and on about them.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    29. Re:Why is our media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were? Hasn't RT.com, the Russian government funded media outlet, been biased against the west and anything Israel for quite some time?
      To me it looks like the cold war has never really ended, no matter if you look at the Russian or US side.

    30. Re:Why is our media... by butzwonker · · Score: 1

      They have much more in common than they do differences.

      You mean both are racist, fairly restrictive authoritarian regimes under oligarchic rule by the 1% with an expressed disdain for basic human rights who also wage aggressive wars from time to time and spend a large amount of their tax payers' money on the military and an absurdly overblown intelligence community? You might have a point there...

    31. Re:Why is our media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're living in a free country, then nobody keeps you from reading up on China, you stupid moron! For example, I've read countless documentaries and editorials on China in the New York Times.

      Complaining that the media doesn't present the world in the way you'd like to see it through your asshole glasses is just retarded, we're living at times when anyone who wants to can be bombarded with information about every fucking last country in the world. All it takes is a few mouse clicks.

    32. Re:Why is our media... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Did you forget Iraq? Oops, inconvenient truth there. The world's most invasion-y country sure ain't Russia.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    33. Re:Why is our media... by will_die · · Score: 1

      Revenge. Russia is just another one of those groups of people who instead of doing what they usually do and help the Democrat party decided to dump Hillary and go with trump.

    34. Re: Why is our media... by Jahoda · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, Mr.Revisionist shill. Russia "annexed" a sovereign nation and has since received the sanctions it justly deserves. They are a kleptocracy ruled by a murderous tyrant and are no friends of my nation. Go find somewhere else to peddle your sewage.

    35. Re:Why is our media... by schleimkeim · · Score: 1

      The conspiracy theorist in me says: Because that's what is planned.

    36. Re:Why is our media... by slashrio · · Score: 1

      Because Putin doesn't obey Netanyahu, or whoever the current sock-puppet may be.

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    37. Re:Why is our media... by slashrio · · Score: 1

      The Soviet Union was an evil empire. It was a legitimate superpower. Their Communist philosophy told them to conquer the whole world.

      And who asks the question *why Russia turned communistic?
      (Let me do it :)

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    38. Re:Why is our media... by slashrio · · Score: 1

      May I point out that, based on your 'requirements', you wouldn't have trusted Singapore's governor Lee Kuan Yew's government either?

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    39. Re:Why is our media... by slashrio · · Score: 1

      But then, you're only a foul mouthed anonymous coward, so who would take *you serious?

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    40. Re:Why is our media... by slashrio · · Score: 1

      ...the defender of liberty and freedom, a bastion of democracy...

      That's only the narrative.
      Unfortunately, and without any exception, all American 'struggles' to 'bring freedom and democracy', have resulted in the total devastation, and immeasurable suffering by the people, of the countries 'liberated' from their 'cruel dictator' this way.
      You must be joking. It hasn't 'changed'... it never was.

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    41. Re:Why is our media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. The media attacks on Kaspersky appear to just be headline fodder. Americans with a clue (not sure how many there are) are not scared of Russians per se, just Putin trying to muck with stuff beyond his borders by illegal means and Americans colluding with them for personal gain. As others have said -- of course Kaspersky works and coordinates with Russian security services. That's what the security services are supposed to be doing. I'm sure the U.S. would LIKE to work with Russian security services to take down organized crime hackers. The problem is that the FSB is too busy actively attacking the U.S. to make that workable.

    42. Re:Why is our media... by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      It's not us. It's Mr. Putin who is being a dick all across the world because he's butthurt that Russia is not playing with the big boys anymore.

      He wants to feel important and be feared and respected like your teenage neighbourhood bully. He hasn't gotten over the collapse of the Soviet Union which was of course the most glorious nation to ever have smiled upon the world.

    43. Re:Why is our media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and?

    44. Re:Why is our media... by butzwonker · · Score: 1

      AC certainly doesn't express it in a politically correct way, but at least he has a point.

      People who flat-out complain about the "media" tend to have a hidden political agenda - far right or far left or religious extremists, they all like to pick on the media in general for obvious reasons. They also consistently fail to name any alternative 'fringe news sources' that would be more reliable than comparing major news outlets. When you ask them, they either come up with nothing at all or with obviously ridiculous choices such as personal blogs, conspiracy sites, extremist radio hosts, etc. Yet they all have in common that they believe they are better informed than people who actually read newspapers. Don't support those lunatics!

