Slashdot Mirror


Aussie Attorney General Says Gamers Are Scarier Than Biker Gangs

Sasayaki writes "South Australian Attorney-General Michael Atkinson claims, in an interview with Good Game, that gamers were more of a threat to his family than biker gangs. This is the man who has been the biggest opponent to Australia receiving an R18+ rating for video games and who has the power to veto any such law introducing it."

409 comments

  1. Well, i guess so... by gandhi_2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    if you are a bag of Doritos.

    1. Re:Well, i guess so... by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To be fair, the context was that a gamer slipped a threatening note under his door. I think in general, zombies are scarier than my next door neighbor, but if my next door neighbor says he's going to burn down my house, and zombies remain fictional, temporarily my neighbor becomes scarier than zombies.

      It's not a statement that should have been made by a politician in public though, and since he's keeping censorship going, he deserves whatever he gets (quotes taken out of context AND the threats). Furthermore, for him to fairly make the comparison, he needs to try banning motorcycles and then telling us which is scarier. I don't know much about motorcycle gangs, but I think they probably wouldn't have slid a note under his door, I think they would have slid a note on the end of their boot up his ass.

    2. Re:Well, i guess so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Also to be fair, he is easily scared. Most gamers go down crying profusely with a light girly punch.

      Way easy to protect yourself from. Sitting on the couch 24/7 does not make you dangerous.

      And dont worry about the posers that think they can shoot a gun... We had a open house day at the range and had some gamer geeks come in wanting to shoot a assault rifle. I watched as 4 out of the 5 never hit the target and 1 cut his eye open as he put his eye on the scope and did not put the butt tight to the shoulder like he was told... And this is all from a wimpy AK-47 a gun with some real kick would have owned them hard. 12 Ga shotguns would have thrown these jokers tot he floor.

    3. Re:Well, i guess so... by dominious · · Score: 1

      You haven't watched this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4t_wqOxKVhk&feature=related

      WOO! HEADSHOT! What? He 'll re-spawn in like a minute...

    4. Re:Well, i guess so... by Bakkster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      To be fair to the guy, if he's worried about threats to his family, none of that matters.

      Of course, the fact that he uses ridiculous rhetoric (apparently he claimed bikers cooked a cat on a grill in his district; even though it wasn't a cat, wasn't in his district, and no bikers were involved) doesn't help matters. However, threatening the guy is the exact wrong way to go about fixing the Aussie rating system. Gamers making threats will just reinforce the stereotype that gamers are dangerous, giving him more reason to oppose adult classifications for games.

      So, to everyone in Australia, the guy who made that threat is fucking it up for the rest of you. Maybe you should beat him up, or something...

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    5. Re:Well, i guess so... by ozbird · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To be fair, the context was that a gamer slipped a threatening note under his door.

      A gamer allegedly slipped a threatening note under his door.

    6. Re:Well, i guess so... by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      And dont worry about the posers that think they can shoot a gun... We had a open house day at the range and had some gamer geeks come in wanting to shoot a assault rifle. I watched as 4 out of the 5 never hit the target and 1 cut his eye open as he put his eye on the scope and did not put the butt tight to the shoulder like he was told... And this is all from a wimpy AK-47 a gun with some real kick would have owned them hard. 12 Ga shotguns would have thrown these jokers tot he floor.

      So that means that if the threat was specific to using a 12 gauge shotgun against his family from those 5 specific gamers, he has little to worry about. I wouldn't conclude he is completely safe from all threats from all gamers, that would be a foolish stereotype.

    7. Re:Well, i guess so... by swedd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      for him to fairly make the comparison, he needs to try banning motorcycles and then telling us which is scarier
      To be fair, he did introduce "guilt by association" legislation to make bikie gangs illegal in South Australia. That is why he is making this particular comparison.

      --
      Deny everything, admit nothing, demand proof, and reject the proof.
    8. Re:Well, i guess so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A long time gamer, and even longer time army sniper salutes you.

    9. Re:Well, i guess so... by Shatteredstar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think we need to see the actual 'note' for evidence. After all the drama surrounding the issue we have a very very high chance of this all being a stunt.

      Gamers as a whole are unlikely to approach someone's home and leave a PHYSICAL note. Most gamers have enough concept and paranoia of the real world law (just see what happens if one of their buddies mentions they got a 'cease and desist' type notice for pirating a game or movie) that they generally do not like doing things that might bring the real world authorities into play.

      Not to mention also a threatening note is easily a candidate for investigation/arrest material even simple fingerprinting is possible to apprehend a suspect for threats.

      If it was a gamer doing this we would be more likely to see something about a threatening email or website, NOT a physical letter under his door.
      Considering a large majority of /. are gamers, would you write a threatening letter to someone in a position of power and leave it at their door?

      The other fishy thing here is no vandalism, if someone was UPSET or bothered enough to actually travel to his home and leave a threatening letter then I don't see why vandalism was not an issue here. Someone young enough to do something as silly/stupid as leaving the note would certainly not be smart enough to avoid the temptation of vandalism at the same time.

      --
      I do what I must because of what I must do.
    10. Re:Well, i guess so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, the context was that a gamer slipped a threatening note under his door.

      A gamer allegedly slipped a threatening note under his door.

      An alleged gamer allegedly slipped a threatening note under his door.

    11. Re:Well, i guess so... by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A gamer allegedly slipped a threatening note under his door.

      An alleged gamer allegedly slipped an allegedly threatening note under his door. Personally, I would need more than a politician's word on it.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    12. Re:Well, i guess so... by interkin3tic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, to everyone in Australia, the guy who made that threat is fucking it up for the rest of you.

      I'd argue that it's mostly the target that is fucking it up for everyone else. He was blocking it well before the claimed threat. Banning all adult games for sale to because one gamer threatened you is incredibly bad justification for an incredibly bad move.

    13. Re:Well, i guess so... by eltaco · · Score: 2, Informative

      funny vid. next time dont give away the punchline though, please.

      --
      It's not about fate, it's about character.
      there be no shelter here, the frontline is everywhere!
    14. Re:Well, i guess so... by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

      > I think we need to see the actual 'note' for evidence. After all the
      > drama surrounding the issue we have a very very high chance of this all being a stunt.

      And I'd like to verify that you're not a shill for the game industry.

      > Gamers as a whole are unlikely to approach someone's home and leave a PHYSICAL note.

      No, of course not. They'll just demand that the person in question setup residence in their virtual reality world of choice.

      > The other fishy thing here is no vandalism,
      > Someone young enough to do something as silly/stupid as leaving the note would
      > certainly not be smart enough to avoid the temptation of vandalism at the same time.

      I bow before the power of your omnipotent foresight engine, o lord of virtual worlds.

      Perhaps the kid in question actually fears the law -- getting into "physical trouble"

    15. Re:Well, i guess so... by smash · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the last time bikies got truly pissed over this way that I can remember, there were shootings and the burning down of a pub. But, i guess notes are scary too.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    16. Re:Well, i guess so... by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 1

      Remember that "gamers" comprise more than just the people you know - and most likely have at least a few people who are not 100% in the head. Not to mention thousands of mental 12 year olds who think doing this would be funny and not think too hard about the potential consequences.

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    17. Re:Well, i guess so... by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

      (apparently he claimed bikers cooked a cat on a grill in his district

      Ah, so Eli Porter is now cooling his heels in the outback...

      Another of life's great mysteries resolved.

      Willingly incurring the karma hit, because when else will I be able to reference "cat on the grill"?

    18. Re:Well, i guess so... by TRRosen · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the context was that a gamer slipped a threatening note under his door.

      Since when did gamers use a pen and paper ? or leave there homes for that matter?

    19. Re:Well, i guess so... by mjwx · · Score: 2, Informative

      To be fair to the guy, if he's worried about threats to his family, none of that matters.

      Of course the matter isn't being investigated by the police. So I'm inclined to believe that this is another politician lying, which parliamentary privilege gives him the right to do (it also gives politicians the right to expose dangers and corruption without fear of retrobution, which is why it is unfortunately needed). No one in Australia is taking this guy seriously.

      This is just proof that Atkinson is scared of opposition like Gamers for Croydon.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    20. Re:Well, i guess so... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      (apparently he claimed bikers cooked a cat on a grill in his district; even though it wasn't a cat, wasn't in his district, and no bikers were involved)

      Well other than those minor details it's a perfectly true statement.

    21. Re:Well, i guess so... by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      "To be fair, the context was that a gamer slipped a threatening note under his door."

      You meant "to be fair to him" I assume. And to be fair to all gamers, one person slipped a threatening note under his door. That person may have been a gamer, that person may also have been a father and an employee at a bank. What about all the gamers who didn't slip threatening notes under his door? Maybe it's not gamers who are dangerous, maybe it's bank employees? Why not claim that bank employees are more dangerous than bikers.

      Regardless, I think we're in agreement. Any intelligent person would agree that the man's a fucking idiot and should slip a resignation letter under Kevin Rudd's door.

    22. Re:Well, i guess so... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      ... and yet me, a gamer... could handle it very well.

      Sure, I might have trouble hitting the target reliably at 100m or beyond, but I know enough that, in such a case, I would make sure I had more than one shot, or much less range. Some gamers actually have guns. Some of those even go to the range and use them!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    23. Re:Well, i guess so... by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 4, Informative
      No - to be fair you'd have to consider the guys history (and ask why he didn't report the alleged incident to police).

      And it's not just little lies about "bikers roasting cats".

      He has also brought in a law (since revoked) that required that people blogging about elections to publish their name and address, and to support that law claimed that a certain blogger was "not a real person" - an invention of the Liberal Party.

      Prejudiced the trial of people by claiming they were "pure evil - have no hope of rehabilitation".

      So he has a history of "discovering evidence" to support his extreme views

      He has a law degree - and spent a couple of years working for a newspaper (until he was "removed" for fabricating stories)

      So he should know about checking your facts, and, the existence of police.

      I believe the appropriate comment is "sucked in!".

    24. Re:Well, i guess so... by socceroos · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think thats a bit different. You can make all the laws you want against bikie gangs, but the fact remains that the police wont go near those gangs and will turn a blind eye.

    25. Re:Well, i guess so... by Kuroji · · Score: 1

      Personally, if someone left him a threatening note, I'd wonder why the police aren't jumping all over this. A threat to a politician? I don't know any country that takes that lightly.

      This has 'PR stunt' written all over it.

    26. Re:Well, i guess so... by obeythefist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Gamers as a whole are unlikely to approach someone's home and leave a PHYSICAL note. Most gamers have enough concept and paranoia of the real world law (just see what happens if one of their buddies mentions they got a 'cease and desist' type notice for pirating a game or movie) that they generally do not like doing things that might bring the real world authorities into play.

      Well, there are stupid gamers in this world, just like there are stupid attorneys-general.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    27. Re:Well, i guess so... by Meetch · · Score: 1
      I love the word "alleged"...

      Based on what Mr Atkinson has alleged in the past, it's far more likely that what actually happened was a gamer slipped him an e-mail that said something along the lines of "I'm 19 now and you have to let me see b00bs in a game if I want! Otherwise if you ever show up in <Online FPS>, me and my buddies are going to camp all the spawn points and frag you 'til you cry to your mum!"

    28. Re:Well, i guess so... by Samah · · Score: 1

      ...reinforce the stereotype that gamers are dangerous...
      *snip*
      Maybe you should beat him up, or something...

      Whaaa...?

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    29. Re:Well, i guess so... by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      No, I would not. I am with you that sounds like total rubbish if you know even a little about the target demographic. I might write a threatening letter to said jackass and post it on Slashdot, but I would most certainly never bother getting off my couch to do such a thing.

    30. Re:Well, i guess so... by IICV · · Score: 1

      Wait wait wait, let me get this straight - this guy blatantly makes shit up about bikers doing horrible things. Then, when he claims with absolutely no evidence that a gamer did some horrible yet politically beneficial thing, you believe him?

      What the hell is wrong with you?

    31. Re:Well, i guess so... by aLEczapKA · · Score: 0

      What an idiot .. I wonder what a member of Hells Angels would do if he tried to ban the motorbikes in Australia??

      just lol... besides he's politician... I don't believe any of it

      --
      -- All Gods were immortal.
      -- S. Lem
    32. Re:Well, i guess so... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      To be fair I heard an anecdote (from a drill instructor) about trained soldiers dislocating their shoulders when firing a 7.68mm assault rifle because they've only used 5.56mm rifles before.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    33. Re:Well, i guess so... by h00manist · · Score: 1

      he claimed bikers cooked a cat on a grill in his district;

      What's wrong with my cat steak? It's not like I'm mixing it with the dog soup.

      --
      Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
    34. Re:Well, i guess so... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      An alleged gamer allegedly slipped an allegedly threatening note under his door. Personally, I would need more than a politician's word on it.

      -jcr

      An alleged gamer allegedly slipped an allegedly threatening alleged note under an alleged door. We don't have any hard evidence that either note or door exist, let alone how threatening the note was or who put it there.

    35. Re:Well, i guess so... by ajs · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the context was that a gamer slipped a threatening note under his door.

      A gamer allegedly slipped a threatening note under his door.

      No, read the OP you were quoting again: "the context was that a gamer slipped a threatening note under his door." That most certainly was the context. Did it happen? Probably, but if it hadn't that would still be the context of the statement. The fact that the entire context is an allegation is also interesting.

    36. Re:Well, i guess so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last I heard, that law had not been revoked, it was merely not going to be policed for now and he was going to revoke it after he was voted back in. If this is still the case, people thinking that it is already revoked may be exactly what he wants.

    37. Re:Well, i guess so... by Shatteredstar · · Score: 1

      True, although even the stupid gamers tend to know enough to not go jaunting off to leave threatening notes at the homes of those they don't like.

      They have email for that!

      --
      I do what I must because of what I must do.
    38. Re:Well, i guess so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No threat was made...

  2. Hells Angels by e2d2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hear a challenge Hells Angels/Mongols/Pagans/Insert your club here. This guy just called you all a bunch of pussies!

    1. Re:Hells Angels by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Hells Angles vs Captain N: The Game Master. Now that's a celebrity deathmatch worth watching :)

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Hells Angels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's probably scared of all the clans with names like LORDS_OF_SATANDEATH666. Won't he be relieved to find out it's just a bunch of 12 year olds.

    3. Re:Hells Angels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is sat and eath?

    4. Re:Hells Angels by Deadplant · · Score: 4, Funny

      according to TFA their 'biker gags' are called 'bikies'.
      wtf?
      makes sense now... who would be afraid of a widdle bikie-wikee gang?

    5. Re:Hells Angels by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I hear a challenge Hells Angels/Mongols/Pagans/Insert your club here. This guy just called you all a bunch of pussies!

