Well, reading through the information on Geller I could find at Randi's site, my statement was correct. A talkshow is hardly a proper testing area.
By the way, it seems to me that Randi seems to make it his job to disprove supposedly outrageous claims (granted many, or even most of these are outrageous).
Anyway, further replies (if any) ought to be directed to my email account, so as not to take up space on Slashdot. Be sure to remove YOUR_PANTS
I'm not going to express my opinion on wether or not Geller is a fraud. -- However -- I don't think its right to label someone a fraud who you have never met. My grandfather _has_ met Uri Geller, and thinks he is authentic.
To sum up the results of tests on Geller's authenticity: though several critics who have tested him will not admit he is authentic, they have not found evidence that he isn't.
Slashdot Mirror
A talkshow is hardly a proper testing area.
By the way, it seems to me that Randi seems to make it his job to disprove supposedly outrageous claims (granted many, or even most of these are outrageous).
Anyway, further replies (if any) ought to be directed to my email account, so as not to take up space on Slashdot. Be sure to remove YOUR_PANTS
-- However --
I don't think its right to label someone a fraud who you have never met. My grandfather _has_ met Uri Geller, and thinks he is authentic.
To sum up the results of tests on Geller's authenticity:
though several critics who have tested him will not admit he is authentic, they have not found evidence that he isn't.