Slashdot Mirror


California To Drop State Rock Over Asbestos Concerns

Diamonddavej writes "The LA Times reports that Californian legislators are close to dropping the translucent green rock Serpentine as the state rock of California because of its tenuous association with chrysotile asbestos. Sen. Gloria Romero declares in her bill (SB 624) that Serpentine should be dropped as California's state rock because it 'contains the deadly mineral chrysotile asbestos, a known carcinogen, exposure to which increases the risk of the cancer mesothelioma.' The bill has backing from mesothelioma support groups. Critics point out that Serpentine is a group of 20 different minerals, and Californian Serpentine rarely contains much chrysotile, never mind its dangerous fibrous asbestos form. Its is suspected that lawyers involved in asbestos compensation claims and cleanup companies will profit from the bill. Vast tracts of California where bedrock is made of Serpentine could be declared hazardous to health... even if it contains no crysotile at all! It looks like SB 624 will be passed; it won unanimous bi-partisan support from an Assembly committee last week."

256 comments

  1. Well then... by DWMorse · · Score: 4, Funny

    Rock on.

    --
    There's a spot in User Info for World of Warcraft account names? Really?
    1. Re:Well then... by homey+of+my+owney · · Score: 1

      Indeed... and on and on... with the generous supply of 'victims' this will supply to mesothelioma minded lawyers.

    2. Re:Well then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rock on.

      /David Caruso //sunglasses //YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHH!

      Swear to Dobbs, I could see the meme in my mind's eye. The best graphics are in the mind.

    3. Re:Well then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only a small drawback that I can see, that's in Florida.

  2. Re:fp by DWMorse · · Score: 3, Funny

    Beaten by my iPhone 3G. Can you feel the burn? Oh yes.

    And I even snuck in a PUN! FP with humor!

    --
    There's a spot in User Info for World of Warcraft account names? Really?
  3. The new state rock - crack. by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... like the new state plant - hemp. They can TAX IT to fix their budget crisis (or at least people won't give a %^!@* any more).

  4. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    California has a State rock.

    1. Re:In other news... by DWMorse · · Score: 1

      California had a State rock.

      Lemme adjust somethin' for ya.

      --
      There's a spot in User Info for World of Warcraft account names? Really?
    2. Re:In other news... by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 3, Informative

      In other news, goofy Californians fiddle with state rocks while their budget burns, note water still wet film at 11.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    3. Re:In other news... by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is precisely the sort of thing that politicians do when the economic and financial situation pretty much destroys any capacity at meaningful change. It's a classic stunt, where they ban things or make pointless proclamations, because these sort of actions are cheap, allow them to look populist and all governmental, even as, as you point out, Rome burns around them.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:In other news... by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also coming up: White Star Line deckchair arrangements may have been less than optimal, claims report.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:In other news... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In other news, goofy Californians fiddle with state rocks while their budget burns, note water still wet film at 11.

      Of course, you cannot use that water to put out the fire because it might threaten another species of smelt or a snail somewhere...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    6. Re:In other news... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      Fixed that for you

      Fixed that for you.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    7. Re:In other news... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Actually politicians do this sort of thing all the time whether there is a crisis in progress or not. It's silly but it doesn't consume a significant fraction of their time (which is too bad because they spend much of the rest of their time doing serious damage). BTW California is not near bankruptcy. The government of the state of California is near bankruptcy (but will avoid it).

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  5. That's California for you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Even their state rock is known by the state of California to cause cancer.

    1. Re:That's California for you. by Volante3192 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fits right in with the air, at least.

  6. Funny thing is this is the non-cancerious asbestos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    If California ever decided to do some research like the New England Journal of Medicine they would find articles all the back to the late 1980's showing that this type of asbestos is not cancerious. The other funny thing is the "doctor" in the 1960's who said that cancer was bad wasn't even a doctor but researching someone's background is a lot harder than just gining into some idiot. If they are banning this rock maybe we should ban dihydrogen monoxide I hear that kills thousnads of people every year.

  7. Pet rock by nOw2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I had a pet rock. It wasn't as maintenance-free as you'd expect.

    Also, is this part of the Daily Mail's efforts to categorise all known substances/things/ideas into those that cause and those that cure cancer?

    1. Re:Pet rock by decipher_saint · · Score: 3, Funny

      is this part of the Daily Mail's efforts to categorise all known substances/things/ideas into those that cause and those that cure cancer?

      How would they categorize radiation! The opposite of a shovel... is a shovel!

      All joking aside the California state rock should be foam spray painted to look like rock until it bounces off of Captain Kirk's head. MOVIE MAGIC!

      Either that or whatever rock is most commonly found in Bronson Canyon.

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    2. Re:Pet rock by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Interesting

      For those who are unfamiliar with the style of California, ever since proposition 65, signs have been popping up everywhere warning about cancer (as this entity so eloquently points out). I'm not sure if the warning labels have achieved anything, but there have been allegations of abuse.

      --
      Qxe4
    3. Re:Pet rock by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      What did you fed yours? I fed mine sunshine and water, but it died after only a few months.

    4. Re:Pet rock by IICV · · Score: 2

      Indeed! The parking structure where I work has Prop 65 signs everywhere. This made no sense to me at first - it's just a giant pile of concrete, rebar, fluorescent lights and asphalt, surely none of that causes cancer right? Then I realized what's likely to be the case: people put cars in parking structures, and car exhaust is known by the state of California to cause cancer. And there's no way around that unless you're willing to not park cars in a parking structure.

    5. Re:Pet rock by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      My guess is they haven't. A warning label might deter people from entering dangerous areas, or at least think twice or take precautions, if it isn't on everything. When every damn public or commercial building has a Prop 65 warning on it, it becomes semantically equivalent to "Warning: you are entering a building".

    6. Re:Pet rock by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Uh.. Fluorescent lights put out UV, and if the question is "does it cause cancer" rather than "is the likelihood of it causing cancer greater than 1e-47%" then the answer is emphatically, "yes."

      The aggregate in concrete can be anything, and one common choice has a decently high uranium content. So you can get hit with decay products and/or radon, either of which can cause cancer.

      Asphalt, the same as concrete, except it's held together with tar instead of quicklime, and surely has a non-zero benzene content. Benzene causes cancer.

      Rebar is made from iron or steel, so you've got me on that one. I'm sure there's something in it that can cause cancer or at least be toxic. Perhaps it contains antimony or chromium.

      Also, the paint on the warning signs themselves could potentially contain cancer-causing compounds...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    7. Re:Pet rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I can tell, everything that exists is known in the state of California to cause cancer. Perhaps they should ban air. That might fix their problems.

    8. Re:Pet rock by Chowderbags · · Score: 1

      I propose the state rock should be Dwayne Johnson.

    9. Re:Pet rock by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

      AFAIK almost anything that can cure cancer will, in the wrong dosage also kill you, in most cases by giving you cancer.

      Funny how it works :-)

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
  8. Seriously by Becausegodhasmademe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I find it amusing that a state rock even exists, let alone the fact that it's causing such a ruckus! You Americans!
    *ruffles hair*

    1. Re:Seriously by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      there's probably also a state virus, hairstyle, eyeshadow color, etc... This is like government holidays, the politicians sign these things into law just to make some group or the other happy. Some school classes spend enormous amounts of time creating things like "international peanut butter and salami sandwich appreciation day" under their teachers tutelage. The politicians hope to gain voters, and the submitters get to proclaim to their friends "Look! I created the states funny walk!"

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    2. Re:Seriously by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Maybe you weren't aware that by law, every citizen must buy 10 pounds of the state rock a year, and rub them together while breathing in the dust that falls. Now you see why it's important that they change the state rock; lots of people have gotten sick due to the poor choice they made.

    3. Re:Seriously by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia has a nice list of state things.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_United_States_state_insignia

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    4. Re:Seriously by lennier · · Score: 1

      I thought the state rock of California was the Eagles.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    5. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      California is... well.. off the deep-end. Even compared to other types of Americans whom might be considered "batshit fucking insane".

      In the future, please don't confuse the two. Thank you.

    6. Re:Seriously by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

      I've lived in California my entire life, and this is the first I've heard of a "state rock."

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    7. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are greatly ashamed of California. We'd give it away, but nobody would take it (what with all the carcinogens and actors).

    8. Re:Seriously by pclminion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most of the US states have a state rock, a state flower, a state bird, a state tree, etc. Oregon even has a state fungus. I never really thought it was weird, just an expression of pride for the place you live in. California certainly isn't alone in this.

  9. Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    ... Dihydrogen Monoxide.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by commodore64_love · · Score: 0

      Mostly likely. After all water is filled with dangerous-and-explosive hydrogen! Just ignore the fact that, like this rock, the dangerous component is locked-up inside the molecule and therefore harmless.

