Well If I were you I would buy a new computer. I can't stand the slow slow 386's. Go to pricewatch.com Computers are very cheep now. If you don't want to do that then try installing Linux or Windows 95. If that does not work then it is a hard ware problem.
Ok from what I understand about Y2K is the amout of memory which stros the year can only hold two digets. I do not understand why the programmer who designed the older operating systems did not think about this more. I might be because they figured they would be dead by the year 2000, so why sould they care. My watch only has two digets for storing the year also. I set it to the year two tousand and it just said 00. If the watch had to devide by the year, then there would be a devide by zero error. Now days we san store gigabytes on a hard drive. One would think we would alow more space then two digets for what year it is. It must have been a buisness plann so people would buy generators.
Slashdot Mirror
Well If I were you I would buy a new computer. I can't stand the slow slow 386's. Go to pricewatch.com Computers are very cheep now. If you don't want to do that then try installing Linux or Windows 95. If that does not work then it is a hard ware problem.
Ok from what I understand about Y2K is the amout of memory which stros the year can only hold two digets. I do not understand why the programmer who designed the older operating systems did not think about this more. I might be because they figured they would be dead by the year 2000, so why sould they care. My watch only has two digets for storing the year also. I set it to the year two tousand and it just said 00. If the watch had to devide by the year, then there would be a devide by zero error. Now days we san store gigabytes on a hard drive. One would think we would alow more space then two digets for what year it is. It must have been a buisness plann so people would buy generators.