The same thing happened to me, but I turned around and found another way without Google's help.
What makes this a problem in my mind is that Google Maps doesn't offer a "detour me" feature that allows you to easily avoid specified nodes in the commute graph.
Likewise. The point at which I turned a corner and found myself on a dirt path with a sheer drop to my left and a two lane highway to my right was the point at which I decided to stop following my iPhone's directions. The route I should have taken (and now take) is effectively the other three sides of a square. At the time, there was no way to derive this from Google Maps, but it was pretty obvious that I shouldn't proceed on the suggested route.
As much as I loved RTD's writing for the series, he had the idiotic tendency to keep committing genocide towards the recurring villains.
As much as I hated most of RTD's writing for the series, I have to say that the Daleks were all killed off in their very first appearance in 1964, as (I think) were the Cybermen in 1966, so you could say he was upholding the series tradition.
Re:unauthorized IP distribution = piracy
on
Making Sense of ACTA
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
Yes, just as Disney used the Pirates of the Caribbean trilogy to glamorise piracy & promote their pro-sharing, anti-copyright agenda.
"From what I can tell, the only thing you get with the iPad is the app-store."
And perfect synchronisation with my iPhone and Mac: contacts, events, documents all available without having to rely on web-apps (e.g. Google Docs) when I'm in the middle of nowhere. Oh, and an interface that's been vetted by an obsessive perfectionist.
An interface that doesn't get in the way of what I'm trying to do is a major selling point for me.
I carry my 13" MacBook Pro every day. I make home visits to clients and have a suite of presentations, elements of which I may need to show them. I have a couple of spreadsheets into which I need to enter data about twice per week at a remote clinic. My iPhone serves to take brief notes and remind me what's next on my calendar, but I prefer the month-at-a-glance view in iCal on my Mac for booking new appointments. I have a load of textbooks in PDF form which I can either read sitting at my desk or through a window on my MacBook (unless I turn it sideways, which is ungainly).
The iPad is one-third of the mass of the MacBook Pro: it would allow me to show my presentations at a size my clients can see, run my spreadsheets, has a usable full-month calendar display and can show PDF books & magazines at roughly "actual size" when I'm sitting on the sofa or on a train without the awkwardness of a keyboard hanging off the side of the document. I have a sleeve case for my MacBook Pro: the iPad would fit nicely into a similar -- possibly even the same -- case while I'm on the move.
There are still many tasks for which I would use a full Mac, but most of those would be desk-based activities (e.g. programming, extended writing). I could see myself replacing my MacBook Pro & Cinema Display combination with an iMac and iPad, or even just leaving the MacBook Pro docked to the Cinema Display most of the week (but with the option to go mobile if I need extra power with me, e.g. when I'm travelling abroad).
The MacBook Air wasn't for me, but the iPad meets *my* needs exactly.
The twitter account in question is using a photo of Donal Blaney taken from his blog, creating the impression that it's his account. I'd imagine he's asserting copyright over his photo?
As soon as I posted, I realised that I'd probably overstated by mentioning copyright on the name of the blog... and just knew that would be the subject of the first reply: geeks will be geeks;-)
The twitter account in question is @blaneysblarney, which is the name of Mr Blaney's blog. The account photo is copied from Mr Blaney's blog. The first post of @blaneysblarney says "Comrades, I thought I would set up a more political twitter and keep my other twitter account for more personal stuff."
So it seems he's trying to prevent someone using his photo and the name of his blog to pass off their words as his. I'm guessing he's asserting copyright on his photo and the name of his blog, which seems reasonable.
I think you need both to be well equipped to be a scientist, or be able to have a meaningful debate on a scientific topic.
Or indeed any topic. I guess I'd assumed that "critical thinking" would, of itself, *require* the facts & figures: argument without supporting evidence may be fun, but it isn't science.
In "The Demon Haunted World", Carl Sagan recalls a taxi driver who professed to be very interested in science... then asked Sagan about flying saucers, Atlantis, etc.
