Slashdot Mirror


Uri Geller sues Nintendo's Pokemon

The-Forge writes "In this article at IGN's Sci-Fi Network, everyone's favorite spoon bending psychic, Uri Geller, is sueing Nintendo over a Pokemon charcter. The Pokemon, #65, is named Alakazam. At this point, you're probably asking yourself why. In Japan this Pokemon is called Un-Geller and carries bent spoons around all the time. And the fact that Geller got mobbed when he went X-Mas shopping in Tokyo by kids wanting him to sign their Un-Geller Pokemon cards didn't help much either. " The great part of this whole deal is the dollar amount - Geller's asking for $97 million.

269 comments

  1. Geller is a fraud... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    ... but I'm backing him on this one. I mean, an "Un Geller" who bends spoons? Not to mention the fact that a poor OCR system could confuse "n" and "ri". I can't believe that they didn't even bother to consult him or ask his permission. Or failing that, create another character who can bend spoons. !!

    1. Re:Geller is a fraud... by derwisch · · Score: 1

      The character's name is Un Geller in Japanese. Are you sure 'Un' and 'Uri' can be mistaken for one another in Katakana?

    2. Re:Geller is a fraud... by degroof · · Score: 2

      I agree. Much as I hate to admit it, Geller has a case. It's obvious that Un-Geller is a reference to Uri Geller. If they did this without his permission, then they're definitely in the wrong. The dollar amount is probably far off the mark, though.

      BTW, I'm assuming that Un-Geller straightens spoons, right? 7:^)

    3. Re:Geller is a fraud... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Are you sure 'Un' and 'Uri' can be mistaken for one another in katakana?

      No, he means that an OCR program could mistake the Roman characters "ri" for an "n" and vice versa.

      However, the "n" and "ri" characters in katakana are strikingly similar. When I first got interested in Japanese writing, I couldn't tell the two apart. To turn a "ri" into an "n", just tilt the little line in the upper-left corner so it points inward and straighten the longer line that runs from the upper-right to lower-left corners.

      Sometimes Roman characters are used in Japanese writing for abbreviations, English names, and other uses. I've got a Japanese poster listing of all 75 of the Pokémon, and, yes, the names are in katakana.

    4. Re:Geller is a fraud... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      It isn't surprising that Geller is suing because that is what he does to try to silence his critics (ask The Amazing Randy!). If memory serves me correctly, many years ago Geller brought a similar lawsuit against Timex for a commercial where an unnamed spoonbender was unable to stop the Timex from ticking. I think Geller ended up dropping that suit because the defense argued that he would first have to prove that he could bend spoons and stop watches before he can rightfully claim that he is being made fun of, and apparently Mr. Geller decided to drop the lawsuit instead of putting his mentals powers to a court-approved controlled experiment.

      Then again, I could have my Geller lawsuits mixed up. I'm recalling this from memory from either something I saw on TV or read about Geller.

    5. Re:Geller is a fraud... by koh · · Score: 1

      Let's try a little katakana rendering ;)

      The 'N' looks like this : `/
      The 'RI' looks like this : ' |

      As you can see, those two glyphs can be used for any kind of pun (as several other glyphs in the katakana alphabet).

      Just my $2E-2.

      --
      Karma cannot be described by words alone.
    6. Re:Geller is a fraud... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, speaking of the fact that his name URI is just another way of spelling U = R * I which is the general electric law, maybe Ohm should sue him for using his law as his name.

      This is just plain stupid. Hope he loses $95 million.

    7. Re:Geller is a fraud... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the card in America is not "um Gellar", only the one in Japan. Unless told, nobody in the US is going to know who was the inspiration behind the card, right? Well, at least no kid into Pokemon will.

      So, he can only really consider suing Nintendo in Japan for libel, right? That brings some other questions to bear -- what can his American lawyer do about it? Does he have any real recourse in the Japanese court? Yet another waste of time lawsuit...

    8. Re:Geller is a fraud... by Amazin+Doug · · Score: 1

      Geller has no case at all. As a celebrity he can be lampooned and satirized without any need for his permission. The Pokemon character is obviously a joke. It is satire. The critter straightens out bent spoons! It a gag. Lighten up. Geller is just trying to get money. Besides, Geller really is a fraud. Geller couldn't bend a spoon with psychic powers to save his life. How can Nintendo harm the reputation of a known con man?

    9. Re:Geller is a fraud... by SydBarrett · · Score: 1

      I think that is the main point here. The character is a parody, and does not slander Mr. Geller. The only way I can think of that would work for him (and I am not a lawyer), would be proving that this one Pokemon made tons of money for Nintendo, which seems unlikely. I still think that he could get a bit of money, based on trademark/copyright gibberish that only lawyers understand.

    10. Re:Geller is a fraud... by zombywoofo0o · · Score: 1
      I'm not going to express my opinion on wether or not Geller is a fraud.
      -- However --
      I don't think its right to label someone a fraud who you have never met. My grandfather _has_ met Uri Geller, and thinks he is authentic.

      To sum up the results of tests on Geller's authenticity:
      though several critics who have tested him will not admit he is authentic, they have not found evidence that he isn't.

    11. Re:Geller is a fraud... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >To sum up the results of tests on Geller's authenticity:
      >though several critics who have tested him will not admit he is authentic, they have not found evidence that he isn't.

      Um, please tell me this statement is a joke... If it isn't, you need to do some reading. Perhaps start with James Randi. There is indeed lots of evidence that Geller isn't authentic (See Randi). But further more, it's not the job of others to disprove outragous claims. You haven't found any evidence that I'm not Jesus Christ, therefore you should just accept that fact until something comes along to show that I'm not. Right?

    12. Re:Geller is a fraud... by zombywoofo0o · · Score: 1
      Well, reading through the information on Geller I could find at Randi's site, my statement was correct.
      A talkshow is hardly a proper testing area.

      By the way, it seems to me that Randi seems to make it his job to disprove supposedly outrageous claims (granted many, or even most of these are outrageous).

      Anyway, further replies (if any) ought to be directed to my email account, so as not to take up space on Slashdot. Be sure to remove YOUR_PANTS

    13. Re:Geller is a fraud... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think its right to label someone a fraud who you have never met.
      Ooh my God!!! How did you get on slashdot?? Shouldn't you be looking for www.morons.com? I suppose you don't have an opinion on people like Hitler, Stalin,... since you never met them.

      Ooh, sorry, I didn't see you were a hotmailer.

  2. Maybe it will slow it down! by grubby · · Score: 1

    Maybe this will slow down the pokemon buzz. Would this be a bad thing?

  3. Opportunistic fake by rde · · Score: 2

    I speak for me. Not my employer, not slashdot, not Xenu.

    Uri Geller is a fake. He's an opportunist. He's doing this for the money. He's described as a real-life spoonbender, which he may well be. But he does it using regular, non-psychic methods.

    1. Re:Opportunistic fake by British · · Score: 1

      I think I remember seeing the Johnny Carson show, where Johnny's stagehands set up the props(un-bent spoons, etc) for him instead of Uri himself.


      He proceeded up with some weird excuse and didn't even try to bend the spoons. Sure, take away his props, and suddenly he can't perform his magic tricks.

    2. Re:Opportunistic fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3
      i agree with the fake stuff. (well, i am poster #1 if you read what i wrote). why do i believe that uri geller is a fake?

      1. material scientists have repeatedly analysed his bent spoons and found deformations caused by fracture (i.e., he bends the spoon with his hands), not by melting (as he claims).

      2. he has never been able to repeat his claims under proper scientific conditions. apparently one time, he stormed out and never came back again.

      3. various entertainers have demonstrated how they too can bend spoons. once you have got it slightly bent, you just raise the angle of the spoon keeping the end as the pivot in the same place (or something) and voila: optical illusion!

      4. to get the initial bend, you grab the spoon quickly in two hands and bend it. on footage (including the impromptu noels house party), geller has repeatedly been shown a quick slight of his other hand before he starts to "bend" the spoon, i.e., perform the optical illusion #3.

      5. i read how he has set up his own "consultancy" business where he will bring your business good luck. i heard how some business was unfortunate enough to employ him, and he didn't find any oil spots for them on the island they were looking at (which is what they employed him to do), yet he lists it as one of his successes on his website (which I haven't visited).

      6. he is blatantly out to make money. i always deliberately avoid reading his column "uri geller's wierd web" (although i cannot avoid reading the title!) in the times' computer magazine.

      7. most obviously to me ... in his FIRST TV performance, they were asking him something like, if he could really, truly, bend spoons. WATCH HIS BODY LANGUAGE. he raises his hand just above his mouth in response to this question. in ANY BASIC BOOK ON BODY LANGUAGE, THIS INDICATES THE PERSON IS LYING! so uri geller may be deceptive in other ways, he may have even mastered the body language by now, but then he utterly and irretrievably gave himself away as a fraud.

      thank you for listening. i still think that he has a right to his own name and image though and that Pokemon should get done for the lack of asking permission.

    3. Re:Opportunistic fake by Yaruar · · Score: 1

      Well, he may be a fake, but then I would keep that news quiet from the oil and mineral companies that hired him during his 'quiet' years and who's pay has brought him a huge house and the need never to work again.... Also, the only time anyone replicated the spoonbending it took about 4 days to set up the scam.

      --
      Working for the (other) man
    4. Re:Opportunistic fake by deefer · · Score: 1

      5. i read how he has set up his own "consultancy" business where he will bring your business good luck.
      Yep. IIRC Reading Football Club (football in the original sense of the word; the beautiful game. Not that USA razzamatazz with 50 heavy dudes in protective harnesses prancing around like they were athletes or something...). Still, last I checked, Reading FC weren't in any danger of threatening the Premier division... Or even anywhere near even being in that division, either...

      --

      Strong data typing is for those with weak minds.

    5. Re:Opportunistic fake by Lars+Arvestad · · Score: 1

      Yep. IIRC Reading Football Club (...). Still, last I checked, Reading FC weren't in any danger of threatening the Premier division... Or even anywhere near even being in that division, either...

      Didn't the English national team also use Geller's "talents" during the last world cup? I remember reading that the former English manager (don't remember his name now, I am not big on football) had a thing for the paranormal...

      And of course, they did not do too well...


      Lars
      __

      --
      Reality or nothing.
    6. Re:Opportunistic fake by bakert · · Score: 1

      In fact they languish in the relegation zone of Division Two (the third of the four) and look near-certain to end up in the bottom division next season.


      Of course I find this hilarious as they are my brother's team but there you go ...

      --

      "Don't open the gates, who the hell needs a wooden horse that size?"

    7. Re:Opportunistic fake by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2
      I would keep that news quiet from the oil and mineral companies that hired him during his 'quiet' years
      So big companies got scammed. Nothing new here. (Insert Bil Gate / Windows reference here.)
      Also, the only time anyone replicated the spoonbending it took about 4 days to set up the scam.
      Nope. I saw famed debunker James "The Amazing" Randi "bend" a spoon - and even make it break - when he spoke at the physics department at the University of Maryland, College Park about 8 or 10 years ago. Most definitely didn't take 4 days to set up. And he's hardly the only one to replicate it.

      C'mon, if you've seen David Copperfield or Penn and Teller you've seen much more impressive illusions and didn't believe they were the results of "psychic powers". Why would you believe it of Geller?

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    8. Re:Opportunistic fake by nayr · · Score: 1

      Since when does "doing something for the money" automatically negate its authenticity? I'm not saying the guy bends spoons with his mind, but I hear that argument all the time: "He's just doing it for the money." Somehow I doubt that all the working stiffs of the world go to work each day thinking that they're building a better tomorrow. I'm more inclined to believe that they're just "doing it for the money."

      Why should he be any different?

      --
      --- sigs are for geeks.
    9. Re:Opportunistic fake by jsm2 · · Score: 1

      Geller gave the England team his "help" as an unsolicited gesture (I think that a newspaper publicity stunt was involved). The manager at the time (Glenn Hoddle) was a paranormal nut, but his thing was spiritual healing, and specifically, not picking players who refused to attend his favourite healer, hence his eventual loss of job.

      I am reminded of a letter to Viz magazine with this helpful suggestion:

      "Next time Uri Geller comes on TV, and asks everyone to concentrate together on bending a spoon or starting a clock, let's all instead concentrate on Uri prolapsing, and see what happens".

      jsm

    10. Re:Opportunistic fake by DrXym · · Score: 1

      8. His amazing trick he does with stupid TV interviewers where he gets them to draw a picture onto a sheet of paper and with "psychic" powers guesses what it is. Invariably it's a house or some other obvious shape that someone peeking could guess easily.

    11. Re:Opportunistic fake by rde · · Score: 1

      Since when does "doing something for the money" automatically negate its authenticity?
      It doesn't. Geller could go around pretending to bend spoons for free, and he'd still be a fake and a charlatan.
      He's an opportunitist because he's suing a multi-million dollar company because they made an oblique reference to his name. He's suing so he can get some free money that he doesn't deserve. A few people have stated that he may have a valid case, but I disagree. However, all this is incidental to the fact that he's lied to millions of people.