      The bikers are running a candidate for Attorney General against him.
      Maybe the biker candidate should co-opt gamers by advocating their cause.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    6. Re:Hells Angels by rarel · · Score: 4, Funny
      Hell's Angles would be pretty tough for a nerd.

      "TANGENT ATTACK! CHEW ON MY SATANIC PI! ONE THOUSAND DEGREEEEES HYPOTENUSE!"
      "NOOO This value is... not... real.. not... possible!Gngngngnn.Must... Resist..." *faints*

      Hell's Angles declared winners.

    7. Re:Hells Angels by natehoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, that's SATA N DEATH 666. It's a SerialATA specifications group who is concerned that SATA will reach 666 MB/s, and that this would indicate the coming of the Apocalypse by bringing one of the Four Horsemen, Death.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    8. Re:Hells Angels by Ninth+Marion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd be less scared of a biker as Attorney General than a puritan nutjob like Atkinson.

      That originally popped into my head as a joke, but I think it's actually true! See also his recent law banning anonymous speech.

    9. Re:Hells Angels by vlm · · Score: 1

      I hear a challenge Hells Angels/Mongols/Pagans/Insert your club here.

      It makes you wonder if one of his competitors faked the whole thing to put a hit out on him.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    10. Re:Hells Angels by xaxa · · Score: 1

      An Australian guy recently took the spare room in my flat. He's not very educated, does manual work etc, but most of the slang he uses ends "-ie", e.g. a small beer is a "stubbie", you already know "barbie", a rolled cigarette is a "rollie".

    11. Re:Hells Angels by Reziac · · Score: 1

      This is the same idiot?? All is explained!

      I like some previous post's suggestion that he try to ban or "rate" motorcycles according to how gang-like they are, and see how far that gets him, with the Hell's Angels or anyone else.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    12. Re:Hells Angels by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Electromagnetic Satanic Prayer Wheels.

      SWEET!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    13. Re:Hells Angels by xenn · · Score: 1

      ...imagine if he'd said it anonymously???!!!

    14. Re:Hells Angels by Gandalf_Greyhame · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, Aussie slang is pretty easy to get the hang of, merely cut the word in half and add "ie" at the end of it. That probably amounts to 95% of Aussie slang

      In the case that a citation is required, is it enough to say that I am Australian

      --
      I am not stubborn. I am right!
    15. Re:Hells Angels by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is the same idiot?? All is explained!

      Yep. If you see any news item these days that can be summed up as "retarded Australian legislation and/or ban", just assume it has the Michael Atkinson seal of approval.

      I like some previous post's suggestion that he try to ban or "rate" motorcycles according to how gang-like they are, and see how far that gets him, with the Hell's Angels or anyone else.

      Will his rating scheme be 1-4 grilled cats?

    16. Re:Hells Angels by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Informative

      For the other 5% you cut the word in half and add "o": lebbo, abbo...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    17. Re:Hells Angels by svunt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yep, that's how we do it...ie. Not only is a bottle of beer a 'stubby' but a can is a 'tinnie' - which is also a small metal boat, like a dinghy. The nastier half of us even call Indians 'curries'.

    18. Re:Hells Angels by smash · · Score: 1

      FYI, he's what you call a bogan, an aussie subculture. Not all aussies are like that.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    19. Re:Hells Angels by Eightbitgnosis · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna need a MEGA-smoke after this-icus

    20. Re:Hells Angels by g-lock82 · · Score: 1

      Possibly someone trying to catch a connecting flight?

    21. Re:Hells Angels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, he's what you call a bogan, an aussie subculture. Not all aussies are like that.

      I want to agree with you but the three example he gave are quite ubiquitous to any Australian of my generation.

    22. Re:Hells Angels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It makes you wonder if one of his competitors faked the whole thing to put a hit out on him.

      Dunno how it's done down there, but no organized criminal group in the states would be stupid enough to put out a hit on an attorney general. Same reason they don't put out hits on cops.

    23. Re:Hells Angels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or a widdle biker-wiker gang ??

      Just sayin'

    24. Re:Hells Angels by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      To be fair, motorcycles are a little bit different down under.

    25. Re:Hells Angels by atomicstrawberry · · Score: 2, Funny

      Australian slang is all about making everything have two syllables. 'Bike' has one syllable, so we add '-ie' to make it two. Lebanese has three syllables, so we take the first syllable and add '-o' to make Lebbo.

      It gets a lot more surreal when we apply this kind of abbreviation slang to things that are already slang. The best example being 'seppo', which is abbreviated from 'septic tank' which is cockney rhyming slang for 'yank'.

    26. Re:Hells Angels by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      In the case that a citation is required, is it enough to say that I am Australian

      No, that makes it original research. But it's okay if you tell some random anonymous person on the Internet and then he cites you.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    27. Re:Hells Angels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Posting anon because Atkinson is known to track down people who make comments he doesn't like and make legal threats.)

      Here in Australia there's two terms: "Bikies" refers to so-called outlaw motorcycle clubs... Hells Angels, Rebels, Finks, Gypsy Jokers, Bandidos are the ones that immediately spring to mind. The blokes that ride around with a "1%" patch on their vest. "Bikers" refers to other motorcycle clubs and individual motorcycle riders.

      Atkinson's remarks are all the more insane in light of an event that occurred not a week before his quip - an alleged associate of the Hells Angels and an accomplice were killed when a bomb they were allegedly delivering to assassinate the head of a street gang exploded in their car a few metres away from the target's home. The two gangs have allegedly been involved in an ongoing dispute over drug dealing that has lead to shootouts in the CBD ("downtown" for the Americans) and drive-by shootings.

      To put it all into some context, there is a state government election on March 20 and the current government of which Atkinson is a part of, are vying for a 3rd 4 year term. Over the last eight years the government has played up the threat of the bikie gangs to the general public. The bikies are the boogey men that are coming to get you and your family and only the current government can save you from them with their draconian new laws (Which incidentally were drafted by Atkinson and have been rejected by the state's highest court as unconstitutional when challenged by the first few bikies they were used against. It gets even better though because Atkinson was warned that would happen but proceeded anyway).

      Atkinson is a liability for the current government with his increasingly bizarre behaviour, but he's not going anywhere because of backroom deals done by factions of the ruling Labor party. If it wasn't for that he probably would have been dumped years ago because he's basically delivered one scandal/debacle after another. Before his latest furphies of the last couple of months, the biggest one was calling a judge "daft and delusional" then being sued by said judge for defamation and losing and having us taxpayers fork out for his defense and $200,000 damages bill.

      I believe he takes delight in trolling gamers, because as he has previously said that a R18+ rating for video games is not a significant issue in his electorate so he doesn't care what the rest of Australia thinks because for some reason he has something like 70% of the vote in his electorate. He taunted gamers to run against him and now perhaps unsurprisingly some gamers have formed a political party (Gamers 4 Croydon) and are running a candidate against him. I can only surmise that since they are out actively campaigning in his electorate and are receiving mainstream media coverage that they are making an impact for him to be amping up the rhetoric, much as the government ramped up the rhetoric against the opposition Liberal party a couple of weeks ago when an opinion poll showed that more people trust the opposition than the government.

    28. Re:Hells Angels by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      Yep. If you see any news item these days that can be summed up as "retarded Australian legislation and/or ban", just assume it has the Michael Atkinson seal of approval.

      Or Stephen Conroys.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    29. Re:Hells Angels by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      Yep. If you see any news item these days that can be summed up as "retarded Australian legislation and/or ban", just assume it has the Michael Atkinson seal of approval.

      Or Stephen Conroys.

      Oh, yes. The minister of the Internet who seems to think his job is to destroy his portfolio.

    30. Re:Hells Angels by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Yep. Although the ones ending in -o are usually derogatory. Including both the above. The ones ending in -ie are so common as to almost not be slang ;)

  3. Bwahahaha! by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Where does Australia find these whack jobs? I mean, either the guy is a paranoid schizophrenic or a mental retard.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Bwahahaha! by geoffaus · · Score: 1

      Adelaide of course!

      --
      As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a reference to Godwin's Law approaches 1
    2. Re:Bwahahaha! by guruevi · · Score: 4, Funny

      He's a politician. What do you expect - he's probably both?

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    3. Re:Bwahahaha! by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't disagree that he's a whackjob. But if people bothered to RTFA (wishful thinking on my part)...

      Atkinson's got very vocal opposition among biker gangs and gamers.

      The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night. No biker has done that.

      Put yourself in the same situation. What would you consider a more present threat to your safety -- a set of organizations who is opposing you politically (the biker gangs are putting forward their own candidate to run against him), or a set of individuals, one of which has made a threat, in writing, at your home?

      Context is everything. The submitter, the editor, and all of the early posters like yourself should do yourselves a favor and (1) read the fucking quote before misattributing words to someone and (2) understand the context in which those words were said.

      I'm addicted to slashdot, obviously so if you see my post history. But I'm sick of it becoming the geek tab of fark.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:Bwahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its ok I'm sure this fellow is just Jack Thompson who relocated to Australia and changed his name so he can practice law again legally.

    5. Re:Bwahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where does Australia find these whack jobs? I mean, either the guy is a paranoid schizophrenic or a mental retard.

      I think it's a side effect of Britain deporting all their criminals to Australia way back when.

      /ducks

    6. Re:Bwahahaha! by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Hello? What kind of people do you think they forcibly shipped from England?

      It's not like North America, where people wanted to get away from English society... ;-)

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    7. Re:Bwahahaha! by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As a politician and (assuming Rudd isn't running everything) a setter of policy, it's his job to look beyond personal anecdotes. If he's making policy based solely on the fact that some nutjob left a note on his door, and he can't get past that, then he has no business being in a position where he does form policy. I'm sorry someone made some sort of a threat, but if he's suffered that significant an emotional scarring from it, perhaps he should recuse himself.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    8. Re:Bwahahaha! by rale,+the · · Score: 5, Informative

      The article also mentions that in his scuffle with the bikers, he claimed they had BBQ'd and eaten a cat. Then was forced to admit he made it up. Why would you give him any credibility with regards to this supposed threat he received, when he has lied about his opposition in the past?

    9. Re:Bwahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're putting the cart before the horse. The incident came about as a reaction to proposed policy, not vice-versa.

      If you think he's setting policy based upon the incident, then you also did not bother reading about it at all. Please go to fark where your misinformed commentary would be more welcome.

    10. Re:Bwahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where does Australia find these whack jobs?

      The same place the US gets them...from the local church.

    11. Re:Bwahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /geese

    12. Re:Bwahahaha! by PawNtheSandman · · Score: 0

      They prefer to be called ra-tards.

    13. Re:Bwahahaha! by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1, Informative

      The article also mentions that in his scuffle with the bikers, he claimed they had BBQ'd and eaten a cat. Then was forced to admit he made it up. Why would you give him any credibility with regards to this supposed threat he received, when he has lied about his opposition in the past?

      Good point, but completely ancillary to the problem I was writing about. :)

      FWIW, the bikers did indeed barbecue and eat a cat. This is no surprise -- cats are a common BBQ treat among bikies down under, second in popularity only to shrimps on the barbie [1]. He just wasn't able to prove it, and so had to recant his claim or be sued for libel/slander.

      [1] Citation needed. But the recantment was in response to a threatened legal action based upon his inability to prove what he claimed.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    14. Re:Bwahahaha! by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      At least in the U.S. we disbarred Jack Thompson. In Australia, they made him Attorney General!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    15. Re:Bwahahaha! by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      There is nothing wrong with eating cat. Just because some countries have decided that they are too cute do eat doesn't make it wrong. In fact, I only wish that eating cat was legal and common where I live. Here in Northern California, cats have gotten to the point of being an infestation. The cat per square mile ratio simply cannot support them all, but people just keep feeding them and letting them breed with no predators. Maybe the Aussie bikers could give US bikers some good recipies.

    16. Re:Bwahahaha! by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the new North Americans were kicked out of England for being religious zealots, in which case I would say they are still here. It would appear that in both cases, not much has changed in either society.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    17. Re:Bwahahaha! by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Informative

      Australia must be a land of lolly pops and fluffy clouds, because I'd wager the Attorney General of any other reasonably large country on this planet probably receives a bag full of hate mail ever year. I can only imagine the kind of stuff the US Attorney General gets.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    18. Re:Bwahahaha! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      It's a requirement for aussie politicians.

      I believe it's a part of their constitution.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    19. Re:Bwahahaha! by Xest · · Score: 1

      More to the point, why does a threat from one gamer automatically mean that gamers in general are more threatening?

    20. Re:Bwahahaha! by icebraining · · Score: 1

      But, cats got personality, personality goes a long way.

    21. Re:Bwahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a counter, one could note that one typically realizes a biker gang is pissed off about 3 seconds before being roughly introduced to the feeling of a pipe hitting the skull - they don't seem like much of a "threatening note" crowd, more of a "smash your face in and ask questions later"...

      And given that there's no mention of any police investigation regarding this supposed note, is there any reason to believe he's not just making the story up? If he ever gets bored in Australia, I think Karl Rove might have a job for him.

    22. Re:Bwahahaha! by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      I would be afraid of the ones who will do more than make idle threats - the bikers. They don't usually make vague anonymous threats. They wont warn you what they are going to do, someday you will just wake up dead. An anonymous note slipped under your door? Probably a 13 year old who left it.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    23. Re:Bwahahaha! by godless+dave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because he's a public office holder. To the modern press, any elected official is automatically credible, even if he or she has been caught lying in the past. This is known as "balanced journalism". And no, it doesn't make any sense.

      --
      "If it's real, then it gets more interesting the closer you examine it. If it's not real, just the opposite is true." -
    24. Re:Bwahahaha! by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Informative

      In Australia, they are called "prawns" and not "shrimps", and I have never heard and actual Aussie ever say "barbie". So for the record, "shrimps on the barbie" is something you would never actually hear in Australia. (At least from a real Australian.) They also think Fosters beer is piss, and Crocodile Dundee is crap.

      And saying something damaging about someone you have a political axe to grind, without any proof, is pretty much the definition of "slander". Thankfully he reduced it back down to "hearsay and bullshit rumors".

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    25. Re:Bwahahaha! by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      FWIW, the bikers did indeed barbecue and eat a cat.

      Which is in direct contradiction with the article that says:

      He was later forced to apologise. The animal was not a cat, the incident happened at another location and bikies weren't involved.

      So...what am I supposed to make of this?

    26. Re:Bwahahaha! by syousef · · Score: 1

      The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night. No biker has done that.

      Yeah the bikers will just sell his kid drugs, and give him no warning if they're going to harm his family.

      I'm sure if he was threatened by a clown he'd be wanting to close all the circuses.

      Loser.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    27. Re:Bwahahaha! by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      I'm a bigger fan of when he said Aaron Fornarino doesn't exist...and then a paper ran a story on this 'non-existant' guy.

      http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/mike-meet-aaron-he-lives-500m-from-your-office/story-e6frea6u-1225826082741

      Now...if it was Mr Fornarino who slipped the letter, we're in the clear, cause he doesn't exist!