      California - proof positive that we're not really any more advanced that any other backwards third-world country. (reads constitution) - Is there anything in here that says we can expel a State from the Union, like the Lisbon Treaty allows States to be ejected from the EU? California will soon be the boil on America's ass the same way Greece is a boil on Europe's ass. I can hear the word on the wind already: "bailout"..... "bailout"

      Californians - Please don't take offense. You know as well as we do that it's not you that sucks; it's your government that sucks. It's been demoted from AA to A- status (not much higher than junk bonds), and the debt-to-GDP ratio is nearing 10%. That may not sound that high, but remember California can't print money - when it runs out, it runs out.

      All the taxpayers in the other states do NOT want to assume responsibility for bailing out Sacramento's mistakes and/or paying their bills, anymore than European taxpayers wanted to assume responsibility for paying Greece's bills.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      California - proof positive that we're not really any more advanced that any other backwards third-world country...California will soon be the boil on America's ass the same way Greece is a boil on Europe's ass...

      As a proud native Californian who's travelled across the U.S. - I ask you all why you're so quick to rag on California when all of your dumb-asses are trying to move here and pollute our collective consciousness with your ass-backwards nazi conservatism and bullshit MTV-fueled spring-break pipe-dreams while driving up our property costs and fistfucking our job market, taking those jobs away from native Californians.

      Why do so many military from dumb-shit states like Oklahoma and Georgia stationed here call us "the land of the fruits and nuts," then continue to live here after their terms are up? Why are there so many assholes from Boston moving to San Diego to chase stupid dreams like bartending and playing in ska bands?

      Welcome to California. Now go home.
      If you weren't born here, Get the fuck out. We won't miss you.

    3. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      ... Dihydrogen Monoxide.

      Is a very dangerous substance, usually in short supply in Kalifornia. Too much of it might be a good thing for Kalifornia as it might reduce the idiot percentages a bit.

    4. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey, I left after moving there as a kid and living there for over 20 years. California is a beautiful place for the most part but the government really sucks. So I'll make you a deal. We'll all leave, but when you state goes bankrupt and cannot pay it's bills, don't ask us for any money - suck it up and fix your own problems. Deal?

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    5. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Actually CA like most coastal states brings more money to the Fed than it gets back. Without this it might be able to balance its books. Perhaps we should stop feeding the welfare queen that is middle America. I do not live in CA nor much like it when I visited it, I like winter. I live in an east coast state that also gives up money we could use to fund hicks in fly-over country.

    6. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I'll make you a deal. We'll all leave, but when you state goes bankrupt and cannot pay it's bills, don't ask us for any money - suck it up and fix your own problems. Deal?

      Can we apply the same logic to all of Dumbfuckistan (the old Confederacy + Texas, Arizona and Utah)? I'm completely sick of watching those pukes whine about the EVIIIIL FEDRAL GUVMINT while receiving more federal dollars than they pay in taxes. Ditto for the mouth-breathers that complain about "socialism" whilst enjoying electricity and plumbing brought to their hillbilly asses far below market prices by the TVA.

    7. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by StopKoolaidPoliticsT · · Score: 1

      Actually CA like most coastal states brings more money to the Fed than it gets back. Without this it might be able to balance its books. Perhaps we should stop feeding the welfare queen that is middle America.

      California controls 53 of the 435 voting seats in the House of Representatives, which is the sole federal body that can appropriate money. If Californians have a problem with how much money the federal government takes, they control a good 1/8th of the House by themselves. That's a pretty good start on a push to reduce federal spending and regulations and they'd get a bipartisan following if they made a concerted effort.

      HOWEVER, Californians love to push for federal spending and new federal programs, plus they love to use the size of their own economy to bully the other states into accepting their ideas through non-federal government means as well (see the CARB emission standards for starters). California is like New York (read New York City)... they've advocated all kinds of obscene spending for years and now that the economy is derailed enough to affect them, they suddenly have a problem with it. Those of us in western NY have been dealing with the consequences of that mentality for decades.

      Fiscal conservatives and libertarian types have been warning about the negatives of abusive nanny governments that spend oodles of money for years, and these very same people that suddenly don't know what to do were the ones shouting us down. Welcome to reality, you can't keep spending on the credit card figuring you'll get a raise every year to cover it while simultaneously never paying down the debt, always promising to do it next year.

      --
      Stop Koolaid Politics
    8. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      California's problem is that they can't raise taxes, thanks to the requirement that they need a 2/3 legislative majority, and the republican calculation that things falling apart would be good for rich fucks.

    9. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well we are one of two republics in this country mean there are two states that can leave, but would you really like the 6th highest GDP in the world to leave the county. We have lots of problems mostly caused by stupid shit the voters themselves have done and unions that have out lived there usefulness not longer helping troughs in them but themselves. Bond deals the voter themselves have passed that use up most of the general fund. Then the government is a joke its so fucked up that even a Governor that doesn't take any pay cant improve the way things work. We the people of California are the problem not just the government. The libertarians need take control for a few years. As it is you cant do much when there are almost more people in this state not working then working. Most of the jobs shipped out of state because of its high cost of living, higher pay min wage of $8 an hour. If the jobs are not shipped to other states they are going overseas. Even Hollywood movies are being moved overseas and out of California and the states in general when all the jobs are leaving this state and even county how are you ever going to recover? As I will tell everyone that will listen free trade caused this resection and tile it is fixed by everyone in the world it will never get better for anyone.

    10. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blithering idiot.

      http://www.nationalbubble.com/people-are-leaving-california-by-the-thousands/

    11. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by stonewallred · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You have your own class of stupid fucks living there and breeding like feral cats. Fuck you and your kind, as I see more and more of you retarded Birkenstock wearing liberal hippy scum coming to NC to escape the taxes and poor social environment. Protip, we don't go to CA from NC unless it is military related and are ordered, and we damn sure don't want your fucktarded asses here. Go move to WA or OR when you need to export your faggotry laden lifestyle upon other folks. (And FTR I ain't homophobic, but faggotry is such a good word, I hate to pass up a chance to use it.)

    12. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      You make good points but do nothing to address the issue I presented. Middle America is sucking the productive states dry, via farm subsidies and similar.

      BTW I live in western NY and am very familiar with the issues you brought up.

    13. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>I ask you all why you're so quick to rag on California when all of your dumb-asses are trying to move here

      No we're not. Therefore the rest of your argument is negated.

      >>>nazi conservatism

      Nazis are anti-freedom (like communism). Conservatives are pro-freedom (except for a religious nutjobs). They are NOT the same thing - they are polar opposites and you make yourself look like a fool when you try to equate them.

      Liberals on the other hand are the ones that passed a law which says I will be fined $950 for choosing not to buy hospital insurance. What's next? A $950 fine because I chose to buy a normal car instead of a Prius or hybrid? THAT's anti-freedom; it's anti-choice. That's closer to nazism and communism than Liberty.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    14. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>Actually CA like most coastal states brings more money to the Fed than it gets back.

      Isn't that how the progressive tax is supposed to work? Richer people pay more money into the central US treasury? Maybe you'd prefer to go to a flat tax.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    15. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by bromlad · · Score: 1

      like we really need to raise taxes on people when there is over a 10% unemployment rate meaning the real rate is closer to 15-20 percent, and don't not forget more jobs are temp and part-time then full time so the underemployment rate is much higher. I am sure getting close to 50 range all together. When employers are posting jobs but not really hiring anyone. There is more jobs leaving the state then coming in to it because of how high the tax rate already is. Yes raise taxes run more jobs out of the state does that really make seances now?

    16. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by bromlad · · Score: 1

      WOW as a native form a long list of native Californians I would like to apologize for this persons comments and say we are not all narrow minded ass clowns with dilutions.

    17. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by StopKoolaidPoliticsT · · Score: 1

      Cut welfare, ALL welfare. Corporate welfare, farm subsidies, entitlements, regulations meant to harm small businesses in favor of big businesses, eternal extensions of copyright and patents on unpatentable things, etc. It's not just the big ticket items like entitlements and defense, but the little things like regulating the size of holes in swiss cheese (even simple regulation requires oversight which costs money and creates barriers to entry), constructing turtle crossing tunnels and studying pig flatulence which adds up too.

      Those red states have plenty of lobbyists demanding money for things like corn, but the blue states have plenty of lobbyists for things like subsidized ethanol, which further redirects money from the big blues to the flyover reds. It's not unlike pre-Civil War America, in that most of the manufacturing takes place in the urban states while the resources come largely from the less populous states. Manufacturing and white colar jobs ultimately pay more than tilling soil or digging for ore, so more people would like to do those types of jobs... but ultimately, someone has to do the hard work too. Those blue states die pretty quickly if they can't get coal, food or steel.

      It's in everyone's interests to work together, which was the entire purpose of forming a united coalition of states to facilitate interstate cooperation. If the blue states feel like they're getting the raw end of the deal, they have the power to help change things, but they should also admit that they had a hand in creating many of the things that they're complaining about. That's where the rub comes in, they have to admit their earlier ideas were wrong and nobody, especially not a politician, wants to face the public and say "look, I screwed up." They all want someone or something else to blame.