      On the subject of money, though, my question is this: he's appeared on television programmes, published books and worked for oil companies, all based on his spurious clames of psychic ability. Why doesn't this constitute fraud? Why hasn't he been arrested?

    12. Re:Opportunistic fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the optical illusion of bending spoons is more in the speed and way you "swish" them. It works for anything - even pencils. You don't necessarialy have to give it a small bend first (but it helps).

      If you want to see the truth, and make a mockery of someone trying to fake you out with this, get them to do it under a strobe light.

    13. Re:Opportunistic fake by Yaruar · · Score: 1

      Can't remember who did the bending, but the guy set it up at his stooges favourite restaurant and had special spoons put in place and used a reactive chemical. The oil and chemical companies money came from dowsing, which ironically anyone can do easily, just he got them to pay a lot of money for him to do it. Randi probably used a reactive chemical to weaken the spoon, which does take a bit of preparation. For good references and information read Colin Wilson's Poltergeist which goes into these areas, and although flawed in many ways, he takes a critical stance on the examples and higlights some interesting examples of phenemonen.

      --
      Working for the (other) man
    14. Re:Opportunistic fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is an entertainer.

      That is all he is, an entertainer. People are entertained by his act.

      Next you'll be telling us that Rush Limbaugh, another entertainer who lies outrageously on the air, should be arrested.

    15. Re:Opportunistic fake by rde · · Score: 1

      Next you'll be telling us that Rush Limbaugh, another entertainer who lies outrageously on the air, should be arrested.

      Well, now that you mention it...

      Actually, I was more concerned with the fact that he charges corporations large chunks of money to dowse for oil or to make them, ahem, lucky. Even if he doesn't guarantee anything, he's still charging money for something he knows won't work

    16. Re:Opportunistic fake by Frijoles · · Score: 1

      'tis a good thing you posted as AC. You could have been next on the ol' suing list of Mr. Geller.

      He'll get you Slashdot.. and you're little dog too!

      --
      -Frijoles-
    17. Re:Opportunistic fake by Myddrin · · Score: 1

      Randi didn't use any chemicals. Just barely perceptable bending back and forth, which causes enough metal fatigue to cause large bends. It was all covered on Nova years ago. There really isn't much debate on this anymore.

      --
      Myddrin
    18. Re:Opportunistic fake by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2
      ...dowsing, which ironically anyone can do easily...
      Here's a little experiment you can try at home. Get a sealed bottle of water. (You might be able to smell an open cup.) Make three opaque cylinders - closed at the top, open at the bottom, and larger than the bottle - out of construction paper or cardboard. Leave the room and have a friend put the bottle of water under one of the cylinders. Have him leave the room so he can't give you any subtle clues. (Many "psychic" insights are just the subconscious reading of subtle environmental or social cues.) Try your dowsing powers and see if you can figure out where the water is. Repeat 20 or 30 times to get some statistics.

      If you can find it consistently, contact the James Randi Educational Foundation and demonstrate your powers and they will give you a million dollars! Though you should probably read their page on dowsing first to learn why no one's been able to do this.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    19. Re:Opportunistic fake by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2
      It was all covered on Nova years ago.
      The episode is "Secrets of the Psychics", and you can buy it on video online at the PBS website.
      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    20. Re:Opportunistic fake by verybusy · · Score: 1
      material scientists have repeatedly analysed his bent spoons and found deformations caused by fracture (i.e., he bends the spoon with his hands), not by melting (as he claims).

      I can think of one more possible way to bend a spoon. He switches the original spoon with one made with bimetallic strips. The heat from studio lights is more than enough to start the bending process.

  4. Another patent idea?? by famfurnell · · Score: 1

    I can see Uri's point... Un Geller is rather similar to Uri Geller, and he surely has a right to be at least consulted before they do something like this, but as for the bent spoons... surely that's up to him to patent?

  5. win or lose? depends... by segmond · · Score: 1

    I do not care if he wins or lose, I just hope he autographed the kids Un-Geller Pokemon cards. As a matter of fact, if he didn't, I hope he loses. If he did, I hope he wins, but perhaps the sum of $5mil.




    --
    ------ Curiosity killed the cat. {satisfaction brought it back | it didn't die ignorant | lack of it is killing mankind
  6. similarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

    If this pokemon character can really bend spoons, then there is little similarity to Mr. Geller

    1. Re:similarity by gonzocanuck · · Score: 1

      ROFL!! hehehehe, it's a little orange beastie with a moustache, I don't see any physical resemblance at all :-) He's a fraud and a weirdo.

      --

    2. Re:similarity by DaveHowe · · Score: 3

      If this pokemon character can really bend spoons, then there is little similarity to Mr. Geller
      I would suggest the character carries around pre-bent spoons, but then Mr Geller's lawyers would be after me, too :+)
      --

      --
      -=DaveHowe=-
    3. Re:similarity by jeremy+f · · Score: 1

      hehehehe, it's a little orange beastie with a moustache

      Which one? The pokemon, or Uri Geller?

      =)

    4. Re:similarity by gonzocanuck · · Score: 1

      LOL LOL I wouldn't be surprised if Geller crawled out from obscurity looking like that one day!

      --

    5. Re:similarity by dancomfort · · Score: 1

      That's probably why he's called UN-Geller!

    6. Re:similarity by m3000 · · Score: 1

      I would sure hope Uri Geller wouldn't look like this......

    7. Re:similarity by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

      The only thing Nintendo did wrong (they own Pokemon?) is they didn't give him about 1,000 Pokemon cards to pass out the last time he was at his highly charged, intelligent, and groundbreaking appearances - namely the Oprah show or an occasional Montel.

      Uri could have really just nipped this in the bud by remotly destroying all the cards, but as he usually states he's 'a believer in love' and probably woudn't do that to the kids.

      I'm pretty sure Pikachu could take him in a fight, release the electric hamster I say.

    8. Re:similarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if any of you realize that Abra, Kadabra, and Alakazam (sp?) are actually shaped like how the Japanese see foxes. I think it's appropriate, considering that foxes are known for their craftiness and that Geller is a con artist.

  7. uh by dayeight · · Score: 1

    my uncle looks like pokemon. can i have a dollar?

    1. Re:uh by clyons · · Score: 1

      I start to confuse people when I get a really bad headache. So I think I should be getting royalties for Psyduck. :)

      --

      --
      Intelligence is definitely a recessive trait.

  8. I'm going to sue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm going to sue them, too.

    Because of their character charmander:

    After I eat lots of curry my arse is on fire too.

  9. You hate to see guys like this win, but... by Powers · · Score: 3
    Yeah, Uri Geller's a fake. His lawyers had a bit of a row with Cecil Adams back when they thought he was criticized in one of the Straight Dope books. Well, I suppose he actually was criticized -- Cecil does that to most anyone, particularly frauds -- but it wasn't anything they could sue over.

    Anyway, as much as I hate to say it, Uri Geller clearly has a case here, and he ought to win, but $97 is far too much. Yes, Pokemon has been a huge moneymaker, but how much of that can be attributed to that one, single Pokemon? If it was Pikachu, maybe, but Un Geller? No way.

    --

    Powers&8^]

    1. Re:You hate to see guys like this win, but... by NettRom · · Score: 2
      ...Uri Geller clearly has a case here, and he ought to win, but $97 is far too much.
      $97 sounds like just the right amount. maybe $98 if he behaves well.
    2. Re:You hate to see guys like this win, but... by Simeon2000 · · Score: 2

      ...they ususally do.

      *patriotic*
      I love my country but
      */patriotic*

      *rant*
      I really really don't like our twisted justice system much anymore.
      */rant*

      Uri Geller is a nobody. He is probably not too well off. Poke'mon is a huge franchise with plenty of money, and is very famous.

      Maybe the Poke'mon creators were really trying to have this pun on his name, but puh-lease... $97mil? Maybe a public apology or something but don't be a baby.

      This is the kind of stuff that lends our legal system to ridicule. I sincerely hope that the judge who fields this case gets a good laugh out of it and soundly spanks Uri for being a bit of a twit.

      Of course, I'm no friend of the Pokemon's, either... but one character out of 150 has a bent spoon and you can sue them for it? *sigh*

      Do you think they sue like this in Costa Rica? I've been considering moving... ;-)
      ----- if ($anyone_cares) {print "Just Another Perl Newbie"}

      --
      warn "Just Another Perl User" if $anyone_cares;
    3. Re:You hate to see guys like this win, but... by Jburkholder · · Score: 2

      >This is the kind of stuff that lends our legal system to ridicule.

      For sure. But is it our (I assume you me the US) system that will be subject to ridicule or Japan's?

      Anyone know where the suit is filed? Isn't Nintendo a Japanese company? Please fill us in on how that works - do you file suit in a US court against a foreign company, or do you have to go to court in that company's country?

      (then again, there *is* a "Nintendo America" subsidiary that is based in the US and presumably subject to US legal jurisdiction?)

      Oh, wait - no the article says he is suing for 60 million *pounds*. Does that imply that he's filed suit in the UK? If so, I think "our justice system" isn't going to become part of this?

      >but one character out of 150 has a bent spoon and you can sue them for it? *sigh*

      Yeah, but the article says he once tried to sue timex for a commercial where a psychic tried to destroy a watch. Sounds like publicity stunts to me?


    4. Re:You hate to see guys like this win, but... by dancomfort · · Score: 4

      Under U. S. Law, at least, Nitendo could make a case that they are satirizing a public figure and win the suit via fair comment. HUSTLER won when Jerry Fallwell sued over a very nasty satire of him. And the Simpsons have satired Ahhnold as Werner Wolfcastle for years with no fear of law suits.

    5. Re:You hate to see guys like this win, but... by Jburkholder · · Score: 2

      >and he ought to win, but $97 is far too much

      Yeah, maybe more like US$0.97 ??

      Actually, he is suing (according to the article) for 60 million pounds (which works out to what, like $97 million?) Still way to much, though. Maybe when he wins again he'll get another huge award like the one buck he got previously (or, should that be one quid?) :-)

    6. Re:You hate to see guys like this win, but... by Vanders · · Score: 1

      Yes, Uri Geller is resident in the UK, and i beleive he may also hold dual nationality. Therefore i should imagine the suit has been filled via. the UK law courts.

    7. Re:You hate to see guys like this win, but... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

      I'm still waiting for the hammer to fall after the 'Leader' episode. The caricature of the leader is a PERFECT L. Ron.

      Maybe the scientologists are just too thick-skulled to get it.

      "Hey Nicole, look at the stupid leader!"

    8. Re:You hate to see guys like this win, but... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

      I'd hate to see a major corporation just use anyone copyright like that. Sure there's fair use and all but using his shtick AND his name is beyond the scope of the fairest use.

      So what is Uri is playing the 'real magic' card game? He knows modern skeptical audiences have trouble suspending disbelief so he puts on the airs of the old 'spritualist.'

      Most, from what I've read, slashdotters giant egos and dogmatic materialistic worldviews can't even face competition from even Uri's lame old and tired shtick.

      Its just a shame that most of the posters can't look past their own prejudices in this case. From a group of people who make efforts to investigate the degradation of rights when it comes to tech and big business this is a refreshing insight into the mentality of US vs. THEM.

      Maybe rights on-line should be renamed rights on-line for geeks only, flakey people need not apply.

    9. Re:You hate to see guys like this win, but... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

      Yes, he has a great case and I don't see why he's so should be hated. He's a cheesy magician who has a shtick that's older than most slashdot readers.

      Everyone knows he's 'fake' but go to his shows for kicks. Unfortunatly the ultra-sensitive giant egos of slashdot can't remotely handle anything the might even come close to challenging their materistic worldview so they come out complaing and actually ROOTING for the big corporations who do as they please. Sad.

      What does money mean in today's judicial system?

      Lets see, some old crone spills Mcdonalds coffee on her cooter - MULTIMILLIONS.


      Or how about the oft told story of the theif who breaks into a hour, hurts himself in the process, and sues the ownder for - MULTIMILLIONS.

      Its mostly bullshit and intimidation, lawyers pick a big number hoping to scare the defendant or impress the jury. In has no relation to money you and I use everyday.

    10. Re:You hate to see guys like this win, but... by Abigail-II · · Score: 1
      Lets see, some old crone spills Mcdonalds coffee on her cooter - MULTIMILLIONS.

      Yeah, yeah, but that's only part of the story.

      "The old crone" wasn't quite smart and spilled coffee that turned out to be quite hot. So, she needed medical attention. Urged by her ensurance company, she turned to McDonalds to get her medical expenses covered - McDonalds had an existing track record of paying such expenses.

      Now, McDonalds tried to make use of the fact she was "an old crone", and refused to pay. Since her medical expenses weren't trivial, she decided to sue, and found some kick ass lawyers. The rest is history.

      Had McDonalds just paid her medical expenses, McDonalds wouldn't have lost the millions.

      -- Abigail

    11. Re:You hate to see guys like this win, but... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

      Like I said "Bullshit intimidation"

  10. Best thing that ever happened to him by EisPick · · Score: 2

    This guy hasn't been on TV since the Mike Douglas show went off the air. This is the best publicity he's gotten in decades. He should be paying Nintendo.