    45. Re:Why is our media... by budsetr · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget the British.

    46. Re: Why is our media... by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      The events, in order:

      The European Union was trying to get the financially struggling Ukrainians to join their Union and offered a tad under $1 billion in aid.
      The Russians said "We'll give you $15 billion if you don't"
      The democratically elected government of the Ukraine chose Russia's $15 billion over the E.U.'s $1 Billion.
      The U.S. then spent $5 billion overthrowing the democratically elected government of the Ukraine, installing what are essentially NAZI's into power.
      Russia then seized Crimea.

      So yes, NATO was annexing parts of Russia, by overthrowing democratically elected governments and installing fascists.

      But lets not let the facts get in the way of your fake dumbass ignorant news that doesnt know fucking shit about anything other than "Russia bad! Russia bad! Russia bad!"

      This is literally all the fucking Democrats doing. Our press, which loves the Democrats, has been and continues to cover for them.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    47. Re:Why is our media... by slashrio · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, people who 'flat out' support the media also may have a political agenda, the agenda of the status quo, neo-conservatives, current rule.
      I agree about the obvious reasons, but I would like to include as a valid reason that the media has betrayed them or misinformed them.
      So many stories like Iraq having WoMD, Iraqi soldiers ripping the babies out of incubators, omission of things that are important to know in order to get a full picture of the situation, CNN faking news on video, BBC reporters allegedly being snubbed by Putin etc. etc.
      I could point you to one site that is not 'main stream media', but would be able to inform you a whole lot more: globalresearch.ca for instance.
      There you can become much better informed about the geopolitical backgrounds of the current socio-political situations and wars than from the main stream media outlets.
      So yes, I do believe one can be better informed than people who not actually, but *only read newspapers and watch Fox, CNN, Al-Jazeera and what not.
      I certainly wouldn't call the more-informed people 'lunatic'.

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    48. Re:Why is our media... by butzwonker · · Score: 1

      Your reply is not very satisfying or convincing to me. You come up with one site on the Internet for additional information - you could have just as well mentioned books or Wikipedia -, put a false dichotomy in my mouth and then mention a few cases which were either corrected by the very same media or are cases of deliberate and massive government-steered disinformation campaigns that are well-known, because they have been uncovered by the very same mass media you're criticizing.

      I also cannot recommend "globalresearch" as an information source, for even just a cursory glance reveals that it is extremely opinionated and primarily based on copying news rather than gathering them. Even if you personally like it, it's important to realize that news aggregation sites like "globalresearch" would be nothing without the media and news agencies who actually employ journalists and have networks of correspondents.

      Sometimes, people who 'flat out' support the media also may have a political agenda, the agenda of the status quo, neo-conservatives, current rule.

      Here we go again, You're implying that either (i) major news outlets are systematically lying in some huge world-wide conspiracy, or (ii) somehow the truth supports status quo neo-conservative views more than other political views. Many people would probably subscribe to (ii) but I think that both (i) and (ii) are completely lunatic.

    49. Re:Why is our media... by slashrio · · Score: 1

      As if the MSM is not 'exremely opinionated', or worse, flat out paid to either convey or leave out messages.
      You mention cases being 'corrected' by the same media, no, not the same, other.
      If Putin is reported snubbing a BBC reporter who asks him about the suffering of Syrian people by the Dutch media, a British subject posts the correction showing the whole video, where Putin actually talks for 20 minutes to the reporter.
      If CNN shows the daughter of the embassador of Quwait to the UN lying about being a nurse 'witnessing' the Iraqy soldiers ripping out the babies from the incubators, it's *not CNN who 'corrected' itself. These were alternative media.
      If CNN totally critiquelessly shows Colin Powell presenting his 'evidence' of WoMD, it wasn't CNN being the (first) one to correct the message. Instead they made a spectacle out of the criminal American destruction of Iraq.
      And one could go on and on..., but I won't.

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    50. Re:Why is our media... by slick7 · · Score: 1

      Find your answer in who controls the media.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    51. Re:Why is our media... by slick7 · · Score: 1

      Amen brother!

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    52. Re:Why is our media... by slick7 · · Score: 1

      Everyone on this planet has the potential to be natural allies. The real question is who or what outside influence needs to be exposed to make this happen? Potus Trump is a real thorn in someone's side and they want him gone. Remember, cream rises to the top of milk, dross rises to the top of molten metal; cream is nothing but fat and dross is useless waste. Both of these need to be removed. The same goes for the power elite of this world who do not believe in world unity.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    53. Re:Why is our media... by phayes · · Score: 1

      Yeah yeah, it's all a plot against RUSSIAN interests. Because RUSSIAN interests are the important part, not that Assad and his father gencide all opposition like that which swept through much of the Arab world. Nor that the Ukraine after decades of Russian domination could look west and see a brighter future with the west than with Putins kleptocracy. Because RUSSIAN interests are so much more important than auto determination - except when it serves RUSSIAN interests - then it's OK.

