The fire hoses and police dogs were called on Blacks and Chicanos, have the balls to post with your name and stand up proudly for the racism you really want to project. Don't hide behind the bullshit convolution of calling out for wiping out of hippies when what you really want is to attack minorities. Shithead.
Also both Amazon and Walmart destroy average wages for their low-level employees and leave their healthcare and general welfare as externalized costs. I am very torn about this as a frequent Amazon shopper. I was able to stay out of Walmart but Amazon sucked me in early, before it became clear how evil they were/are.
Except for the elites he has constructed his cabinet from, corporatists every last one and believe me, they don't give a shit, let alone two shits about us natural humans. It has also been quite bad in other ways as he has ordered the US Army Corps of Engineers to allow the Dakota Access Pipeline to continue. His election has emboldened the extreme right here and abroad, witness the murders in a Canada Mosque by a tRumpF supporter. There is the extreme corporatist Judge he selected as his nominee to the Supreme Court, I hope the Dems have the balls to reject that and all his attempts at an appointee.
Yes, I suppose you are right about that. Looked at another way, if you are able to install your own panels and do your own design, you cut out the final profit takers and save yourself 85% - 95% of the cost of installed panels. I appreciate you pressing on this issue, by forcing me to think about it more you've helped me understand how much better off I'll be installing my own panels.
P.S. My math was 0.4/7.5 for the max savings and 1.4/10 for min savings, which is energy time divided by cost time but I think there is something wrong with my logic. I think that maybe because I can't believe the savings is so drastic, or maybe there is something else I'm missing but can't put my finger on it.
wait, you suggest we do more fracking to avoid pollution due to coal production? I don't know for sure but I think you are the pot (there's a good chance you're the kettle though).
Those guys are referring to the time to recoup the money the panels cost you by way of savings vs staying with your grid provider. The parent (Geoffrey.landis) was referring to recouping the cost of the energy required to make the panels. Two very different things. So, you guys are probably in agreement just talking past each other, mostly you arth1 since you jumped in with what you thought was a counter.
Since we're looking straight down the barrel of a jobless future due to automation, I think efficiency is not the goal. Maximum employment at very good pay should be the goal as that is the only way to have a healthy level of consumers.
Thank the shitty nutritional documentations courtesy of your local governmental agency for that almost reality. Assuming you prefer only one gender, you're already down to 50% roughly. 25% of the population is probably kind of old >65, so it would be cruel to expect many them to look too attractive. So you're at about 37.5%. Obesity rates are 50% or over so So 18.75% would be nominally attractive, at least not obese. I suggest that 1% of people being attractive is a bit low, probably closer to 9% assuming you're not too picky. Twice as many if you're bi.
Because no one will buy their shit or use the services of their shit companies if we aren't around. We, the 99% are the job creators, we are the demand side, without us, they'll soon be doing their own farming and having no one to buy the useless shit they convinced us we need.
hmm, can you show one with higher rate of absurd wealth/income inequality? One which isn't a third world shit-hole? We are rapidly descending or have arrived at third-world status and that is nothing to be proud of.
Slave labor as per AC, also lack of environmental regulations (the oh-so-clever and damaging externalizing of costs), and the willful and malicious weakening of the American middle and working classes.
Great point cayenne8, there is a bit of a problem though with the foundation of your argument. That being that, yeah, back in the day, only/mostly kids who would take these types of jobs for extra cash. Unfortunately due to automation/outsourcing/walmart/dual-income trap, the number of good quality jobs has diminished. Subsequently for a lot of people, these side-gig jobs are the best thing out there. So, now the crap-shit jobs are the few jobs left. When Pres Obama was going on about job creation, sadly it was mostly these McJobs he was talking about.
Yeah, you are definitely in the "get off my lawn" crowd with this argument, I believe I've already covered what you missed. You're welcome! Have a great day!:-)
P.S. I have 15 mod points but thought I'd miss out on using them on this thread just so I could respond to you. That is how much I value your comment.
You do realize that he was a fighter pilot protecting the highly contested air space of Texas, right? Also, do you really think that his daddy didn't pull strings, twist arms, and break kneecaps to get little dubya the fighter pilot role he really really wanted? One gets to be governor anywhere by raising money and having the team that can pull/push/coach one through to a victory. The politician is the face/sock puppet of a well-oiled machine. Again, daddy had the connections to help get that team together, hell Cheney was probably on the team already at that time.
I was disappointed that Obama did not do more for blacks and minorities in general. For fuck's sake the very least he could have done was legalize marijuana. I think it was extremely disingenuous of him to allow it to stay classified as a Schedule I drug especially given how it was a significant part of his early life. Him and Clinton both, probably dubya too but he was too much of a puss to admit he used it often. Obama's IQ is probably in the 130-140 range and dubya is in the 90's he was a true buffoon: "fool me once, fool me twice,... he! he!"