  11. hmmm... by froz · · Score: 2

    Is it too late to legally change my name to pikachu?
    C'mon i'm sure there's enough /. readers willing to change their names so we can get all the pokemon off the market.

    Gotta sue 'em all!

    1. Re:hmmm... by generic-man · · Score: 2

      Is it too late to legally change my name to pikachu?

      Only if you also change your voice box so that you only communicate by saying your name (or parts thereof) with various inflections. :)

      --
      For more information, click here.
  12. "I wish I was Uri G . . . " by gnarphlager · · Score: 3
    Shesh. Pathetic. If anything he ought to be flattered; he'd been out of the public eye for a while, and despite the fact that it IS a pokemon we're talking about, it's not like he's being slandered. If anything, he ought to sue every entry level psychology course that DOES make fun of him when they introduce parapsychology.


    Besides, there's a little thing known as Fair Use. Ask Negativland . . . they've been fighting this battle longer than anyone I personally know. Don't get me wrong, I've nothing against suing the Big Evil Corporation(tm), but I DO have something against frivolous lawsuits.


    oh yeah, vote for me for best dressed ;-)

    --

    Bad things often happen to good people,
    It is up to them to see that they remain good.
    1. Re:"I wish I was Uri G . . . " by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, how would the Linux community if a new pokemon was created: a penguin with the name of, oh, maybe Tux?

    2. Re:"I wish I was Uri G . . . " by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wouldn't be accurate unless the pengiun fought by infecting hard drives with the LILO boot sector virus.

  13. Ooops. by jallen02 · · Score: 2

    Everyone is sue happy. I do not know much about japanese or anything. Does that word have some other meaning? Anyone here know? Before he gets away with that much money you need a LITTLE more than a freaking spoon that is bent ( I can bend them to. I use the deadly frozen ice-cream trick ) Okay the name thing is close but Uhm. Ive never heard of the guy and he has not really trademarked or copyrighted any of the spoon bending stuff (has he?) so how can he dream of pulling this off? *shrugs* IANAL so I would be interested in hearing what anyone has to say.

    1. Re:Ooops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The great thing about the Internet is that everybody can express an opinion. The terrible thing about the internet is that everybody does.

      Next time try posting something that contains some information other than "I don't know anything and I've never heard of this and I would be interested in what anyone has to say". This originally started out as a flame, but I don't think you deserve one. Just come up with something interesting or funny....please. Slashdot has a low enough signal-to-noise ratio as it is.

    2. Re:Ooops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe I did say I would be interested in what anyone had to say ehh? I was just after a different line of thinking. If thats noise im sorry.

  14. Makes me mad so it does. by Psiren · · Score: 1

    97 Million? What the fsck?! How the hell did they come up with this amount. Lawsuits like these just really get my back up. Surely the best thing to do would be to dump Uri and these Pokemons on some planet and leave them there. Lets see him bend himself out of that one...

    "Some smegger's filled in this 'Have You Got A Good Memory?' quiz!"

  15. Arent we forgetting a very important detail? by cxreg · · Score: 1

    There is no spoon!

    1. Re:Arent we forgetting a very important detail? by stuntpope · · Score: 1
      I was waiting for that to come along...

    2. Re:Arent we forgetting a very important detail? by operagost · · Score: 1

      I'll bet you've been waiting for that opportunity for a long time!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:Arent we forgetting a very important detail? by dangermouse · · Score: 1

      only Zuul.

    4. Re:Arent we forgetting a very important detail? by wynlyndd · · Score: 1

      "If someone asks if you are a god...you say, 'Yes!'"




      "Dogs and cats living together...mass hysteria!"

      --
      "Dogs and cats, living together...it's mass hysteria!"
    5. Re:Arent we forgetting a very important detail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      okay, why was this one modded up and labeled as funny, yet the same joke in the 1st ten posts was modded down.

      This one should be modded down a labeled redundant.

  16. Conspiracy by alannon · · Score: 5

    I believe this is just the beginning of an evil plot by Nintendo to replace all the important and famous people in the world with Pokemon characters.

    Picture if you would a grotesque little monster with greying hair named Clintoboinko that defeats his opponents by whipping out his... umm... on second thought, actually, don't picture that.

    1. Re:Conspiracy by arivanov · · Score: 1

      This will spoil the game PG rating ;-)

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    2. Re:Conspiracy by WinTired · · Score: 1

      Picture if you would a grotesque little monster with greying hair named Clintoboinko that defeats his opponents by whipping out his...

      On the other hand, wouldn't it be nice to have a Bill-Gates-like character? Maybe serving as a dart target or for vodoo porpouses...


      -------------------------

      --

      -------------------------
      "People ask FAQs all the time". - David Allen

    3. Re:Conspiracy by Icculus · · Score: 1

      If any of you have seen Being John Malkovich, you probably remember the scene where he travels into his own head. I think that's where they're keeping the Malkovich Pokemons until they can be unleashed upon the world.

    4. Re:Conspiracy by jafac · · Score: 1

      It MAY be an evil plot after all, just think how much those Un-Geller cards will be worth if Nintendo has to change them.

      In fact, my son has a Japanese Alakazam (holographic), but I don't think there are any roman characters on it, I don't remember. . .

      I wish I had a nickel for every time someone said "Information wants to be free".

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  17. Re:Spoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i was told the same thing by a small child dressed as a buhdist monk. i think it was hemos.

  18. This is old hat for Geller by kzinti · · Score: 4

    Uri Geller has a long history of filing lawsuits against anyone who criticize him, debunk him, or even just incorrectly describe his past. Witness, for example, his various suits against James "Amazing" Randi, who published The Truth About Uri Geller . I don't recall all the details of Geller's suits against Randi, but you can probably find more info at randi.org. Fortunately, Randi is a bulldog who doesn't let Geller intimidate him. The long and the short of it is that Geller is a fraud and will sue anyone who dares to say so.

    --Jim

    1. Re:This is old hat for Geller by Paul+Johnson · · Score: 2
      IIRC, one of those suits was in Japan. Geller won because the truth is not a defence against a charge of libel in Japan: its actually more about whether you have insulted the plaintiff than whether what you said was true.

      Geller was awarded $1 in damages.

      Paul.

      --
      You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
    2. Re:This is old hat for Geller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, in Yen?

    3. Re:This is old hat for Geller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      $1?

      Now that's insulting. :-)

    4. Re:This is old hat for Geller by NReitzel · · Score: 1

      Did Pokemon #65 ever say Geller was a fraud? Or is it just that #65 is a whole lot better at spoon bending than our favorite Israeli?

      A hundred million, give or take a spoonful?


      --

      Don't take life too seriously; it isn't permanent.

    5. Re:This is old hat for Geller by COLUG · · Score: 1

      The Amazon reviews of James Randi's book are hysterical. Almost all of the negative reviews are written by "a reader from..." (AKA Anonymous Cowards.) The wording and phrases are remarkably similar from review to review. Could this be a mutation of the Slashdot Effect?

      Paul Hostetler

  19. He already won! by StarFace · · Score: 4

    It is a simple case of deduction. Uri Geller is psychic, so he knows what will be the outcome. He wouldn't have placed the suit if he knew he would not win.

    So we can all go home now...lawyers step aside, he is obviously more than you can handle.

    --
    V
  20. URI GELLER IS A ***FRAUD*** by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 2

    He's actually a former -- lame! -- magician. Since he was'nt skilled enough to do it the honest way, he pretended to do it by supranatural power. This way, he got fame, money, girls ... And HE'S A FRAUD. The magic community is laughing at him. The bent spoon is an ultra easy trick. You can do that really simply with shape-memory (don't know the english term for it) material.

    A group of french skeptics are offering $20000 to anybody who will be able to bent THEIR spoon, which is placed inside a sealed glass tube, without opening / breaking the tube. Oddly, Uri Fraud Geller never tried to do it!!!!

  21. What is our Capitalistic Monarchy coming too? by v3rgEz · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, this looks like just another attempt by a fading star to regain their celibrity. From another view though, it's the lone ranger crusading for basic human rights (EG Not to be portrayed as a pokemon card.) Still, that much money is very, very excessive. I severely doubt that it hurt his reputation that much.

  22. Blackmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He won't get his 97 million, but he will get a lot. Japanese companies are notoriously afraid of unpredictable U.S. courts and so they settle, settle early, and settle big.

    1. Re:Blackmail by Robert+Wilde · · Score: 1

      Japanese companies are notoriously afraid of unpredictable U.S. courts and so they settle, settle early, and settle big.

      Not true for any multinational like Nintendo or Sony. Besides, there is no suit in the US (since the US version of the card isn't named after him).

  23. Un(in)formed thoughts by The+Unknown+Anorak · · Score: 1
    Uri Geller annoys the hell out of me. He's made a huge fortune winding up gullible people who desperately want to believe in something spiritual. To add to the other debunkings people have mentioned, James Randi went head to head with him a few years ago in the UK. He had no sense of humour then and evidently has no sense of humour now.

    Oh and as for everyone quoting The Matrix, I give you The Tick: Spooooooooooooooooon!

    --
    If a tree falls in the forest, and it falls on a mime, does anyone care?
  24. Is it coincidence? by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

    I think it comes down to whether it is coincidence. There's some SMALL possibility that it was (doesn't seem very likely, but let's never assume anything). If it wasn't, then certainly they didn't have the moral right to do what they did.

    Whether or not they have a legal right, I don't know... I'm not a lawyer, least of all a Japanese lawyer, but in America, it'd proably be covered under Parody clauses of Copyright laws, which basically state that you can pretty much rob someone blind of intelectual property such as names, as long as you're doing it to make fun of them.


    WOOHOO!!! About 400th Post!!!

  25. Geller's latest attempt at "Make Money Fast" by substrate · · Score: 1

    Uri Geller isn't a spoon-bending psychic. He's a money grubbing charlatan who has tried to employ the same tactics as the Scientologists (lawsuits anyone?) against his detractors, albeit with less success. He's now jumped on the new age bandwagon and his latest snake-oil are crystals and tapes on how to develop your ESP and other psychic abilities.

    Suing over the Pokemon card is just another attempt of his to get rich quick. He might be on to something but I doubt it. The Pokemon card could probably be defended as a parody of Uri Geller, a public figure.

    Click here. Professional skeptic, James Randi (also a shameless self promoter, but hey, at least its for a better cause) has debunked Geller in a book. He's also challenged him to perform his feats of telekinesis under controlled circumstances for a million dollar prize. Given he loves publicity and will do anything for a buck his refusal to compete for the prize speaks volumes about his credibility.

    1. Re:Geller's latest attempt at "Make Money Fast" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is Randi's 'better cause'?? A parasite whose host is another parasite is still a parasite.

    2. Re:Geller's latest attempt at "Make Money Fast" by Creosote · · Score: 1
      What is Randi's 'better cause'??
      Dedication to the truth, perhaps?
  26. A Haiku... by Louziffer · · Score: 1
    Uri Geller's spoon
    Bastard Pokemon stole it!
    Psychic whoop-ass time

    Personally, I find the idea of Uri Geller being mobbed by children asking him to sign their Pokemon cards quite hilarious.

    He should have seen it coming... ;)

    LouZiffer

    --

    LouZiffer

    1. Re:A Haiku... by Hecubas · · Score: 1
      Oh my god that is funny, and I don't know why!

      Maybe there should be a Slashdot feature column just for Haiku...


      -------

      --
      Hecubas
  27. Names --> Common Words by Steve+B · · Score: 2
    It seems that Geller's name is becoming a general term for "psychic", at least in Japan.

    It reminds me this story: a few months ago Dr. Bernard Lewinisky (Monica's father) got upset when the TV Show Law & Order: Special Victims Unit used "lewinsky" as a colloquialism for oral sex. Annoying, but probably not actionable (at least under US law; I don't know about Japan) given proof that the name is in general use as a common word.
    /.

    --
    /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  28. Is is illegal? by tomservo3000 · · Score: 1

    Well, I know that a while back, some company couldn't get the right (or permission) to use Sean Connory's likeness for some game (another CCG?), so they had to use a shadow that vaguely looked like him. I'm not sure if it was illegal for them to use his likeness without his permission, or if they did it just to be nice. Also, I'm not sure what the laws in Japan. 97 million is pretty steep though, but if it's a company that has a lot of money, I guess you try to take it to the bank. I wouldn't want to see him win either, but it appears inevitable. I guess a fictional character with the same last name as you and who bends spoons (allegedly) like you counts as a likeness.... any thoughts though?

  29. And the Tick says.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...."SPOON!!!"

  30. And, in related news... by jht · · Score: 4

    Uri Geller has filed suit against Sarah Michelle Gellar, alleging "a conspiracy to defraud and confuse" the public. The main thrust of Geller's suit is that the uncanny similarity between their names and their involvement in the magic field "can't be a coincidence". Attorneys for Ms. Gellar responded with the statement "It's just a TV show, stupid. I mean, it's on the WB, and who even watches that? WB stations are usually in the UHF band, anyways."

