I don't care about Bill Clinton's consensual sex life.
I'm not talking about Monica.
I'm talking about Kathleen Willey, Paula Jones and Juanita Broaddrick, not to mention the other women who recanted their allegations after Hillary's forces put pressure on them.
She victimized women who were assaulted by her husband.
That's far worse than Bill's hanky-panky with an intern.
By all means, you may vote for whomever you choose but please don't lie about it.
Hillary Clinton is one of the most corrupt politicians who has ever been on the national scene. Her job during her husband's administration was to orchestrate the harassment and character assassination of the women who were sexually assaulted by her husband.
The problem with segregation wasn't that it was allowed to happen. The problem with segregation was that it was legally mandated.
Haven't you ever seen the movies where there were police officers enforcing segregated dance floors at concerts?
If segregation was happening by choice, it would simply be a free market issue and people could vote with their dollars. Segregation was legally mandated and it wasn't optional.
"If I were in the south and a southerner didn't want me to eat in his restaurant and I forced my way in and then let him go back in his kitchen and prepare some coffee for me to drink, I'd consider myself insane to drink it." - Malcolm X
So the KKK can force a black or Jewish printer to print posters for their next rally, then?
If you answer no, you agree with the govenrnor of Indianapolis. If you answer yes, you're in favour of slavery (forcing the printer to serve against their will). Pick one.
I remember when this happened and none of the hypocrites who are against this law said a thing in support of these people who wanted nothing more than to buy their child a birthday cake.
You beat me to the punch. This is what I was going to say on the matter.
And to be fair, it's not just Obama. It has been pretty much every head of the executive branch for as long as I have been alive but he's the guy there now.
If you read the above link, they even take the unprecedented step of saying that in essence, the ACLU thinks that the SCOTUS is wrong and that the Constitution doesn't say what the SCOTUS says that it says.
I despise Romney, I have never voted for him and unless he's running against a demon I won't ever vote for him.
That being said, the "Binders full of women" controversy was bullshit. It was a manufactured controversy. It was in line with the Alinsky method of turning your opponents strength into a weakness and using ridicule as a weapon.
Romney has spent the past 30 years making himself acceptable to the center-left contingent of American politics and I have no doubt that he seriously looked at every qualified female prospect when he was recruiting. The operatives in service to the Democrat National Committee had to do something to de-emphasize the fact that Romney was much better on women in the workplace than they were.
It's a good thing when law enforcement officers have to take time to do their jobs. The power of the state is a terrible and awesome thing. The last thing a free society needs is law enforcement with spare time.
An idle cop is a cop who will find something to do. If his job is to arrest people and present cases for prosecution, he'll find new and creative ways to make that happen.
In the UK, they're doing random searches for knives...That's unthinkable in most of my country.
Mandating the use of compromised cryptography doesn't benefit the citizenry. It makes it possible, and arguably inevitable, that the government will use the knowledge of people's private communications to quash legitimate dissent.
For example, it's alleged that the FBI had knowledge of MLK cheating on his wife. How do you think the department of justice would have used that information if they had captured emails or naughty text messages proving it?
I'll take risky freedom over the safety of an overpowering government, any day.
Slashdot Mirror
No. That's pretty much the exact opposite of what happened.
Monica denied that anything happened until she was threatened with perjury charges because of Linda Tripp's recordings.
Please, familiarize yourself with the events before you opine.
LK
Yes, according to Dick Morris.
When the Clinton's left him out to dry, he stopped keeping their secrets.
LK
Who said anything about the intern? That was a series of consensual encounters.
I'm talking about the women that he sexually assaulted.
LK
I don't care about Bill Clinton's consensual sex life.
I'm not talking about Monica.
I'm talking about Kathleen Willey, Paula Jones and Juanita Broaddrick, not to mention the other women who recanted their allegations after Hillary's forces put pressure on them.
She victimized women who were assaulted by her husband.
That's far worse than Bill's hanky-panky with an intern.
LK
By all means, you may vote for whomever you choose but please don't lie about it.
Hillary Clinton is one of the most corrupt politicians who has ever been on the national scene. Her job during her husband's administration was to orchestrate the harassment and character assassination of the women who were sexually assaulted by her husband.
LK
I have noticed, for years, that there seems to be a corporate effort to stomp all creativity and expression out of IT.
There seems to be this thought that if IT can be turned into the new accounting, that IT professionals will be as interchangeable as accountants.
LK
Where was your outrage then?