Interesting. I am guessing that the half-billion per quarter is coming out of their investors' asses. So who is getting the money that UBER is losing? Is this true redistribution of wealth to the poor albeit at a high price to them?
Significantly better weather too. They, along with many other Latin American countries are discussing legalization of marijuana, if they also legalize cocaine, that would eliminate a lot (all?) of the narco-violence and turn the country back into the oasis it can be.
Who gives a flying fuck about a war? We are quite capable of destroying anyone in any sort of war. Of course if it's a big nuclear war then we're looking at a Mad Max future but with no hot women as they'll all be deformed due to radiation poisoning. Back to my point, a war is the least of our worries, we'll probably fight it with drones and just work on destroying infrastructure so HallitosisBurton can get in there and rebuild for fat profits on our tax dollars. Our biggest worry is that the country will shut down on his watch. I mean the nation will end and he will probably wrap it up badly.
Dubya might have had an IQ of 120 when young but decades of heavy drinking probably brought him down to the level we observed which was probably in the mid 90's. Contrary to popular belief, drinking doesn't kill off just the weak neurons.
If I am right about the situation when the trust already exists, I think I would also be right about transferring the asset into a trust. As I stated, there is no transfer of property created when moving property into the trust. This is a law that the rich take advantage of with reassuring frequency so one has to imagine that the hole is large enough for a camel to fit through it.
I read the link. However, your extension of the logic would mean that corporation could not buy a license and then said corporation be sold and along with it its assets including any software licenses it currently "owned". That example is what I was referring to and as far as I can tell is not covered by the ruling you cited. It is an interesting and chilling one, but I don't agree it nullifies the solution I proposed.
Wouldn't it be ironic if we are ultimately incapable of understanding the complete function of the brain, and it required an AI to comprehend it all?:)
Yeah, and to top that off, the AI won't be able to comprehend itself so it will need to build an AI that can understand it... It will be turtles all the way down dear AC.
Slashdot Mirror
The fire hoses and police dogs were called on Blacks and Chicanos, have the balls to post with your name and stand up proudly for the racism you really want to project. Don't hide behind the bullshit convolution of calling out for wiping out of hippies when what you really want is to attack minorities. Shithead.
Not as much as your lips from fellating tRumpF's tiny member.
Also both Amazon and Walmart destroy average wages for their low-level employees and leave their healthcare and general welfare as externalized costs. I am very torn about this as a frequent Amazon shopper. I was able to stay out of Walmart but Amazon sucked me in early, before it became clear how evil they were/are.
Except for the elites he has constructed his cabinet from, corporatists every last one and believe me, they don't give a shit, let alone two shits about us natural humans. It has also been quite bad in other ways as he has ordered the US Army Corps of Engineers to allow the Dakota Access Pipeline to continue. His election has emboldened the extreme right here and abroad, witness the murders in a Canada Mosque by a tRumpF supporter. There is the extreme corporatist Judge he selected as his nominee to the Supreme Court, I hope the Dems have the balls to reject that and all his attempts at an appointee.
lol
The bigger issue is why I am responding to a Slashdot comment
Loneliness?
Yes, I suppose you are right about that.
Looked at another way, if you are able to install your own panels and do your own design, you cut out the final profit takers and save yourself 85% - 95% of the cost of installed panels. I appreciate you pressing on this issue, by forcing me to think about it more you've helped me understand how much better off I'll be installing my own panels.
P.S.
My math was 0.4/7.5 for the max savings and 1.4/10 for min savings, which is energy time divided by cost time but I think there is something wrong with my logic. I think that maybe because I can't believe the savings is so drastic, or maybe there is something else I'm missing but can't put my finger on it.
wait, you suggest we do more fracking to avoid pollution due to coal production? I don't know for sure but I think you are the pot (there's a good chance you're the kettle though).
No, but all your buggering turned him.
Those guys are referring to the time to recoup the money the panels cost you by way of savings vs staying with your grid provider. The parent (Geoffrey.landis) was referring to recouping the cost of the energy required to make the panels. Two very different things. So, you guys are probably in agreement just talking past each other, mostly you arth1 since you jumped in with what you thought was a counter.
Since we're looking straight down the barrel of a jobless future due to automation, I think efficiency is not the goal. Maximum employment at very good pay should be the goal as that is the only way to have a healthy level of consumers.
Thank the shitty nutritional documentations courtesy of your local governmental agency for that almost reality.