      The solution is to go back to the purposes we were founded on and the Constitution which was meant to dictate our interstate cooperation. Namely, we have to stop using the federal government as a hammer to pound our desires onto everyone else, we should reconsider the idea of taxing based on apportionment and the number of representatives, to stop using the federal government to spread wealth from one group to another, etc. Maybe most important to this particular conversation is the purpose of the Commerce Clause, which was originally meant to facilitate commerce, making trade a regular action between the states, not to tell you whether or not you're allowed to grow wheat in your back yard for your own use.

      Once that happens, California can make the welfare laws which are best tailored to the Californian population, New York can make the education standards best suited to New York, West Virginia can create the mining laws best suited to West Virginia, Louisiana can best figure out how to protect itself from flooding, etc. As it is, every state, especially big, wealthy states that don't have to worry about meeting budgets, want to meddle in the affairs of every other state and their citizens... and it costs us a fortune. That's fine for the blue states during good times, but now that they've gotten a taste of what its like to have to bear the economic burdens of those regulations themselves, they're crying foul.

      Truth is, a good number of people from the red states would LOVE to reduce the size, scope and cost of the federal bureaucracy and they routinely elect politicians who pledge to do just that. Now, those politicians rarely live up to their promises, but the red state voters are largely up for it. Sure, they may bulk at losing something like corn subsidies, but someone has to have the guts to actually do it. The market will eventually take care of itself and some politicians may get voted out for actually keeping their promises... but its the right thing to do. It's also why only the House of Representatives was supposed to be publicly elected, with the Senators, the Statesmen, if you will, being virtually untouchable so that they COULD do the right thing.

      We've completely ign

      --
      Stop Koolaid Politics
    18. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liberals on the other hand are the ones that passed a law which says I will be fined $950 for choosing not to buy hospital insurance

      News flash: if I have to pay for your health care, you have to pay for mine.

    19. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Not nearly as corrosive as my bottle of hydric acid!

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    20. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure... FEMA just classed my immediate area as a DHMO-surplus hazard area. I live at the crest of a ridge in the middle of a desert area that has NEVER had a DHMO surplus in all of recorded history. Point being between the People's Republic of Kalifornia and the feds, we don't know if we're drowning or dessicating. Does it surprise anyone that they can't tell one rock from another either??

      [This nonsense from FEMA is going to add $67,000 to my mortgage, which I didn't agree to in the contract but is being forced upon me anyway, and devalues my property to unsalable and unbuildable. So I'm more than a little ticked about it.]

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    21. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      If farmers could make a living wage (especially in the face of rising costs; fuel costs have tripled in the last decade yet the price of corn remains the same) instead of grossing less than 5% of the retail price of food, maybe those subsidies would no longer be necessary, politically or economically.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    22. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Same thing going on in Montana :( Worse, CA money has driven real estate prices (and RE taxes) up to the point that no working-class Montanan can afford a house anymore.

      It's been suggested that the farming/ranching states should secede before they're overwhelmed. I have a better idea; let's kick out the coastal whackjob states instead.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    23. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      As a proud native Californian who's travelled across the U.S. - I ask you all why you're so quick to rag on California when all of your dumb-asses are trying to move here and pollute our collective consciousness with your ass-backwards nazi conservatism and bullshit MTV-fueled spring-break pipe-dreams while driving up our property costs and fistfucking our job market, taking those jobs away from native Californians.

      And Californians wonder why we don't like them. They complain when another US citizen moves in but have sanctuary cities designed to harbor non-us citizens here illegally.

    24. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      As a person who's moved to California, and now lives here, I can tell you that the only reason people move to California is the weather. Everything else is completely nuts. And the other poster is right, the only reason there's any money in California at all is the people moving here (seriously, we have no industry, and very little agriculture compared to the population). We work hard and pay a lot in rent an taxes to be here, so don't be ragging on us immigrants just because we see the state for what it really is.

    25. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      H2O probably will be outlawed. After all water is filled with dangerous-and-explosive hydrogen! Just ignore the fact that, like this rock, the dangerous component is locked-up inside the molecule and therefore harmless.

      California - proof positive that we're not really any more advanced that any other backwards third-world country. (reads constitution) - Is there anything in here that says we can expel a State from the Union, like the Lisbon Treaty allows States to be ejected from the EU? California will soon be the boil on America's ass the same way Greece is a boil on Europe's ass. I can hear the word on the wind already: "bailout"..... "bailout"

      Californians - Please don't take offense. You know as well as we do that it's not you that sucks; it's your government that sucks. It's been demoted from AA to A- status (not much higher than junk bonds), and the debt-to-GDP ratio is nearing 10%. That may not sound that high, but remember California can't print money - when it runs out, it runs out.

      All the taxpayers in the other states do NOT want to assume responsibility for bailing out Sacramento's mistakes and/or paying their bills, anymore than European taxpayers wanted to assume responsibility for paying Greece's bills.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    26. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>>>I will be fined $950 for choosing not to buy hospital insurance
      >>
      >>News flash: if I have to pay for your health care, you have to pay for mine.

      News flash: That has nothing to do with my decision to NOT buy insurance. I can afford to pay my OWN health expenses, same as I could afford to buy a $200,000 house and $30,000 Lexus (times two). Most health procedures really aren't that expensive - like my dad's pacemarker implant - just $8000.

      I don't need you paying my bills, therefore NO valid reason why I must be forced to buy insurance, so shove your anti-choice idea somewhere else. Be a Pro-Choice person instead.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    27. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      That's true.

      As is the case throughout most of the US, the "bad eggs" are just those who live inside the California cities (bounded by the beltway). Most everyone outside the beltway are decent people who want to see government spending shrunk, but their voices are almost never heard.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    28. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      Are you serious?

      Most of the farmers in the US are employees of large agribusiness companies and are pulling down mid-range six figure salaries. They aren't poor, they are upper middle class to rich.

      The "small, poor family farm" died a long time ago, and hasn't existed for years.

      For criminy's sake freaking use Google before you post.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    29. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      Excellent idea, except for one problem: the "welfare" is what keeps the current political class in power, and they know it, and would regard your (or my) suggestions as political suicide. You can only implement limited government if you get the totalitarian thugs who are there now out of power, and they have rigged the system so as to make that very, very difficult. And then you have to keep the new political class from lapsing into the same behavior as the old one. In my view, the system itself is broken, exactly as many of those who have studied "democracy" have long predicted. When people get to vote themselves largesse at the expense of others, they will do so, eventually causing their own destruction. The only real alternative that I see is anarchism, which is not the absence of law but rather the absence of rulers who place themselves above it, and which recognizes that people are entitled to rule themselves but NOT to rule others without the latter's consent.

    30. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      The money is with big ag, and unfortunately big ag gets most of the subsidies; family farms often aren't even eligible. But in sheer numbers, there are a LOT more family farms, most of which now need someone working an outside job to make it. Subsidies have become essentially a regressive tax loaded against small producers.

      If you're a high volume producer, 25 cents for a gallon of milk is fine. If you have 200 cows, it's a starvation wage.

      Also, speaking of research before you post, last I saw all farm subsidies combined were under 1% of the federal budget. Hardly a major drain.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    31. Re:Next up on the PC list of banned items .. by bromlad · · Score: 1

      Your limited view of Cali has you blindsided there is a shit load of agriculture and industry it has the 6th largest GDP of countries in the world and is a leader in exports of rice to Asia. You may not have any idea on where it is but its there in Bakersfield and the Central Valley and silicon valley got its nick for a reason along with Napa valley wine.

  10. Unanimous bi-partisan support... by DarrenBaker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why is it that every time I read the words "Unanimous bi-partisan support", the result is always and without exception... Trouble?

    1. Re:Unanimous bi-partisan support... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Informative

      It means that no one voting understands the issue, and they all think that voting against it will look bad when revealed to the voters (who also don't understand the issue).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Unanimous bi-partisan support... by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is akin to the "all puppies are lovely act" - anyone who doesn't vote yes on it is a communist.

      Seriously - doesn't California have bigger problems to tackle? It really is a testament to how broken government is when the only thing they can pass is a change to the state rock.

    3. Re:Unanimous bi-partisan support... by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      Seriously - doesn't California have bigger problems to tackle?

      Of course they do. Cow tails.

    4. Re:Unanimous bi-partisan support... by flieghund · · Score: 1

      Gloria Romero, the bill's sponsor, is being termed out. She's a lame duck right now with an uncertain future (she placed third in the recent primary for Superintendent of Public Schools). The biggest problem she has is what to do next. Aligning with a potentially divisive (but ultimately meaningless) issue like this gives her something to be remembered by, and possibly positions her for a run for some other tangentially related elected position, like Insurance Commissioner.

      --
      "I came here to kick ass and chew bubblegum. I'm all out of bubblegum." MSE USC APX AIA CSI CASp
    5. Re:Unanimous bi-partisan support... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Cowbell, you idiot.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    6. Re:Unanimous bi-partisan support... by DesScorp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is akin to the "all puppies are lovely act" - anyone who doesn't vote yes on it is a communist.