    28. Re:Bwahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night. No biker has done that.

      If I were a biker and I wanted attention off me, that's exactly what I'd do.

    29. Re:Bwahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wonder he got that threat.. there are way more gamers than bikers and he's acting like a dick to them.

    30. Re:Bwahahaha! by NFN_NLN · · Score: 1

      Atkinson's got very vocal opposition among biker gangs and gamers. The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night. No biker has done that.

      You fools! Can't you see that a biker did leave that note to frame the gamers and take the heat of the biker gangs. You're playing right into their trap, fools!

    31. Re:Bwahahaha! by NFN_NLN · · Score: 4, Funny

      FWIW, the bikers did indeed barbecue and eat a cat.

      Which is in direct contradiction with the article that says:

      He was later forced to apologise. The animal was not a cat, the incident happened at another location and bikies weren't involved.

      So...what am I supposed to make of this?

      It was not a cat, it was a pig. Those weren't bikers, they were Hawaiians. It wasn't a biker gang rally, it was actually a Luau. He wasn't even in Australia at the time, he was on vacation in Hawaii. OK, it all makes sense now.

    32. Re:Bwahahaha! by tdelaney · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, I'm an Aussie who says "barbie", as does everyone I know. "Shrimp" OTOH is never used (and if I ever hear the term, I think of really tiny little prawns).

    33. Re:Bwahahaha! by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      So...what am I supposed to make of this?

      You could make a brooch, a pterodactyl...

      I was taking the piss with that line. Nice to see someone bothered to RTFA.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    34. Re:Bwahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, but a dingo still ate your baby!!!1

      you can never take that from us
      oh, and have from complimentary "CP"

    35. Re:Bwahahaha! by Shagg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I mean, either the guy is a paranoid schizophrenic or a mental retard.

      Why not both?

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    36. Re:Bwahahaha! by precariousgray · · Score: 1

      Then was forced to admit he made it up.

      No.

      "He was later forced to apologise. The animal was not a cat, the incident happened at another location and bikies weren't involved."

      The article states he was forced to apologise. It is inconclusive as to whether or not he conjured this lie out of thin air, or was simply misinformed. Given he is a politician, we will never know.

      --
      not much, just being forced to manually insert line breaks into my comment
    37. Re:Bwahahaha! by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Let me think about it for a second...let's see...who's scarier? On the one hand, we have a 16 y.o. bone-skinny nerd with masking tape on his glasses who has never even met his ten best friends IRL. Granted, he did slip a threatening note under my door, but still...my eight year old daughter could break him in half. On the other hand, we have a six foot plus, 300 pound, leather-clad, tattooed, knife-wielding man, who's ten best friends have stood beside him in bar brawls for the last 20 years. He may never have said a threatening word to me, but then again, he doesn't have to.

      Yeah, sorry. I gotta go with the biker dude as the scarier of the two.

      Disclaimer: I also am (just) over six feet tall, (sometimes) wear leather and ride a motorcycle. However, I am considerably less than 300 pounds, I have never had a tattoo, nor have I ever been in a bar brawl.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    38. Re:Bwahahaha! by Shagg · · Score: 1

      He probably wrote the note himself.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    39. Re:Bwahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I completely agree, the man has no credibility.

      I, for one, can't believe that he could make such an outrageous claim that he is more afraid of a gamer than a biker (to clarify a 'biker' is referring to a bike gang member that the AG sought to place tougher laws against, these lot have been known to commit violent crimes and peddle drugs etc.). The facts:

      Bikers have concealed melee wepons or small arms; gamers don't.
      Bikers sell drugs and extort small businesses; gamers flame forums.
      Bikers aren't so stupid to threaten a poly they have no leverage with; some gamers, on the other hand, act inappropriately, leaving threatening letters that they have no actual intentions of fulfilling.

      That is how I feel about the matter knowing plenty of both gamers and bikers.

    40. Re:Bwahahaha! by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      The politically organized one, they act as a front ... if they turn violent you have a group facing you. A group known to get very violent in an organized way, even against some pretty high visibility targets. Here in the Netherlands a group of Hells Angels came into a TV studio, beat some people up and forced the host to read a reclamation from an earlier statement they were a criminal organization.

      From the other group you are only fearing one individual, even if he's serious it's still only one guy.

    41. Re:Bwahahaha! by HaZardman27 · · Score: 1

      Was that a Pulp Fiction reference?

      --
      Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
    42. Re:Bwahahaha! by russotto · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sorry. I gotta go with the biker dude as the scarier of the two.

      Maybe he means the other kind of biker gang. You know, the 130 pound mid-20s guys (and somewhat lighter gals) who are built like Tyrannosaurus Rex (huge legs, skinny little arms), dress in bright colored Spandex and wear those funny foam caps.

      Naa. They're still scarier than the gamers.

    43. Re:Bwahahaha! by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      (1) read the fucking quote before misattributing words to someone and (2) understand the context in which those words were said.

      You do realize that both of those expectations would require the posters to RTFA, and that this is /.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    44. Re:Bwahahaha! by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Really? Where are you from? All the Aussie I have ever known have never used that term.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    45. Re:Bwahahaha! by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      A real gamer would not have left a note under his door unless it was his own son or daughter coming up out of the basement on the way to the kitchen for a snack to take back downstairs. I suspect he made it up or someone is trying to frame a gamer.
      How do you get a note under the door anyway? I've never lived anywhere where you could get a note through the seal of the door. Is it so balmy down there in Australia that you can have open space under your doors? Does he live in a hotel or an apartment with doors on the inside hallway?

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    46. Re:Bwahahaha! by ctsupafly · · Score: 1

      Condemning the whole over the acts of an individual is short sighted & stupid. ONE person left him a note, so therefore, to him, all gamers are more dangerous than bikers. Sounds like just another elected idiot to me.

    47. Re:Bwahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If stupid politicians were not trying to implement stupid laws they would not get equally stupid notes.

    48. Re:Bwahahaha! by dan828 · · Score: 1

      That would have to be one charming mother fucking cat.

    49. Re:Bwahahaha! by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the new North Americans were kicked out of England for being religious zealots
      So the revolutionary war was actually a war of the colonies trying to remain a part of Britain while being forced them to become independent?

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    50. Re:Bwahahaha! by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Sadly, this I cannot deny.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    51. Re:Bwahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some municipal officials in my "ultra-safe" Nordic country get death threats on a regular basis. The angry locals are very nasty with their word but fortunately rarely take action on them. A criminal complaint is just shuddered by the police in these cases, unless an actual, increasingly threatening series of events occurs. In addition there are guns everywhere.
        So, with his reaction to a threatening note the Attorney-General has shown to be overly sensitive considering his position, in my opinion.

    52. Re:Bwahahaha! by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      So trap and neuter the cats, it is the only real way to reduce a wild cat population. Killing them or moving them somewhere else does not work, and has been tried repeatedly in other areas. TNR (Trap, Neuter, Release) is the only thing that has been proven to work.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    53. Re:Bwahahaha! by dan828 · · Score: 1

      I take it as a matter of pride the our ancestors were kicked out of every decent country in the world. The sheep stayed behind.

    54. Re:Bwahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Say "Was that a Pulp Fiction reference?" again! Say "Was that a Pulp Fiction reference?" again! I dare you! I double-dare you, motherfucker! Say "Was that a Pulp Fiction reference?" one more goddamn time!

    55. Re:Bwahahaha! by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      So just beacuse the bikers has not done something _yet_ they are to be considered less dangerous than a bunch of nerdy gamers?

    56. Re:Bwahahaha! by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Are you actually trying to say that dead cats breed more frequently than Neutered cats? That seems highly unlikely to me.

    57. Re:Bwahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't disagree that he's a whackjob. But if people bothered to RTFA (wishful thinking on my part)...

      Atkinson's got very vocal opposition among biker gangs and gamers.

      The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night. No biker has done that.

      Must have been scary. I bet it called him a noob, a faggot, and told him his ass would be "pwned", whatever that means.

    58. Re:Bwahahaha! by demi · · Score: 1

      The reason neutering works better is because the dead cats don't mate, but the neutered ones do (and produce no issue).

      --
      demi
    59. Re:Bwahahaha! by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      No, just that that approach has been tried before and has failed. As I said the thing that works best is neutering. Look up info on it yourself if you don't care to believe me. Here is a start. Unless you are just one of those type who hates cats, and will look for any reason to get rid of them, TNR makes the most sense becasue it is the cheapest and most effective way to deal with feral cat populations. The numbers from the studies done on other feral cat populations don't lie.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    60. Re:Bwahahaha! by stuckinphp · · Score: 1

      you must be new here

      --
      if only
    61. Re:Bwahahaha! by exomondo · · Score: 1

      so the threat of a group of organisations with a history of bloody violence, drug trafficking, murder and other illegal activity is trumped because of a strongly-worded letter from a gamer? And that this one person's attitude and activities are somehow representative of the much wider population of gamers. Seriously the guy is a douche!

    62. Re:Bwahahaha! by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      The gamers are running a candidate against him
      at the upcoming election too.

      They have condemned this action, which appears to have been taken by an individual not an organisation.

    63. Re:Bwahahaha! by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      South Australia the state in question was not settled by criminals.

      I was setup with free settlers, as a supposedly utopian society.

    64. Re:Bwahahaha! by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Australia must be a land of lolly pops...

      Indeed. It's just that they are vegemite flavored lollipops.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    65. Re:Bwahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, the bikers did indeed barbecue and eat a cat. This is no surprise -- cats are a common BBQ treat among bikies down under, .

      Lmfao what...People obviously don't know much about Australia. I've never even heard of the incident with the bikies doing it once! Granted we came from a heritage of convicts but we ain't savages.

    66. Re:Bwahahaha! by IndigoDarkwolf · · Score: 1

      That's too bad, because it's so much easier to remain cynical when every seafood restaurant presents you with an oxymoron.

    67. Re:Bwahahaha! by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Because politicians - in general - are knee-jerk reactionary idiots.

      Not all of them......but certainly most, it seems.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    68. Re:Bwahahaha! by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Bikers have concealed melee wepons or small arms; gamers don't.

      Of course. Gamers tend to carry their huge 14 foot long plasma cannon rifles right out in the open, because they're usually protected by multi-layer self-powered shielded body armour, so nobody can touch them, anyway.

      Oh....you mean in real life..... ....nevermind.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    69. Re:Bwahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Fosters is the beer we export not the beer we drink - XXXX, Tooths Tooheys, VB, MB, Swan etc

      One of the things that annoys me as an Expat Aussie is watching this pandering to the religious right that we never had so openly before -

      Was in the past that australian pollies would tell the Rev Fred Nile and his cronies to take a hike - now they are doing the same thing the Republican party does here in the US

      We got the Convicts NOT the Puritans - since when did that change????

    70. Re:Bwahahaha! by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      One method removes a resource consumer, which leaves more left for everyone else, the other method removes a breeder while keeping the cat in competition for resources.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    71. Re:Bwahahaha! by ashridah · · Score: 3, Informative

      s/country/state/g. This is a state-level Attorney General, not for the entire country. (US has state-level AGs as well, fyi)

      Second, there's a difference between getting nastygrams sent to your office, where they can be filtered by functionaries, and a nastygram sent to your home.

      That said, this guy's holding an irrational position if he wants to avoid violence getting in the hands of teenagers, imho. Better off allowing R18+, and then pushing for more games to be rated R18+, so that fewer of them are given to children by parents. Of course, he prefers the 'head-in-sand' approach.

    72. Re:Bwahahaha! by ashridah · · Score: 1

      Depends where you live. In melbourne, we call them prawns. IIRC, they tend to get called shrimp in QLD, don't they?

    73. Re:Bwahahaha! by ashridah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      plus fucking 1 on that score. How the hell did we end up with a religious nutjob for a prime minister?

    74. Re:Bwahahaha! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Beside, cat tastes awfaul.

      Er, so I heard.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    75. Re:Bwahahaha! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You're making a big assumption there. Do you have any proof that he can write?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    76. Re:Bwahahaha! by Canberra+Bob · · Score: 1

      Same here, and same with everyone I know. Since when is "barbie" not the Aussie slang for bbq?? On that note - if its not "barbie" then what is it?

    77. Re:Bwahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's a state AG, not federal. That means his entire role is restricted to converting oxygen into carbon dioxide to try an keep the trees alive.

    78. Re:Bwahahaha! by Eth1csGrad1ent · · Score: 1

      no offence, but where are YOU from ? Its either a bar-b-que or a barbie in Oz and always has been... If you've never heard the term "fire up the barbie.." then you've either never lived in Australia, or you have no friends.

    79. Re:Bwahahaha! by Techman83 · · Score: 1

      When someone says shrimp, tiny little nippy things come to mind. Quite common in the Murry river, they're actually quite tasty! Big load of Garlic prawns on the Barbie are also quite a treat :)

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i cat
      Damn, my RAM is full of cats. MEOW!!
    80. Re:Bwahahaha! by exomondo · · Score: 1

      because if you can discredit a person somehow associated with a group - even if this group is only a group based on a common interest and not an organisation - morons will accept that the behaviour of that one person is representative of the entire group, and douchebag politicians exploit this.

    81. Re:Bwahahaha! by smash · · Score: 1

      The "threatening note" was probably some educated adult complaining in a letter they knew would actually get *to him* about the way he is treating the majority of gamers like children.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    82. Re:Bwahahaha! by smash · · Score: 1

      Nah, asustralia is a nation of people who just don't give a shit. This is both good (we're easygoing and get along with pretty much anyone) and bad... They can't be arsed sending the hate mail. Which is unfortunately how we end up with whack jobs like this (donkey voting), and also how they stick around (no one can be arsed doing anything about it). I consider myself to be australian (not nationalized, UK citizen, but I've been here since I was 4).

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    83. Re:Bwahahaha! by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      Put yourself in the same situation. What would you consider a more present threat to your safety -- a set of organizations who is opposing you politically (the biker gangs are putting forward their own candidate to run against him), or a set of individuals, one of which has made a threat, in writing, at your home?

      Hmmm... Probably the person that actually left the threatening note.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    84. Re:Bwahahaha! by bloodhawk · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would probably stake all my money on the fact that "MOST" aussies use the word barbie. I know I have only ever lived in Canberra, Sydney and Melbourne and few country towns, but considering it is common practise in all those cities and towns and that is a large proportion of the countries population I feel my money would be pretty safe. I would also like to bet your not an aussie and have probably never been there if you think we don't use that term.

    85. Re:Bwahahaha! by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

      The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night. No biker has done that.

      Exactly. The bikers that blew themselves up in their car last week in Adelaide while taking a bomb to go kill another rival biker were missing that 'note under the door' edginess to really let the other biker gang know that they meant business. All the really dangerous types know that the best way to take care of the opposition is via slips of paper under the door. Let someone know you're coming for that extra added suprise.