Assuming you prefer only one gender, you're already down to 50% roughly.
25% of the population is probably kind of old >65, so it would be cruel to expect many them to look too attractive.
So you're at about 37.5%.
Obesity rates are 50% or over so
So 18.75% would be nominally attractive, at least not obese.
I suggest that 1% of people being attractive is a bit low, probably closer to 9% assuming you're not too picky.
Twice as many if you're bi.
Because no one will buy their shit or use the services of their shit companies if we aren't around. We, the 99% are the job creators, we are the demand side, without us, they'll soon be doing their own farming and having no one to buy the useless shit they convinced us we need.
You do realize you are in the useless, worthless (to the 1%) crowd of the 99%? What kind of morons boost their oppressors?
hmm, can you show one with higher rate of absurd wealth/income inequality? One which isn't a third world shit-hole?
We are rapidly descending or have arrived at third-world status and that is nothing to be proud of.
Slave labor as per AC, also lack of environmental regulations (the oh-so-clever and damaging externalizing of costs), and the willful and malicious weakening of the American middle and working classes.
Great point cayenne8, there is a bit of a problem though with the foundation of your argument. That being that, yeah, back in the day, only/mostly kids who would take these types of jobs for extra cash. Unfortunately due to automation/outsourcing/walmart/dual-income trap, the number of good quality jobs has diminished. Subsequently for a lot of people, these side-gig jobs are the best thing out there. So, now the crap-shit jobs are the few jobs left. When Pres Obama was going on about job creation, sadly it was mostly these McJobs he was talking about.
Yeah, you are definitely in the "get off my lawn" crowd with this argument, I believe I've already covered what you missed. You're welcome! Have a great day! :-)
P.S. I have 15 mod points but thought I'd miss out on using them on this thread just so I could respond to you. That is how much I value your comment.
You do realize that he was a fighter pilot protecting the highly contested air space of Texas, right? Also, do you really think that his daddy didn't pull strings, twist arms, and break kneecaps to get little dubya the fighter pilot role he really really wanted? One gets to be governor anywhere by raising money and having the team that can pull/push/coach one through to a victory. The politician is the face/sock puppet of a well-oiled machine. Again, daddy had the connections to help get that team together, hell Cheney was probably on the team already at that time.
I was disappointed that Obama did not do more for blacks and minorities in general. For fuck's sake the very least he could have done was legalize marijuana. I think it was extremely disingenuous of him to allow it to stay classified as a Schedule I drug especially given how it was a significant part of his early life. Him and Clinton both, probably dubya too but he was too much of a puss to admit he used it often. Obama's IQ is probably in the 130-140 range and dubya is in the 90's he was a true buffoon: "fool me once, fool me twice, ... he! he!"
Interesting. I am guessing that the half-billion per quarter is coming out of their investors' asses. So who is getting the money that UBER is losing? Is this true redistribution of wealth to the poor albeit at a high price to them?
Significantly better weather too. They, along with many other Latin American countries are discussing legalization of marijuana, if they also legalize cocaine, that would eliminate a lot (all?) of the narco-violence and turn the country back into the oasis it can be.
Who gives a flying fuck about a war? We are quite capable of destroying anyone in any sort of war. Of course if it's a big nuclear war then we're looking at a Mad Max future but with no hot women as they'll all be deformed due to radiation poisoning. Back to my point, a war is the least of our worries, we'll probably fight it with drones and just work on destroying infrastructure so HallitosisBurton can get in there and rebuild for fat profits on our tax dollars. Our biggest worry is that the country will shut down on his watch. I mean the nation will end and he will probably wrap it up badly.
Dubya might have had an IQ of 120 when young but decades of heavy drinking probably brought him down to the level we observed which was probably in the mid 90's. Contrary to popular belief, drinking doesn't kill off just the weak neurons.
If I am right about the situation when the trust already exists, I think I would also be right about transferring the asset into a trust. As I stated, there is no transfer of property created when moving property into the trust. This is a law that the rich take advantage of with reassuring frequency so one has to imagine that the hole is large enough for a camel to fit through it.
I read the link. However, your extension of the logic would mean that corporation could not buy a license and then said corporation be sold and along with it its assets including any software licenses it currently "owned". That example is what I was referring to and as far as I can tell is not covered by the ruling you cited. It is an interesting and chilling one, but I don't agree it nullifies the solution I proposed.
Wouldn't it be ironic if we are ultimately incapable of understanding the complete function of the brain, and it required an AI to comprehend it all? :)
Yeah, and to top that off, the AI won't be able to comprehend itself so it will need to build an AI that can understand it... It will be turtles all the way down dear AC.