      Seriously - doesn't California have bigger problems to tackle? It really is a testament to how broken government is when the only thing they can pass is a change to the state rock.

      More than a testament to broken government, it's a reflection of the state and its people too. This is yet another sign of how California, once the greatest most glamorous state in the union, has become the nation's laughingstock. California looks more and more like Rome at the end of its life. Unfortunately, what happens to California is often a precursor of where the rest of the country is going.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    7. Re:Unanimous bi-partisan support... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > This is yet another sign of how California, once the greatest most glamorous > state in the union, has become the nation's laughingstock.

      Midwesterners have been laughing at California since before WWII.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    8. Re:Unanimous bi-partisan support... by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      California also rank the the highest GDP (13% or 1.8 Trillion) of the US. Texas ranks #2 with 1.2 Trillion. New York ranks #3.

      If California falls, the entire US will take a major hit. At least business in silicon valley are starting to move to Austin, TX. They see the hand writing on the wall. That, and UT is full of talented minds to feed the industry.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    9. Re:Unanimous bi-partisan support... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means that no one voting understands the issue, and they all think that voting against it will look bad when revealed to the voters (who also don't understand the issue).

      I think you need to me more assertive with that statement. Or do you really think that the people of California WON'T demonize anyone "voting to keep the cancer rock?"

      People are stupid. Politicians understand that.

    10. Re:Unanimous bi-partisan support... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because anything that's good for everyone in government is undoubtedly bad for the people.

    11. Re:Unanimous bi-partisan support... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American humorist Will Rogers once said, "No man's wallet is safe while Congress is in session."

    12. Re:Unanimous bi-partisan support... by Halborr · · Score: 1

      Cowbell,

      More of it?

    13. Re:Unanimous bi-partisan support... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      > California looks more and more like Rome at the end of its life.

      Thank you. Don't any of the 60 million people there realize this and care?

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    14. Re:Unanimous bi-partisan support... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, like pass the budget. The governator has mandated that all state employees get minimum wage until the budget gets passed. So pass the budget and forget the stupid rock. Yes, I live in California.

    15. Re:Unanimous bi-partisan support... by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 1

      Midwesterners have been laughing at California since before WWII.

      Yes, because the Rust Belt is doing so well.

    16. Re:Unanimous bi-partisan support... by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 1

      At least business in silicon valley are starting to move to Austin, TX. They see the hand writing on the wall. That, and UT is full of talented minds to feed the industry.

      Any evidence of this? I'm not questioning your point, just interested.

    17. Re:Unanimous bi-partisan support... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Just Google "silicon valley move to austin". You're bound to pick up quite a few hits.

      Here's a good article on the topic.

      http://www.visitmeagain.com/The-Advantage-of-Moving-to-Austin-Texas

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  11. Hmmm... by decipher_saint · · Score: 4, Funny

    Isn't ALL rock hazardous to your health if you breathe it?

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
    1. Re:Hmmm... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Isn't ALL rock hazardous to your health if you breathe it?

      Remember the safety drill: Stop, drop and roll :)

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's been modded funny, but it's correct. The most common mineral on the land surface is quartz -- the crystalline form of SiO2. Powder it, breath it in, and eventually you get silicosis. So, obviously we must ban rocks.

      In reality, rock *dust* is harmful, but that should be fricking obvious. Take the risk seriously and wear breathing protection, and avoid powdering rocks and breathing it in if you can.

      The only rock dust that might not be particularly harmful if inhaled in small quantities could be from minerals that are reactive enough to be completely dissolved in the body. Silica and asbestos are such a problem precisely because they are silicate minerals that *aren't* easily broken down chemically, so the microscopic but sharp grains mechanically damage cells over and over again -- it's like the microscopic equivalent of crushed glass shards. Among the common rocks, limestone (CaCO3) and gypsum (CaSO4) are the only ones I can think of that are easily metabolized. We often eat these ones as food additives. Calcium supplements are often limestone. But too much of that is probably also harmful if breathed in (the lungs have a limited capacity to remove particles), and most natural limestones are not pure CaCO3 (there would be an insoluble residue left over, and that could build up).

      I can't believe they're wasting time on this. As the article mentions, much serpentine doesn't even have asbestos.

    3. Re:Hmmm... by woboyle · · Score: 1

      All rocks are hazardous if applied to one's head at an excessive speed. I think that's what happened to all those California legislators - they all got whacked upside the head by one of those rocks they are going to ban.

      --
      Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
    4. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not always, sometimes you get stoned...

    5. Re:Hmmm... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Among the common rocks, limestone (CaCO3) and gypsum (CaSO4) are the only ones I can think of that are easily metabolized.

      Let me add salt (NaCL) to your list.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    6. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [rolls eyes in stupid acknowledgement] Oh yeah. And that one :-)

      Halite is the mineral name for NaCl. The health hazards from eating too much of that one are well known, but I'm not sure what breathing in halite dust would do. It wouldn't be immediately toxic, but I'm guessing it would be bad given that it would probably throw off the salt concentrations in the fluid that coats the interior of the lungs.

    7. Re:Hmmm... by selven · · Score: 1

      If rock is in the kind of state where you can breathe it, you'd better run fast, preferably away from the mountain.

    8. Re:Hmmm... by Labarna · · Score: 1

      At work I learned of simple and chemical asphyxiants. I presume that most rocks (along with concrete) would represent simple asphyxiants. I think it will become a bigger deal once transporter technology is ubiquitous.

    9. Re:Hmmm... by Cyberax · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Halite dust actually has some theurapeutic effects: http://www.salt-therapypipe.com/background-of-treatment.asp

      And it's not like you can easily breathe a lethal concentration of salt.

    10. Re:Hmmm... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Precisely. The state rock is merely a symbolic ...ummm ... symbol. It's not an officially sanctioned encouragement to eat it, inhale it, or shove it up your butt.

      Plenty of states have an animal mascot too. It doesn't mean you're unpatriotic if you don't go out and try to fuck one.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    11. Re:Hmmm... by sjames · · Score: 1

      They're even worse if someone smashes your skull with one.

    12. Re:Hmmm... by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      Isn't ALL rock hazardous to your health if you breathe it?

      Yes. And certain kinds of rock will get you high too!

    13. Re:Hmmm... by Chowderbags · · Score: 1

      Kaolinite is a common food additive and useful for some medicinal purposes. It's also a type of clay (remember that next time you eat a Snickers). Many other clay rocks are similarly used. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medicinal_clay

  12. Known to the state of California... by siwelwerd · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe they should just put warning labels on all the rocks. "Serpentine, the state rock of California, contains substances known to the state of California to cause cancer".

    1. Re:Known to the state of California... by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe they should just put warning labels on all the rocks. "Serpentine, the state rock of California, contains substances known to the state of California to cause cancer".

      "Serpentine, the state rock of California, may contain substances known to the state of California to cause cancer".

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:Known to the state of California... by Jerf · · Score: 1

      I used to joke it was just a matter of time before the entire state of California was labeled "California contains substances known by the State of California to cause cancer." I guess it's not a joke anymore. It may not have happened yet, but this certainly takes the humor out of it; now it's merely a rational prediction.

  13. It's strange by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I thought California was bankrupt or something. But I guess this is the biggest problem.

    1. Re:It's strange by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

      Well it's not going to help tourism if we don't know what rocks we can and cannot breathe via "State rock" designation!

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    2. Re:It's strange by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>Well it's not going to help tourism if we don't know what rocks we can and cannot breathe via "State rock" designation!

      I've visited California twice.

      It's hot and dry. The northern part wasn't bad though. Maybe if the state was split in half, North and South California, I'd even be willing to move to the northern part..... kinda similar to how I liked living in North Carolina but thought the southern half sucked.

      signed,
      tourist

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    3. Re:It's strange by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Moral and intellectual bankruptcy happened years ago. Financial bankruptcy cannot happen soon enough to this steaming cesspit of gibbering whores we have for a state government.

    4. Re:It's strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're complaining about a lack of humidity? Try moving to Alabama where your front porch doubles as a sauna in the summer.

    5. Re:It's strange by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

      Oh, it isn't. Someone started a rumour to that effect but it's actually BS. Glad we could clear that up.

  14. Here's hoping for no replacement by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

    Seriously, what the hell is the point of having a state anything? They got birds, fish, various rodents or whatever the fuck.

    Can them all and save us the time of ever having to debate this shit.

    1. Re:Here's hoping for no replacement by AGMW · · Score: 1
      LOL: It sure made me laugh last time I was over in the US ... State bird, state pie (quiz: Which state is Chicken and Mushroom?), state room, state of mind (Manic!) ... kinda funny really?

      Anyone know why? Are the different names for the states not a sufficient differentiator that other items are required? Do US Sat Navs perhaps use them to help find their position? - Was that an Albatross? OK, left at the lights?

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    2. Re:Here's hoping for no replacement by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Anyone know why?

      Sometimes even politicians have a sense of humor.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  15. Should be banned from even being considered by 18_Rabbit · · Score: 1

    ..while California doesn't even have a budget. This isn't their job.