    In a related development, NSI responded by immediately placing all related domain names on hold.

    - -Josh Turiel

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    1. Re:And, in related news... by RAruler · · Score: 1

      aahahahahha%!#%!

      that's so true, who really watches the WB anyways? its like the black hole of the entertainment field.

      --

      --
      Insert Witty Sig Here
    2. Re:And, in related news... by clyons · · Score: 1

      Wait a second.... don't you mean that NSI gave control of all related domains to the person with the most money?

      --

      --
      Intelligence is definitely a recessive trait.

    3. Re:And, in related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just assumed the Pokemon character was a reference to Sarah Michelle (cleverly misspelled). She's hot enough to bend a spoon, after all. Mmmmm.

  31. Hmmmm..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see; it's called Un Geller, and it can bend spoons psychically. He's called Uri Geller, and he can't. Seems to me, they named the pokemon correctly: it is definately an unGeller.

  32. Win-Win situation for Geller by kuro5hin · · Score: 2
    Hey, if he loses the case, he can always just autograph a few of those cards and sell them. Not worth $97 Mill, but it's money in the bank (and what's he doing for money these days?)

    "Moderation is good, in theory."
    -Larry Wall

    --
    There is no K5 cabal.
    I am not the real rusty.
    1. Re:Win-Win situation for Geller by jeremy+f · · Score: 2

      If we wins the case, he can probably buy, oh, maybe a box of cards.

      I saw the price in E.B. the other day -- $2.50 / pack -- and only 8 come in a pack? Does anyone remember paying even close to that much for baseball cards? Okay, so I'm 20, and packs of baseball cards only costed $.50 - $1.50 when I was collecting, but you got 15, and until around '90, a stick of gum..

      Nintendo is making more than enough money on this case to pay him off over and over again. Not that I care either way who wins this -- a corrupt wanna-be psychic who discovered a neat trick while he was a child, or a corrupt company who's business practices makes Microsoft look saintly.

    2. Re:Win-Win situation for Geller by Evangelion · · Score: 2


      Dude, you were obviously *not* around for the Magic: The Gathering craze.

      God, I don't want to know how much money I spent on those things....

      Hell, I remember buying 3-4 *boxes* of cards at a time. I really should get together with some guys and play the game again. I haven't touched the cards in about 3 years.

    3. Re:Win-Win situation for Geller by Danse · · Score: 1

      At least Magic is a pretty decent game, Pokemon doesn't even have that much going for it.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  33. The obligatory AC Posts by Kaufmann · · Score: 1

    Yet
    Another
    Uri
    Geller
    Lawsuit
    Story

    Pokemon sux
    Pokemon rox
    Pokemon sux rox

    I wonder what a Beowulf cluster of Uri Gellers would be like...

    [Insert your favourite "there is no spoon" quote here]

    [Insert your favourite Natalie Portman naked and petrified nonsense here]

    Et cetera, ad nauseam. There, I've done it for you. Now you can go home.

    --
    To the editors: your English is as bad as your Perl. Please go back to grade school.
  34. Geller on "Late Late Breakfast Show" by Paul+Johnson · · Score: 2
    A few years ago Geller was caught by Noel Edmonds on the BBC "Late Late Breakfast Show" (it went out at 6pm, geddit?). The show had a regular spot called the "Gotcha Oscar" in which a celebrity was set up for a practical joke. Geller was filmed in a restraunt by hidden cameras. He did a few of his tricks, and the cameras caught him bending the spoons by decidedly non-psychic means.

    After a few minutes he seems to have smelt a rat, and stopped. Geller's supporters claimed that he had obviously detected the cameras by psychic powers.

    Paul.

    --
    You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
  35. ya right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

    people have the right to make parodies of celebrities. like it or not.

  36. I hope the judge sentences him to death. by Electric+Eye · · Score: 1

    What an a-hole. $97 million, huh? Makes a whole lot of sense to me.....

  37. 97 Million Dollars? by leftorium · · Score: 1

    Why does he need 97 million dollars???
    He _bends spoons_ for a living! Is he gonna sue the Wachowski Bros too for the little bald kid?

    --
    ______
    everyone was born right-handed, only the greatest overcome it.
    http://leftorium.net
    1. Re:97 Million Dollars? by mcc · · Score: 1

      Why does he need 97 million dollars??? He _bends spoons_ for a living!

      I think you just answered your own question.. if bending spoons was all you had to support yourself on, you'd need $97 million, too.

    2. Re:97 Million Dollars? by mcc · · Score: 1

      Why does he need 97 million dollars??? He _bends spoons_ for a living!

      I think you just answered your own question.. if bending spoons was all you had to support yourself on, you'd need $97 million, too.

    3. Re:97 Million Dollars? by Viper+@+Home · · Score: 1

      "He _bends spoons_ for a living!" He needs the money so he can affort to sue the spoon makers... there getting to hard for him to bend.

      --
      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (S)lap nearest bystander.
  38. Some thoughts by jd · · Score: 3
    First, it's irrelevent as to whether Uri Gellar is "genuine" (whatever that may mean) or not. The argument is not over whether he can bend spoons with his mind, hands or a fork-lift truck. The argument is over whether someone has tried to cash in on his name and image.

    IMHO, if you create a fictional character with a very similar name, and various hallmarks that clearly identify the original person, then you have a clear-cut case of misuse of that person's name, unless they've given permission. You can't get away with saying "any resemblance of real people, living or dead, is coincidental", if there is good reason to believe that that is so much bullshit.

    Now, I'm not standing up and saying "all hail the great and wonderful Gellar!". What I =AM= saying is that the law must apply to EVERYONE, EQUALLY, or it's no law at all. If Uri Gellar feels that his character has been seriously besmirched, or that Nintendo has sought to profiteer off a celebrity's image without permission or recompense then I say "go for it!".

    Nobody should be allowed to covertly or overtly profit off another's name, no matter WHAT people think of that name. To profit like that is flat-out WRONG, and Nintendo deserve everything they get for it. $97 million seems odd, though. Surely a round figure would be better. $100 million sounds much more impressive.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Some thoughts by alannon · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you read the article, you would see that he's selling for 60 million pounds, which comes to $97 million.

      But of course you read the article, or you wouldn't be posting a comment about it, would you...?

    2. Re:Some thoughts by vilms · · Score: 1

      Yeah I didn't read all the way through, but I think I understand the general drift of what yer saying. Unfortunately I can't get past Geller *wanting* to be the definitive "spoons guy". Nice one Uri, it has made you a lot of money, and fame and girls and I would be inclined to defend it for 97 mill if I'd thought of it first. It puts me in mind of the knife-wielding Cassavetes guy from "The Dirty Dozen" duh.

    3. Re:Some thoughts by abyzz · · Score: 2

      Actually, I think this could fairly be attributed to parody, and might therefore be legal. At least it is more fun than www.microsoft-sux.com websites, which usually recieve this exemption, contrast also the various George Bush jr. websites which does such a good job of mocking him.
      On the other hand, doing this for profit might work against them...

    4. Re:Some thoughts by toriver · · Score: 1
      MHO, if you create a fictional character with a very similar name, and various hallmarks that clearly identify the original person, then you have a clear-cut case of misuse of that person's name, unless they've given permission. You can't get away with saying "any resemblance of real people, living or dead, is coincidental", if there is good reason to believe that that is so much bullshit.

      So, like, why didn't he sue the makers of the Discworld II adventure game? There is a bloke in Djellibeibi with name and powers kinda like... Anyway, the Un Geller is one of 151+ Pokémon, there probably are other such "coincidences", without them lacking a sense of humour, unlike "Sue-i" Geller.

    5. Re:Some thoughts by 10am-bedtime · · Score: 1

      i see your initials are the name of a popular brand of whiskey.... beware the lawyers!

  39. Geller's objection by lohen · · Score: 1

    In an article I chanced upon about a week ago, Geller said one of his main objections was that the character is described as being violent which he thought was associating defamatory statements with his name. Or words to that effect.

    --
    "What is freedom of expression? Without the freedom to offend, it ceases to exist." Salman Rushdie
    1. Re:Geller's objection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but then Geller's a thief, since he has taken money for the use of his `powers'.

    2. Re:Geller's objection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is actually a kind of violator. He has been on TV so many times in Japan. (I grew up out there...) He has deceived not only kids but also stupid adults by showing some magics as super powers. That makes the people to believe stupid things easily, and pushed people to knock cult's door. He should be a person to be sued. Nintendo, however, can be sued too.

  40. Spoon bendind method patented by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 2
    Geller receives patent for 1-Glance spoon bending method

    RUSSIA, Nov. 14 /PRNewswire/ -- Leading spoon bender Yuri Geller has been awarded a patent for its innovative 1-glance spoon bending method, wich allows one who uses this technique to easily bend spoons. It is rumored that Geller is going IPO. The market is waiting anxiously.

    In other news, Geller is going to sue Matrix movie makers, because of that famous Matrix scene, in wich a boy teaches Neo how to bend spoons.
    -"This is an obvious infingiment of my patent" -angrily said Mr. Geller.

    --

    -
    Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    1. Re:Spoon bendind method patented by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are monkeys moderating today?!? Someone re-score this one...

  41. Good for him.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nintendo got careless.. But when you get careless, you get burned. Hey, and looking through the character lists, I found some other notable sue-ables: Sgt. Taco, who can destroy with the crushing power of a /.-attack JamKatz, wielding the powerful stick up his ass Lime Torvalds, wielding the power of God Shill Gates, wielding the power of Satan Albo Cox, who could probably crush you with his bare hands.. Maybe if everyone gets up the guys to tell Nintendo that we've had enough, we can put this pokemon garbage out to sea where it belongs.

  42. Two wrongs don't make a right.... by RuntimeError · · Score: 1
    Is Geller really a psychic, and is metaphysics reality rather than some fizzy-wozzle ?

    Nobody really knows this beside Geller, and that's beside the point.

    There two important facts here:

    1. People have the right not to be depicted as a little orange monster by a multibillion dollar multinational organisation.

    2. $97 Million has more to do with greed than about redressing one's violated rights.

    If Mr Geller really wants to make a point, I suggest that he declares that if he wins, he will donate the money to charity.

  43. Geller is trying to promote his book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    . . . I saw it this past weekend in Borders, while walking past the "new age lunacy" section (why do they put that so close to the cookbooks?).

    Anyway, Mr. Geller is simply looking for publicity. He's got a book on psychic healing (or something equally stupid) and nobody noticed, so he's decided to up the ante by suing someone.

    . . . and while I'm at it, why hasn't he sued Buffy? Isn't her last name Gellar? Sounds like infringement to me!

    1. Re:Geller is trying to promote his book by RAruler · · Score: 1

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=00/01/04/08252 56&cid=38

      --

      --
      Insert Witty Sig Here
    2. Re:Geller is trying to promote his book by koh · · Score: 1

      He didn't because Buffy _CAN_ bend spoons ;)

      --
      Karma cannot be described by words alone.
    3. Re:Geller is trying to promote his book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get with it Rob & Co. !!


      Where's our link to buy his book at Amazon.cum?

  44. $97million... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...which is almost enough to buy one of the offending cards.

  45. Somebody had to say it by broken · · Score: 1

    Geller geller? Geller geller geller!

  46. Geller is a fraud, but a fraud w/ a case by BadERA · · Score: 1

    Geller is, as we all know, a fraud. He alone probably did more to harm the reputation of research into the veracity of potentially psychic occurrences than anyone before or since. However, his likeness is his own to profit from, and any idiot ought to associate a spoon-bending twit figure with Uri Geller, so he would seem to have a case ...

    --
    I am, therefore you think.
  47. Nintendo's a big target by Greyfox · · Score: 2
    Everyone wants to sue Nintendo because they have a lot of money. Isn't that the American dream? To sue a large corporation for a lot of money and win?

    What's the matter, Mr. Geller? Bending spoons not as lucrative living as it used to be? Trying to move up to bending corporations? Really, if you don't want media attention, you shouldn't fucking bend spoons for a living. That was supposed to be the whole idea, wasn't it?

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Nintendo's a big target by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

      I think its a rightful suit. Uri Geller is famous for spoon bending, etc. Whether its lucrative or not is more or less irrelevant. The point is that his "likeness" (a spoon bender, with his name) is being used to make money for a corporation without his permission.

      Identity theft?