      If someone was actually going to do something incredibly idiotic like trying to hurt him because of a game classification rating, I don't know if starting out with a nasty note is the way to go. I suppose it's not like he has a WoW character to camp though.

      Also, we're talking about a guy that made up a story about bikers BBQing and eating a cat, later proven to be completely false. In addition to this being the guy that wanted online political commentary to be accompanied by actual names and postcodes because of an example poster that was clearly a fake name working as an opposition shill, because Atkinson knows everyone in his district. Except the guy actually existed, lived half a km away from his office, and had actually been in there before.

      It's not entirely outside the realms of possibilty for this to also have been made up. Back when there was just some quiet rumblings as to his "I know whats best for everyone else" control mentality, he was quietly smug and arrogant. Now that the real backlash and the reality of that is coming out, the crazy we all assumed was simmering beneath the surface is coming to the fore.

    86. Re:Bwahahaha! by Renraku · · Score: 1

      Next up:

      Free speech advocates are more violent than most criminals!

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    87. Re:Bwahahaha! by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Australia must be a land of lolly pops and fluffy clouds, because I'd wager the Attorney General of any other reasonably large country on this planet probably receives a bag full of hate mail ever year.

      Yes but that's filtered out but the intern he's rodgering (poly sci or law students basically). This one was allegedly delivered to his house, so it wasn't filtered.

      If the Australian Police aren't taking this seriously, neither am I.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    88. Re:Bwahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      English, motherfucker, do you speak it?

    89. Re:Bwahahaha! by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      If the guy is anything like the anti-gaming nuts to be found elsewhere, I certainly wouldn't put it past him to try to justify his views and policies. Politicians are, at the best of times, pretty morality-challenged, and when they're claiming moral highground, you can almost be certain their nothing more than dishonorable hypocrites.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    90. Re:Bwahahaha! by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      To complete the context, gamers aren't just a bunch of individuals but are also putting forward a candidate to run against him.

    91. Re:Bwahahaha! by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

      In Australia, they are called "prawns" and not "shrimps", and I have never heard and actual Aussie ever say "barbie". So for the record, "shrimps on the barbie" is something you would never actually hear in Australia. (At least from a real Australian.) They also think Fosters beer is piss, and Crocodile Dundee is crap. And saying something damaging about someone you have a political axe to grind, without any proof, is pretty much the definition of "slander". Thankfully he reduced it back down to "hearsay and bullshit rumors".

      Actually, as an Australian, I can truthfully say I have heard many Aussies say "barbie", and I am guilty of using the word myself. I also thought Crocodile Dundee (well, the first 2 anyway) was funny.

      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
    92. Re:Bwahahaha! by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      Well there's all those retarded laws he keeps signing.

    93. Re:Bwahahaha! by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      >> Bikers have concealed melee wepons or small arms; gamers don't.

      Stupid-ass assumption to make. (regarding "gamers don't")

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    94. Re:Bwahahaha! by registrar · · Score: 1

      Me too. And I liked Crocodile Dundee.

    95. Re:Bwahahaha! by mjwx · · Score: 1

      If the guy is anything like the anti-gaming nuts to be found elsewhere

      Yep, this guy is Australia's Jack Thompson, not to be confused with Australia's Jack Thomson.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    96. Re:Bwahahaha! by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      FWIW, the bikers did indeed barbecue and eat a cat. This is no surprise -- cats are a common BBQ treat among bikies down under,

      I call bullshit. He made the cat claims in Parliament - where he is protected against charges of slander and libel. In fact he can pretty much say what he likes except call a politician a liar. He withdrew his claim when it was demonstrated that the incident "did not take place". Not because he couldn't prove it. It was proven that no "bikies" were a the local park that day. The alleged "cat cooking" took place at another park - and "did not" involve bikers.

      Try "Hansard" for the actual record

      As to - cats being a common treat among bikies down under - I can only presume you are suffering from some sort of brain fart - of course I can't prove that what you say is untrue... which hardly "proves" your junk statement either. I haven't attended every barby hosted by bikers - but pig on a spit is pretty popular.

      Politicians are the same the world over - different dogs but the same leg action, so are idiots.

    97. Re:Bwahahaha! by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Informative

      Another Aussie here, Victorian but at 50 I have seen most of the country several times over. Everyone I know calls it a barbie, including the polititians on TV who try to set the adgenda for "talking around the barbie".

      Shrimp = short person, or the tiny prawns in a "shrimp cocktail".

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    98. Re:Bwahahaha! by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      It makes me want to form a Motorcycle Club for gamers. I don't know what the name would be, but our motto would be "Big Hogs and Dual Analogs!"

    99. Re:Bwahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And whilst his afraid of some angsty gamer leaving notes under his bloody welcome mat us bikies fund his rivals and their activities and pull strings with his allies as we edge closer to elections. If he was in his right mind some angry teenager would be the last of his problems.

    100. Re:Bwahahaha! by simplexion · · Score: 1

      He also said that someone who lived around the corner from him was made up by the opposition party to post comments on a news website opposing his policies. He then had to eat his words again and meet the "imaginary" person.

    101. Re:Bwahahaha! by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "Is it so balmy down there in Australia that you can have open space under your doors?"

      Yes.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    102. Re:Bwahahaha! by Samah · · Score: 1

      Where does Australia find these whack jobs? I mean, either the guy is a paranoid schizophrenic or a mental retard.

      When it comes to Michael Atkinson, those two labels are not mutually exclusive.

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    103. Re:Bwahahaha! by Dracophile · · Score: 1

      Where does Australia find these whack jobs? I mean, either the guy is a paranoid schizophrenic or a mental retard

      Well, either a majority of his electoral division all got together and decided in their collective infinite wisdom that it was in their best interests, all things considered, to be represented by a paranoid schizophrenic, mentally retarded whack job... or the majority of his division are simply paranoid schizophrenic, mentally retarded whack jobs themselves. I'll meditate on which of the two possibilities is the more likely.

      --
      Athy, athier, athiest.
    104. Re:Bwahahaha! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The sheep stayed behind.

      No, they went to New Zealand...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    105. Re:Bwahahaha! by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      Female cats' need to mate can be satisfied, and so an infertile mate will remove the female from the breeding population for a time.

      Until she mates or is spayed, these estrus cycles will repeat as often as every two or three weeks, causing distress to both the queen and her human companions. (1)

      Male cats also have a barbed penis; upon withdrawal, the vagina is damaged and the female would be unwilling to mate for a while even if she remained in estrus (i.e. if ovulation failed to be stimulated).

    106. Re:Bwahahaha! by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      either the guy is a paranoid schizophrenic or a mental retard.

      That's unfair. He could easily be both.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    107. Re:Bwahahaha! by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Dead cats that don't mate produce more kittens than neutered cats that do?

      Do you work in Australian politics, by any chance?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    108. Re:Bwahahaha! by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      They're not trying very hard then. Explain why dead cats have more kittens than live ones.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    109. Re:Bwahahaha! by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Interns don't just give blowjobs; they smarter ones can be trained to sign your name for you.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    110. Re:Bwahahaha! by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      I've noticed that the The Spandex ones tend to break more laws than the beer belly ones; like at every intersection.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    111. Re:Bwahahaha! by demi · · Score: 1

      If you trap and kill the cats, the remaining feral fertile cats mate with each other, producing a new generation of kittens.

      If you trap and sterilize the cats, and release them back into the wild population, the remaining feral fertile cats mate with them (at least sometimes), and fewer kittens result.

      --
      demi
    112. Re:Bwahahaha! by riprjak · · Score: 1

      Indeed... If a person placed a note under my door threatening my family in the middle of the night would be cause for concern regarding the behavior of deranged and possibly violent people who stalk my house. I just do not see what this has to do with gamers. I can't think of any way in which the alleged commission of any crime can be caused by your enjoying video games.

      I mean, they arrested a shotgun wielding bandit in Adelaide recently and he had a drivers license and lived in a house... so are we to be scared of drivers and people who aren't homeless now because they will all shoot us in the face with a shotgun??? or should we perhaps reserve that particular fear for shotgun wielding bandits regardless of their hobbies?

      It is a gross overstatement to tar all people who share a hobby with the acts of a single individual who claims to share that hobby but cannot prove it.

      I could go on to discuss the base rate fallacy in this context but I feel my point is made.
      err!
      jak.

    113. Re:Bwahahaha! by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      The Brits wanted our *money*, our taxes, our resources, our trade, and control over us. They wanted Power, with a capital P. That is what the Revolutionary War was about. That was back in the days when being an Imperialist was considered a good thing.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  4. I'm pretty sure... by SharpFang · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...it would be opposite if he was proposing a ban on motorcycles.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:I'm pretty sure... by megamerican · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The article states that he indeed, did:

      Mr Atkinson was involved in introducing tough new laws to outlaw bikie gangs in South Australia several years ago.

      At the time he said politicians and public officials had to put themselves "on the line" to take the gangs on.

      How brave of him. Now he has to bravely face some teenager leaving a note at his door that most assuredly called him a "nigger faggot."

      --
      If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
  5. What you should know of Michael Atkinson's family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are a bunch of spawn camping llamas.

  6. Even scarier - both by davidwr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Biker gangs playing video games while driving - that's double scary.

    But what about Biker gangs playing video games about biker games playing video games while driving, while driving???

    Or what about ERR_STACK_OVERFLOW

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Even scarier - both by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Yo dawg, we put a biker video game about a biker playing a video game in a video game on your bike so you can game while you game and bike while you bike!

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    2. Re:Even scarier - both by yourexhalekiss · · Score: 1

      Thank you, Xzibit.

    3. Re:Even scarier - both by drkim · · Score: 1

      "Wow, I really feel like I'm playing virtual skeeball!"

  7. Wow by gparent · · Score: 1

    Are the biker gangs in his town dressed up as teddy bears with pink helmets or something?

    1. Re:Wow by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Furries biker gangs?

      Holy crap Australians are kinky!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Wow by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Are the biker gangs in his town dressed up as teddy bears with pink helmets or something?

      No, that's in Sydney.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  8. Anecdotal Evidence Disagrees. by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Gamers sometimes learn bad fictional behavior. (Consider the evil character paths in various D&D games.) Gamers frequently learn good fictional behavior. (Consider the hero character paths in many D&D games.)

    In contrast, a chapter of Hell's Angels in Hamburg ran multiple houses for the rape of teenage girls and women held as slaves. (Sources: Victor Malarek's The Natashas, Terry Lee Wright's River of Innocents.) They were responsible for enabling thousands of rapes in the real world.

    Yes, it's atypical for a biker gang. But all things considered, it's more rare for the gamer.

    --
    -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    1. Re:Anecdotal Evidence Disagrees. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But all things considered, it's more rare for the gamer.

      The time spent trying to find the USB port on a teenage girl means at most you will only ever have one girl kidnapped per Gamer...

    2. Re:Anecdotal Evidence Disagrees. by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

      In halo, one can usually find cases of necrophilia/rape as people teabag their victims.

    3. Re:Anecdotal Evidence Disagrees. by will+this+name+work · · Score: 0, Troll

      Necrophilia is not rape... unless the victim dies in the process.

    4. Re:Anecdotal Evidence Disagrees. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly though, it's a dead body. Who was hurt? Aside from the guy they just killed, who is now in "Heaven" with "Baby Jesus" and "the flying spaghetti monster"?

    5. Re:Anecdotal Evidence Disagrees. by hypergreatthing · · Score: 2, Insightful

      well.... a corpse can't give consent.

    6. Re:Anecdotal Evidence Disagrees. by icebraining · · Score: 1, Informative

      Neither can a sex doll, but you don't call their owners "rapists".

    7. Re:Anecdotal Evidence Disagrees. by ae1294 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Which is why we need another new law covering this....

    8. Re:Anecdotal Evidence Disagrees. by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Since your post has inspired a debate about whether corpses and zombies can be raped, I'll point out that slaves cannot be. Being a slave-trader is worse than being a rapist, not the reverse as your post would seem to imply. Now I ask you, are gamers scarier than Thomas Jefferson?

    9. Re:Anecdotal Evidence Disagrees. by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 1

      > Since your post has inspired a debate about whether corpses and zombies can be raped, I'll point out that slaves cannot be. Being a slave-trader is worse than being a rapist, not the reverse as your post would seem to imply. Now I ask you, are gamers scarier than Thomas Jefferson?

      On the contrary; slaves can be raped, and frequently are. (I would say usually are, but a lot depends on which definitions you use, and labor trafficking does not always involve rape, although sometimes it does.)

      It is possible to claim otherwise by claiming that a slave has no rights, but that applies only in cases of legal slavery, and slavery is not legal today. (The prohibition on slavery takes on the status of jus cogens in international law, meaning that it is not and cannot be legal anywhere in the world.)

      As to slave trading and rape, that's generally true at least because the former usually involves a lot of the latter. (So there's no need to get into the messy question of what absolute wrong is worse than another, all other things being equal).

      Thomas Jefferson... Mmm.... Probably not, but some gamers would be the exception. Thomas Jefferson was an especially effective politician, which makes him dangerous. Only some gamers are dangerous. Therefore on the whole, gamers are not scarier than Thomas Jefferson.

      "Gamers are not scarier than Thomas Jefferson." Of all the sentences I didn't expect to use today...

      --
      -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    10. Re:Anecdotal Evidence Disagrees. by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Yes. But HE doesn't find biker gangs more dangerous. He isn't a teenage girl. Being a selfish twit none of that concerns him.

    11. Re:Anecdotal Evidence Disagrees. by dan828 · · Score: 1

      Well, at least TJ could put a decent sentence together.

    12. Re:Anecdotal Evidence Disagrees. by M8e · · Score: 0

      Don't forget SpongeBob SquarePants.

    13. Re:Anecdotal Evidence Disagrees. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'd find a gamer has a hard time getting a girl into their house

      Gamer: Want to come play D&D?
      Girl:

    14. Re:Anecdotal Evidence Disagrees. by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      In reality, what happens in fictional worlds is irrelevant.

    15. Re:Anecdotal Evidence Disagrees. by cheatch · · Score: 1

      wasn't Thomas Jefferson a slave trader himself?

  9. I hear that AG! by AioKits · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can't count the amount of times I've felt threatened on the highways here as a beat up, patchy painted Honda Civic pulls up with a triforce or horde sticker in one of the windows. If it's one car, you can usually outrun it as they're not really going to be paying attention, usually debating the merits of pixel shading with others in the car at this point. However, if it's more than one car, you can bet they have you in their sights. Especially after playing that brutal and vicious car game I saw in the arcades once.. Spy Hunter I think it was?

    Or if I actually make it to a gas station and am fueling up, one of em might come over, push his glasses up or adjust the tape holding them together, asking what if I'm gonna reserve the new StarCraft! The horror!