    1. Re:Should be banned from even being considered by hedwards · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is that the voters tend to reward such stupid things. Sort of like in 2006, when the Feds were debating same sex marriage and abortion rather than the federal budget and the ongoing wars.

    2. Re:Should be banned from even being considered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that the voters tend to reward such stupid things. Sort of like in 2006, when the Feds were debating same sex marriage and abortion rather than the federal budget and the ongoing wars.

      You mean the same year the Republicans lost control of the House and Senate?

    3. Re:Should be banned from even being considered by commodore64_love · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      >>>the Feds were debating same sex marriage

      Such silliness. People should be free to marry whoever they want, and multiple partners (up to a certain point - not 100s of wives). What the fuck do I care if my neighbor is two married women? Or Mormons practicing "big love". Stop being so damn controlling over other people's lives. It is NONE of your business you ugly shrew.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    4. Re:Should be banned from even being considered by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      Yes, especially now that state workers are now having all of their pay above the minimum wage deferred indefinitely. How's it feel to be a minimum wage worker in a state with one of the highest costs of living? This is after they've been put on mandatory furlough for a few days each month, giving them a ~10% cut in pay.

      Seriously, California is fucked unless they make the budget take priority over shit like this.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    5. Re:Should be banned from even being considered by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      People should be free to marry whoever they want, and multiple partners (up to a certain point - not 100s of wives).

      Goddam bigot!

    6. Re:Should be banned from even being considered by Dynedain · · Score: 1, Informative

      What you forget to point out is that all those pay cuts are because the state can't actually lay off any of the workers due to union protections.

      Meanwhile, in the private sector, companies like mine are laying off 30% of their staff and cutting the pay of everyone else by 10% in order to keep fiscally solvent. Of course this means dramatic cuts to the state because of reduced income and sales taxes. But let's make sure that people in state government keep their jobs and mandatory pay raises. Let's not cut spending, we'll just raises taxes. They're already the highest in the country, what's another couple percent?

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    7. Re:Should be banned from even being considered by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      The problem seems to be that you (as the taxpayer) get to support these folks one way or another.

      Fine with plural marriage... not so fine with the seemingly usual result (broken homes, screwed up abused children). So the taxpayers get to support the excess wives and children.

      If we could all just agree to have everyone supported by the government it would be much simpler. Then nobody would be complaining about having to support these people because we would all be supported by the government. No job, no problem - just get the same government money. I guess anyone left working (suckers!) would be paying 100% of their income in taxes. This would (obviously) do away with rich people as well as poor people - everyone would just get the same from the government.

      Oh wait... didn't somebody try this already?

    8. Re:Should be banned from even being considered by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>The problem seems to be that you (as the taxpayer) get to support these folks one way or another.

      Two married women (or 1 man and 2 wives) can't support themselves? I'm fairly certain they can and your argument is specious. These people are no more likely to end-up on welfare then a divorced man and wife
      .

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    9. Re:Should be banned from even being considered by jmichaelg · · Score: 1

      ...the state can't actually lay off any of the workers due to union protections.

      Don't know where you got that idea. Several state agencies have been laying off workers for the past couple of years. The problem the unions pose is that layoff notices are handed to the most recently hired workers, not the least competent workers.

    10. Re:Should be banned from even being considered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Mormons practicing "big love".

      Problem with this is that most are child molesters.

    11. Re:Should be banned from even being considered by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Nope, I was mistaken,it was 2004.

  16. State rock??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a non-american i have to ask, What the hell kind of insane place has a 'state rock'? IT'S A ROCK!! Is the state so well run that this is the kind of nonsense they need to have legislation for? Do they have nothing better to do than designate 'state $inanimateobject'?! If that's the case fire them and spend their wages on something useful. What the hell is going on with the world?

  17. State rock assignments are dangerous! by cvtan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe I'm missing something here, but how does designating something as the state rock cause it to give people cancer? PS: The state rock of Utah is coal which has led to more than 100000 deaths and injuries due to mining (never mind the air pollution issue...).

    --
    Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    1. Re:State rock assignments are dangerous! by commodore64_love · · Score: 0, Troll

      Dear friend:

      Let me introduce you to clean coal. I learned about it from my Electric Car friend. Basically it's coal that is burned extremely hot, so that there's nothing left but gas, and the gas is 99.999% filtered to remove impurities. What's left is cleaner than sucking fumes from a Prius.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:State rock assignments are dangerous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear that "clean coal" also makes you shit unicorns. Hey, we can *all* make totally bogus facts up!

    3. Re:State rock assignments are dangerous! by commodore64_love · · Score: 0, Troll

      >>we can *all* make totally bogus facts up!

      Yes we can but in this case - I didn't. The modern plants built since 2000 really are cleaner than the exhaust coming-out of your Prius. That also means an EV powered by this clean coal electricity is cleaner than a Prius.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    4. Re:State rock assignments are dangerous! by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      "...so that there's nothing left but gas, and the gas is 99.999% filtered to remove impurities."

      Yes, we cannot have any impurities in our greenhouse gases. That would be pollution!

    5. Re:State rock assignments are dangerous! by cvtan · · Score: 1

      I thought "clean coal" was a myth or at least an oxymoron, an attempt to make coal relevant in an age of renewable energy. Anyway, mining deaths (especially if you include China) are enough to make coal more dangerous than serpentine or nuclear energy (no troll intended).

      --
      Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    6. Re:State rock assignments are dangerous! by cvtan · · Score: 1

      I did say, "never mind the air pollution issue".

      --
      Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
  18. And People Wonder... by sycodon · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...why CA is so screwed up.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:And People Wonder... by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 0, Troll

      ...why CA is so screwed up.

      All the nuts head west.......when they reach the Pacific they can't go any further.

      --
      "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    2. Re:And People Wonder... by Zarf_is_with_you · · Score: 1


      Why is CA so screwed up? Dude because they need to look like they actually accomplished something.

      I find it funny that such a thing as a State Rock exists!

      I wonder if the State Rock Band is Twisted Sister?

      Zarf

      PS. No proof as been shown that Twisted Sister is the cause of any form of cancer.

    3. Re:And People Wonder... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this clearly is the most important issue facing California.

      Next most important thing, budget? Debt load? Or tires in landfills?

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    4. Re:And People Wonder... by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Zarf?

      You're not related to Pinky are you?

    5. Re:And People Wonder... by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Oregon, Washington and Alaska are further west than California.

    6. Re:And People Wonder... by Forge · · Score: 1

      But the nuts don't know that.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    7. Re:And People Wonder... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      We have our share here in Washington, Californication is a sad reality here...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    8. Re:And People Wonder... by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't appear to be a state rock band, at least not according to wikipedia.

      Lots of other state stuff though.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_United_States_state_insignia

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    9. Re:And People Wonder... by srmalloy · · Score: 1

      All the nuts head west.......when they reach the Pacific they can't go any further.

      They can always go over into the water and drown, like the lemmings in those 'nature' films so carefully staged by Disney where film crew were off-camera pushing the lemmings toward the edge...

    10. Re:And People Wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the nuts head west.......when they reach the Pacific they can't go any further.

      They can always go over into the water and drown, like the lemmings in those 'nature' films ...

      We can only hope.

    11. Re:And People Wonder... by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      And no one is pushing anyone toward the edge now?

    12. Re:And People Wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moderated Troll. I guess the CA druggies came out of their stupor long enough to get on slashdot.

    13. Re:And People Wonder... by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      I find it funny that such a thing as a State Rock exists!

      Me too. I have heard of state flowers and birds, but never rocks.

      But looking deeper, I guess my state has a state rock
      http://www.enchantedlearning.com/usa/states/texas/

      You can make any jokes you want that Texas' state rock is Petrified Palmwood.

    14. Re:And People Wonder... by treeves · · Score: 1

      Oregon's state rock is the thunderegg.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    15. Re:And People Wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and Hawaii?

  19. Many rocks are deadly by davidwr · · Score: 1

    *cue image of evil looking guy sneaking up on unsuspecting California assembly-person holding large green rock in a menacing fashion*

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Many rocks are deadly by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      *cue image of evil looking guy sneaking up on unsuspecting California assembly-person holding large green rock in a menacing fashion*

      Well... if that evil looking guy is bald, and if the California assembly-person is Kryptonian - this could be a very serious concern!

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  20. lots of fraud around asbestos by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There's been a lot of fraud around asbestos. Recently it's also transferred to silica dust somewhat. It is based in truth, because asbestosis and silicosis are real dangers, but lawyers have committed real fraud with it. In some lawsuits, the same people who were made sick and diagnosed with asbestosis were later diagnosed by the same doctors with silicosis for a different lawsuit. Here is that story. Here are some other lawyers who were recently convicted for fraud with asbestos cases.

    Lawyers are one of the biggest areas of fraud and corruption the US right now. In a lot of states, the attorney general sets up a pay-to-play system where they get kickbacks to let certain law firms handle certain legal issues (or even pursue cases that normally would be ignored). In other cases, lawyer lobby organizations try to get laws written in vague ways that will require extra legal work, or as in this case, create potential lawsuits where there doesn't seem to even be danger.