Sagan describes his sadness at having to tell the guy that so many of his interests are "baloney"... and his anger at an educational system that didn't equip the guy with the knowledge to distinguish science from pseudo-science.
A couple of decades later, school science teaching still seems to be less about critical thinking and more about absorbing facts handed down from on high. I imagine that most science *teachers* wish it were otherwise, but are bound by the curriculum.
Re:Too few computers, too little bandwidth
on
IT and Health Care
·
· Score: 1
I've no idea about the real costs of servers and their maintenance, but as for re-purposing old computers: last time I saw someone (our department secretary) have their computer replaced before it died - or was stolen - was 2001!
As you say, all that's really required is a dumb terminal that can run XP with IE6 (or even IE5!)... but that just reduces the cost of replacements for dead machines. There's no incentive to upgrade from existing machines, so few older models to repurpose.
Too few computers, too little bandwidth
on
IT and Health Care
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
I can't speak for the US or private medicine but I've seen numerous electronic record systems piloted in the NHS.
My colleagues would love to have fast access to up-to-date clinical notes rather than play pass-the-parcel (or more often, hide & seek) with a patient's paper case-file(s), but wards tend to have one or two computers per ward and community services may have one computer between three to five staff. So at the end of a shift, when ward staff would be writing their notes, there'd be a queue for the computer. Similarly, before setting out on their visits at the start of the day and after returning from their visits at the end of the day, all community staff want access to the computer at the same time. Also, security dictates that as little information as possible is stored on the user's machine, so the intranet is swamped at these times and users face frustrating lags (I've been unable to access records in time for an appointment as the system was "oversubscribed").
To increase computer access to usable levels in my former service would have required a 3-400% increase in the number of computers provided to healthcare staff. I have no idea what the resource implications would have been for the service's intranet, but I imagine that a commensurate increase in server capacity (and in the IT department staffing, to take care of all of this) wouldn't be cheap. As a health service manager, having to decide between enough hospital beds or enough computers, which do you suppose is more likely to keep you in your job?
Slashdot Mirror
The same thing happened to me, but I turned around and found another way without Google's help.
What makes this a problem in my mind is that Google Maps doesn't offer a "detour me" feature that allows you to easily avoid specified nodes in the commute graph.
Likewise. The point at which I turned a corner and found myself on a dirt path with a sheer drop to my left and a two lane highway to my right was the point at which I decided to stop following my iPhone's directions. The route I should have taken (and now take) is effectively the other three sides of a square. At the time, there was no way to derive this from Google Maps, but it was pretty obvious that I shouldn't proceed on the suggested route.
As much as I loved RTD's writing for the series, he had the idiotic tendency to keep committing genocide towards the recurring villains.
As much as I hated most of RTD's writing for the series, I have to say that the Daleks were all killed off in their very first appearance in 1964, as (I think) were the Cybermen in 1966, so you could say he was upholding the series tradition.
Yes, just as Disney used the Pirates of the Caribbean trilogy to glamorise piracy & promote their pro-sharing, anti-copyright agenda.
Oh, wait...
"From what I can tell, the only thing you get with the iPad is the app-store."
And perfect synchronisation with my iPhone and Mac: contacts, events, documents all available without having to rely on web-apps (e.g. Google Docs) when I'm in the middle of nowhere. Oh, and an interface that's been vetted by an obsessive perfectionist.
An interface that doesn't get in the way of what I'm trying to do is a major selling point for me.
I carry my 13" MacBook Pro every day. I make home visits to clients and have a suite of presentations, elements of which I may need to show them. I have a couple of spreadsheets into which I need to enter data about twice per week at a remote clinic. My iPhone serves to take brief notes and remind me what's next on my calendar, but I prefer the month-at-a-glance view in iCal on my Mac for booking new appointments. I have a load of textbooks in PDF form which I can either read sitting at my desk or through a window on my MacBook (unless I turn it sideways, which is ungainly).
