But, what about typing the name of any random household object, name spoken on TV or food, adding.xxx and seeing what turns up? You would deprive us of the joy of USB-cables.xxx ?
If LargeFormatPhotography.info got "phased out," I would consider it to be a great loss.
Unless you're going to somehow miraculously force all the content of all the sites to conform to your notion of their TLD's category (eg: Diving.net doesn't seem to be directly related to network infrastructure.), what does it matter how many TLDs there are?
If I were building a house today, I'd make the walls from cellular concrete type ICFs. I'd rout a groove in the surface where I want the wiring to go, put EZ-Anchors in the back of the groove and install channel conduit. (Some of the plastic stuff can be bought in rolls.) I'd glue the conduit cover to the back of fire rated polyurethane chair rail molding (eg Spectis). Then when I want to change something, I have access to the wiring, and I don't have to deal with pulling wire through a tube. If there was a bug highway issue (which tube type conduit could also have), I might have to block the cross section here and there with duct seal or firestop type urethane foam.
It's never the ones who make threats you have to worry about. It's always one of the ones who seem to pay no particular attention to you - one of those ICAC supporters who seems so quiet...
I want to carry my data on a fast terabyte micro sd card in my smartphone. When I want the screen/keyboard/battery/ram/processing power, then I open the netbook (with the cpu & ram behind the screen, and the crap collecting keyboard being easily replaceable) and put my smartphone on the wireless power supply spot. The availability of the extra power turns on the UWB radio in the phone, and the phone's already running & net connected OS starts using the new resources. The netbook has two batteries, like the Motion Computing slates, so if I want more battery life, I can just bring more batteries & swap 'em like it was a cordless drill.
I agree. Rather that calling for a large organization to do things the way I want,
I think I'm better off downloading something like Cellcrypt or Raseac and trusting
that it works as advertised. My laptop has advised me that my hotel internet
connection isn't secure, but I trust that the current version of https protocol is
sufficiently secure as to allow me to conduct business on my bank's website.
Maybe if you squint....
A 3x4 card at arm's length does seem kind of limiting.
I suppose it'll be nice for kids to appear to look at you
while they're texting.
Because it represents such a large percentage of all internet traffic?
But, what about typing the name of any random household object, name spoken on TV or food, adding .xxx and seeing what turns up? You would deprive us of the joy of USB-cables.xxx ?
If LargeFormatPhotography.info got "phased out," I would consider it to be a great loss.
Unless you're going to somehow miraculously force all the content of all the sites to conform to your notion of their TLD's category (eg: Diving.net doesn't seem to be directly related to network infrastructure.), what does it matter how many TLDs there are?
www.operaswimwear.com/
If I were building a house today, I'd make the walls from cellular concrete type ICFs. I'd rout a groove in the surface where I want the wiring to go, put EZ-Anchors in the back of the groove and install channel conduit. (Some of the plastic stuff can be bought in rolls.) I'd glue the conduit cover to the back of fire rated polyurethane chair rail molding (eg Spectis). Then when I want to change something, I have access to the wiring, and I don't have to deal with pulling wire through a tube. If there was a bug highway issue (which tube type conduit could also have), I might have to block the cross section here and there with duct seal or firestop type urethane foam.
But I sure hope anyone who had a hand in it is canned.
It's never the ones who make threats you have to worry about. It's always one of the ones who seem to pay no particular attention to you - one of those ICAC supporters who seems so quiet...
I want to carry my data on a fast terabyte micro sd card in my smartphone. When I want the screen/keyboard/battery/ram/processing power, then I open the netbook (with the cpu & ram behind the screen, and the crap collecting keyboard being easily replaceable) and put my smartphone on the wireless power supply spot. The availability of the extra power turns on the UWB radio in the phone, and the phone's already running & net connected OS starts using the new resources. The netbook has two batteries, like the Motion Computing slates, so if I want more battery life, I can just bring more batteries & swap 'em like it was a cordless drill.
I agree. Rather that calling for a large organization to do things the way I want, I think I'm better off downloading something like Cellcrypt or Raseac and trusting that it works as advertised. My laptop has advised me that my hotel internet connection isn't secure, but I trust that the current version of https protocol is sufficiently secure as to allow me to conduct business on my bank's website.
Maybe if you squint.... A 3x4 card at arm's length does seem kind of limiting. I suppose it'll be nice for kids to appear to look at you while they're texting.