Hypocrite.
LK
Your hypocrisy is strong.
The bakery chose to not make a birthday cake for an innocent child.
Where was your outrage then?
LK
The problem with segregation wasn't that it was allowed to happen.
The problem with segregation was that it was legally mandated.
Haven't you ever seen the movies where there were police officers enforcing segregated dance floors at concerts?
If segregation was happening by choice, it would simply be a free market issue and people could vote with their dollars. Segregation was legally mandated and it wasn't optional.
"If I were in the south and a southerner didn't want me to eat in his restaurant and I forced my way in and then let him go back in his kitchen and prepare some coffee for me to drink, I'd consider myself insane to drink it." - Malcolm X
LK
You are mistaken.
What prompted this law was a bakery in Oregon was driven into bankruptcy because they declined to make a wedding cake for a gay wedding.
They were willing to sell the couple a different cake but that wasn't acceptable to the couple. They wanted to compel the bakery to make their wedding cake or face financial penalties.
THIS is why religious freedom laws are needed.
LK
Did these people sue when the bakery refused to sell them a cake?
Where was your outrage then?
LK
So the KKK can force a black or Jewish printer to print posters for their next rally, then?
If you answer no, you agree with the govenrnor of Indianapolis. If you answer yes, you're in favour of slavery (forcing the printer to serve against their will). Pick one.
I remember when this happened and none of the hypocrites who are against this law said a thing in support of these people who wanted nothing more than to buy their child a birthday cake.
LK
You beat me to the punch.
This is what I was going to say on the matter.
And to be fair, it's not just Obama. It has been pretty much every head of the executive branch for as long as I have been alive but he's the guy there now.
LK
Because...
Patriarchy!
Cock-man Oppressor!
Triggered!
Just to be sure, you are making a Serenity reference, right?
LK
It's like when he says that he "believes" in the right to keep and bear arms. There's an asterisk in there somewhere.
LK
The problem is mass surveillance and data mining.
There hasn't been an administration in this country for the past 63 years that I would have any level of trust with that kind of information.
LK
I guess that just shows the NRA has a political agenda beyond gun rights.
Either that, or I missed the ACLU's campaign to ban guns.
The ACLU doesn't work to ban guns but they don't oppose the idea, either.
If you read the above link, they even take the unprecedented step of saying that in essence, the ACLU thinks that the SCOTUS is wrong and that the Constitution doesn't say what the SCOTUS says that it says.
LK
I'm not sure if you're trolling or serious.
Would you mind clarifying?
LK
The ACLU's motivation was stopping mass surveillance and not the preservation of Americans' second amendment rights.
Sure, the ACLU may have been the source of this information but it will be the NRA, SAF, CCRKBA, JPFO and similar groups that actually use it.
LK
Fair point but I'm talking about a real "tail, horns and cloven hoof" demon.
LK
I despise Romney, I have never voted for him and unless he's running against a demon I won't ever vote for him.
That being said, the "Binders full of women" controversy was bullshit. It was a manufactured controversy. It was in line with the Alinsky method of turning your opponents strength into a weakness and using ridicule as a weapon.
Romney has spent the past 30 years making himself acceptable to the center-left contingent of American politics and I have no doubt that he seriously looked at every qualified female prospect when he was recruiting. The operatives in service to the Democrat National Committee had to do something to de-emphasize the fact that Romney was much better on women in the workplace than they were.
LK
No, The thinking is consistent , not sound.
It's a good thing when law enforcement officers have to take time to do their jobs. The power of the state is a terrible and awesome thing. The last thing a free society needs is law enforcement with spare time.
An idle cop is a cop who will find something to do. If his job is to arrest people and present cases for prosecution, he'll find new and creative ways to make that happen.
In the UK, they're doing random searches for knives...That's unthinkable in most of my country.
Mandating the use of compromised cryptography doesn't benefit the citizenry. It makes it possible, and arguably inevitable, that the government will use the knowledge of people's private communications to quash legitimate dissent.
For example, it's alleged that the FBI had knowledge of MLK cheating on his wife. How do you think the department of justice would have used that information if they had captured emails or naughty text messages proving it?
I'll take risky freedom over the safety of an overpowering government, any day.
LK
I'm just over here talking about how thankful I am that 3.5 is still available via TDE.
LK
I take it you liked shitty games then? After all, they did develop a lot of terrible games for Acclaim and LJN.
Killer Instinct, motherfucker!
That is all.
LK