      The thing about the RUSSIAN point of view is how it's always about RUSSIA with absolutely no thought to the rest of the world

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
  5. I'd like to see more details... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    But I'm not really feeling the outrage here, at least with regard to what was reported.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:I'd like to see more details... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The second part is more unusual: Kaspersky provides the FSB with real-time intelligence on the hackers' location and sends experts to accompany the FSB and Russian police when they conduct raids.

      Hmm. I'm guessing that these raids are conducted in Russia? How is this any different from phone companies locating scammers or Microsoft helping the U.S. government shut down bot nets?

    2. Re:I'd like to see more details... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Russia! Kaspersky! TRUMP!!!

      See? It all ties together!

  6. Lets read what the AC linked to by AHuxley · · Score: 0

    From https://www.bloomberg.com/news...
    "worry U.S. national security officials "
    "six U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agency chiefs were asked"
    "While the U.S. government hasn’t disclosed any evidence of the ties"
    "A person familiar with"
    "The U.S. government hasn’t identified any evidence connecting"

    Consider all the good work thats been done over the years.
    Equation Group https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    Stuxnet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    Work to publish on Gauss, Regin, Flame, Red October, Duqu, Silverlight and Mask

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  7. Slashdot became political loudspeaker? by NuclearCat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I noticed last week or so "Russia this, Russia that" hysteria, rumours and manipulations appeared here, something strange, as they don't contain any credible information, even anything interesting for geek, just gossips - and it's trending in traditionally geeky website.
    Slashdot was safe harbor for me for more than a decade from filthy political news and "news for housewives".
    Seems its time to put dot and say bye bye?
    P.S. Yes i'm russian, and i hate politics and propaganda. Peace!

    1. Re:Slashdot became political loudspeaker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The democrats are just looking for a scapegoat for their losses, since they won't look at their own corruption, we always have Russia to blame, the same Russia that gave us Martin Luther King Jr. :-/

      *cough* Sorry

    2. Re:Slashdot became political loudspeaker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Slashdot's tagline from the beginning included the words "Stuff That Matters".
      Whether or not you feel your safe space has been invaded, this stuff MATTERS. The headlines that are political are usually clear, easy enough for you to avoid. It's not as if you see one that says something about quantum dots or M-theory and then turns out to be all about how Trump would love to suck Putin's dick.

    3. Re:Slashdot became political loudspeaker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I noticed last week or so "Russia this, Russia that" hysteria, rumours and manipulations appeared here, something strange, as they don't contain any credible information,

      Yes, its all fake news. Go back to sleep comrade. And whatever you do, don't read Fredo's twitter feed. Its all fake news.

    4. Re: Slashdot became political loudspeaker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      These stories are published because they attract attention. Any story about Russia, Syria or Ukraine or Trump or the EU or any topic where Russia might want to influence will attract comments from Putin's trolls as well as the "normal" crowd. It's not new, it's been happening here for at least three years.

      In the past month or so I've noticed an increase in the numbers here admitting to being Russian, or at least not disguising it, both of which are welcome. I wonder if that's anything to do with Putin's defensive admission that "It might have been Russians"?

      Of course we still have Putin's trolls, from the obvious like Rockoon and friends to those (presumably) indistinguishable from genuine comments.

    5. Re:Slashdot became political loudspeaker? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      P.S. Yes i'm russian, and i hate politics and propaganda. Peace!

      Yes, as do most of your countrymen, and mine. That's why both of our governments are so spectacularly fucked up. We let other people run our governments for us.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Slashdot became political loudspeaker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Slashdot was safe harbor for me for more than a decade from filthy political news"

      Slashdot has always covered government and political news as it relates to the internet, censorship, cyberware, security, and tech firms. This relates to many of these, particularly given past news on Kaspersky wrt the US government, code, and suspicions.

      The weight and relevance of the report as it pertains to you is for you to judge, but for a site accumulator of news, /. is most certainly doing its job appropriately.

      "P.S. Yes i'm russian, "

      Of course you are. Of course you are.