    I always feel much safer knowing that the guy next to me on that bike on the highway has a full body tattoo and a mustache, and so does his girlfriend on the bitch seat! I mean, at least they're not gamers, right?

    * PS - This is intended as a lame attempt at humor, don't hurt me, I play games too! >.>

    --
    "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    1. Re:I hear that AG! by Stregano · · Score: 3, Funny

      So you are going to reserve Starcraft 2, right? RIGHT?!?

      --
      The world is how you make it
    2. Re:I hear that AG! by AioKits · · Score: 1

      Y-yes Sir.. Don't hurt me!

      --
      "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    3. Re:I hear that AG! by maxume · · Score: 1

      Whenever I see a beat up, patchy painted Honda Civic with a triforce or horde sticker in one of the windows, I fear for the future of humanity.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:I hear that AG! by Shagg · · Score: 1

      If it's a Honda Civic, you can probably get out and walk... and still outrun it.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    5. Re:I hear that AG! by Nivlheim · · Score: 1

      I can't count the amount of times I've felt threatened on the highways here as a beat up, patchy painted Honda Civic pulls up with a triforce or horde sticker in one of the windows.

      Reroll on a PvE realm! Oh wait..

    6. Re:I hear that AG! by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      If it's a Honda Civic, you can probably get out and walk... and still outrun it.

      Yeah....it's the Toyotas that you have to worry about. :)

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  10. Blame game. by BlueKitties · · Score: 1

    Conservatives want to blame the gays; Liberals want to blame open media and expression of thought. On the right hand we have austere government imposed morality, on the left hand we have censorship nanny state. I'm not really sure which I hate more.

    --
    "Sorrow is better than laughter, for by sadness of face the heart is made glad." [Ecclesiastes 7:3]
    1. Re:Blame game. by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      What happened to the far right "impose morality and open media on the government, and leave the citizens in charge"?

      Can we mod our gov -1 redundant?

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    2. Re:Blame game. by BlueKitties · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      There is no -1 disagree.

      --
      "Sorrow is better than laughter, for by sadness of face the heart is made glad." [Ecclesiastes 7:3]
    3. Re:Blame game. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conservatives want to blame the gays; Liberals want to blame open media and expression of thought.

      Yeah, that's right - censorship is a liberal trait!

      Oh, right!

    4. Re:Blame game. by jtev · · Score: 1

      Please look at the context. American liberalism and conservatism aren't the same as everywhere in the world. In fact, calling the ideas "liberal" or "conservative" is quite misleading. There are certain "Pet Rights" of each side of the political spectrum in the US, but that doesn't mean that they will be the same in all countries. Links to American politics therefore do not apply.

      --
      That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
    5. Re:Blame game. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Overrated

    6. Re:Blame game. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liberals want to blame open media and expression of thought.

      Wait
      What?

      Liberals are those guys that put free speech and expression above everything. They're often too much of the 'free market is everything' part for me, otherwise they'd get my vote. Now I'm stuck to voting for a relatively small left-liberal party.

    7. Re:Blame game. by dan828 · · Score: 1

      Amazing how people fail to realize this. I mean the Nazis were crazy syndicalist-socialists with a penchant for psuedo-scientific race theories and mystical Teutonic nationalism, yet they always get described as "right wing". Economically and socially they were pretty far "left" in a lot of their policies.

    8. Re:Blame game. by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Ironically, The Liberal Party in Australia ARE
      the conservatives.

      The Labour party used to be left wing, but is now slightly less conservative than the Liberals.

      It always makes me laugh when I see US posters carping on about liberals as left wing!

    9. Re:Blame game. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      On the right hand we have austere government imposed morality, on the left hand we have censorship nanny state.

      Except that nobody on the left is actually proposing censorship. You are confusing "populist politicians" with "leftists" - the same is true for "conservatives." There really isn't much resembling either leftism or conservatism is modern western politics, it's all just a bureaucratic mish-mash of pandering.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    10. Re:Blame game. by BlueKitties · · Score: 1

      Oh, let me educate you then. Left and right are relative to the individual. For example, if you're facing me, my left is your right. In AU, "left" has a slightly different meaning than it does for US citizens. But I understand people from other countries aren't educated enough to see this, so I understand your mistake.

      --
      "Sorrow is better than laughter, for by sadness of face the heart is made glad." [Ecclesiastes 7:3]
    11. Re:Blame game. by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      LOL An american who says other countries education system is inferior.

      Now I know you are deluded. (Or perhaps your just a product of the US education system, same thing really)

      It not a slightly different meaning it is a hugely different meaning. You simply dont have ANY left wing in the US compared to civilised countries.

    12. Re:Blame game. by BlueKitties · · Score: 1

      Your superior education system apparently didn't teach you much about how word usage and meaning varies between cultures. But that's okay, I'm sure we'll go liberate the hell out of you guys Bush style soon enough, and you can have some of our amazing edumikation.

      --
      "Sorrow is better than laughter, for by sadness of face the heart is made glad." [Ecclesiastes 7:3]
  11. Soo.. by binarylarry · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What he's saying is, every person under 30 who lives in Australia is scarier than Biker Gangs?

    Does he ever leave the house?

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    1. Re:Soo.. by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

      Does he ever leave the house?

      Of course he does.....with a large, well-armed security detail.

      --
      "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    2. Re:Soo.. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Not anymore! Too many gamers out there!

    3. Re:Soo.. by Lunzo · · Score: 1

      The average age of the Aussie gamer is around 30. So he's equally scared of the 50% of gamers who are over 30!

    4. Re:Soo.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What he's saying is, every person under 30 who lives in Australia is scarier than Biker Gangs?

      No, not even remotely. He's only saying that, while he has proposed legislation that pisses off biker gangs and gamers, it's only the gamers who have threatened his life, while the biker gangs have merely chosen a political route to opposing him, so therefore the gamers are the ones who he considers a bigger threat to his and his family's personal safety.

      It's actually a completely logical thing to say, under the circumstances. But, of course, actually putting his quote in context isn't nearly as sensational.

    5. Re:Soo.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some gamers left a threatening note under his door. The biker gangs have organized a political candidate to run against him. So which group appears to be acting with more civility in this case?

  12. That's not a knife. by gimmebeer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    *pulls out lvl48 warhammer w/+10 damage spell* THIS is a knife.

    1. Re:That's not a knife. by Whalou · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You had me fooled. I thought it was a warhammer.

      --
      English is not this .sig mother tongue...
    2. Re:That's not a knife. by KTheorem · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      "Warhammer" is the name of his knife.

    3. Re:That's not a knife. by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Strikes me as particulary poor naming for a knife. It needs something sharper.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  13. now now now... by Moheeheeko · · Score: 1

    ..there has been many a victim of a gamers....getting up, wheezing, using his inhaler and then starting a hate thread on 4chan.

  14. A matter of scale OR politics (or both) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is really a two-sided failure of understanding on his part OR a purposeful tactic to push his agenda. Either way is stupid. First off, to say the gamer demographic in AU is several orders of magnitude larger than the outlaw biker demographic is a GROSS understatement. So it follows that you are going to get more 'fringe' elements in the gamer segment. There's bound to be a few nuts in a box that big. Combine that with the fact that it would be totally in their worst interests for the bikers to do something like this, and of course he's going to get more threats from gamers. And honestly, he should feel more threatened. Not because they're going to take violent action against him, but because he's pissed off a large group of people, and a good deal of them may have political clout and means to make his life a public servant miserable. And they should, because he's an asshat.

  15. Veto? by afidel · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wow, the AG has the power of the veto in .AU? That's a pretty strange arrangement where the guy charged with enforcing the law gets to decide if something should be a law.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:Veto? by Beezlebub33 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If there is a law, and the AG doesn't enforce it, it might as well not be a law. That's an (implicit) form of veto. Of course, the summary is hyperbole, but the key point (that the guy's a loon and in a position to affect how the law is applied) is correct.

      --
      The more people I meet, the better I like my dog.
    2. Re:Veto? by pavon · · Score: 1

      On the other-hand, the AG isn't normally allowed to continue to enforce laws that have been repealed. Having the power to veto bills that change laws in ways he doesn't like would effectively give him this ability (limited to any override process).

    3. Re:Veto? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... the guy charged with enforcing the law gets to decide if something should be a law.

      You mean like the President of the United States?

    4. Re:Veto? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the record, the Atkinson has a veto over changes to the Australian classification regime, not over laws generally. Because the Federal Government in Australia has no constitutional power to set the classification scheme a compromise was involved in the national scheme that means all the state AGs have to agree to any changes.

      Hence creating an R18 rating for games is something Atkinson can veto.

    5. Re:Veto? by Falconhell · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is a STATE AG, and for the relevant changes the approval of all the states AG is required.

      Atkinson is the holdout.

      He is the darling of the Right faction of the Labor
      party, which confusingly used to be left wing before they sold out.

      Please note in au liberals are the conservative party!

    6. Re:Veto? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, the AG has the power of the veto in .AU?

      This is a STATE politician, NOT Federal ..........

    7. Re:Veto? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Please note in au liberals are the conservative party!

      Note that's Liberals (name) not liberals (concept). Out party lines are not drawn on the rigid left/right scale that the US is. Both parties have left and right elements. Labour more so then Libeals. Atkinson and Conroy are from Labours extreme right.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    8. Re:Veto? by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      There is no U in labor party, quite ironic really.

      When au political parties factions are mentioned with respect to these parties, it is relative, a factional right wing Labor person would still normally be more left of centre policy wise than a left wing Liberal faction memeber. The difference seems to be less each year.

      Of course both would be thought of as goddamn socialist liberal commies in the US. It cracks me up when Americans refer to "socialist" policies as frankly both the US political parties and thier supporters would be viewed as far right loonies here.

      Shit now I am confused!

    9. Re:Veto? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure how it is set up in AU but in Texas if an Attorney General gives an opinion on something it carries the force of law until the legislator makes an actual law concerning the subject or a court strikes down his/her opinion.

      The appellate courts of Texas have consistently held that attorney general opinions, although not binding on the courts, are entitled to "great weight." An opinion of the attorney general should be deemed to state the law correctly, unless or until the opinion is modified or overruled by statute, judicial decision, or subsequent attorney general opinion.

      source: http://www.oag.state.tx.us/opin/legal_authority.shtml

  16. Of course! by geoffaus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Of course they are scarier - they get multiple lives!

    --
    As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a reference to Godwin's Law approaches 1
    1. Re:Of course! by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Of course they are scarier - they get multiple lives!

      and they have secret codes, like up up down down left right left right b a, to get even more lives; plus, those bikers have nothing on those power glove, they're so bad!

  17. Well....Yeah? by Drakin020 · · Score: 1

    And Bikers would be more of a threat to me than terrorist if I tried to outlaw motorcycles.

    Christians would be more of a threat than street thugs if I tried to ban religion.

    It's stating the obvious here....

    --
    The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
  18. Re:The guy's right by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Jesus, who are you, his wife? Hur dur, a random crazy threatened him, but no bikers have... why might that be? Let's see him support legislation outlawing biker gangs, see how many threats he gets.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  19. WTF? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    Aren't all Australians compelled by law to watch Mad Max? Surely that should provide suitable education on the dangers of biker gangs...

    1. Re:WTF? by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Just you wait until Toe-Cutter 3: Thunder Down Under comes out! Who'll be laughing then? Huh?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  20. ok... by kaoshin · · Score: 2, Funny

    "He was later forced to apologise. The animal was not a cat, the incident happened at another location and bikies weren't involved."

    This bloke is a dill mates.

    1. Re:ok... by KaptainKrunch · · Score: 0

      So he attended a BBQ of a cow with some PTA parents?

    2. Re:ok... by Mathonwy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "He was later forced to apologise. The animal was not a cat, the incident happened at another location and bikies weren't involved."

      Wait, what?!

      "Oops, my bad, it was a cow, not a cat. And it wasn't at my house, it was at the local Burger King. And I guess it was just a family of 4, not bikers. But it looked so delicious that I was understandably confused!"

    3. Re:ok... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, he fails to see logic over and over. Most of his arguments conflict with each other.

  21. What a tit by Attaturk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not sure whether my biker self or my gamer self is more offended by this arsehat. I've met and hung out with dozens of "biker gangs" at various rallies - yes including the patch clubs that people refer to here like they're comprised of mindless hooligans - and felt safer in their company than when taking a trip through a town centre on a Friday or Saturday night.

    In short, "biker gang" is not shorthand for dangerous thug. Nor is "gamer" shorthand for brainwashed serial killer. And while we're at it I'm pretty sure that "Australian politician" doesn't mean paranoid, misinformed and dangerously ignorant jerk"... but I could be wrong.

    Just a thought Mr Atkinson but perhaps your ill-considered bigotry is what causes people to take such a dim view of you. A single gamer harrassing you is more likely indicative that you've pissed someone off personally than that all gamers are out to get you and your family. Gah.

    1. Re:What a tit by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

      I pretty much have to agree there. I ride a little yellow 150cc Vespa, and it's an odd day when one of the young men on the crotch rockets even deigns to acknowledge my presence, but the guys on enormous Harleys -- including members of the patch clubs -- always wave as we pass, and more than a few have struck up conversations at stops. While I'm sure there are thugs out there, the scariest-looking hardcore bikers have generally turned out to be pretty nice guys. I wouldn't go out of my way to piss any of them off, of course, but I see no reason to worry when one of them rumbles up to where I am.

      If you want scary, try clean-cut businessmen talking on their cell phones in enormous SUVs. Those guys are casual killers. The Hell's Angels, not so much.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    2. Re:What a tit by exomondo · · Score: 1

      The next time a taxpayer threatens him he'll be saying taxpayers - as a group - are more of a threat to him than biker gangs, regardless of the fact that a % of biker gang members would also be taxpayers.

    3. Re:What a tit by mooingyak · · Score: 2, Informative

      And while we're at it I'm pretty sure that "Australian politician" doesn't mean paranoid, misinformed and dangerously ignorant jerk"... but I could be wrong.

      It does actually, though it means it if you drop 'Australian' from there too.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    4. Re:What a tit by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that "Australian politician" doesn't mean paranoid, misinformed and dangerously ignorant jerk"... but I could be wrong

      Possibly means "madder than a cut snake" and "couldn't lie straight in bed". Conroy is not helping the image.

      Sometimes you get the impression they have forgotten that Australia is supposed to be a Representative Democracy - they are supposed to represent the views and interests of the electorate - NOT thier personal views.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    5. Re:What a tit by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      As an early 20's male riding a crotch rocket, I can see where they come from in the doesn't acknowledge your presence business if you are male and on a vespa.

      Something doesn't seem right about riding a more dangerous (the vespa) vehicle while at the same time looking feminine, the tiny wheelbase on scooters makes them horrible over bumps, and the seated position is impossible to escape if you ever stack it, you're stuck essentially.

