Slashdot Mirror


User: dmckeon

dmckeon's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5

  1. New Mexico State question on California To Drop State Rock Over Asbestos Concerns · · Score: 1

    The unofficial responses to which are:

          Which is less hot? (tourist)

          Which is hotter? (local)

          Which is better today? (foodie)

          On the side. (wimp)

          Christmas! (wiseass)

          It was yellow when I went through it, officer,
          and three other cars came through behind me! (local)

    The question:

            Red or Green? (chile, not political affiliation.)

  2. Ahh, Fry's ... on Low-Level Format For a USB Flash Drive? · · Score: 1

    ... where you always find things sort of like what you really wanted.

  3. MSFT surrenders to France? on Microsoft To Ship Emergency IE Patch · · Score: 1

    Way to go, citizens. March on!

  4. Re:Online backup - Mozy on Online Storage For Lawyers? · · Score: 1

    their booth was across from ours at the ABA TechShow.

    Most of the services available through state or other BAs and other
    industry groups are not necessarily "endorsed by" those groups or likely
    to be better than other solutions.

    I wouldn't expect an affiliation or mention of any kind to indicate
    anything more than something like "their sales team got here first"
    and perhaps "and offered us some kind of good deal".

    IANAL. YMMV. Place on ground, light, retreat. :-)

  5. Re:Clever new tools for kernel config on Linux 2.6.26 Out · · Score: 1

    After my last round of wrestling with video drivers,
    I'd settle for a multi-step process:

            install new distro
            plug in all optional hardware, devices, whatever
            boot an 'inventory' kernel
            mount all desired file-system types
            start any unusual drivers or processes

            direct 'inventory' kernel to
                    "detect and configure the options as needed"
                            for all the hardware or other configuration
                            sensitive stuff that is visible, mounted, etc.

            manually tweak kernel config if needed
            compile new kernel & any modules needed
            boot to new kernel
            enjoy

    I'd settle for any method that lets the non-kernel-guru
    user focus on the few config items that might need
    changing, instead of facing 2900-odd CONFIG_ variables,
    many for obscure hardware that won't be found in most
    systems. Yes, the settings need to be available for
    people who do have that hardware, but they should not
    require decisions by people who do not have that hardware.

    To put that in a way more Slashdot readers might remember,
    I'd like a tool or specialized kernel that could determine
    from the hardware, without having to poll the user,
    the appropriate settings for:

            CONFIG_ATHLETIC_JOCK_STRAP=

            CONFIG_ATHLETIC_SPORTS_BRA=