    --
    Qxe4
    1. Re:lots of fraud around asbestos by gotem · · Score: 2

      Why dont they just stone all the lawyers with Serpentine

    2. Re:lots of fraud around asbestos by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah but as costly as lawyers are, they are still only 1/100th as costly as the US Congress or State Legislators that are writing the laws. It's the reason why Thomas Jefferson quit his law career and moved into politics - he realized real change can only come from the top, by writing the laws himself, and ignoring those who would try to corrupt the system

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    3. Re:lots of fraud around asbestos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      figures that they're all lawyers

  21. Distraction by AnonymousClown · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, I guess the CA legislature needs some distraction from their complete and utter incompetence and stupidity with regards to the budget, spending, and tax revenue for their state.

    --
    RIP America

    July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

  22. this is why we need a part time legislature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The people who run California are doing a terrible job. The 2010 budget is 20.7 billion dollars in debt. If we returned to a part-time legislator then they wouldn't have enough time to come up with crazy ideas like this. Unfortunately the California Part-Time Legislature Initiative (09-0031) will not be on the November 2, 2010 state ballot. The petition drive deadline for the measure was March 29, and organizers did not turn in signatures by that date. You can find out more information on how we can pass this in 2011 at http://www.reformcal.com/

    1. Re:this is why we need a part time legislature by couchslug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "The people who run California are doing a terrible job."

      The public of California are doing a terrible job. The price of freedom is vigilance.

      Inaction is consent to incompetence, tyranny, and incompetent tyranny.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:this is why we need a part time legislature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem isn't inaction. Precisely the opposite: it's that California's allowed itself to be governed by populist whim.

      Government, especially of large groups, needs to be at least a little bit progressive and strategic. It needs to be able to push short-term pain and/or make unpopular decisions to keep the wheels turning. It can't do that when everything is either mired in partisanship or handed over for referendum.

      This isn't an exclusively Californian problem, either: quite a lot of the United States' problems come from populist silliness.

  23. Wait... by shakezula · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...is this really a matter of pressing urgency in California? Wouldn't working towards plugging the state budget gap be a better use of the CA Legislation's time?

    --
    I know what you're thinking. Did I forward 65,535 packets or 65,536 packets?
    1. Re:Wait... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      Here's the problem: There are two groups of people interested in what legislators do. Taxpayers, and Union bosses.

      Union bosses pay the legislators (through a campaign slush fund system that basically amounts to the legislators being on Union payrolls--the funds pay for vacations, and trips to the tune of millions).

      Taxpayers elect them.

      There are two ways to fix a deficit: raise taxes (they already tried that once with the largest state level tax hike in US history in 2009, didn't work), or cut spending.

      If they raise taxes, voters will fire them. If they cut spending, the unions will fire them.

      Basically, if they fix the budget, they get fired, no matter what method they choose. Since all they care about is their mortgages, they're content to keep their jobs and do as little as possible.

  24. Trial lawyers fund the Democrat party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just keep voting that way and you'll get more of the same.

    1. Re:Trial lawyers fund the Democrat party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least it's better than the pedophile preachers and "Gummint hands off my Medicare!" teabagger nutcases that make up the Republican party.

  25. political retardation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just another nail in the coffin of intelligence, just goes to show how the politicians are getting dumber every year. I feel sorry for Californians that have to pay taxes to support such idiots and their retarded bills.

  26. Re:Funny thing is this is the non-cancerious asbes by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Whatever you do, don't let them know that Cyanide is made of carbon and nitrogen. It could spell the end of California!

    Actually, on second thought...what the hell, let's tell 'em and see what happens!

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  27. Would this qualify as 'fiddling whilst Rome burns? by johnsjs · · Score: 0

    Surely there are more important issues.

    The minor one of what to do about the imminent bankruptcy of the US's largest single state economy, and the worlds 8th largest economy springs to mind, but maybe this is more critical.

    Actually, translucent, green, are we sure this isn't a blatant ad to invite Superman to give up his Arctic home, and move to the Golden State? That would definitely bring in tourists, and that could solve the budget crisis. Brilliant thinking there....

  28. In most other states... by jbarr · · Score: 1

    ...Paper still covers Rock.

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    1. Re:In most other states... by Convector · · Score: 1

      But Rock smashes Scissors! And Scissors cut Paper! Kif, we have a conundrum.

    2. Re:In most other states... by Pontiac · · Score: 1

      Rock flies right through paper.. Nothing beats rock!

      --
      If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. --Red Adair
  29. I guess ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... they could always make it crack.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  30. How about Pyrite... by willwinter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fools Gold seems appropriate for California these days.

    1. Re:How about Pyrite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If yer dun laik it yer can GIT OUT.

  31. I lived in California for 25 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To anyone wondering why the state is in so much financial trouble perhaps this story will explain why. Most state legislatures have their heads up their own asses. In California they can see daylight and teeth.

  32. Re:Funny thing is this is the non-cancerious asbes by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

    Don't believe him. He obviously works for them.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  33. In other news: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    In other related news, Sarah Palin and her army of professional teabaggers demanded an alternative bill be considered that would redesignate asbestos as a childhood nutrient.

    1. Re:In other news: by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      In other related news, Sarah Palin and her army of professional teabaggers demanded an alternative bill be considered that would redesignate asbestos as a childhood nutrient.
      Come on Keith, just sign for a damn nick name and be done with it. Then you can post about it on twitter.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
  34. Because by sv_libertarian · · Score: 1
    They totally aren't going bankrupt over there. You'd think that they would have a lot more important things to do than some absurd PC feely good weirdo ass bill that makes no sense and does nothing for the progress of the state. BUT they can now say they have made things sound so much happier and better now that there is no chance of Kaliforniastan being associated with a rock that is associated with asbestos. Idiots. This is the danger of PC thought run amok.

    This last session here in Washington State, some idiot tried to pass a bill that would change the words "At risk children" in all laws, state documents, etc... to "Children at Hope". She even wrote pleading editorials on the subject. All this while we were facing a huge (and still are) budge deficit, declining revenue, and all the other associated evils of the recession. But do these kinds of idiots get voted out? Oh no. The wrong lizard might win instead.

    1. Re:Because by willwinter · · Score: 1

      I guess "Children at Hope" means "Children at Risk" or "Children in Trouble" or "Children in Danger" ?

      So, to them "Hope" means Risk, Trouble or Danger. I think I understand their position on a lot more things now.

  35. In case there was any doubt by int69h · · Score: 1

    California is crazy. People are fond of making fun of places like Arkansas, Alabama, and Mississippi, but at least they don't spend their time passing stupid crap like this into law.

    1. Re:In case there was any doubt by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...at least they don't spend their time passing stupid crap like this into law.

      Oh yeah?

      Highlights:
      Bear wrestling matches are prohibited.
      Incestuous marriages are legal.
      Boogers may not be flicked into the wind.

      Well, OK, I sort of agree with that last one.

    2. Re:In case there was any doubt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incestuous marriages are legal.

      Not really. If you click the link it turns out they are just binding until annulled, which does make some sense.

    3. Re:In case there was any doubt by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      Bear wrestling matches are prohibited.

      Let me guess, you are one of those people who also thinks that dogfighting should be legal.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    4. Re:In case there was any doubt by compro01 · · Score: 1

      You think those don't have a ton of state stuff they spent time passing?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Arkansas_state_symbols
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Alabama_state_symbols

      Amusingly, both have a version of the bible as their state book.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    5. Re:In case there was any doubt by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      There was a lady who almost got tossed from Alabama. All she said was "Bear who."

  36. Which leaves one question: by lennier1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Who exactly was drunk enough to come up with the idea of a state rock in the first place?

    1. Re:Which leaves one question: by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Sometimes these bills are "written" by schoolchildren as an educational exercise. The lesson would be indeed be valuable, but they are probably to young to understand.

    2. Re:Which leaves one question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      According to an editorial linked from TFA, it was made the state rock in the 60s to promote the asbestos industry.

      I don't know much about this issue, but I'm going to guess the legislature doesn't think that stripping the rock of its designation will protect anyone. It's probably a symbolic measure, just as when the state rock was named in the first place, to indicate that the state no longer promotes that industry. Given that history, I'd probably vote for the bill if it came up (unless it contained provisions that actually did something -- if so, I'd judge them on their merits). This may be a case of the public failing to understand the relevant history, not of the legislature failing to understand the relevant science.

      From what I can tell, the bill doesn't appear to do much of anything but reverse the rock designation. It's probably not really taking much of anyone's time. But now we're all reading about it, and not about important things that the legislature might be doing. As the bill can easily be portrayed as silly to people that don't understand its history, and people are already angry at the legislature, it's easy to turn this story against the legislature and especially against the senator that introduced it. So... I'd guess the fact we're hearing about it at all is thanks to some PR work by someone's political enemies.