    7. Re:Slashdot became political loudspeaker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I think the best way to learn about Russia is to go there. Wonderful country and culture. Great people. Beautiful cities. I've been to SPb (St. Petersburg) a bunch of times, and consider it my second home. Americans know so little of Russia. And that's one of the problems causing this mass hysteria.

    8. Re:Slashdot became political loudspeaker? by butzwonker · · Score: 1

      Boy, calm down, that's nothing in comparison to the past. You should have been alive when the Cold War was raging... all those pesky US fake news outlets going against Prawda!

    9. Re:Slashdot became political loudspeaker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry bud, but the reality is that your country is pretty active recently doing all sorts of ugly and subversive things around the globe. Looks like Putin wants to do as much damage, ANY damage, as he can. As if that will help Russia shine? Rather stupid if you ask me.

      Supporting Trump alone was a major fuck-you. I'm not saying Russians got him elected, but they sure tried, and they sure helped. Any sane person was aware what Trump is, so it's not some kind of political disagreement. Putin wanted Trump not because they have the same goals, but because he knew Trump would be a disaster, and he wanted disaster on the US.

      So what you see now is an immune reaction. We may be overreacting at times, but that's healthy.

    10. Re:Slashdot became political loudspeaker? by slashrio · · Score: 1

      fool

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    11. Re:Slashdot became political loudspeaker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      P.S. Yes i'm russian, and i hate politics and propaganda. Peace!

      Soooo as someone who was born in USSR I have to ask, how much are you paid not to care per post?

    12. Re: Slashdot became political loudspeaker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paid troll

  8. What is this world coming to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Next thing you'll be telling me Facebook is a project of the CI%!*^#.NO CARRIER

    1. Re:What is this world coming to? by slashrio · · Score: 1

      Facebook received 12 million in start-up money from ACCEL corporation, which has direct ties to In-Q-Tel which is the venture capital arm of the CIA.
      So although it's not a direct project of the CIA, I bet it's highly useful to them.
      It was only unforeseen that the ancestor of Cambridge Analytica would suck up so much information from the facebook likes that Trump could win the elections (and Farrage the Brexit vote).

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  9. Big surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In a move that literally doesn't surprise anybody... That's why you should trust anything made by foreign countries, especially China and Russia.

  10. Re:Russian Intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Because we're not racist like you.

  11. Russian about everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But his emails!
    Lock Trump Jr up!
    Covfefe out.

  12. Re:Russian Intelligence by KiloByte · · Score: 0

    "Russian integrity", "Russian democracy" or "Russian sobriety" would indeed be oxymorons. You can't deny a good minority of Russians to be intelligent, though. Their country suffering from an unbroken series of bloody dictators for at least 500 years is another matter, and most people learned that trying to fight against the dictator currently in power is far more unhealthy than it would be in most other countries.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  13. This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I guess everyone's forgotten all about RSA Security's cozy relationship with those friendly NSA folks. -PCP

    1. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess everyone's forgotten all about RSA Security's cozy relationship with those friendly NSA folks. -PCP

      Wrong.
      They took a lot of crap for that, rightly so. My former company dropped them and moved to Entrust despite being RSA customers back when they were known as Security Dynamics.

    2. Re:This is news? by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

      So no dealings with McAfee products either then?

      --
      - Tjp

      I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

    3. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess everyone's forgotten all about RSA Security's cozy relationship with those friendly NSA folks. -PCP

      Did you just sign your comment while posting as AC?

  14. I guess I am not seeing the issue here by charles05663 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, it is being claimed that Kaspersky's is trying to take down cyber-criminals? If they were accused of using their anti-virus software to spy that would be a different story.

  15. Re:Russian Intelligence by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    One of the most brilliant listening devices was designed by a Russian named Leon Theremin. Yeah the theremin guy invented this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  16. Re:Russian Intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Russian" isn't a race.

  17. They want Trump out by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and Pence in. Trump is unpredictable. He's come out in favor and against single payer health care, restrictions on work visas, tariffs and a whole host of populist ideas that the folks that actually own the media aren't too keen on. Now, it's not that they expect Trump to actually _do_ any of that (he's still one of them after all) but they don't want folks to even know a progressive agenda is a possibility. So Trump's out, Pence is in and the mega-corp status quo is maintained. Maybe with a tad more religious furor but that doesn't affect them personally. Nothing much ever does...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:They want Trump out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to over-simplified. Many people do not want what Trump wants.... don't blame that on the media. Those of us with a brain and the ability to use it know most of what Trump proposes in his speeches will be bad long term. He might have a few ideas that would give us a momentary bump but will come back to haunt us after he's 6 feet under.

