Slashdot Mirror


User: muchandr

muchandr's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
97
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 97

  1. strugatski bros on Sci Fi Literature 101? · · Score: 1

    Some of my favborites too, but are there good english translations? If you read Russian, there are texts available online...

  2. So what? on Compaq: Alpha is Better Than IA-64 · · Score: 1

    HP and IBM have been able to get very close to Alpha performance with much lower clocked chips several times already. Give or take the same process they can never achieve the same clock rates as Alpha though, because Alpha is much simpler. They get their performance from being sophisticated arhictecturally, whereas Alpha is classical barebones RISC. All this tells me that Alpha is going to crash and burn, no matter how much the first iteration of I-64 sucks. You can only raise the clock frequency that much...

  3. VCs will not sign NDAs on How to Approach Venture Capital Firms? · · Score: 1

    Period. End of story. They see too many similar ideas. They are supposed to operate under code of conduct similar to lawyers (who also won't sign NDAs)

  4. Stonebraker on Linux Databases with Huge Tables? · · Score: 1

    is now with Cohera (www.cohera.com) They are doing "federated" databases

  5. Re:Don't Go To Berkeley!! on High Intensity Computer Colleges? · · Score: 1

    Still? Back in my time (1-2 years ago) upper division classes were full because of undeclared hopefuls trying to boost their tech GPA. The way things work in Berkeley that you can get into CS program two ways. You either apply to School of Engineering as EECS major right out of school or you can apply to Letters & Science as undeclared major and then declare CS. The second way makes it easier to get into the school, but you need to get something like 3.5 in technical subjects the first year and getting harder every year. Anyway, I thought the new rules don't allow undeclared's in upper division CS anymore? God, I am really happy that I don't have to get in now. It was way easier back in 94 when I started.

  6. Put your money where your mouth it on H-1B Tech Workers May Be Severely Underpaid · · Score: 1

    I think if Feds want to see if there is really
    200K shortage, they should let H-1B switch job
    as easily as it is for residents/citizens.

    I think both sides have a point. Yes, there is
    a huge shortage and yes, H-1Bs are indentured
    slaves.

  7. domain shift? on Legal Implications of MP3 Rulings · · Score: 1

    I thought for a sec they will be talking about how
    you have the right to shift your stuff from time
    domain to frequency domain (video part of MPEG
    uses FFTs) Heh.

  8. Red Bull and co on Competition for Jolt/Dew/Coffee? · · Score: 1

    Much higher coffeine concentration is also true
    of the "Energy Drinks", eq Red Bull. BTW the
    original Austrian Red Bull can says "Do not mix
    with alcohol" in small print. (Everybody does of
    course) I think this is due to some amino acid
    that improves alcohol absorbtion into blood.

  9. Re:Those Hitachi processors.. on Top 500 Fastest Computers · · Score: 1

    The hitachis are vector CPUs. You don't have much
    use for them, but they sure do run optimized linear alrebra codes fast. Most other machines
    on the list use commodity CPUs. Cray used to
    have a bunch of vector CPUs in MPP configuration,
    but now they just use Alphas. Doing a separate
    CPU line for supercomputers is just too expensive.
    Let's hope the vector stuff is gonna make a
    comeback in next generation "multimedia" instructions or something like that.

  10. Better way of making superconduction computers on Using Superconductors as Insulators · · Score: 1

    Trying to represent ones and zeroes by switching
    voltage levels like in semiconductor transistors
    is not the best way to utilize superconductors.
    Take a look RSFQ logic:

    http://pavel.physics.sunysb.edu/RSFQ/RSFQ.html

    They represent bits with quanta of magnetic flux.

  11. Ether backbone on 3 Computers in One Case · · Score: 1

    Sucks as a cluster interconnect. You can do factor
    of 100 better with something like Myrinet unstead
    of Gigabit Ether for about the same money.

  12. stealh on Fighting the Techno-War · · Score: 1

    Stealh planes are invisible to nacked eye because
    they only let them fly at night.
    Also stealth can be seen on a meter wave radar.
    That makes it not worth it.

  13. same language on Fighting the Techno-War · · Score: 1

    Actually, even the language is the same. Serbs,
    Croats and Bosnians all speak Serbo-Croatian.

  14. DICE on Need a Job? · · Score: 1

    DICE is the best. in my expirience. The only
    job board that actually does something for us
    contractors. I also love the area code search
    function.

  15. PNG and Microsoft, PNG and FPUs on Yet Another New Image Format · · Score: 1

    Actually, PNG is the internal image format used
    by MS Office. It is not widely advertised, but
    acknowleged. libpng (reference implementation
    is available in source) The only issue I have
    with it is that it relies heavily on FP hardware.
    A truly portable implementation should work on
    integer-only hardware.

  16. NOW on R12K Debuts · · Score: 1

    Of course. Myrinet will set you back $1.2-1.5K
    per node in networking gear.

  17. NOW on R12K Debuts · · Score: 1

    well, its not that bad.

    build a NOW over Myrinet, just 1.2K per node.
    Myricom claims that on PCs, the bottleneck is
    PCI DMA performance. Network faster than
    internal bus. Not bad. www.myri.com

  18. This is not about the CPU on R12K Debuts · · Score: 1

    This is not a limitation of any specific CPU,
    but rather of SMP architecture. How many CPU
    do you want to hang out on a single chunk of
    memory? The ASCI machine with several thousands
    MIPS chips was an MPP setup. Sun Enterprise
    with 64 CPUs uses a crossbar to memory and god
    knows what other tricks that have nothing to do
    with CPU itself. You pay dearly for stuff like
    this...

  19. Too little, too late on R12K Debuts · · Score: 1

    This is the MIPS swan song. As far as I know
    there is no next generation MIPS CPU in the
    pipeline. The 'Beast' project and the next one
    after that are dead. Or is this the 'Beast'?
    Doesn't look like it. Beast had a target clock of
    around 666Mhz. SGI is probably moving everything to Merced.
    I think the E2k looks interesting to peolple like SGI. CT never posted my translations of the Russian articles, so let me give you a recap. E2K uses a binary recompilator. Something like DEC's FX32!, but with hardware support. Apparently their
    recompiler is easily retargetable. They now
    can compile x86 and SPARC to E2K and run on the
    simulator. They plan to add Merced once the ISA
    is fully disclosed. They claim to have booted Windoze on a SPARC and ran Flight simulator, which
    supposedly won Babayan a bet with Mr. Ross
    (Ross Technologies, creators of HyperSPARC) They can probably add MIPS and any other "legacy" architecture relatively easily...

  20. Too little, too late on R12K Debuts · · Score: 1

    MIPS is royally screwed now. I mean, what is it?
    If you sell it as a high performance
    "compiler-friendly" architecture, there is Alpha.
    They will be hard-pressed to consistently outperfrom Alpha. An embedded architecture? Well,
    a lot of people use it. I suppose that's because
    they used Patterson/Hennesy books in their
    CPU design class at school. IMHO, MIPS is horribly
    miscast as an embedded architecture. Because it
    is so streamline, the code density is horrible.

  21. there is nothing wrong with a BSD kernel on Linux Kernel underneath OS X? · · Score: 1

    The question should be, why won't Apple give out
    the sources?

  22. Alpha is RISC, nuff said on G4, PIII & E2K Compared · · Score: 1

    Alpha is a canonical RISC machine, more so than
    SPARC or PPC. The only simpler instruction set
    out there is MIPS. This means Alpha will be hurt
    even more by the problems that are plaguing all
    high-end RISC designs now. It is becoming the
    very antithesis of itself. Very very complex.
    It's time to move beyond RISC.