    6. Re:What a tit by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Something doesn't seem right about riding a more dangerous (the vespa) vehicle while at the same time looking feminine

      ...says the guy humping a cricket.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  22. is he right? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

    I think he is!

    Thats to say... I agree that biker gangs are about as ridiculous of a thing to worry about harming your family as video games.

    Unless you have lots of contact with a biker gang, or have 1%er in the family, or have some other factor which makes you more likely to be involved in biker gang violence (maybe you are a meth addict with a penchant for not havening the money?) or maybe if you live next door to a particularly disliked gang member or chapter president, then... really.... what a stupid thing to worry about.

    Theres what, maybe, one biker gang member per couple of million per capita here. Are they like 15%ers in Australia? Are biker gangs like soccer hooligans? Do the outlaw bikers have a national political party?

    I mean seriously.... why not compare the danger of video games to lightning strikes or shark attacks as dangers to your family. How do they rate against.... dust mites! I garauntee bed bugs are worst!

    -Steve

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    1. Re:is he right? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Ok, I am going to fucking shut up now.... I got p0wn3d:

      "I feel that my family and I are more at risk from gamers than we are from the outlaw motorcycle gangs who also hate me and are running a candidate against me," he said on ABC TV's Good Game.

      Wow...um.... so if you live in Australia...do worry about the biker gang party.... holy shit.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    2. Re:is he right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF is a 1%er or a 15%er? Is it something to do with what beer they drinks?

    3. Re:is he right? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      You know, I always thought Mad Max was a futuristic post-apocalyptic film series, not a documentary on the Australian socio-political scene.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:is he right? by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most 1% er's people see are actually posers. I've been an official photographer for most of the BIG motorcycle events in the eastern half of the USA and real bikers that are real 1%er's are far and few between.. Most of the time you have a 1%er poser. someone that wants to look like a badass but in reality is a big pussy that wants attention. Problem is at Sturgis these posers get their asses kicked by the real 1%ers because they try and pull their bullshit in front of them.

      a Real 1%er when you find one will let you know. I've met a few of them, and I steer clear after I buy them a drink and they let me know of who to steer clear of.

      So that loser riding his shiny new 2010 harley all leathered up with harley jeans, harley shirt and skull print face mask... He is, in fact, a poser. 1%er's don't have new bikes and dress in all that branded crap at the hardly store.

      A real 1%er has a jacket that has road rash on it and looks like he at one time was ran over by a truck, because they typically lead incredibly hard lives. I have almost lost a camera to a 1%er. I gladly handed it over, saying "I'm sorry, here you go".. surprisingly he stopped, asked how to remove the card and threw me the camera back grunting, "NO PICTURES".

      You don't screw with a 1%er. In fact I don't even raise my camera in their general direction. After the 6 years of shooting at Sturgis and other big events I can spot them easily.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:is he right? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Obviously, you don't know too many bikers. :)

      Long story short: A while back an article was run about how most motorcycle riders are average joes and law abiding citizens. In said article, it said that the "bad guys" were, at most, 1% of the community, and not representative of the average biker.

      As such, outlaw biker gangs responded by taking the label "1%" to denote themselves as the bad ass bikers. As such, 1% has become a common tatoo amongst that crowd, along with 1% patches on leather jackets and the term "one percenter"

      Wiki has a short writeup on it. I have seen it in articles myself and, had the story told to me by my wife's leather wearing, bike riding non-1%er grandfather.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outlaw_motorcycle_club#One_Percenters

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    6. Re:is he right? by maroonhat · · Score: 1

      1%er is a reference to criminally bikers, from an AMA (American Motorcycle Association) publication ('91 I think) claiming that 99% of bikers are law abiding citizens. The suggestion of 15%er is that in AU there are many more criminal bikers than in the US, so many that it might be an acceptable form of shenanigans, like soccer hooligans in GB.

      --
      The more I learn about Windows the more I am surprised it runs at all
    7. Re:is he right? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Gangs would on average be a known to state and federal task forces.
      With licence plate and facial recognition of event photographs, early reconnaissance of a state of federal minister could be detected.
      Kind of hard to hide your face too well at a day in the park, mall or city or suburbia during a meet and greet.
      Every gang member would be in a shared database.
      Next event, security is up and your 'gang' is distracted by state and federal bureaucracy, police roadworthiness questions and infiltration.
      Now the random lone wolf gamer showing up at an event and requesting their 'you tube' back or talking about a sitting member as if they where the taliban on camera is hard to deal with.
      They show up, make their point and are back to life in suburbia with a 'win' video or detained with a 'dropped' video device.
      Their courage and/or arrest 'you tube' event video becomes infectious.
      Anyone in the crowd could be a gamer ready to campaign over the Senator Conroy issue.
      The ALP has two options, clean, controlled events.
      Option two is up security and have the staff filmed protecting a member from the truth.
      That attracts more gamers for the 'win' and requests for collar numbers from plain clothed officers.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    8. Re:is he right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you have lots of contact with a biker gang, or have 1%er in the family, or have some other factor which makes you more likely to be involved in biker gang violence (maybe you are a meth addict with a penchant for not havening the money?) or maybe if you live next door to a particularly disliked gang member or chapter president, then... really.... what a stupid thing to worry about.

      I live in the US, and there is a fairly large biker gang that roams between South Dakota, Colorado, Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming. They spend most of their time raising money for children's hospitals, and doing volunteer work for local communities. Most years they donate and volunteer at the local "soup kitchens" during the holidays, and round up toys for the poor kids, as well as help fund them with school books and supplies.

      There are a few biker gangs out there who engage in rough and/or criminal activity, but to be blunt most of the "gangs" out there are just people who like to ride. And a good chunk of them take off the leathers and chaps, and put their suits back on for the workweek.

    9. Re:is he right? by thatkid_2002 · · Score: 1

      Hang on a sec

      s/biker/gangster
      s/biker/hacker
      s/biker/goth
      It is pretty much the same with any of the "cool" minority groups.

    10. Re:is he right? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Correct on the AMA reference, but I think the term is much older than that.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    11. Re:is he right? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Actually I meant 15%er as a joke more like.... MAYBE if 15% of the riding community were criminal bikers, then you might have a leg to stand on claiming that criminal bikers are a real concern for your family. As stated by others, the real percentage is lower than that (probably lower than 1% even... though... the number of gang members when added to hangers on etc is estimated to approach nearly 5 million which is around 1% of the general US population.... so maybe...)

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    12. Re:is he right? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Of course, you do know, I used the term 1%er liberally, which specifically is meant to A) refer to criminal outlaw bikers and B) illustrate that 99% of riders are NOT criminal outlaw bikers

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  23. This guy is going to piss him... by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 2, Funny

    This guy is going to piss himself if he meets a gamer that's in a biker gang.

    1. Re:This guy is going to piss him... by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Apparently there are some such here on /.

      And for that matter, how does he know the threat didn't come from a gamer who was also a biker?

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  24. Anal Bum Cover? by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

    It that something like anal bum cover?

    1. Re:Anal Bum Cover? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer The rapists...

    2. Re:Anal Bum Cover? by Miseph · · Score: 1

      The penis mightier than swords.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
  25. Re:The guy's right by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

    I retract my previous post, as I finished the article and it turns out he did exactly that. Bleh.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  26. Re:The guy's right by Qzukk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    this guy thinks that gamers are generally more dangerous than bikers in order to discredit him.

    Quote:

    "I feel that my family and I are more at risk from gamers than we are from the outlaw motorcycle gangs who also hate me and are running a candidate against me"

    He didn't say "from a gamer" he said "from gamers", as in the whole group. As opposed to the outlaw motorcycle gangs, as in their whole group. He feels that gamers are more dangerous than bikers. If he's never received a death threat from anyone but a gamer, then perhaps he's justified in feeling that way, but I'm seriously surprised that this is the first death threat an AG would get.

    I do have to say that the motorcycle gangs have a better long term plan than the gamers do at this point. Someone should start a gamer party and run for election on the grounds that you actually know something about what you're trying to regulate.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  27. that IS scary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd give a wide berth to anyone sporting pink leathers...

  28. Re:The guy's right by jason.sweet · · Score: 1

    He's pissed the biker's off enough that they are running a candidate against him. It seems that he compared the childish, illogical response to the mature, productive response and made the correct assessment.

  29. Article says he helped ban biker gangs by Lemming+Mark · · Score: 1

    To be fair, the article does say that he banned biker gangs and he's suggesting that he's under more threat over this games business than he was over that. Given somebody has evidently been round his house, slipping a note under the door, I can understand why the guy might be freaked out.

    But as you pointed out, he's only banned / restricted biker gangs, not motorcycles. Banning motorcycles because of biker gangs would have annoyed a larger section of the population, many of whom would resent being grouped in with gangs just because of their transportation. Perhaps a larger number of indignant people makes a response like this more likely, although still not acceptable. In a sense the situation of banning motorcycles would be somewhat closer (although still more severe) to his stance on video games. At least he's not banning video games outright but he doesn't exactly seem to be being reasonable if he's allowing there to be an R18 rating. Aside from anything else, not having an appropriate rating encourages developers - and potentially the regulators themselves - to skate on thin ice and try and push products through that would more appropriately have a higher rating if it existed.

    This is a political issue, so doing things like slipping a note under his door during the night is not going to help anyone. A sensible letter-writing campaign / publicity / demonstrations would seem more appropriate, something that will add political pressure for him to reconsider instead of making gamers look dangerous, which would only support his case.

    1. Re:Article says he helped ban biker gangs by element-o.p. · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This begs the question, and I'm sincerely curious about the answer. In practical terms and under Australian law, what is the difference between a group of friends riding motorcycles together and a biker gang? He couldn't seriously have outlawed group rides, could he? Or is it only a gang if everyone (majority, perhaps?) are wearing black leather and riding Harleys?

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    2. Re:Article says he helped ban biker gangs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In a sense the situation of banning motorcycles would be somewhat closer (although still more severe) to his stance on video games. "

      No, it's exactly as severe.

      What he's doing is PRECISELY the equivalent of banning motorcycles, on the grounds that there are lots of perfectly nice scooters and anyone who wants to ride a motorcycle instead of a scooter is a bad person.

    3. Re:Article says he helped ban biker gangs by broggyr · · Score: 1

      Or is it only a gang if everyone (majority, perhaps?) are wearing black leather and riding Harleys

      Sure, because everyone who rides a Harley while wearing black leather is definitely in a gang...

      --
      Irony? Yea, it's like goldy and bronzy, only it's made of iron!
    4. Re:Article says he helped ban biker gangs by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      The gangs are banned one by one on application by the Poilice commisioner. So far only The Finks gang has been banned.

      That law was struck down in a court challenge and an appeal to the high court is pending.

    5. Re:Article says he helped ban biker gangs by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      That's my point -- I don't see any way this law could actually be enforced without needlessly harassing a multitude of law-abiding bikers. What are you going to do? Pull over *every* group of people on motorcycles who ride past? Only pull over people who look tougher than average? Just pull over people if you don't like the way they look? It's an unenforceable law, and such laws should never be on the books in the first place.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  30. Re:The guy's right by jtev · · Score: 1

    He did. The "Bikeies" as they are called down under are running a candidate against him. The gamers are stalking him and leaving personal threats. Yes, I actually did RTFA.

    --
    That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
  31. This might be true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this guy is responsible for delaying, censoring, and outright banning numerous games released in Australia. Maybe there is a merit to gamers being more of a threat to him and his family than bikers. I kinda doubt he has gone out and intentionally kicked any full-patch Hell's Angels in balls recently, but he has gone out and neutered Left 4 Dead 2, just saying.

  32. Re: Try scambaiting. by Technician · · Score: 1

    For the ultimate thrill and hundreds of death threats, try pulling a few freight baits and get a scam gang to pay thousands of dollars for trash and insults.

    http://thescambaiter.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1132

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzz1tNppsIM Warning adult theme and language

    This guy lost count of the death threats. ;-)
    He has an ax to grind after the loss of $4,000 due to a bounced check. He grinds them well.
    If you wondered about all those scam emails, this is the place to see how they all work.
    Fake checks, Auction site scams (seller beware), apartment rental scams, it's all there.

    Baiting scammers is a great hobby. Collect trophys, bust bank accounts, collect fake checks and more.
    http://thescambaiter.com/ For the geeks, check out the gold coast bait! A GPS tracked case of cash adrift in the Atlantic. Fun stuff.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  33. Re:The guy's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be like if an Asian woman once cut in front of my car on the highway, so now I'm justified to think that all Asian women are jerks. Conversely, if a black guy once held a door for me, it would make sense for me to respect all black men regardless of their personal history or temperament.

    Judging any group by a sampling, however large or small, is sheer bigotry. There are always exceptions, and the smaller the sample being judged, (in this case, one) the more likely that there are a lot of exceptions.

  34. Re:The guy's right by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

    Today is just not my day. I accidentally checked the AC box on that... no karma for me.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  35. Shh, don't tell him... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That a bunch of gamers got together and raised 1.7M dollars for charity last year to give to sick kids in the hospital, including two hospitals in Australia on the east coast...

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    1. Re:Shh, don't tell him... by Macrat · · Score: 2, Funny

      That a bunch of gamers got together and raised 1.7M dollars for charity...

      By smuggling drugs or weapons?

    2. Re:Shh, don't tell him... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, by playing Smurfs on ColecoVision.

    3. Re:Shh, don't tell him... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure smuggling guns wrapped in drugs would be better than playing smurfs on ColecoVision...

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  36. Re:The guy's right by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

    So did I, and retracted my previous post before you even started yours, unless you type really slowly.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  37. Re:The guy's right by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Insightful
    He feels that gamers are more dangerous than bikers.

    No. That generalization of his quote is incorrect. You are correct in gernealizing from "a gamer" to "gamers" -- but you are incorrect in generalizing from his family being at risk to other families, or individuals, or all of society being at risk.

    Considering that he claims a credible threat was made against him by gamers, and none by bikers, you can see his rationale for believe that *his specific family* is more threatened by gamers.

    That does not mean that you can generalize his beliefs to include *gamers in general* are more dangerous than *bikers in general* regardless of the subject of the risk assessment.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  38. Aussie Jack Thompson? by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Interesting to note, that he basses his views of the groups as a whole on the behavior of individuals.

    Were he to say, "I am more worried about black people* than Mexicans because a black person slipped a note under my door." he would get eaten alive by the public outcry. Apparently, it's ok to generalize based on traits that are chosen rather than inherited...

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Aussie Jack Thompson? by Whalou · · Score: 2, Funny

      Kangaroo Jack Thompson.

      --
      English is not this .sig mother tongue...
    2. Re:Aussie Jack Thompson? by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      Apparently, it's ok to generalize based on traits that are chosen rather than inherited...