      We need to start electing younger politicians.. ones that will also have to live in the world in 20, 30, 40, and maybe even 50 years. Fuck these guys who'll be dead by 2030 anyway.

  18. Slashdot is aging by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and older folks are worried about politics. We're getting old enough to worry about pensions, medicare, our kid's job prospects, etc, etc. Politics affects _everything_. Like the internet? Then you better pay attention to politics. Remember, it's not just news for nerds, it's also stuff that matters. The President getting impeached and replaced with a far right, intensely religious VP? Yeah. That Matters.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  19. Russian Intelligence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russian Intelligence? Are you mad?

  20. Even if... by mhkohne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even if Kaspersky doesn't want to do anything bad, I can't imagine that Russian intelligence doesn't have someone on the inside. Just as I can't imaging the CIA or NSA doesn't have someone inside MS and Google.

    I don't know why this is such a big deal - they are a Russian company, which means they are (whether they like it or not) somewhat under the influence of the Russian government. Just as (again) MS and Google are somewhat under the influence of the US government.

    Stop freaking out about it already, and if you consider their products just make sure you think about the ways this could be a problem for you or not.

    And frankly if Kaspersky is helping the intelligence guys kick down the doors of DOS script kiddies, more power to them. It's not like the guys who do DOS attacks are generally all that smart or useful, they're just damned annoying to the rest of us.

    --
    A thousand pounds of wood moving at 300 feet per minute. Don't get in the way.
    1. Re:Even if... by PPH · · Score: 1

      Just as (again) MS and Google are somewhat under the influence of the US government.

      This.

      How do you say 'National Security Letter' in Russian?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re: Even if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You use "somewhat" as if they have the same extents in different national contexts. The flavor of the word isn't even shared across languages.

    3. Re:Even if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The occasional DOS is a far lesser evil than alphabet soup agencies in general, the emerging surveillance state, malwar in virus scanners, tech industry and governments colluding, not being able to trust computers at all, etc.

    4. Re:Even if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Always assume the worst, right.

      The only question is WHICH government you want to be helping. Trump is bad but Putin is much worse. Make your choice.

    5. Re:Even if... by slashrio · · Score: 1

      Even if Kaspersky doesn't want to do anything bad, I can't imagine that Russian intelligence doesn't have someone on the inside. Just as I can't imaging the CIA or NSA doesn't have someone inside MS and Google.

      Hahaha, you're so naive...
      Why would the CIA *and* NSA not have 'someone' inside Kaspersky?

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    6. Re:Even if... by slashrio · · Score: 1

      It's NATO that right now puts soldiers on the doorsteps of Russia, not the other way around...

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    7. Re:Even if... by q4Fry · · Score: 1

      Hahaha, you're so naive...

      Why would the CIA *and* NSA not have 'someone' inside Kaspersky?

      You mean like Ruslan Stoyanov?

    8. Re:Even if... by slashrio · · Score: 1

      Not really, this looks more like an internal Russian affair. No ties with CIA/NSA are suggested.

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  21. Can we have a tech discussion for once? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 3

    Somebody doesn't know what the first D in DDoS stands for evidently (No, Kapersky was not identifying the hacker's location. That is not even within the realm of possibility.)

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    1. Re:Can we have a tech discussion for once? by behrooz0az · · Score: 1
      Actually, it is.
      If

      Kaspersky Lab would also cooperate with internet hosting companies

      you can easily find the C&C server and from there you can try to find the man behind it.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
    2. Re: Can we have a tech discussion for once? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2

      How are you going to "easily find the c&c server when it is distributed? You don't really think the hacker logs into each node of the botnet do you? You would need to find a single session, most likely over HTTPS, somewhere on the planet. That isn't just trying to find a needle in a haystack, that is trying to find an invisible needle somewhere in one of the haystack on the planet.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    3. Re: Can we have a tech discussion for once? by behrooz0az · · Score: 1

      Intersect IP addresses originating from the botnet nodes that are not the target, duh.
      The hacker doesn't log into the nodes, the nodes check a C&C server in small intervals; this being easy to code and hard to detect locally is the primary reason that most botnets do it. and the ability to find them using a simple intersection is the reason that botnets either use a dictionary, a backup list or an algorithm to generate random domain names on demand.
      You and whoever upvoted you, go back to school.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
    4. Re: Can we have a tech discussion for once? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      It doesn't work the way you think it does... duh.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    5. Re: Can we have a tech discussion for once? by behrooz0az · · Score: 1