    3. Re:Which leaves one question: by Atario · · Score: 1

      Just about every state has a state rock, mineral, or gemstone.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._state_minerals,_rocks,_stones_and_gemstones

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  37. Too MUCH TIME on their hands! by markw365 · · Score: 1

    You sometimes wonder if this should be a part time gig for these guys. :( Yea!, my tax dollars at work. :(

  38. Dumb As , er, ah, Rocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Incredible that folks can make an issue out of absolutely nothing and get pumped up by the media for it. Obviously, the 21st century interpretation of "Pet Rock" (trademark belongs to someone somewhere) involves inert matter and lawyers (or is that another type of inert matter).

  39. news flash by Flector · · Score: 0

    California has a state rock and people are concerned about it.

  40. I think it's rather appropriate. by Reilaos · · Score: 1

    After all, everything in California causes cancer.

  41. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Took the words right out of my mouth. According to Wikipedia, the following state insignia exist: amphibian, beverage, bird, butterfly, color, crustacean, dance, dinosaur, fish, flag, flower, food, fossil, grass, insect, instrument, license plate, mammal, mineral, motto, nickname, poem, poet laureate, reptile, route marker, seal, shell, ship, slogan, soil, song, sport, tartan, toy and tree.

    OK, I can understand flag, license plate, motto, route marker and seal. I can understand the nickname (although why it's apparently official is beyond me). I probably could understand the slogan if I knew how it differs from a motto.

    But the rest? I mean... grass? Tartan? Crustacean? I'm not from the USA, so can somebody explain to me what the point of these is?

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      No, we can't really explain it any better.

      I assume it's just some official marketing trick and/or environmental plea (won't someone PLEASE think of the state mammal?!).

      I don't understand having a motto either. I don't even know what my state's motto is.

      Ok, I looked up a few state mottos.

      Utah: Industry
      Maryland: Manly deeds womanly words (Fatti maschil, Parole femine)
      Colorado: Nothing without the Deity (Nil sine Numine)
      New Jersey: Liberty and Prosperity
      Montana: Gold and Silver (Oro y Plata)

      Here's the complete list: http://www.statesymbolsusa.org/Lists/state_mottos.html

      And, seriously, that is Utah's motto.

    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wikipedia forgot 'question.'

      Yes, New Mexico has a State question.

    3. Re:MOD PARENT UP by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Tartan I can sort of get. There's quite a number of Americans with Irish and Scottish ancestry.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    4. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the following state insignia exist: ...dinosaur

      What.

    5. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it "Are you going to Carcosa?"

    6. Re:MOD PARENT UP by illtud · · Score: 1

      Yes, New Mexico has a State question.

      I *had* to google this.

      From the New Mexico Blue Book 2007–2008. New Mexico Secretary of State. http://www.sos.state.nm.us/BlueBook2008/StateSymbols.pdf

      STATE QUESTION - "RED or GREEN"
      In 1996, the New Mexico State Legislature passed a House Joint Memorial declaring "Red or Green?" as the official state question. This refers to the question always asked whether one prefers red or green chile when ordering New Mexican cuisine. This measure was passed to signify the importance that the chile industry has on the economy of the state.

  42. Re:Funny thing is this is the non-cancerious asbes by woboyle · · Score: 1

    Re: dihydrogen monoxide - I hear that it is the principal cause of drowning...

    --
    Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
  43. Re:Funny thing is this is the non-cancerious asbes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "...this type of asbestos is not cancerious."

    One: it's spelled cancerous, not cancerious.
    Two: Cancerous means being a cancer - e.g. "that lump on your lip is cancerous". By definition, no rock is cancerous (unless it is on a Horta or other silicon based life form, I guess - currently a moot point).

    To be capable of causing cancer is to be carcinogenic.

    Of course, the rock in question isn't carcinogenic as well as not being "cancerious".

  44. Californian legislators lead by example... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    ... the example of what happens when you don't have any meaningful requirements to be a voter.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  45. In the mean time by dave562 · · Score: 1

    The same legislature can't even pass a budget. Some how they can find time to debate the various pros and cons of the state rock, but they can't pass a budget. I swear that politicians are a layer of middle management that need to be downsized out of the system. We can call it an efficiency improvement.

  46. Now wait a minute by ubungy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought everything caused cancer in California.

  47. Re:Funny thing is this is the non-cancerious asbes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    One: it's spelled cancerous, not cancerious.

    While your second point is spot-on, this is incorrect: cancerious denotes something that is seriously cancerous.

  48. Worse than that... by sribe · · Score: 1

    Actually, chrysotile is not a proven carcinogen. It is a suspected carcinogen, and its toxicity is at worst rather low. There are many forms of asbestos, only a handful have been linked to mesothelioma by solid evidence, but the plaintiff's attorneys try to exaggerate it to "a single fiber of any asbestos could theoretically cause cancer." I'm not kidding; I've heard that from an attorney.

    1. Re:Worse than that... by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Would you believe a lawsuit because someone was afraid of asbestos?

    2. Re:Worse than that... by sribe · · Score: 1

      Would you believe a lawsuit because someone was afraid of asbestos?

      Yes, it wouldn't even surprise me at all.

  49. What a disingenuous claim by joelsanda · · Score: 1

    The Environmental Working Group cites 2,509 deaths from mesothelioma per year. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration cites, in 2008 alone, 34,107 fatal crashes, which sent 26,689 people to their own funeral.

    According to the California Office of Traffic Safety there were 3,995 fatalities from car crashes in 2008 alone. More people die in car accidents in one year in California than nationally from mesothelioma.

    Do these pesky politicians actually think they're doing good with laws like these? How do people like Sen. Gloria Romero prioritize risk and public safety?

    --
    The Luddites were ahead of their time.
  50. Now they'll have to ban the state animal by Len · · Score: 1

    Grizzly bears kill people, too.

    1. Re:Now they'll have to ban the state animal by selven · · Score: 1

      Grizzly bears don't kill people, people kill people, with grizzly bears!

  51. Suggestion for an Alternative by CrazyDuke · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have a suggestion for an alternative all natural, eco-friendly solution: Coprolite

    It even fits well given the politics of California.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
  52. Douches by Runaway1956 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The federal government is considering outlawing douches, due to the fact that so many Californians are douches. There is fear that repeated douchings may be the cause of the douches in that once great state.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  53. Black and White Thinking by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

    If ever there was an example of shallow, inane, uncritical and utterly monochrome thinking, this is it. The thinking of this elected representative has gone somthing like this:

    Asbestos is bad. Rock is associated in some way with Asbestos. Therefore rock is bad. Ban rock.

    Students of basic logic/philosophy may weep, but this is not only the thinking of the representative, but also of a substantial portion of the California electorate and indeed the electorate throughout the western world. This pantomime logic characterizes many of the reasons for why California in particular is the way it is. Politicians and voters who are opinionated, vocal and hubristic, yet simultaneously uncritical, gullible and capricious.

    To compound matters Californians decided that this irresponsible electorate should have the ability to override any and all other checks and balances in the state, from the courts to the government to the civil service. And they did; and the state is all but a wreck as a result. This is what comes from placing the will of the people on a pedestal.

    The old Greek theory divided governments into three basic forms; rule by the people, rule by a select group, and rule by a single person. What's often forgotten is that each of the three forms had both virtues and vices. A single dictator might be cruel, but could also be a decisive leader. Similarly, the people could rule for the benefit of all, but they could also degenerate into rule by the mob or by demagogues. The western form of Government is(really was) an attempt to blend all three governments; a lower house and referendums to represent the people, a largely appointed upper house to represent select groups, and a single president/kind to represent a single person.

    The Californians have forsaken these lessons and history by giving all power to the people and allowing no other checks and balances. If nothing else, the state is a textbook case of what happens when a state loses balance in its form of government.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  54. Re:Funny thing is this is the non-cancerious asbes by fyoder · · Score: 1

    Re: dihydrogen monoxide - I hear that it is the principal cause of drowning...

    It can also kill you if you drink too much of it. People have also been crushed by it in frozen form. You can avoid drowning by avoiding immersion, you can drink only beer, but for purposes of bathing regularly, unless you are quite well off or are content with just sponge bathing, even the cheapest beer is too expensive. As with so many things, it is the poor who suffer most.

    --
    Loose lips lose spit.
  55. Re:Funny thing is this is the non-cancerious asbes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If California ever decided to do some research like the New England Journal of Medicine they would find articles all the back to the late 1980's showing that this type of asbestos is not cancerious. The other funny thing is the "doctor" in the 1960's who said that cancer was bad wasn't even a doctor but researching someone's background is a lot harder than just gining into some idiot. If they are banning this rock maybe we should ban dihydrogen monoxide I hear that kills thousnads of people every year.

    It's well established (search PubMed) that chrysotile asbestos is carcinogenic, though not nearly to the degree amphibole asbestos fibers are (lung cancer from chrysotile is most strongly correlated with sustained, industrial exposure). Chrysotile exposure is only weakly correlated with mesothelioma.