      Within reason, absolutely. I generalize that gang members are more likely to engage in theft and violent crime. Is that wrong?

      Regardless of how unreasonable his initial claim that adult games are unacceptable is, reinforcing his view that gamers are predisposed to violence (particularly when even biker gangs haven't threatened you with physical harm under similar circumstances) seems like an obvious responseto a threat from a gamer.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    3. Re:Aussie Jack Thompson? by talis9 · · Score: 1

      You're post is funnier than you realise. We already have an Auusie Jack Thompson. He's an actor http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0860233/

      And for the geek connection, he was in Star Wars II

  39. +3 reaction adjustment by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    Someone should start a gamer party and run for election on the grounds that you actually know something about what you're trying to regulate.

    Awesome idea! Who do we know that has an 18 charisma to head up the party?

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:+3 reaction adjustment by ashridah · · Score: 1
  40. Re:The guy's right by jason.sweet · · Score: 1

    I'm not saying there are no holes in his argument. His statements have more to do with pandering to his constituency than with how he feels about the safety of his family. I'm just pointing out that he is publicly at odds with bikers as well.
    Karma is overrated.

  41. Its the truth!! by Xanator · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you ever wiped a raid in World of Warcraft, you'll believe this guy, those guys can get really scary, specially when they found out you did it on purpose just to see what the "fear button" did :P


    Believe me there is nothing more scary than 24 angry players with huge repair bills, and no epic loot.....

  42. Re:The guy's right by testostertwo · · Score: 1

    Someone should start a gamer party and run for election on the grounds that you actually know something about what you're trying to regulate.

    Or even just join the Bikers party and stand a better chance of fixing both asinine attitudes at once. In my opinion politicians as a group represent more of a danger than bikers _or_ gamers.

  43. He's on to us! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Our plans have been discovered early! Now our time has come! Gamers everywhere, flock to your mopeds and your scooters, or borrow a ride from your mother. We shall gather and overthrow the authority known as government. Our battle cry shall be fearsome, as we scream “Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A”! And as our numbers fall, we shall terrify the enemy, for our army will rise again, as we know the cheat code for infinite lives! Gather your arms, your light guns and joysticks. We shall prevail!

    I might be a little bit late... My guy is almost to level 30 and I can't find a save point anywhere...

    1. Re:He's on to us! by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Quick! To my parents' minivan!

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
  44. I'd have to agree with him... by jafo · · Score: 1

    I'd agree that gamers are more of a threat to my family than biker gangs. But that's just because, as far as I have observed, biker gangs don't exist; or at least they don't exist in my world. However, gamers do exist, I've seen them with my own two eyes.

    However, if they did exist and a biker gang were trying to break into my house, I'd want a bunch of gamers with me. I mean, if there isn't already a training simulation out there with that story, I'm sure there will be one soon.

    Coming soon from Big Lizzard Entertainment: Bikers versus Gamers.

    Sean

    1. Re:I'd have to agree with him... by edraven · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, it's always good to have a few fat slobs to cover your escape while you run out the back door.

    2. Re:I'd have to agree with him... by minorproblem · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing! Like the philosopher and the engineer.. I am not trying to out run the lion i am trying to out run you!!

  45. Source of threat should also be considered by Jimmy+King · · Score: 1

    Guys like this like to throw a fit whenever they get some sort of death threat or other violent threat as if there was a real risk of it happening. The source needs to be taken into consideration with this stuff. How likely is it that the person actually meant the threat rather than that they were just being an annoying asshole? If they did mean it, how likely is it that they can or will follow through with it?

    Just because someone says "I'm going to kill you" doesn't mean I actually think they are. I'm certain 99% (or more) of supposed "death threats", especially in places like Australia, the US, western Europe, etc. are a bigger sign of the threatener being an immature loudmouth than of them being an actual physical threat or having any intention of even trying to be one.

    1. Re:Source of threat should also be considered by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      Death threats are never trivial, and I have to worry about the maturity and mental stability of someone who cant figure that out. They are exactly the same sort of people who SHOULDN'T be playing R18+ games.

      That said, i'm sure it's just a few bad apples in an otherwise very normal group.

  46. b0ng clan for life by dadelbunts · · Score: 2, Funny

    I remember when me and my clan defeated the Hells Angels. They didnt even know how to plant the bomb properly. LOL NOOBS. One of them was using an aimbot and still lost! After going 30-4 (they got lucky a couple of times) we kicked them out. They packed up their alienware laptops and rode into the sunset broken and defeated.

  47. Re:The guy's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but you are incorrect in generalizing from his family being at risk to other families, or individuals, or all of society being at risk.

    If "society" isn't at risk, then what exactly is his justification for banning the various games? It basically becomes "people are having fun doing stuff I don't like" as opposed to his stated concerns about encouraging crimes.

  48. Where's Our old Friend by nonades · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    JACK THOMPSON, WHERE ARE YOU? I miss that guy sometimes *wipes tear from eye*

  49. What's even scarier: Attorney Generals... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    ...with the intelligence of a nasty mold.

    Any further comments needed?

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    1. Re:What's even scarier: Attorney Generals... by sincewhen · · Score: 1

      The plural of Attorney General is Attorneys General.

      Just thought you'd like to know.

      --
      -- Braden's law of data: All data spends some of its lifetime in an excel spreadsheet.
  50. Re:The guy's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No karma? Would you expect to get karma for stating that the sun is bright, water is wet, or ElectricTurtle is a karma whore who doesn't RTFA?

    BTW, wouldn't an electric turtle short out, since most of them live in water? Sure, box turtles are terrestrial (except for Malaysian box turtles), but most of them are aquatic. Just wonderin'.

  51. Yu-Gi-Oh! Gang by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    You don't wanna mess with the Yu-Gi-Oh! Card-Gaming Gang.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  52. The guy is a bad politician. by Tei · · Score: 1

    This is the type of politician that gives "populist" bad name. Hell.. what this dude did was banned all productions of a whole artistic genre that don't come to australia to register. He is asking for it. Please never vote thid dude again Australia.

    --

    -Woof woof woof!

  53. Re:The guy's right by precariousgray · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    "Mr Atkinson was involved in introducing tough new laws to outlaw bikie gangs in South Australia several years ago."

    So, I'm not really sure what you're saying.

    --
    not much, just being forced to manually insert line breaks into my comment
  54. Re:The guy's right by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

    You must be new here. Stating the obvious, regardless of facts or RingTFA (and I did realize my error and did retract my post before anybody even said anything, but mods aren't paying attention), is frequently modded way the hell up. Yes, I'm a karma whore. So what? Eat me.

    And as for electric turtles, by your reasoning, there are no such things as submarines. (I love /.)

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  55. Dude, I've been to Austalia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, I've been to Australia.
    Trust me.... Mad Max wasn't a film. It was a documentary.

    1. Re:Dude, I've been to Austalia by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Impossible. It didn't contain nearly enough venomous animals...

    2. Re:Dude, I've been to Austalia by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Impossible. It didn't contain nearly enough venomous animals...

      or land sharks, they can follow you on shore for 200 Kilometres.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  56. Re:The guy's right by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

    You may have done a better job than I did of reading the article before posting, but you failed at reading the thread.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  57. 1%ers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If gamers are worse than bikers, who are the the 1%ers of the gamers?

  58. Re:The guy's right by SirWhoopass · · Score: 1

    I do have to say that the motorcycle gangs have a better long term plan than the gamers do at this point.

    I agree. My initial reaction to the article was that the motorcycle gangs are smarter than the gamers. Or a particular gamer. A threatening note under his door? What is the point of that? Did somebody think that was going to make him change his mind?

    I'll assume the gamer was some teenage idiot who had zero intent or ability to carry out the threat. If he did intend to carry it out, however, that is even dumber. It certainly would not convince anyone to take a more favorable view on an adult gaming rating. A backlash is more likely.

  59. Re:The guy's right by precariousgray · · Score: 1

    No, because you suggested that the reason he had not received threats from biker gangs was because he had not previously supported legislation against them. However, that is completely, irrefutably incorrect.

    Hur dur.

    --
    not much, just being forced to manually insert line breaks into my comment
  60. Re:The guy's right by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

    Wow. You really are dense. I just linked to where I retracted what I said because I finished reading the article. Hours ago. You're obviously as dumb as the mods who keep modding it up even though I retracted it.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  61. Re:The guy's right by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

    Which leads me to believe that Aussie biker gangs aren't quite the same as US biker gangs.

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  62. Re:The guy's right by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

    Well, what do you expect? They call them 'bikies' for chrissake. If you said 'hey bikies!' in bar full of bikers in the States you'd be lucky to leave with all your limbs.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  63. Re:The guy's right by russotto · · Score: 3, Funny

    No. That generalization of his quote is incorrect.

    It's not a generalization. He said "I feel that my family and I are more at risk from gamers than we are from the outlaw motorcycle gangs who also hate me and are running a candidate against me".

    Of course, this "note" could easily be bogus, like the cat incident. Perhaps it will turn out that the note wasn't slipped under his door, it was placed on his refrigerator. It wasn't written by a gamer, it was by his daughter. And it wasn't a death threat, but a grocery list.

  64. Hey, we got some of them in Amsterdam by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Funny

    Me and some gamer mates are going to beat up the Amsterdam chapter of the Hell's Angels. I mean, we are thougher then them right? What could possibly go wrong? They are wusses and I will make sure to tell them loudly and clearly, what are they going to do? None of them has scored as many kills in Counterstrike as I have.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  65. Oh, great; there's MORE of these wackos? by Millennium · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So basically, this guy is to Australia what Jack Thompson would be to the US if he ever got into a position of power. Guys like him would probably faint at the words I typically use to talk and think about them, not because of any actual obscenities, but because phrases like "enemies of freedom" would remind him too much of the way them thar turrists talk about the West.

    That said, I can't help but wonder if maybe JonKatz was onto something. Not even 15 years ago, gamers and geeks of all kinds tended to be seen as mostly harmless: bumbling and socially-inept, but generally well-meaning (albeit odd). We were condescended to, and even bullied from time to time, but we were more or less given the benefit of the doubt.

    That's changed, and it hasn't been for the better. The condescension and bullying haven't really gone anywhere, but now there's a palpable sense of fear mixed into it. We're seen as ticking time bombs, holding on by a thread that a pin drop in the wrong direction could snap. Some see us as pre-murderers, others as pre-rapists, yet others as pre-saboteurs, but the common thread is clear: we are sleeping monsters to be tiptoed around.

    The stereotype is of course false, or at least it's no more true than it's ever been for any group of people. But like the old stereotype, the new one wasn't born in a vacuum. Gaming and geekdom have always had a few Creepy People doing Creepy Things, but it's only recently that they've risen to the forefront. That's our image problem, and it would do us as a group a lot of good to think about why it happened and how to reverse it, before people like Thompson and Atkinson manage to do it for us.

    1. Re:Oh, great; there's MORE of these wackos? by darkmalice · · Score: 2, Interesting

      he's Jack Thompson on crack, its not only games he trying to control he also recently attempted to make anyone writing online about his political party to submit there name and postcode (zip code), thankfully this never came to fruition but it is extremely disturbing how much power this guy seems to have.

    2. Re:Oh, great; there's MORE of these wackos? by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Bloody hell cobbers, did someone on Slahdot just say John katz was right about something? (Checks out window for signs of apocolypse)

    3. Re:Oh, great; there's MORE of these wackos? by ekhben · · Score: 1

      Every generation needs something they don't understand to fear and attempt to destroy. Games are the new rock and roll!

    4. Re:Oh, great; there's MORE of these wackos? by CheshireFerk-o · · Score: 0

      I enjoy this effect of them tip-toeing around us, makes for some rather interesting situations. I've been doing personal social experiments since as long as I can remember, just simple things to see what reaction I could arouse. But I've got to say from being picked on as a child to being feared for my IQ in adult life, this is a hell of a lot more fun!

  66. Kick over a Harley by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    I think you will find that there are worse things then nerd rage.

    You might think you are cool because you capped 10.000 people in the head online, and they can count their kills on the fingers of one hand, but their score is in real life.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  67. In return... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Gamers say that Aussie Attorney Generals Are Scarier Than Rape Gangs

  68. Rex, a gamer and a biker... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a shame that he is taking this (somewhat mis-directed) critisism personally now and putting his effort against gamers because one threatened him... personally.
    It seems we always get these nut-jobs when it comes to political dis-agreements, Pauline Hanson even did a video eulogy.
    On one side he feels that gamers are 9 years old and need to be protected from adult based content, on the other he feels threatened by a letter, purpotedly posted by one of these kids. That's not to say he shouldn't be concerned, but really, these are the knocks you get in current day politics. What he has received is a letter of complaint and he should be taking this on board along with the majority of concerns over his appoach to this topic. The reality is that we want these games, we have the right to them, the rest of the world agrees so why is Australia trying to maintain a back-water illusion of goody-ness where we don't have bad web sites, adult games, drugs or guns. In reality we have all these things and given that the government thinks they are controling it by pretending to stop it is wrong because prohibition does not work, but if you manage it and monitor it and judge it as it happens and it is recognised for what it is properly then it is better controlled. Stupid Government.

  69. He is a psycho. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is like any other "see I told you so" politician that wants to make up all these strange scenarios just so he can get legislation passed that would resolve any misapplication of laws that is unstable mind would think could screw-up his prosecutions. People like him are the reason why terrorists aren't afraid of the people, because we all get disarmed and the terrorists get recognitions and protections of special handling and treatment that we can't get as a whole. Where can I live for 4 years with 3 meals a day and no rent, and all I have to do was pretend to be a little loose around some MP's just get away from my 3rd-world shithole of plowing fields with my bare-hands and fighting-off starving locusts?

    Gitmo is quite a hotel on the failed-prosecution side of things.

  70. Re:The guy's right by brkello · · Score: 1

    The statement is dumb, though. Slashdot might be wrong in their reasons for calling him stupid based on this article. But after reading the article, he is still stupid.

    It would be like saying that a conservative sent Obama a threatening letter and then saying that conservatives are more dangerous than liberals. One bad person does not make the whole group bad. Gamers aren't pro-violence to officials. Some kid got pissed and did something dumb. I'd expect an elected official to be more mature about it. haha, what am I saying, the older I get the more I see how even the people in the highest positions are morally and intellectually inferior.

    --
    Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
  71. Re:The guy's right by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

    Australians like to add -ie to the end of everything. To an Australian bikie sounds just as hardcore as biker, if not more so.

    If you actually insulted a bikie, you'd better be able to run real fast.

  72. What does the AG do?? by Kanasta · · Score: 1

    If teenagers playing games in darkened rooms threatens your way of life, you should probably change to a better way of life...