      When was the last time you made a botnet?
      Code samples for the botnet client part and cisco/juniper traffic filtering, logging and aggregation commands are available online, and they work, I've seen it work.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
    6. Re: Can we have a tech discussion for once? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Three words: Peer to Peer. Sure, there are stupidly designed botnets. A well designed one will not have nodes that contact a C&C. The C&C is distributed.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    7. Re: Can we have a tech discussion for once? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      See my other comment, but also even for the poorly designed botnet you describe you are only able to locate the C&C ... the hacker will still be elsewhere on the planet hiding behind several proxies.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    8. Re: Can we have a tech discussion for once? by behrooz0az · · Score: 1

      peer to peer botnets don't work behind a NAT without a UDP hole punch coordinator .

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
    9. Re: Can we have a tech discussion for once? by behrooz0az · · Score: 1

      And you read my first comment because that's 'Exactly' what I said.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
    10. Re: Can we have a tech discussion for once? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      They work just fine behind a NAT as you just admitted. Of course, you are ignoring the other point I made elsewhere. What you should have responded with next is "Holy FUCK, I ... Behrooz Amoozad ... am an IDIOT! Of course the hacker himself will not be able to be located by finding the C&C! You are right Zero__Kelvin, he will be hiding behind multiple proxies! I know I looked like an idiot, but thanks for helping me so I won't continue to sound stupid when I say ridiculous shit like this in the future!. I accept your apology.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    11. Re: Can we have a tech discussion for once? by behrooz0az · · Score: 1

      a UDP hole punch coordinator == a server I NEVER said anything about finding the hacker. I said we can find the C&C as a first step... sir, The idiocy in you is baffling. Am done talking to you.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
    12. Re: Can we have a tech discussion for once? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      My initial post said they can't find the hacker. The post you replied to saying it was easy dumbfuck. And you don't need a server to do UDP hole punches idiot. What the fuck do you think the point of being distributed is? Just admit you are incompetent and move on with your pathetic life.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    13. Re: Can we have a tech discussion for once? by behrooz0az · · Score: 1

      Guess what, imbecile, I said to find the C&C server, not the hacker. The whole definition of UDP hole punching revolves around having a server with a constant address, reachable by both clients, outside both NATs to coordinate the timing.
      Obligatory xkcd: https://xkcd.com/386/

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
    14. Re: Can we have a tech discussion for once? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have to be a server idiot. It just needs to be that one system has a static IP. You can use the 10000 systems with static IPs to do it in a distributed fashion. Seriously, you suck at computers.... become a janitor or something.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    15. Re: Can we have a tech discussion for once? by behrooz0az · · Score: 1

      it does, because timing and congestion.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
    16. Re: Can we have a tech discussion for once? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      You are an idiot kid. You have no clue. You don't know how any of this shit works. There is no timing issue with a DDoS... You just need to tell a shitload of systemd a target IP and time to act. Good luck with your janitor job. I hear Clorox is nice!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    17. Re: Can we have a tech discussion for once? by behrooz0az · · Score: 1

      I'll make sure to try them when I open an office in the US. tnx

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
    18. Re: Can we have a tech discussion for once? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      We have plenty of janitors here already.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    19. Re: Can we have a tech discussion for once? by behrooz0az · · Score: 1

      I know, Am responding to one right now.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
    20. Re: Can we have a tech discussion for once? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0

      Well don't waste your time posting here then, get back to 4chan and finish your response to him ... he's waiting to hear what you are going to do after you swallow!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  22. Re: Oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pretty funny considering it's well known that nearly ALL top tech companies in the USA have cooperated extensively with multiple American intelligence and law enforcement agencies with details of actual incidents now in the public domain.

    Meanwhile we're supposed to give a fuck about vague insinuations with one Russian software company???

  23. OMG. That couldn't happen in the US! by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

    It isn't like the Intel McAfee division works with the CIA, NSA, and FBI amongst others on analysis of network traffic and features in their product... Which has been publicly discussed quite a bit. This is a Russian cybersecurity firm dealing with a Russian nation-state-level governmental security organization.

    Find an exploit put into their products to spy on the users that can be traced to the FSB, then its news.

    --
    - Tjp

    I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

    1. Re: OMG. That couldn't happen in the US! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't apply American sensibilities to Russia. It's a different culture with an inherently different ethical outlook. There's not really anything wrong with that. It just is what it is.