The iPad is one-third of the mass of the MacBook Pro: it would allow me to show my presentations at a size my clients can see, run my spreadsheets, has a usable full-month calendar display and can show PDF books & magazines at roughly "actual size" when I'm sitting on the sofa or on a train without the awkwardness of a keyboard hanging off the side of the document. I have a sleeve case for my MacBook Pro: the iPad would fit nicely into a similar -- possibly even the same -- case while I'm on the move.
There are still many tasks for which I would use a full Mac, but most of those would be desk-based activities (e.g. programming, extended writing). I could see myself replacing my MacBook Pro & Cinema Display combination with an iMac and iPad, or even just leaving the MacBook Pro docked to the Cinema Display most of the week (but with the option to go mobile if I need extra power with me, e.g. when I'm travelling abroad).
The MacBook Air wasn't for me, but the iPad meets *my* needs exactly.
The twitter account in question is using a photo of Donal Blaney taken from his blog, creating the impression that it's his account. I'd imagine he's asserting copyright over his photo?
As soon as I posted, I realised that I'd probably overstated by mentioning copyright on the name of the blog ... and just knew that would be the subject of the first reply: geeks will be geeks ;-)
The twitter account in question is @blaneysblarney, which is the name of Mr Blaney's blog. The account photo is copied from Mr Blaney's blog. The first post of @blaneysblarney says "Comrades, I thought I would set up a more political twitter and keep my other twitter account for more personal stuff."
So it seems he's trying to prevent someone using his photo and the name of his blog to pass off their words as his. I'm guessing he's asserting copyright on his photo and the name of his blog, which seems reasonable.
I think you need both to be well equipped to be a scientist, or be able to have a meaningful debate on a scientific topic.
Or indeed any topic. I guess I'd assumed that "critical thinking" would, of itself, *require* the facts & figures: argument without supporting evidence may be fun, but it isn't science.
obligatory xkcd: http://xkcd.com/263/
In "The Demon Haunted World", Carl Sagan recalls a taxi driver who professed to be very interested in science ... then asked Sagan about flying saucers, Atlantis, etc.
Sagan describes his sadness at having to tell the guy that so many of his interests are "baloney" ... and his anger at an educational system that didn't equip the guy with the knowledge to distinguish science from pseudo-science.
A couple of decades later, school science teaching still seems to be less about critical thinking and more about absorbing facts handed down from on high. I imagine that most science *teachers* wish it were otherwise, but are bound by the curriculum.
I've no idea about the real costs of servers and their maintenance, but as for re-purposing old computers: last time I saw someone (our department secretary) have their computer replaced before it died - or was stolen - was 2001!
As you say, all that's really required is a dumb terminal that can run XP with IE6 (or even IE5!) ... but that just reduces the cost of replacements for dead machines. There's no incentive to upgrade from existing machines, so few older models to repurpose.
I can't speak for the US or private medicine but I've seen numerous electronic record systems piloted in the NHS.
My colleagues would love to have fast access to up-to-date clinical notes rather than play pass-the-parcel (or more often, hide & seek) with a patient's paper case-file(s), but wards tend to have one or two computers per ward and community services may have one computer between three to five staff. So at the end of a shift, when ward staff would be writing their notes, there'd be a queue for the computer. Similarly, before setting out on their visits at the start of the day and after returning from their visits at the end of the day, all community staff want access to the computer at the same time. Also, security dictates that as little information as possible is stored on the user's machine, so the intranet is swamped at these times and users face frustrating lags (I've been unable to access records in time for an appointment as the system was "oversubscribed").
To increase computer access to usable levels in my former service would have required a 3-400% increase in the number of computers provided to healthcare staff. I have no idea what the resource implications would have been for the service's intranet, but I imagine that a commensurate increase in server capacity (and in the IT department staffing, to take care of all of this) wouldn't be cheap. As a health service manager, having to decide between enough hospital beds or enough computers, which do you suppose is more likely to keep you in your job?