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    2. Re:Nintendo's a big target by Danse · · Score: 1

      I think the point is that it's a parody and should therefore be protected. We make fun of people for all sorts of things that aren't nearly as stupid as spoon bending. I think he's definitely fair game.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  48. Yet another death toll for Pokemon by Masem · · Score: 3
    While I don't think this particular case is the final straw, there's enough out there to indicate that Pokemon is very much on the decline:

    • The last Pokemon show has aired in Japan, bringing the total to about 160 some episodes. Warner Bros. current have the rights to about 100+ of those, and will probably get the rest as 4Kids translates them. However, there's only a limited number of episodes left; unlike certain other TV shows in the states that get run into the ground (The Simpsons, for example), the show had a story arc, and it finished it and ended.
    • Pokemon have been reported as tools of the devil, etc etc, by a number of critics.
    • Pokemon toys was the big hit this Christmas. There's yet to have been a single popular toy to continue dominating Christmas sales two years in a row. Anyone remember Cabbage Patch Dolls, Tamagachi, or Furbys?
    • Pokemon card trading has been banned from many schools because students spent more time doing that than learning.
    • A wrongful death lawsuit may be brought against Pokemon and has forced the recall of millions of pokemon toys: a toddler suffocated to death when she placed half of a Pokeball that came from Burger King over her nose and mouth, and couldn't breath.
    • Pokemon, the cartoon, is overplayed way too much on WB networks: Pokemon's on about 7 to 9 times (depending on the weekend schedules) on the WB network, and so far, WB's only had 60-some episodes to rotate through. Doesn't take a math genius to see how fast it would take to get boring.
    • "Pokemon the First Movie" was a practical failure in the states: sure, it got a profit for the WB as they spent nearly nothing to get it, but compared to something like Toy Story 2, it did not get a lot of return viewers as some were expecting.
    • Pokemon's been spoofed by MAD and South Park. :D.
    It's not that Pokemon is bad, but it was pushed in our faces to the point where you could not ignore it, and now people are getting disgusted with the entier concept and are now fighting back.
    --
    "Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
    "I can see my house from here!" - ST:
    1. Re:Yet another death toll for Pokemon by handorf · · Score: 1

      You forgot all the bad publicity from when Bun-Bun dressed up as Pikachu.

      Pax.

      --
      -- IANAEG - I am not an elder god.
    2. Re:Yet another death toll for Pokemon by esper · · Score: 1
      The last Pokemon show has aired in Japan, bringing the total to about 160 some episodes. Warner Bros. current have the rights to about 100+ of those, and will probably get the rest as 4Kids translates them. However, there's only a limited number of episodes left; unlike certain other TV shows in the states that get run into the ground (The Simpsons, for example), the show had a story arc, and it finished it and ended.

      And this affects the GameBoy and collectible card games how? Also, if you cite this as an indication that its longevity is failing, how do you account for the continuing popularity of other finite (anime and otherwise) series?

      Pokemon have been reported as tools of the devil, etc etc, by a number of critics.
      Pokemon card trading has been banned from many schools because students spent more time doing that than learning.

      You're kidding with these two, right? Being called a tool of Satan and a breeding ground for witches was probably the best thing that ever happened to D&D.

      Pokemon's been spoofed by MAD and South Park. :D.

      I thought that was a sign of success, not failure...

    3. Re:Yet another death toll for Pokemon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My problems with your assumptions are this: 1. I has heard that while THIS version of the Pokemon cartoon had ended, a new version with the same characters that takes place 4 years (or so) later would be out next. 2.You're right about toys not dominating two years in a row, but 2 out of the 3 you named (not Tamagachi) are still made and were still good/big sellers this year. 3.The banning from school is a non-issue. I never remember stopping something because the schools wouldn't let me. Teachers didn't like me bringing comic books to class, but that never stopped me from collecting. 4. Alot of your others cites are just opinion....the show is overplayed...maybe if you don't like it, but for fans (the kids) it probably isn't on enough. The movie was a failure? How? TONS of kids went to see it. While it may not have been a box-office smash because adults stayed away (the 18-whatever demographic that make "hits") that doesn't mean it failed, it was a KIDs movie. Everyone is looking at the Pokemon craze from their standpoint, that of an adult. Kids couldn't care less about half these issues. I doubt most kids even knew who Uri Gellar was without being told....if they even know now.

    4. Re:Yet another death toll for Pokemon by m3000 · · Score: 1

      While I don't think Pokemon can keep up it's current popularity, I don't think it'll totally die out anytime soon, if only for the game. The game is what started this whole thing, and in my opinion, it's a damn fine game. I never watch the TV show because it's never on when I'm at home, but I saw the movie and thought it was pretty good. And like someone else above me said, it was a kids movie, and a lot of people above 12 were scared of it. I was the only teen-ager in the theater. But yet it still almost managed to sell out every show the first weekend. My god, I didn't relieze how many little kids there are where I live, but I found out when I went Thursday (it was a county wide day off from school). Anyway, the card game never really interested me, and I can see that falling out of favor, but Pokemon as a whole is far from dead I believe.

    5. Re:Yet another death toll for Pokemon by garamir · · Score: 1

      >The last Pokemon show has aired in Japan
      And a new series will begin.

      >Pokemon have been reported as tools of the devil, etc etc, by a number of critics.
      True. So has the Magic card game (which still exists), and many, many other things.

      >Pokemon toys was the big hit this Christmas.
      And last Christmas, if I remember correctly.

      >Pokemon card trading has been banned from many schools because
      >students spent more time doing that than learning.
      These aren't Pogs. Banning them probably won't kill Pokémon utterly, since the cards are only a small part of the franchise. An annoying part that I would love to see die, but I digress...

      >A wrongful death lawsuit may be brought against Pokemon
      It could, but would it succeed? I'm honestly not certain, since these were Burger King's toys. In fact, the lady is suing Burger King, not Nintendo. And, in any case, if Pokémon is as big as everyone says it is, would one lawsuit cause it to go out of fashion?

      >Pokemon, the cartoon, is overplayed way too much on WB networks
      And out of order, to boot. I feel it has gotten boring, but people who haven't seen it would not get bored as soon. This doesn't mean that it won't happen, only that it'll take a while. In any case, that still leaves the main part of the franchise, the GameBoy games, to be dealt with.

      >"Pokemon the First Movie" was a practical failure in the states
      Toy Story 2 isn't the movie to compare to, since it is something of a classic, due to the original. Pokémon the Movie was brought over for all the Pokémon fans here in the States, and it did surprisingly (sickeningly?) well for an anime movie.

      I don't hate Pokémon either, nor do I love it... although I wonder when everyone will settle down and start /playing/ the card game, bad as it is. I just don't think the points you presented will kill the games, nor the show. It has a lot of inertia behind it, and it'll take a long while to stop rolling.

    6. Re:Yet another death toll for Pokemon by lvirden · · Score: 1

      1. A new Poke'mon series, based on the newly release Gold and Silver, is being prepared.
      And look how long Star Trek - with many less episodes - has run. Same thing for many other short lived series - animated or live.
      2. Rock and Roll has also been reported as a tool of the devil - it keeps going and going.
      3. Furbies sold quite well this Christmas.
      4. Pagers and cell phones have also been banned - but that trend doesn't appear to be going away.
      5. The wrongful death suit was filed against Burger King and the company that manufactured the poke balls. Pokemon isn't an entity so it cannot be filed against. I don't believe that Game Freak and Nintendo (the owners of the license) or 4Kids (the US coordinator of the license) were included in the suit.
      6. I agree the cartoon is played a lot. Interestingly enough, it is still out performing its competitors. As long as that is the case, WB will play it. Once it slows down, something else will go in there. Note that Fox still runs Power Rangers and their numbers have been low for years.
      7. The movie was no failure - just because someone doesn't do as well as another item doesn't make it a failure. As long as the money invested returns significantly more than was invested, it was a success. In this case, the Pokemon movie was a success already - and the videos, etc. are not out yet.
      8. Spoofing is proof that they are here to stay.

      --
      URL: http://xanga.com/lvirden > Quote: Saving the world before bedtime. Even if explicitly stated to the contrary, n
  49. Un Gellar? In Japanese? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how do they spell it, since the language has no "L" sound? I suppose they handle the "r" at the end using the usual "ru" with a silent "u"... Is it Un Geruru or something?

    1. Re:Un Gellar? In Japanese? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the spelling of loan words is phonetic so it would be UN GE-RA

    2. Re:Un Gellar? In Japanese? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably "geraa". If you can read Japanese, I'm sure it's on the card. Someone somewhere probably scanned it.

    3. Re:Un Gellar? In Japanese? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone somewhere probably scanned it.

      Oh no! Oh no! I hear the brisk walk of jack-booted lawyers walking your way at the very suggestion.

  50. Take a hint from Carl Sagan and Apple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Rename the pokemon "BHM" (stands for "butthead magician").

  51. Justice should not be a lottery. by rakjr · · Score: 1

    Justice should be served.

    1. It is just that Geller should win the suit if they did not make the appropriate contacts.

    2. It would also be just for Geller to be slapped with a frivelous filing of suit given the amount of money he is asking. My first response to this story was "Who the heck is Uri Geller?" If the character had been "Pizza the Hut" and it had a red roof looking top half, ok maybe there is a reason for there to be alot of money because the business has a ton of face time with the world and they have paid for that face time. It would be more interesting if the jury was allowed to set damages in cases like this rather than the plaintif.

    --
    In a place beyond time and space, in a land far better than this, look for me there...
    1. Re:Justice should not be a lottery. by DaveHowe · · Score: 1

      My first response to this story was "Who the heck is Uri Geller?" If the character had been "Pizza the Hut" and it had a red roof looking top half, ok maybe there is a reason for there to be alot of money...
      Hmm. given how popular these things are, I suspect PizzaHut would PAY for there to be a pokemon with a red roof :+)
      --

      --
      -=DaveHowe=-
  52. TERMINOLOGY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a representative of the New Age community, I am APPALLED at the lack of sensitivity to correct terminology by you people.

    Mr. Geller is a MYSTIC not a psychic!

    For people who get their underwear in a knot whenever someone gets hacker/cracker wrong, how can you people not do your homework and understand the simple difference between psychic and mystic?

    A psychic is someone who has knowledge about events (past/present/future) through extra-sensory means.

    A mystic is someone who has the ability to affect the environment/objets around them by force of will alone.

    Would you people please do your homework next time?!?!?!

    Note: any negative replies/moderations to this post will be noticed, and will be posted as replies the next time the "hacker/cracker" debate comes up.

    1. Re:TERMINOLOGY! by DrXym · · Score: 1

      No, the proper terminology for Mr Geller is that he is MAGICIAN, a SLIGHT OF HAND ARTIST or a FLIM FLAM. Much like anyone else claiming to be a PSYCHIC or a MYSTIC in fact, though that group also includes the GULLIBLE, the MENTALLY ILL, the DELUDED and CROOKS EXPLOITING THE FORMER.

      Spoon bending and all the other clap trap he's famous for have been debunked time and again by magicians who show you exactly how such tricks are performed. The only powers he has are the powers of deception.

    2. Re:TERMINOLOGY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very good point, I can see why you would get upset about this. We are just as guilty of being insensitve to the metaphysical community as the media is to us. Please accept my personal and profound appology for the hacker community.

    3. Re:TERMINOLOGY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you didn't spell it 'magick', though, so you don't get your cookie.

      Remember, next time, to do it all evile and kewl and stuph.

      Or we throw you clean out of the New Age.

      The current "New Age", by the way. Not the last one (Nazi Germany).

    4. Re:TERMINOLOGY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, this so called "metaphysical" community is being profoundly insensitive to the philosphical 'community' who use the term metaphysical properly, and not to sell a bunch of inferior books full of clap-trap and hooey to confused losers.

  53. Considering there is no letter L in Japanese... by Jim+Bellinger · · Score: 1

    That's absolutely incredible!

    1. Re:Considering there is no letter L in Japanese... by AndrewHowe · · Score: 1

      Well of course there are no *letters* at all in Japanese. There are syllables, which can be written with hiragana or katanana (or Kanji but that's more complicated...)
      The 'r' in the syllables 'ra','ri','ru','re','ro' sounds more like an 'l' with a hint of 'd'.

      I haven't seen the katakana for the Pokemon character in question, but I would guess it would be romanized as 'ungeraa'.

      A previous poster's comment about katakana 'ri' and 'n' being similar is an interesting one ('uri' -> 'un'), but actually the katakana for 'ri' is closer to 'so'.

      Just my 2 yen. Disclaimer: I'm not Japanese.

      Andrew.

    2. Re:Considering there is no letter L in Japanese... by ChristW · · Score: 1

      A previous poster's comment about katakana 'ri' and 'n' being similar is an interesting one ('uri' -> 'un'), but actually the katakana for 'ri' is closer to 'so'.

      I think he meant that the Latin characters 'ri' and 'n' look alike. Ask any OCR program to see why...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    3. Re:Considering there is no letter L in Japanese... by AndrewHowe · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I was not specific enough. I was referring to post #63.

  54. Re:I'm getting a lewinsky right now. by Steve+B · · Score: 1

    From the lack of typos and extraneous characters, I gather that either she's not doing it right or you need to see a doctor.
    /.

    --
    /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  55. It wont... by Haven · · Score: 2

    First of all there is no better press than a scandal that you can legalese your way out of. If you look like the underdog being viciously prosecuted by psychos and you win, you are a hero.

    Secondly, Uri should be happy he is getting all this publicity. I am an avid Pokemon television show watcher, and I loved the movie. If it weren't for Pokemon, and this story I would have no idea who Uri Geller was. Now I think he is cool b/c he is modeled after my favorite pokemon.