    2. Re:OMG. That couldn't happen in the US! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, which is cause to keep Kaspersky Lab out of US and our allies infrastructure and military at the very least.

  24. Re: Oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod up.

    It would be more fun to read Russia cannot afford top notch security people with programming and debug ability, and has to pay through the nose to get basic assistance for predictable annoyances. In which case Kaspersky is just another company seeking to line its pockets - just as all serious USA players have been doing, albeit embarrassing if word leaked out.

    The REAL story is major countries have counter strategies they are not sharing with the community or publishing - not even the GOP. What comes around ...

  25. And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How not a fucking surprise.

  26. Key Term: "Inappropriate" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a country where any private company can be nationalized on a whim, I doubt any interaction with the government is deemed inappropriate.

    If you don't trust the Russian government, don't do business with Russian companies.

  27. Re: Oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really?

    Last time checked, Apple refused to decrypt an iPhone for the FBI. Google, and Amazon also force the government to subpoena them for information. It's bad business to give up your customer's data, and America is capatalist.

    When you protest in Russia, you get killed one way another, possibly by polonium laced water. What happens in America? At worst a civil infraction.

    To illustrate my point further: when was the last time you bribed a police officer? After all the stuff I've seen, I actually like police officers now.

    All of these Americans who have never visited Russia have no idea how good we have it. Obama as far as i know did not have a bank account in Panama, but both Putin and Poroshenko did.

    It's disappointing to see how we've lost faith in our own country, which has spread freedom across the world, for which other coubtries thank us for having done so. I never trusted Kaspersky, and now I have a reason to.

    Sure disagree with me. America sucks, right? Well when Putin surreptitiously takes over America in 2020 (next time via democratic candidate because no one is suspecting it, and that's what a troll does), I bet you'll be begging for old America: where people take pride in their jobs. Ambulances show up to your house in minutes, not hours, and you don't need to bribe people to get things you want.

  28. Re: Oh no by mOzone · · Score: 1

    Apple only stands for freedom when fronting for american consumers.. apple has casued 100s maybe more to die or get jailed in china indoniesea etc etc. So Apple encryption cares is bullcrap

  29. Re: Oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly! I too am definitely American and laugh heartily at how USA NSA and CIA are true evil of world. Russia is the good guy, but sites like slashdot ruled by democrat party are hurt there reputation hugely. So sad.

  30. Re: Oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meanwhile we're supposed to give a fuck about vague insinuations with one Russian software company

    More like buyer beware. It shouldn't be a surprise that companies cooperate with governments where they are domiciled and sometimes other governments too. Individuals should keep that in mind whenever they use software, especially closed source software, produced by these companies.

  31. It is all industrial scale eavesdropping by Max_W · · Score: 1

    All, absolutely all modern software and hardware, are based on eavesdropping. We read about entrepreneurs who built a global software empire via hard work and a talent overnight. But it just cannot be true. These all are projects which require enormous investments of several generations.

    I think it is time to start building computing from scratch, from the ground, with open hardware and software, with command line tools at first. With big transparent casings, so that we can actually trace wires and components.

  32. Re:Oh no by someone1234 · · Score: 1

    I see no problem with the FSB banging the door of a few Russian hackers. What did the Author of this crap expect, how should the number of Russian hackers dwindle? Sending in the FBI/CIA?

    --
    Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
  33. It's more PROPAGANDA now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Getting older? Bullshit. We've always been getting older.

    It's more PROPAGANDA now.

  34. Re:Russian Intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russians rushing are a race.

  35. Only complete morons are surprised by this by schleimkeim · · Score: 1

    Seriously, what the fuck did you expect? That's like expecting norton not to work with the CIA.

  36. Re: Oh no by schleimkeim · · Score: 1

    But they are cooperating with American intelligence and law enforcement to protect your freedom. Not unlike the bad guy Russia. Duh!

  37. The usual propaganda story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A security company aids its own government with special solutions to keep their systems secure, as any company in any country would, but if it's a Russian company then the U.S. propaganda mill moves into high gear to make it sound like they're trying to hack the planet.

    American bullshit and propaganda, as always. Kaspersky delivers a top quality suite of security product, regardless if they sell their products to one or more governments.

    Stop trying to make them out as some spying company or malware producer. It won't work, and nobody buys it.

  38. Re: Oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The good ol' whataboutism.
    It just never gets too old when there's something to report about Russia.