    What is ridiculous about California's impending law is that not all serpentine is comprised of chrysotile. Based on the available data, it would be reasonable to conjecture that there are dozens if not hundreds of anthropogenic chemicals that cause cancer at the same rate chrysotile does. Better get busy CA legislature!

  56. Not only that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When it gets really hot in Cali we sometimes find our men with no skin and hanging from their feet. But things are better now our Governor can handle that problem all by himself!

  57. Cancer by Xoltri · · Score: 1

    So the state of California itself may cause cancer? Seems fitting...

    --
    -Xoltri
  58. It's about money, not cancer. by edfardos · · Score: 1

    I live in CA, with some of my property on exposed serpentine. I therefore, have to pay extra taxes to California any time I want to dig. The more serpentine, the more money the government receives. These laws are so easy they practically write themselves. Also, it is proposed that the earth's mantle is comprised almost entirely of serpentine (iron/magnesium/silicon), so I suspect these taxes will soon arrive at a county near you. --edfardos

  59. California got chrysotile asbestos in its vagina! by Phizzle · · Score: 1

    The pussification of the state and the country continues - nothing to see here. :(

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
  60. Californicators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Maybe californians should stop being such a bunch of candy assed weenie whackers and find something productive to do with their time. Like incite flamewars on slashdot to give the pussy moderators something worth modding down instead of spending mod points promoting their personal agenda.

  61. Re:Funny thing is this is the non-cancerious asbes by Opyros · · Score: 1

    The other funny thing is the "doctor" in the 1960's who said that cancer was bad wasn't even a doctor

    So do real doctors say that cancer isn't bad?

  62. Re:Funny thing is this is the non-cancerious asbes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, like all American legislation, just follow the money.

    Its is suspected that lawyers involved in asbestos compensation claims and clean up companies will profit from the bill. Vast tracts for California where bedrock is made of Serpentine could be declared hazardous to health... even if it contains no crysotile at all!

    Like most American legislation, it has nothing to do with the public good, it has everything to do with greed and corruption.

  63. Referendums by nten · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seems like a large part of the problem has been the prevalence of referendums, rather than laws passed by the legislature. No one votes to raise taxes and everyone votes to create a new program to save the rattlesnakes or whatever. There is a reason we have a representative democracy, we can't all be expected to be informed on every issue or bill. We aren't even supposed to worry so much about whether we agree with the positions a politician takes, but rather whether we think they are keeping themselves informed and are honest and difficult to corrupt. If we all voted for honest and intelligent people that have the talent of spotting when they are being BSed, then we would see change. Instead we let ourselves be manipulated by dishonest and intelligent people, who use issues we don't fully understand to convince us to vote for them or their bill that reaches into our pockets. The problem is scale. How can you tell if that guy on TV is honest using sound bytes? The only solution I can think of is a hierarchical vote sort of like super voters at party conventions, but that still isn't a very good one.

    --
    refactor the law, its bloated, confusing and unmaintainable.
  64. Re:Funny thing is this is the non-cancerious asbes by jythie · · Score: 1

    Eh, I doubt money has anything to do with this. Choosing a new 'state rock' will not get the current one declared toxic.

  65. Life imitates The Onion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Concerned parents demand removal of Arsenic from Periodic Table of Elements

    http://www.theonion.com/audio/concerned-parents-demand-removal-of-arsenic-from-p,13863/

    Sometimes the difference between reality and The Onion's headlines becomes rather vague...

  66. California outlawed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And in other news, California has been legislated as unhealthy. More on this after our report on the dangers of children's playgrounds. Over to you Bob."

    /left hand, right hand, both are busy scratching someone elses ass

  67. And This is Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...only fools rely on Wikipedia.

  68. What about the state mineral? by AxeTheMax · · Score: 0, Troll

    According to the LA times article, the state mineral is gold! Do they know that gold is a heavy metal, and as poisonous as lead? (Yes alright, I know it has get into your blood in soluble form or something, and that is a bit difficult to manage, but if it did happen, it would be poisonous).

  69. They should replace it by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    with an "IOU". After all, they've done it with everything else.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  70. In other news.. by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

    The state animal will be changed from the Grizzly Bear to the newt over bear attack concerns.

    The state dance will be changed from West-Coast Swing dancing to the Drunk Uncle Shuffle over swing dance accident concerns.

    Srsly. Are there any geologists here who can suggest a rock that isn't dangerous to breathe? Oh, and is this the same state that has just reduced state-workers pay to minimum wage? Did you guys not learn from the last time you elected an actor to public office? Hell in a handbasket.

    1. Re:In other news.. by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > ...a rock that isn't dangerous to breathe?

      Limestone.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:In other news.. by rampant+poodle · · Score: 1

      No need to worry. California's last grizzly bear was shot about 80 years ago.

  71. fools gold contains sulfur by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    which is also in sulfuric acid, which is hazardous to your health, so sulfur should be illegal, and therefore fools gold should be illegal

    also, iron is in steel, which is used in battleships, which are used to kill people, so that should be illegal too

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  72. Re:Funny thing is this is the non-cancerious asbes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be fooled! Most brands of beer contain dihydrogen monoxide in large amounts.

    I recommend to limit your drinking and bathing to vegetable oils which have been shown to keep the hazardous substance away. Some brands of vodka keep their dihidrogen monoxide level low and may be safe to drink and bathe though but most use it to 'cut' their products.

  73. Re:Funny thing is this is the non-cancerious asbes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nobody understands that they FORCE FEED the state rock to elementary school students here. its horrible, passing it off as captain crunch. they sprinkle powered asbestos on it as sugar. thank god somebody is doing something about this.

  74. What About the California Poppy? by BryanL · · Score: 1

    Though the seeds do not contain opium like other types of poppies, if smoked, it still gives a mild sedative buzz. While they are getting rid of asbestos that doesn't cause cancer, California should also get rid of poppies that don't contain opium. Makes just as much sense.

  75. Only California by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Could do something so stupid.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  76. Re:Funny thing is this is the non-cancerious asbes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Real doctors don't say it is, chrysotile is not canerous at all and when a person applies it all they need to wear is a face mask as a general precaution, once applied it is harmless to the people of the building. The canerous type is amphibole. If you get a chance you might want to read the book Eco-Freaks by John Berlau, he covers asbestos as well as some other things we have banned that were never bad in the first place but had idiots who know nothing about it say they are bad for us and the enviroment.

    The "doctor's" name was Irving Selikoff.

  77. New Mexico State question by dmckeon · · Score: 1

    The unofficial responses to which are:

          Which is less hot? (tourist)

          Which is hotter? (local)

          Which is better today? (foodie)

          On the side. (wimp)

          Christmas! (wiseass)

          It was yellow when I went through it, officer,
          and three other cars came through behind me! (local)

    The question:

            Red or Green? (chile, not political affiliation.)

    1. Re:New Mexico State question by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      The correct answer is always Christmas.

  78. Serpentine, Shelly! by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    Serpentine!

  79. Greeaaat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So we can't get the legislator to pass a budget so that State employees won't end up getting federal minimum wage, but we can vote on this? Great.

  80. Not a troll. by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

    Why is this modded troll? I live in California, I can attest to the accuracy of the claim.

  81. Warning! by Dr.+Hok · · Score: 1

    Warning! This Rock Contains Chemicals Known To The State of California To Cause Cancer and Birth Defects Or Other Reproductive Harm. A Brochure With More Information On Specific Chemical Exposures Is Available Inside The Rock.

    --
    Say out loud: I'm an Aspie and I'm somewhat proud, I guess. Uh. Can I write an email in all caps instead? Hm...
  82. I don't think it means what they think it means by Zediker · · Score: 1

    If I understand properly, isn't asbestos just a common geological term for a fibrous mineral? So wouldn't this have nothing to do with carcinogenic asbestos insulation?

    --
    I love to slaughter the english language.
  83. Re:Funny thing is this is the non-cancerious asbes by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 2, Funny

    why so cancerious..?

    --
    (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
  84. Science and society by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

    We have long since passed the point where science is as important a driving force behind societal development as the classic shapers of such development, religion, politics, education. It is high time we required scientific competence from the holders of public office. The Luddites have inherited our government; if our institutions are to adapt to our developing human realities, we must install in office those with a clear ability to grasp technical issues. California appears to have failed in this regard.

  85. "Known to the state of California?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when can a State KNOW? A state can declare, recognize, propose, define, etc., but a state can not KNOW.

  86. Asbestos is terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The amount of people that are dying every year from Mesothelioma is terrible. Being exposed to Asbestos from decades prior allows scar tissue to take place and for Mesothelioma to form. What a horrible disease to have.

  87. Politicians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can't balance their budget ...but they have plenty of time to get all worked up over their pet rock. Recall the whole f*cking lot of them

  88. Dribbling idiots by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    Subject line says it all.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  89. California morons in government strike again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This inane political correctness is almost amusingly bizarre. The interesting line of thought about her being supported by trail lawyers almost could be true.

    Serpentine is one of the most common rocks in California. Easily ahead of granite of the Sierras.