    1. Re:It wont... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think he is cool because he is modelled after your favorite Pokemon.

      My, you're a brilliant young one, are you not!?!

  56. Why Nintendo? by Shafik · · Score: 1

    I could have sworn the cards where put out by Wizards of the Coast, unless I am missing something here, did Nintendo buy Wizards, I really hope not.

    1. Re:Why Nintendo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Japan they are published probably by Carddass Masters (yes, that is their real name).

    2. Re:Why Nintendo? by mal3 · · Score: 1

      Nope, WotC was bought by Hasbro. WotC is just the North American distributor for Pokemon cards, they didn't create the game or the cards all they do is translate(maybe not even that). Nintendo is the company that has all of the Pokemon trademarks, etc.

      --
      Non gratis rodentus anus
    3. Re:Why Nintendo? by esper · · Score: 1

      The cards are based on a GameBoy game produced by Nintendo.

  57. Off topic - Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is still every book quoted here has a link to amazon. Wasn't someone supposed to remove all amazon links on /.
    And for the posters, can't you just have a plain pointer to a compare and shop site (there are hundreds now) with the ISBN if you know the book ?

  58. Hey, I didn't know we could do that! by Gyver · · Score: 1

    Can I sue Nintendo too? I always thought that Brock guy was way to much like me. Chases after every girl he comes across, only to get shot down by all of them. He can spend day after day camping with the same young girl and still not score. Has a strange fixation with breeding strange and exotic animals...oops I think I said to much.

  59. When is the world going to realize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When is the world going to realize that names, ideas, words, ANYTHING that one human comes up with is, by default, rightfully usable by another human? The idea of "this is mine, you can't have it" just plain sucks. Just imagine where we would be if people would just work for a common cause, not for their own personal gain. I can.

    1. Re:When is the world going to realize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "just plains sucks" has no legal bearing in court.

      Try to use more exacting language, and maybe what you have to say will be worth hearing.

    2. Re:When is the world going to realize by Geopoliticus · · Score: 1

      Did you want to add something... or just nit-pick?

      I wanted to nit pick. :)

  60. What about Hitmonchan and Hitmonlee? by Battra · · Score: 2

    Don't forget that there are also pokemon called Hitmonchan and Hitmonlee that are martial arts experts.

    Do you think Marcel Marceau could sue over the pokemon called Mr. Mime?

    Also, Alakazam is the third evolution of the pokemon. The earlier forms are called Abra and Kadabra in English, I wonder what their Japanese names are and if they have anything to do with other con artists.

    I only know about pokemon because I have a four year old!

    1. Re:What about Hitmonchan and Hitmonlee? by Captain+Sarcastic · · Score: 2
      Do you think Marcel Marceau could sue over the pokemon called Mr. Mime?

      I'm not sure that he has much to say about it...

      --
      Strike while the irony is hot! -- The Freethinker
    2. Re:What about Hitmonchan and Hitmonlee? by Jburkholder · · Score: 2

      >I only know about pokemon because I have a four year old!

      Yeah, that's the excuse I use! I have 3 year old daughter and 6 year old son who really like the show, but I gotta admit that I watch it with them and try to keep up on which Poke'mon evolves into what and keep track of how many Gym Badges Ash has. :-)

      Sucks though that the WB station here in Chicago shows the episodes all out of order. They air it twice each weekday and probably 3 times over the weekend. They mix current episodes with older ones and it's confusing as hell.

      It's one of my "Guilty Pleasures". I always use the excuse that I watch the show with my kids and that's the only reason I know anything about it - but a couple weeks ago my wife took the kids out to the library early in the morning and came home to find me sitting in the kitchen sipping coffee and eating breakfast cereal with the show on. :-)

      There's something really fun about being the only adult in a room full of first graders that 'gets' poke'mon. They seem facinated by "Andrew's Dad" who has a Pikachu keychain and understands what they are talkingabout when they debate the relative coolness of Mewtwo and Mew. Blew their minds when they asked me what was my favorite Poke'mon and I answered "Jiggly-Puff - he's the one that puts everyone to sleep when he sings and then gets mad and scribbles on everyone's faces."

      In some wierd way its kind of a prestige thing for my son. All of his 1st grade classmates are really impressed.

    3. Re:What about Hitmonchan and Hitmonlee? by jafac · · Score: 2

      ha ha, there's another ME out there! I have a 3yr old daughter and 6 yr old son, and they're the reasons I watch that stupid show, and collect those stupid cards, and spend hours helping them with that stupid Gameboy game. . .

      It IS great, getting dirty looks from the neighbor-kids' parents when I "steal" their kids on the simple virtue that I have a clue who or what a Rhydon is.

      Here's a good joke to play: I've convinced my kids, and their friends that there is a new type of Pokemon out there, that is going to be in the TV show someday, but there are no cards for this one, and it's not in the Nintendo game. It's called "Redrum", (for those of you that have seen "The Shining") and it talks with it's finger. It's a riot to see a bunch of kids running around, saying "REDRUM! REDRUM!" in gruff voices, wiggling their index fingers, just like the kid in the movie. . . I'd really like for this to become a nationwide phenomenon, just remember, when CNN is asking, from whence did this "Redrum" thing appear. . .

      I wish I had a nickel for every time someone said "Information wants to be free".

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    4. Re:What about Hitmonchan and Hitmonlee? by Battra · · Score: 1

      OK, you caught me!

      I do watch the show with my kids and they (we) have some of the cards, mostly I'm interested in the game.

      It's actually a decent Adventure/RPG type of thing. I don't have a Gameboy, so it's an excuse for one more emulator.

      You're right about it being kind of a Rosetta Stone for talking to kids. They are amazed to find an adult who knows anything about pokemon. This is the first fad that my son has been into. I have learned about it because I want to know what he's into. It kind of gives me the creeps that there are all these parents out there who have no idea what their 4-6 year olds are talking about. I mean, if my kids develop an interest in something, I want to know what it is so I can share it with them, but also to make sure it's something I approve of. Just think, what if it was sumliminally urging them to buy Microsoft products or something?

    5. Re:What about Hitmonchan and Hitmonlee? by anonymous+cowerd · · Score: 1

      I'll get my daughter to make up a fake card for Redrum. She's good at doing stuff like that in Photoshop. The question is, what should it look like? I picture it as a squat little red-colored demon holding a bottle of rum (depressingly literal I am) in one hand while the other hand is upraised with that famous crooked finger, this would be a "drunk pokemon," but she may have a better idea. Hope Nintendo doesn't sue me. She's 12 and she still digs Pokemon, though not half as much as her 7-year-old brother.

      I put on my Snorlax hat to write this post.

      Yours WDK - WKiernan@concentric.net

    6. Re:What about Hitmonchan and Hitmonlee? by TrentC · · Score: 1

      I only know about pokemon because I have a four year old!

      I own a comic and gaming store that sells the stuff (when I can get it) so I call it "market research"...

      Jay (=

  61. eh-oh! by Cool+Hand+Luke · · Score: 1
    *sigh* Guess I should stockpile my amazing
    Ramdi (Flimi-Flami) Pokemon doll collection in
    case more lawsuits are filed. They could become
    collector items. :)

    George Lee

  62. But he's really James Bond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but I bet you two pounds that Connory would never sue anyone over using his likeness. He has to much karma going on for that.

  63. Agreed (a greed) by guran · · Score: 1
    Even if that pokemon was worth those money it is still outrageous. Shouldn't damages be calculated on the actual damage to the "victim", not the gains of the "villain"?

    --

    All opinions are my own - until criticized

  64. Suing, patents.. by skurk · · Score: 1

    Since everything is about suing and patents, I guess I can't be the "Don't sue people"-Panda.

    Anyway, asking for no less than $97M shows that he is nothing but a hoax. First he hoaxed the world by claiming the ability to bend spoons telepatically, and now he asks Nintendo for no less than ninety-seven mills? Get a grip, Geller - I don't think it hurt THAT much.

    --
    www.6502asm.com - Code 6502 assembly or.. DIE!!
  65. oh shut the hell up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shut the hell up. mystic, psychic, both of them suck. why? because neither one of the REALLY does anything. at least a little script kiddie knows how to incant some cracker code and get it to do *something*...

  66. Poke-Parodies. by Nonesuch · · Score: 1

    Speaking of Pokemon parodies and South Park, Superosity has a short movie parody, Parkemon.

  67. Uri Geller is suing? by haggar · · Score: 1

    OK, so how can someone who has built up all his career on deceiving the scientific community have the guts to sue someone?
    For YEARS the academic circles have been proposing to Mr. Geler a scientific investigation of his spoon-benidng capabilities, yet he has ALWAYS declined. He didn't like the aseptic lab environment and scientific methods, I guess.

    OK; don't take my words for it, check on the facts yourself. What you will realize is that Mr Geller has as much credibility as the Zodiak or Numerology. I believe many people have built a fortune on the guillable and sily people of the world. I just don't get it when one of these criminals has the guts to sue for money! It just rubs me the wrong way.








    --
    Sigged!
  68. it doesn't matter! by gadwale · · Score: 1

    It doesn't matter if you don't like the guy or you think he is a fraud or you just plain don't like guys whose name starts with 'U'! The pokemon craze is all over the place and there are millions of dollars invested and millions more to be made. If they wanted to use his likeness, they should have asked his permission period.

    Why do you think everyone of those millions stupid sweepstakes letters makes you think you have won but still has the legal wording so that they can use your likeness?? The operative word is likeness: it doesn't have to be a picture or an accurate description, if people can identify me from it, it is my likeness. Of course, if you go ahead and name it after me, there is no grey area left!

    I don't particularly care about the guy or pokemon, but do you want to be mobbed by a bunch of people and find out there are a zillion copies of your likeness out there that you never new about??

    There are some exceptions here for celebrities etc in the law which allows us to criticize polititians indiscriminately (watch jay leno), but I don't think that kicks in here as they are commercially exploiting his likeness.

    On the other hand, if the pokemon could bend stuff and was called "Bender-mon", could the people down at futurama sue them??

    Conclusion: futurama rox.

  69. I can see it now. by Voltage_Gate · · Score: 1

    It will come down to a question of his credibility, like a trial of magic vs science. He'll probably get the O.J. jury and walk away with $97 million.

  70. You, too, can bend spoons by mlc · · Score: 1
    In an article in the Jerusalem Post , Geller recommends The Idiot's Guide to Being Psychic:
    Page 294 of the Guide to Being Psychic reveals the secret of spoon-bending, which is a great relief to me since it means other people can take over the onerous duties of mangling the planet's cutlery. One accurate observation suggests novice spoonbenders will have better success when the audience is on their side. Positive, open minds are great for psychokinesis - negative, skeptical minds are not.

    These books are crammed with easy-to-use features, packed into short spurts of text and peppered with quotes, asides and definitions.

    Yes, so you, too, can be Uri Geller. In fact, it'll actually be a relief to him. Ah, lucky guy.

    I dunno. Perhaps the wierdest part of all this is that Uri Geller is writing book reviews. (In the article, he also reviews The man who invented the 20th century (Nikola Telsa), and tries to discredit Prof. Richard Dawkin's book Unweaving the rainbow, because that book explains why Geller is a fraud.)

  71. Re:Spoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this a troll? It should be given at least a +1 and labeled as funny?

    Geez, didn't you moderators ever see The Matrix?

  72. Satire by john@iastate.edu · · Score: 1
    I don't know about Japan, but satire is protected here (or else Mad Magazine et. al. would have been sued into oblivion years ago).

    --
    Shut up, be happy. The conveniences you demanded are now mandatory. -- Jello Biafra
    1. Re:Satire by Abigail-II · · Score: 1
      I don't know about Japan, but satire is protected here

      "here" is an interesting concept to be used on a medium like the WWW. It basically doesn't say anything.

      Having said that, I don't think `satire' is any defense. Uri Geller made fame in the 70s. Pokemon is aiming at kids, most of them being single digit years old. Show me one kid with memories of the 70s that's still younger than 10 years old. Satire needs context to be satire, and the context isn't here. Not to mention that satire is entirely lost on the target audience of pokemon. I wouldn't be surprised if there were more children believing pokemons are real than there are adults believing Uri Geller is for real.

      I think Uri Geller has a case. The fact he's a charletan doesn't matter. As for the enormous amount of money, that's probably to have a lot negotiation grounds for an out-of-court settlement.

      -- Abigail, who rather sees a Uri Geller performance than pokemon nonsense.

  73. None of you realize the most important thing!! by jconley · · Score: 1

    There IS no spoon! Sorry, I couldn't resist. J

  74. Poorly animated crap by DrXym · · Score: 1
    I have the misfortune of catching this show occasionally while channel hopping and why this thing became a hit is beyond me. The story every week is practically identical with lousy animation and 30% stock footage to boot. What the hell is the point of this show?

    I could understand if there was even a glimmer of quality in it all but there isn't. It's garbage pure and simple. I pity the kids who buy into the hype and feel very sorry for the parents too.

