The Atlantic Monthly had an article that documented research that stated that human biology is set up to maximize a person's health at age 20 at the expense of later years.
Certain trade-offs are made that sacrifice the health of the future you just to keep the "child-bearing" you at 110%.
This suggested that an individual human would live significantly longer if these trade-offs were not made, but a population group would surive longer and have more/better children otherwise.
A *real* thesaurus and a *real* dictionary should include all accepted English words. They are supposed to be references after all.
However, I bet most people would rather have MS Word use a "business" dictionary and thesaurus that contained only accepted BUSINESS English.
A good example of this would be removing the word "manger" from the spell-checker, since I bet 99.9999999% of the time the user is trying to spell "manager" instead. And one would almost never use the word "idiot" in a real business or technical document.
I want to know the answer to "is a click legally binding" instead of listening to the maligning of lawyers. So what is the answer? Or will someone have to consult a lawyer to find out?
Slashdot Mirror
The Atlantic Monthly had an article that documented research that stated that human biology is set up to maximize a person's health at age 20 at the expense of later years.
Certain trade-offs are made that sacrifice the health of the future you just to keep the "child-bearing" you at 110%.
This suggested that an individual human would live significantly longer if these trade-offs were not made, but a population group would surive longer and have more/better children otherwise.
This research seems to be more of the same.
A *real* thesaurus and a *real* dictionary should include all accepted English words. They are supposed to be references after all.
However, I bet most people would rather have MS Word use a "business" dictionary and thesaurus that contained only accepted BUSINESS English.
A good example of this would be removing the word "manger" from the spell-checker, since I bet 99.9999999% of the time the user is trying to spell "manager" instead. And one would almost never use the word "idiot" in a real business or technical document.
I want to know the answer to "is a click legally binding" instead of listening to the maligning of lawyers. So what is the answer? Or will someone have to consult a lawyer to find out?
"Rodona Garst" Anagrams
-----------------------
Tornado Rags
Dragon Roast
Sargon-Tardo
and the obvious
Arson God/Rat