  39. Re: Oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It appears like the Russian propaganda machine is very effective at sowing distrust and animosity in the West.
    I've observed a similar thing happening here in Germany over the last decade. Basically whenever an online news outlet reports anything remotely critical about events in Russia, there's a huge circlejerking outrage in the comment section with a lot of people becoming apologists, establishing that Russia is the last bastion of good morals in Europe. In turn they're complaining about 'Gleichschaltung' of all western media. Because you know, when a lot of people say the same thing, then there must be a conspiracy behind it. Stating random things that happen in Germany or the US, which are 'a lot worse' than events in Russia. Usually referring to RT.com and asking why Western media doesn't cover these things. And yes, they like to bash the US for no good reason, even if it isn't mentioned in the article.
    Thankfully these are mostly things that happen on the internet. But as these platforms become more and more important when it comes to forming opinions the future doesn't look that bright.

  40. Re: Oh no by butzwonker · · Score: 1

    Well, it all depends on where you would prefer your data not to show up - in the hand of the GRU or FSB, or in the hand of the NSA or FBI? To be honest, judging from the past actions of the US and Russia, I would avoid antivirus software from those countries altogether. France and the UK are out of question, too, they have a long history of totalitarian surveillance measures. Maybe I'm wrong, but from all I've heard - endless discussions about the legality of government Trojans, etc. - I'd find it less likely that a German antivirus producer collude directly with government agencies. I'm sure there are even better choices if you care to look closely at the public discussion, laws, and the way intelligence agencies operate in other countries. Maybe some other European country?

    The real problem is that antivirus software tends to be fairly insecure in itself, though, to the extent that some people have started to question whether it actually heightens security. :/

  41. Re: Oh no by hord · · Score: 1

    The US has a long-standing tradition of allowing political dissent. You only get thrown in the gulag if you smoke pot or don't pay your fair share under duress. Yes, freedom all over the world. Especially in the middle east where I never voted to spend a single dollar of money. Russia sucks. But America does too.

  42. Re: Oh no by butzwonker · · Score: 1

    These are trolls, just ignore them. Russia has a special eye on Germany, not just for geostrategical reasons but also because due to his past Putin considers it somehow his home turf.

  43. Re: Oh no by Zemran · · Score: 1

    All this is talking about is the FSB wanting normal protection that any business would want. Somehow because they are Russian that is bad.

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  44. Re: Oh no by Zemran · · Score: 0

    I can only assume that you have never been to Russia and why you are explaining that one maybe you can tell me what is wrong with having a bank account in Panama? Protest is a normal part of life in Russia just like most European countries. Yes, bad things happen but far less than in the US. As for the US spreading freedom, you must be smoking some really strong stuff. Iraq was a free country that is now overrun with terrorists, Libya had a good democracy but now overrun with terrorists, Syria was the most secular country in the middle east and is now overrun with terrorists. You seem to be confusing destroying countries with spreading freedom.

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  45. Kaspersky Anti-Virus Software by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Virus Detected.
    Please Select Option:

    1) Quarantine
    2) Clean (Delete)
    3) Send FSB (Delete with Extreme Prejudice)

  46. Re: Oh no by slashrio · · Score: 1

    The company does regularly work with governments and law enforcement agencies around the world with the sole purpose of fighting cybercrime.

    And I don't see what's wrong with that.

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  47. This is actually Kaspersky vs Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People hate Microsoft's antivirus software. Microsoft tries to make it hard as hell to install anyone else's antivirus because many conflict with their internal phoning home stuff. Kaspersky is the popular choice and because of Russian ties, they cleverly utilize what's been going on with Trump and Russia as a means to discredit a company that hasn't been doing anything different than any other antivirus or security company has done. The U.S. security software companies also give out the addresses of threats to police. If you want antivirus that doesn't, you will have to go the open source route with a system like Linux or antivirus like ClamAV. I think they're afraid that antivirus software is becoming too intelligent and may confuse a "normal" Microsoft running processes as a virus because of how Windows 10 and Cortona works.

  48. Dupe from 2015? by Hadley123456 · · Score: 1

    Same two authors wrote an article from 2015 with the same intent.
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news...

    and a great retort from that 2015 article https://www.grahamcluley.com/k...

    I would like to see an actual evidence based reason before I put Kaspersky on my shit list (Russia is already on it). Working with a government to track down DDoS attackers is not a low point for a security company.

  49. Re: Oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vladimir? Is that you? Don't you have an invasion in the Ukraine to run?

  50. If I were a paid troll... by slashrio · · Score: 1

    ...I would have posted as an Anonymous Coward.

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.