    1. Re:Poorly animated crap by Jburkholder · · Score: 2

      Oh, I wouldn't say that. It's no worse than speed racer or any number of other cartoon shows we all watched as kids. I have a 6 year old and a three and I watch the show with them most mornings as they eat their breakfast before school and daycare. It's not all that bad. Some of the story lines are actually pretty good and while there is a lot of repitition for sure, (team rocket tries to capture pikachu almost every episode) there are also a lot of 'moral of the story' type things that I find to be of value.

      I see a lot of good character traits displayed in the three principles - strength, compassion, dedication, respect for nature and living things, selflessness, good personal freindship and other things that I consider to be a positive message for my kids to watch. A lot better than a show like Dragon Ballz that is pure violence.

      The thing that I do hate about this whole frachise is the endless merchandise tie-ins. A couple posters, some cards and the occasional t-shirt to go with the tv show and the video game would be allright, what kills me is the endless Burger-King promotions, 12 different varieties of plastic or stuffed dolls, the stickers, board games, bed sheets and underwear that is constantly shoved in my kids' faces.

      No, I don't buy each and every one of these things for my kids, of course not. My son likes the cards, my daughter the stuffed dolls, not too much beyond that. Its the neverending 'gotta catch 'em all' mentality with 150+ of these things that kinda wears thin real fast.

      To summarize:

      Badly animated -- about on par with average stuff we watched growing up.
      Empty, worthless crap -- not in my opinion. Not the best stuff for my kids to watch (PBS, Discovery Kids and the Learning Channel are on a *lot* in my house) but far from the worst. Fairly entertaining with positive message.
      Over-hyped merchandising machine -- without a doubt.
      Added bonus -- the identical female characters of Nurse Joy and Officer Jenny as a running gag in the series is actually kinda funny.

      total score - 3 out of 5

    2. Re:Poorly animated crap by Wah · · Score: 2

      Over-hyped merchandising machine -- without a doubt.

      this is the part that bothers me the most. Training kids to be good little consumers. "You'll be happy if you just have this doll...and this one...and this one, etc." I'm seriously thinking that a universal ban on advertising to children under 12 would be a grand idea, isn't it like that in some countries? Children don't have the abstract reasoning needed to see past the actors in commercials, or the need to question what they are told (especially at loud volume). In the end you get Pokemon, which is, IMHO, Japanese for "blind consumerism".

      --
      +&x
    3. Re:Poorly animated crap by Bernal+KC · · Score: 1
      Yes, kids are way too prone to marketing pitches. And the WB's, Nick's, and Disneys of the world are mind-bogglingly adept at reaching kids. But banning ads aimed at kids is way off the mark. We parents have a job to do, not some regulators.

      First, teach the kids to distinguish between ads and entertainment. I noticed that my nieces and nephews had no idea what an ad was versus the show they were watching. Now with my own kids I find it takes some training to help them to distinguish one from another. Further education about commercialism and materialism will go on forever, I suspect.

      Second, don't buckle under the pressure to buy them every stupid thing they're sold. My kids get a pittance for an allowance and they can blow that on whatever they want -- usually Pokémon cards. But almost all of their stuff is bought by us parents. We're in control. It can be hard to endure their incessant and ill-mannerred demands -- especially if you're known to cave in. But we're getting better at it.

      The bottom line is that I have to monitor and limit the hours of TV, video, and movie viewing. And whatever crap my kids choose to watch -- I must watch it too. If its crap, I let 'em know it by heckling and vocally abusing the rubbish. Its boring and boorish, but its my job.

    4. Re:Poorly animated crap by Jburkholder · · Score: 2

      >If its crap, I let 'em know it by heckling and vocally abusing the rubbish

      This is my tactic as well. My wife doesn't understand why I let my kids turn on shows like Cow and Chicken, Ed Edd and Eddy and Two Stupid Dogs only to sit there and constantly bitch about how bad it is. I'm trying to pass on my sense of what is good to watch and what is crap so they'll learn to distinguish for themselves. Beats just telling them 'no' and snapping off the program. That just makes them more intrigued.

      When we turn on the learning channel and dad sits there and says 'wow, that's cool, huh?' they seem to pick up on it and pay more attention to the show. If my son is going to insist on flipping Johnny Bravo for 1/2 hour, I don't begrudge him that. Sometimes you do need a short amount of mindless crap to just veg out.

  75. I'm no fan of Uri Geller, but.... by drac · · Score: 1

    1) He's before our time. He was more of a celebrity years ago. He may be a fake, but he certainly was quite well known, almost a household word.
    2) Whether or not we consider him a fake has nothing to do with the validity of his claim, which clearly has basis.
    3) The utterly overinflated amount is probably a tactical move in the plan to get lots of dough from the settlement.

  76. All things in moderation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I noticed several posts that were poorly moderated today. Has /. finally implemented the dreaded moderation bot? It must be making heavy use of the rand() function and have sense_of_humor set to false.

  77. Just ask yourselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you created a new line of toys called "pokermon", do you think Nintendo will be sending their lawyers after you?

    1. Re:Just ask yourselves by ChadN · · Score: 1

      Yes, but mainly because that would be a trademark based lawsuit. Uri Gellar's name is not a trademark (Although he probably wishes it could be, maybe he should incorporate). But if someone parodies Pokemon (and they do it in a way that doesn't step on other legal toes), it should be legal under US Law. BTW. IANAL.

      --
      "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
  78. a juicy tidbit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that I found at Rotten:

    Jan 4 1997
    Rumors run rampant through Israel, particularly over talk radio, that a UFO will land at Tel Aviv on the following day. The predictions are purported to have been made by spoonbender Uri Geller. Thousands flock to the beaches, but no saucers.

    Just thought it was an interesting bit. Find it today, Jan 4th, on their daily dose of Today in Rotten History.

  79. How to bend a spoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I've seen Geller bend spoons, he didn't use memory metals. Instead he used the "Hey, is that Elvis over there?" [bend quick with both hands] technique. It's much simpler.

  80. Geller on Carson ... by RavinDave · · Score: 1

    I have a distinct memory of that Johnny Carson show, but it went down a bit differently than you recall. First, you must recall that Carson was an amateur magician. Carson had contacted none other than James Randi and (together) they devised a series of demos to fairly test Geller's psychic abilities. Nothing was rigged, per se ... a real psychic would have had no trouble, but Geller fell flat on his face after each of his stock tricks failed to come off. One particular example leaps to mind: Geller was presented with a series of empty 35mm(?) film cannisters. One contained an object. Geller was supposed to identify which. Randi had taped the bottom of the cannisters to the desk, so that Geller could not "accidently" bump them during the course of his spiel. Of course, he fell flat, begged off for some anemic reason, and Carson went to a commercial. When they came back, the band was playing and Uri was clapping wildly and stomping his foot, apparently
    enjoying the music. But it was pretty obvious to everyone in the know that he was merely trying to jiggle those damn cannisters -- ! What a riot. Carson was deadpan and totally neutral to Geller's antics throughout, which made Geller look even more foolish.

    1. Re:Geller on Carson ... by SydBarrett · · Score: 1

      This was documented on a PBS NOVA special awhile back hosted by The Amazing Randi himself. It showed Geller sitting in front of a table of props, and trying to "concentrate", then remarked that he felt tired. Cut away to a comerical. Back to the show, there is a priceless shot of Johny smoking, looking very tired and irrate, staring at Geller and the props. Geller then commented that Johny was pressuring him to do stuff. Johny remarks something like "Well, Isn't that way you are here?". Funny stuff. The documentury also shows Randi debunking faith healers and Russian psychics. Randi flat out hates fakers, people who use magic tricks to prove that they have "powers", rather than just saying "Hey! Look at this cool trick!" I knew I should have got this tape back when I visited my folks over the holidays. Damn.

  81. There IS no spoon! by jabber · · Score: 2

    And in related news, Uri Geller has filled an injunction against the Wachowski brothers, to prevent them from making any Matrix sequels.

    Apparently, the sci-fi hit sequels were rumored to involve reviving stopped watches and taking photographs without first taking off the lens cover. Slinky Carrie Ann Moss was also to be featured wearing a skin-tight aura of bio-energy.

    Actor Keanu Reeves was quoted as saying: "Whoa.."

    --

    -- What you do today will cost you a day of your life.
  82. But... by Shaheen · · Score: 2

    There is no spoon. I don't see what Geller is worried about if, in fact, there are no spoons to bend.

    --
    You should never take life too seriously - You'll never get out of it alive.
  83. Parody by Anonynous+Coward · · Score: 1
    IANAL, but in the US, I believe this whole case would be thrown out, if not for the ridiculousness of it, then for the fact that the character could be seen as parody of a(n in)famous person.

    Is the suit being brought in japan? I didn't see any information one way or other in the original article? Do they feel differently about parody there? My guess is this guy just files suits once in a while to keep his name in the papers.

  84. it's irrelevant whether he's a fake... by JackiePatti · · Score: 1
    What is relevant is he is suing for a character that is an obvious parody of him.

    I don't understand how anyone can think this is OK. Parodies of famous people populate many, many forms of comdey.

    If this is OK, then Saturday Night Live owes an awful lot of money to all ex-presidents over the past few years. And just imagine what South Park owes to Barbara Streisand.

    IMO, he has no case at all.

  85. He should win... by farrellj · · Score: 1

    I mean, the guy has nothing left but his image. Here in Canada, musician Nash the Slash sucessfully sued Pepsi for using his likeness in a commercial with Carol Pope. Stars have a certain image, a persona that they use to sell their product, be it their acting abilities, their music, their "mystical powers". The last goes for both Uri Geller, and the Catholic Pope. I don't judge them, but I don't believe in them, either...the "mystical powers", that is.

    ttyl
    Farrell

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
  86. Look, Ma, a link! by A+Big+Gnu+Thrush · · Score: 3
    1. Re:Look, Ma, a link! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This shows just what a bastard Geller is.

  87. That's America by Tyrell+Hawthorne · · Score: 1

    Why is anyone surprised? Oh, no one is. Well, $96 million is about as silly as $14 million (or was that crowns?) for hot coffee. OK, he should get reimbursed. Give him a buck for every game of pokemon that is sold. And $5000 for the kids harassing him. That's a lot of money. $96 million is just silly.

    1. Re:That's America by Twyg · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more 'bro... It's an outrageous amount to be asking... seems to be to be a 'celebrity stunt'... "Hey, maybe if I ask for more money than the world even has, I'll be back in the spotlight" Know what I think... corny (other words come to mind, but I ain't gonna use 'em....)Sh**head comes to mind (whoops was that the out loud voice)
      \Twyg
      \NYRF=Squires Pendragon Games

      --
      John "Twyg" Hyde
  88. He's ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uri-diculous

  89. He's ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uri-diculous

  90. Re:Er... satarize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Isn't Uri Gellar a "Public" figure and open to saturization... at least in the US thats protect under free speach.

    I mean if every public figure had the right to sue over something like this, editorial comics and satire wouldn't exist.

    I think its funny though. especially since nintendo has a full war chest.

  91. He has a legal basis for a suit by _iodine_ · · Score: 2

    Uri Gellar has a right to sue Nintendo of Japan. Everyone of the Pokémon names is trademarked (at least here in the U.S.), and the fact that the Pokémon is named Ungellar in Japanese obviously isn't coincidental. As has been previously stated, the katakana glyphs for Ri and N are strikingly similar. It can therefore be determined that Nintendo's name 'Ungellar' was a play on Uri Gellar's name. Mr. Gellar obviously would have a winning suit if not for the international complications.

    Gellar cannot sue Nintendo of America - that Pokémon is called Alakazam here and a simple "He bends spoons too!" suit would not hold up in a civil court. The only way for Gellar to get money would be to sue Nintendo of Japan, and then you obviously have international trademark and copyright law coming into play with every one of the Pokémon names being trademarked (at least in the U.S.)

    With all the difficulties that are inherent of an international suit, I doubt that he'll get the money, even though he probably deserves it.

    --
    printf("Why have a signature?");
  92. Now, now, Geller bends spoons all the time... by edremy · · Score: 1

    ...just not using his mind. Reading of his various exploits, I'm not surprised he has to make a living suing people. He certainly couldn't make it as a (honest) magician.

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  93. In related news... by DrCode · · Score: 1

    ... Marcel Marceau (did I spell that right?) is suing Nintendo for their use of the "Mr. Mime" Pokemon.

  94. Re:There is no spoon by Fnkmaster · · Score: 0

    What the fuck does this have to do with "those jews"? Why do some imbeciles on slashdot post something anti-semitic at every chance they get? Now, I have no idea whether Uri Geller is Jewish or not, but I don't see what fucking relevance it has. If you actually believe that somebody can bend spoons with their mind then you are an idiot, and you missed the whole point of modern "magicians"/illusionists as entertainers.

  95. THE TRUTH!!! LEARN THE TRUTH!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Learn the ultimate truth about Pokemon here at http://cornswalled.webjump.com/pokemon/pokemon.htm l

  96. "Yungeraa" by Megane · · Score: 1

    First of all, it's #64 (Kadabra, with one spoon), not #65 (Alakazam, with two spoons). The kana read YU-N-GE-RA-A. That's YU, pronounced like the English word "You", same as the "U" in Uri (pronounced Yuri).