    1. Re:What does the AG do?? by crafty.munchkin · · Score: 1
      Clearly you haven't been paying attention. South Australian Attorney General Michael Atkinson is the one Attorney General in the Australian council of AG's who has, consistently for years opposed and vetoed the introduction of an R-18+ rating for games. As I'm not from South Australia, I can't do anything to get rid of this idiot, but as an adult gamer aged 33, I would seriously like to be able to play games which are designed for someone my age.

      The people making the threats are quite possibly teenagers however the campaign against him is being organised by a group of adult gamers who simply want him to wake up and realise that the average gamer is over the age of 18 and can handle the sight of boobies, sex and/or violence to the level of hundreds of movies which they can easily and legally get their hands on.

      --
      ... wait, what?
    2. Re:What does the AG do?? by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      Well the good news for kids is that we have dozens and dozens of games that are rated 17+ in the states and 18+ in Europe that are rated 15+ here with no modifications. So in the great twist, the AG is giving our kids more access to violent games than their American and European counterparts.

  73. Book Burnings and Witch Hunts by darkmalice · · Score: 1

    between him and conroy we will soon be back to book burnings and witch hunts. Oh I do hope he says something against the bikies then we'll see who's more scarier (actually to be honest the bikies probably wouldn't care).

  74. Re:The guy's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This just makes Aussies (lol) a bit of a joke to the rest of the English-speaking world where an 'ies' ending on anything is almost always diminutive and/or feminine. There's a reason why it's 'pussies' not 'pussers'. It's one reason there was a push to rebrand 'Trekkies' as 'Trekkers' because many thought the former sounded too pathetic.

  75. Re:The guy's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean like Gamers for Croydon

  76. Re:The guy's right by Qzukk · · Score: 1

    It's not a generalization.

    Red Flayer is saying that my mistake was in leaving off the "to my family and I" when I said "he feels gamers are more dangerous".

    Given the AG's decision to campaign against creating a ratings category that would "unban" some games, I'd say that he considers the games that can't be rated to be dangerous to society, if not the gamers that play them.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  77. Re:The guy's right by Falconhell · · Score: 1

    Someone should start a gamer party and run for election

    An group called Gamers for Croydon has already done exactly that. They have denied any involvement in this scare and condemned it.

  78. Political Disenfranchisement by soporific16 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When one guy can hold an entire country of gamers to ransom, it's not hard to understand the frustrated reactions of those who are effectively politically disenfranchised. Australians have very low levels of political consciousnesses compared to the rest of the world's population and part of this is reflected by the way the system was setup over here. It's not as if the convicts ever had much say in what went on and this top-down and top-heavy system of governance has developed as such, such that we have a nanny-state style of organising society. The wowsers are in control and don't you forget it! Sit down, shut up, or you won't EVER get your R18+ gaming classifications. I think it's fair to say it's never gonna come without a little pressure, but immature notes under the door probably isn't the sort of pressure that will work. Having said that, the dickhead deserves nasty things said to him. Very nasty things. I would say R rated things, but he's probably never heard any :(

  79. Re:The guy's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this guy thinks that gamers are generally more dangerous than bikers in order to discredit him.

    Quote:

    "I feel that my family and I are more at risk from gamers than we are from the outlaw motorcycle gangs who also hate me and are running a candidate against me"

    He didn't say "from a gamer" he said "from gamers", as in the whole group. As opposed to the outlaw motorcycle gangs, as in their whole group. He feels that gamers are more dangerous than bikers. If he's never received a death threat from anyone but a gamer, then perhaps he's justified in feeling that way, but I'm seriously surprised that this is the first death threat an AG would get.

    I do have to say that the motorcycle gangs have a better long term plan than the gamers do at this point. Someone should start a gamer party and run for election on the grounds that you actually know something about what you're trying to regulate.

    They have...

    It's called The Pirate Party.

    Get out and VOTE!

  80. Re:The guy's right by dangitman · · Score: 1

    Then comes the internet and blows this totally out proportion and saying that this guy thinks that gamers are generally more dangerous than bikers...

    Well, what point was he trying to convey by saying this on a gaming show? Are you trying to argue that it was just a totally unrelated personal anecdote, and he didn't actually mean anything by it? That the comment was not supposed to relate to gamers in general in any way?

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  81. LoL by Valacer · · Score: 1

    Gamers scarier than bikers? Clearly the bikers need to step up.....

  82. A NOTE? Oh, NOES! The horror! by jcr · · Score: 1

    the context was that a gamer slipped a threatening note under his door.

    Jesus christ, what a pussy. How in the hell did he ever make it through grade school?

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  83. *South* Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FWIW he's the AG of *South* Australia, one of Australia's six states and two territories (the American equivalent for S.A. might be Arkansas).

    1. Re:*South* Australia by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Come on, surely Tasmania is the Australian Arkansas

      South Australia is more the Australian Idaho

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  84. Re:The guy's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    requesting charcoal briquettes, lighter fluid, BBQ sauce, paper plates and napkins, and a trip to the pet store...

    "Make it a pretty calico, daddy! They're the best!"

  85. Re:The guy's right by Lunzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think it's all a load of bullshit.

    1. The contents of the note haven't been made public, so we don't know how threatening it really was. My guess on the contents: "I want my left 4 dead 2 you fucking fucker"
    2. There is no indication that the police have been involved. If Atkinson was actually scared of the supposed death threats you'd think he would have called the cops.
    3. It is currently legal to leave a note under someone's door, even at 2am.
    4. He is more at risk from bikie gangs than gamers. SA has some nasty anti-bikie laws that he introduced recently. These laws are a horrible attack on freedom of association, and in theory could be used to rule other groups illegal in the future.

  86. Re:The guy's right by ashridah · · Score: 1

    Ooooohhhhh. you mean like this political party? oh, wait, that's the site for the party of gamers that are running against Atkinson.
    But if it's not in the article, it mustn't be true! Gamers are clearly all stalking Atkinson and completely eschew the political process!

  87. Re:The guy's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do have to say that the motorcycle gangs have a better long term plan than the gamers do at this point. Someone should start a gamer party and run for election on the grounds that you actually know something about what you're trying to regulate.

    Gamers are also running a candidate in Mr Atkinsons electorate - http://www.gamers4croydon.org/

    Also, Mr Atkinson is a state attorney general (not the federal one). As a SAG, he forms part of the committee of attorneys general, which must form a consensus in order to change the classification system. As the only AG against the R18+ rating for games, he's out of touch with the other states AG's and the only person stopping the change from happening.

  88. Re:The guy's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a reason why it's 'pussies' not 'pussers'.

    Could that reason possibly be that it's the plural of "pussy", not "pusser"?

    Not to belittle your overall point, but what a stupid example.

  89. AS a gamer-biker.... by smash · · Score: 1
    How does he know it WASN'T a biker?

    :D

    Yes, yes, i know he's talking about the leather wearing crime syndicate types... but...

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  90. Re:The guy's right by SpaceCadets · · Score: 1

    I'd always thought that a Trekkie was someone that got into Star Trek The Original Series, and a Trekker was someone that got into Trek via the other series... I'm not sure where I heard it, so it's probably wrong. :P But us Aussies do use "ie" and "o" a lot... "Did you see those bikies at the servo this arvo?" translates to "Did you see those bikers at the service station (gas station) this afternoon?".

  91. Re:The guy's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  92. How di d the 'gamer' find out where he lives? by CaptainPotato · · Score: 1

    I find it interesting that anybody found out where he lives, given that Michael Atkinson refuses to reveal where he lives.

    With no proof one way or the other, I suspect that the note story is made up. Just like the barbecued cat story.

    --
    I heard that your library burnt down and destroyed your only two books - and one was not even coloured in yet.
  93. Or a game like Sim AG from Maxis. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where bikers can drive while playing as an AG, where they direct the AG into a prison cell to insult bikers and they count how many inches they can phist post their AG under control?

    bring me my rape shoes, helmsman Zakhary Wylde...

  94. Re:A NOTE? Oh, NOES! The horror! by nomadic · · Score: 1

    Jesus christ, what a pussy. How in the hell did he ever make it through grade school?

    Actually if I had a family and someone slipped a threatening note under our door I'd take it pretty damn seriously.

  95. More attractive to women? by R3coiler · · Score: 1

    As a gamer, does being scarier than a biker gangster make me that much more attractive to women?

  96. Solution - Vote for the opposition on March 20. by harlequinn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Michael Atkinson is a Labor Attorney-General.

    The incumbent South Australian Government is Labor.

    Vote for the opposition (Liberal, Independant, etc.) in the impending South Australian State Election on the 20th of March 2010 and the new government will invariably give us a new AG.

    If you are in the Croydon electorate - which is where Michael Atkinson's seat it - then you should rally all your friends and vote for the opposition - then he won't even have a seat, let alone be AG.

    Democracy at work people.

  97. Threatening?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is a copy of the note itself
    http://imgur.com/CeACw.png

    How does this constitute a threatening letter?
    "Dear Mick, I Can Has R18 Rating Pls? kthxbai"

    Screen shot Taken from http://www.abc.net.au/news/video/2010/02/16/2820930.htm (not by me)

    Talk about the media taking it and running with it and blowing out of proportion

    1. Re:Threatening?? by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 1

      I think it's safe to say they didn't happen to have cameras there filming the bottom of the door the moment the note was slipped under. There's also no indication that the note shown in the show bears any resemblance to the actual note (if there really was a note).

      Given that the hosts didn't make any comments on what they thought of the issue (other than devoting more airtime to proponents of an R18+ rating for video games), I would suggest this was the show's way of expressing its own opinion on the matter, i.e. by taking the piss out of the allegation. Hardly unexpected given the nature of the show...

    2. Re:Threatening?? by ajs · · Score: 1

      Here is a copy of the note itself
      http://imgur.com/CeACw.png

      How does this constitute a threatening letter?
      "Dear Mick, I Can Has R18 Rating Pls? kthxbai"

      Screen shot Taken from http://www.abc.net.au/news/video/2010/02/16/2820930.htm (not by me)

      Talk about the media taking it and running with it and blowing out of proportion

      The issue isn't that the note contained a direct threat. It's that an anonymous cut-out-letter note was placed on his home doorstep. I'd be concerned for the safety of my family if people started coming to my house to leave such notes as well. It shows a degree of willingness to invade my personal space and at the same time a desire to remain anonymous that I can't imagine anyone NOT finding somewhat creepy and worrisome.

    3. Re:Threatening?? by ajs · · Score: 1

      How prophetic was that?!

      Thursday night some drunk guy tried to get into my house in the middle of the night. When he proceeded on to trying car doors, I called the cops.

      Still, freaky coincidence. I've had two incidents where I've had to call the police from my home. One was an accident and that was the second.

  98. Re:The guy's right by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

    There is a gamer party running against him in his electorate. http://www.gamers4croydon.org/. This is why he's trying to discredit gamers so desperately.

  99. Re:The guy's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um.. He did support legislation that outlawed bikie gangs.

    About a year ago, after a certain horrific incident at a Sydney airport.

    That was the entire point that he was making. Even after bikie gangs have been forced underground in most places in Australia, in no small part due to the actions of this man, he still feels more threatened by a gamer who targeted his house with a perceived threatening letter, the content of which we know nothing.

    I still think this guy is an idiot however and it's clear as day that most gamers statistically speaking are probably going to be less involved with truly harmful illegal activities than bikers.

  100. Re:A NOTE? Oh, NOES! The horror! by socceroos · · Score: 1

    Politicians making it through grade school? What planet are you from? ;)

  101. Re:A NOTE? Oh, NOES! The horror! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would you do differently? Why aren't you doing it now? One way or another, a threat is just a promise of violence. Certainly a worrying thing. But what would the politician guy have done if he had just been attacked, instead of threatened? Would he defend himself while keeping himself and his family safe? Would he be able to? If he could, this threat ought not worry him.

  102. Vote for the opposition/Liberal. by bejiitas_wrath · · Score: 0

    The labour government is facing defeat in the next election. Do not fear them their Hit Points are low. They are proposing the internet filter and will protect us from the evils of child pornography/internet freedom and will make the net safe for everyone. So they say.

    --
    liberare massarum ex ignorantia, clausa descendit molestie.
  103. Re:The guy's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fear and loathing in Attourney General Michael Atkinson's head.

  104. WOW! I didn't realize ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WOW! I didn't realize Australian biker gangs were such pansy's.

  105. Everything is NOT bigger in Texas by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Throw a shrimp on the barbie" was a joke, it's saying "everything is NOT bigger in Texas", eg: Anna Creek cattle station is more than 10X the size of the largest US ranch. Americans failed to get the joke and thought the phrase was part of our lingo.

    BTW, Most Aussies including me enjoyed the first Crocodile Dundee but Hoag's lost his popularity with Aussies when he dumped his wife of 20yrs and ran off with the woman from the movie.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  106. Atkinso = Christian Nazi and Hypocrite. by dogzdik · · Score: 0
    Atkinson says that homosexuality should be banned - because the bible tells him so;

    Praise jeezers

    And then he goes home and fucks his wife in the arse.

    --

    .

    Voting up, Voting down - If I really gave a fuck about your approval or not, I'd come and ask you.

  107. It's never the ones who make threats... by John.Banister · · Score: 1

    It's never the ones who make threats you have to worry about. It's always one of the ones who seem to pay no particular attention to you - one of those ICAC supporters who seems so quiet...

  108. Now the bikies are mad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enjoy:

    http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/in-depth/bikies-plan-to-ride-on-polling-booths/story-fn2sdwup-1225831112809

  109. Re:A NOTE? Oh, NOES! The horror! by daveime · · Score: 1

    Fine, I have a family and I agree wholeheartedly. So call the police, get it investigated using proper channels instead of calling the nearest hack with the "scoop".

    But he is elected by the people, and is supposed to represent the people. Just because 90% of the population is apathetic and could care less about an R18 for games (even less trivial these days, since anything you really want is available online anyway), that's no reason to ignore the other 10%.

    I'd imagine bikers are less than 10% of Australia's population, yet they seem to get a free pass from the police and the government, despite being (at times), a bunch of bad bastards. So instead of going after the hard target, let's take away another freedom from honest hardworking people who AREN'T Puritanical throwbacks.

  110. Bikers? by Phoghat · · Score: 1

    I think he's watched "Mad Max" too many times.

    --
    Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
  111. err this is the same guy.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the same guy who made headlines recently in regards to people posting political comments in news papers etc he wanted to make it illegal to do it as anonymous ...

  112. Re:The guy's right by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

    We're talking phonetics here, not spelling. There's a difference. An 'eee' sound becoming plural.

    Aussie, Aussies. Barbie, barbies. Bikie, bikies.

    All *phonetically* similar to pussy, pussies or pansy, pansies. And keep it in context, we're contrasting 'bikie' with the phonetics of 'biker', so it is completely appropriate to look at bike, biker, bikie, bikies vs. puss, (hypothetical) pusser, pussy, pussies.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  113. Re:The guy's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they have, www.gamers4croydon.org