    And #63 (Abra) is KE-E-SHI as in Edgar Cayce. If someone can tell me WTF "FU-U-DI-N" (#65) is a reference to, I'd appreciate it.

    What I find odd is that kids anywhere could recognize this guy on sight. He's been out of the publicity spotlight for well over a decade now. Maybe this is just a publicity stunt to get the spotlight back on him. What was he doing Xmas shopping in Tokyo anyhow?

    And don't forget, there is no spoon.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    1. Re:"Yungeraa" by Zagadka · · Score: 1

      If someone can tell me WTF "FU-U-DI-N" (#65) is a reference to, I'd appreciate it.

      It's Houdini, of course.

      See The Origin of Japanese Pokemon for the Pokemon names in English and Japanese, as well as some translations of the Japanese names.

  97. Parody in Japan by Megane · · Score: 1

    The Japanese parody laws are much more lenient than those in the USA. In the USA, you have to defend trademarks or lose them. That includes trademarked cartoon and comic book characters.

    In Japan, random people can publish parody comics, in particular "hentai" (putting the characters in sexual situations, even characters from kids shows), with no worries at all.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  98. Pokemon is a video game, and other game TV by LadyNymphaea · · Score: 2

    I seem to remember a "Super Mario Bros." cartoon that was out about 10 years ago. It also featured Legend of Zelda shorts. There aren't any new episodes being made, but gamers are playing new releases of Mario and Zelda games. Final Fantasy games inspired several animated films. We're on FF8 right now, right?

    So the TV show is over, and the toys won't be popular Christmas 2000. If the past proves predictive, we'll be looking forward to more Pokemon gaming excitement for the next 10 years-no matter if there's an anime attached or not.

  99. Re:There is no spoon by weatherboy · · Score: 1

    Well, you gotta hand it to those jews, they sure have a nose for business
    p.s. No fascist meaning attached


    No, just centuries-old anti-semitic bullshit, you stupid bigot.

    Seriously, why bring racism into this thread? One can easily find frauds and con artists in every race
    of people on this Earth. The Jews simply happen to have Uri Geller as a fine example of both.

    Jerk.

  100. Mankey by Duxup · · Score: 1

    My last name is Mankey and there is a Pokemon named Mankey. . . I'd sue except that a member of my family teaches 3rd Grade at an elementary school, it's interesting how popular she is with the kids because of that.

  101. Mankey by Duxup · · Score: 1

    My last name is Mankey and there is a Pokemon named Mankey. . . I'd sue except that a member of my family teaches 3rd Grade at an elementary school, it's shocking how popular she is with the kids because of that. They always want to discuss Pokemon with her, as if she has some deep genitally inherited Pokemon insights into Pokemon strategy.

  102. Ack! The trolls are getting to me! by cje · · Score: 2

    When I first read this headline, I thought it said:

    Uri Geller sues Natalie Portman

    Only for a split-second, mind you. :-)

    --
    We're going down, in a spiral to the ground
  103. If I had telekenetic powers... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

    ...I'd have my $97,000,000 without having to sue anyone.

    --
    It's October 6th. Where's W2K? Over the horizon again, eh?

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  104. Parodies in Japan by frankie · · Score: 1

    Japanese game companies often throw parodies of famous people into their products, especially for domestic distribution. Then the names get changed for export -- UnGeller becomes Alakazam. I'd love to know why they do that.

    For example, in the Street Fighter video game the disgraced former boxer was named M. Bison (parodying Mike Tyson), the über-villain was Vega, etc. Then when they brought it to the USA their legal department got a bit worried, so they rotated a bunch of names one space to the left.

  105. This is a good test... by LaoTzePhuuk · · Score: 1

    If he is psychic he already knows he has 97 million in the bank. IMHO they honored him with the wrong card. If it looks like a psyduck, walks like a psyduck and is a quack like Geller it must be a Psyduck-Geller Pokemon.

  106. Pokemon win on this one... by Little+Shimmy · · Score: 1

    Sorry, Geller. Not a chance in hell. There's a fantastic book on copyright law, released a few years ago by the experimental found-sound band Negativland, entitled "Fair Use: The Story Of The Letter U And The Numeral 2", which details the struggle of said band to win back the ownership of their magnum opus, entitled U2.

    Many thought provoking issues on Fair Use and copyright law in general are brought up, and it includes a pretty hefty reference section, which includes many legal precedents. One of which is from Vanna White suing.. Toshiba, I believe, for using a robot "version" of Vanna White in their commercials. It was taken to the Supreme Court, and in their analyses of the case, this entire discussion is basically encapsulated. And it's law. And Geller's side does not hold water.

    So there.

  107. How's this for a defense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got the perfect defense strategy. Pokeman says, "Oh, our Pokeman is totally different than Uri Geller. You see, our Un-Geller is a fraud who bends spoons through slight-of-hand and trickery. Not through any sort of psychic powers. See, they're not alike at all!" Uri then has to concede that either they have completely different spoon-bending techniques, or that he also bends spoons through slight-of-hand. What do you think?

  108. Donkey Kong by ronfar · · Score: 1

    This is not the first time this happened to Nintendo. A while ago they made a game called Donkey Kong and Universal tried to sue them for big bucks over the game's similarity to the movie King Kong (mostly based on the name). By the end of that case, not only did Nintendo not have to pay Universal any money, but Universal had been legally proven to have no legal rights to the name "King Kong" and Nintendo was awarded 1.8 million dollars from Universal for their counter suit. Sometimes it isn't smart to mess with companies like Nintendo...

    --
    All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
  109. Geller? by Colossal- · · Score: 1

    Geller? I shall poop on his head!

  110. Katakana "n" and "ri" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  111. and a CHIDE MOLESTA is someone who cares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    sweet jesu have mercy on us all!

    chide_molesta@hotmail.com

  112. And you're... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...a frickin' chide molesta! sweet jesu have mercy on us all!

    chide_molesta@hotmail.com

  113. ...except the CHIDE MOLESTA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    sweet jesu have mercy on us all! a moderation-bot would be the bain of all the chide molesta stands fo'! if there is no need to drain points from the slashdottin' karma whores, chide molesta might as well go back to touchin' hemos!

    we's gotsta save the chirrun!

    chide_molesta@hotmail.com

  114. a CHIDE, you say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    well, i may know of this CHIDE... because i know ALL CHIRRUN! i am the CHIDE MOLESTTA! sweet jesu have mercy on us all!

    chide_molesta@hotmail.com

  115. Hip Parents by gonzocanuck · · Score: 1

    Hip Parents are always cool :-) I swear my mom is the only mom I know that liked watching Kids in the Hall with her kids :-)

    --

  116. People /. doesn't like have no rights by gad_zuki! · · Score: 3

    He's an old time magician using modern psi-buzzswords for his show. So what if he won't admit its just 'magic.' Its part of the illusion.

    Does he so challenge you average slashdotters wordview they agree that he's an ass (which he probably is) but an ass that doesn't deserve his own day in court?

    Its an obvious rip-off and the 'bad guy' here are the practices of corporation who have mastered marketing to CHILDREN. Now thats pathetic, at least Uri can make adults look slack-jawed and goofy when he takes their watch and changes it to GMT. But commercializing crap aimed towards the under 10 market is evil incarnate.

    Now Pokemon's masters not satisfied with world domination start fucking around with some guy (regardless of who he is) trademark act AND name.
    Boo hoo slashdotters cry, Uri is psychic he has no rights lets make fun of him cause we're all so smart and hip to the materistic worldview he challenges through a freaking stageshow.

    Its infringement plain and simple. Even if he's litigation crazy he might actually be right one time. Scary I know, its called justice. Can you guys stop being prejudice for 1 minute to read about the issue?

    If he was suing MS, I'm sure we'd have a gaggle of pro-MS geeks crawling out of the woodwork.

    1. Re:People /. doesn't like have no rights by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      I noticed that too. In fact, I spotted the article a while back, but decided not to bother since Uri's a fraud and Pokemon did clearly rip him off. "No honour amongst thieves" is probably a bit strong (I know you didn't say that, I am) - but I do think the two "giants" deserve each other. (It is hard to pick a side to support... ;)

  117. I don't know if it's the truth... by afree87 · · Score: 1

    ... but Nintendo said that a certain group of programmers named Game Freak came up with the names at random. Either it's a joke, or it's just a coincidence . I'm really annoyed with posts about how "Nintendo deserves it". Yup! Sure they did! Haha! Booger!

  118. Re:TERMINOLOGY! GIMMIE A Break! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Notice which site this is? Hmm it's not the PSYCIC Feinds, or some other such nonsence.... If you want to BOO-HOO do it some where else... BTW when did EVERYTHING get PC!? Give me a BREAK this is bloddy PSYCICS for crying out loud! Everybody knows they are a scam!

  119. More ways to bend a spoon by B.D.Mills · · Score: 1
    There's many ways how a spoon can be bent:
    1. There's Nicolas' method of "shape-memory" alloys.
    2. There's the AC's method of "Hey, look! Elvis" distraction technique (then bend the spoon). But in a large grup of people, there's a chance that someone won't fall for it - especially since this technique won't work a large number of times.
    3. Make the spoon out of soft metal such as tin, and just bend it with one finger in a similar manner to the "Uri Geller" technique.
    4. Perhaps cheaply-made spoons can be bent by thumb pressure in a technique indistinguishable from Uri's "thumb-rubbing" technique.
    5. Yet another method that can be employed is to introduce metal fatigue into the spoon by bending it and straightening it until it can be bent more easily.

    --

    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
  120. what wrong? by Danse · · Score: 1

    1. People have the right not to be depicted as a little orange monster by a multibillion dollar multinational organisation.

    People have no such right. Especially public figures. There's a little thing known as parody. Geller is an ideal target for it.

    2. $97 Million has more to do with greed than about redressing one's violated rights.

    Gotta agree with that.

    If Mr Geller really wants to make a point, I suggest that he declares that if he wins, he will donate the money to charity.

    Geller is his own favorite charity.

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  121. Spoonbending and The Matrix by B.D.Mills · · Score: 2

    The characters in The Matrix know the real secret to bending spoons:

    There Is No Spoon

    --

    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
  122. Body Language by Jonathan · · Score: 1

    Well, Uri Geller is a fake, but claiming that he is a fake because of his "body language" is absurd. "Body language" like handwriting analysis or phrenology is nearly as unscientific as paranormal claims.

  123. Re:You heartless bastard! by webslacker · · Score: 1

    Haha, now I wish I had kids of my own so I could play funny tricks on them like that too!

  124. you mean like this? by Zugok · · Score: 1

    pika, pika?
    pikachu?
    pi, pi, pikachu!

    or for those who want the orignal Japanese version, (switch your encoding to Shift JIS)

    Ò©A@Ò©H
    Ò©ãH
    ÒA@ÒA@Ò©ãI

    --
    "I just can't sit while people are saying nonsense in a meeting without saying it's nonsense" J Watson, Sci Am 288:(4)51
  125. Where pokemon came from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nintendo licensed a game called Pocket Monsters from some company named Game Freak. When they made a Japanese version, the changed the name to fit the usual japanese language consonent-vowel-consonent-vowel construction. And that is where POKEMON came from.

    1. Re:Where pokemon came from... by afree87 · · Score: 1

      I knew that! I was talking about Um Geller!

  126. "Pizza the Hut" by MattT · · Score: 1

    IIRC "Pizza the Hut" was character in "Spaceballs", and looked like an 800lb mound of melted mozzarela cheese! To the best of my knowlege, Mel Brooks was not sued for the theft of the trademark for this "fine dining establishment"

    --
    -MattT *** Not speaking for my employer, or any other sentient beings ***
  127. failed with big ben, parodied in computer game by kimihia · · Score: 1
    Didn't he try and stop Big Ben over New Year's? Apparantly he was standing on the street below, yelling at the clock to stop.

    Does anyone remember seeing a guy using 'tele-kinetic powers' to bend spanners on that classic game: Sam 'n' Max Hit the Road? He reminds me of Uri.

  128. TV show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > a corrupt company who's business practices makes Microsoft look saintly.

    You know, Nintendo (or the programmers who developed the game) never had the intention that Pokemon would get this "big". Initially, if I recall correctly, Nintendo thought about bringing the Gameboy carts here but after the fiasco involving the show (you know, the infamous flashing ep.), 4Kids (the US company) became interested in bringing the show here (to get into the anime craze) and from there, the fad/trend/etc. really went off. Nintendo isn't as corrupt (only as much as every other videogaming company) as you assume.

  129. Uri Geller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought The Japanese ate with chopsticks.

  130. Re:There is no spoon by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

    *I* posted flamebait? That is a completely moronic moderation. Go read the post I replied to. It was racist and entirely ignorant. I was replying in an entirely appropriate fashion, and I will continue to post such replies. Somebody has to have the cojones to stand up to racists. Obviously it's not whoever incorrectly ended up with moderator points.